Yep...great Al didn't call for an insurrection....I fail to see how that somehow proves your already debunked point? Bush and Trump didn't call for insurrections either.Good for him.....but the Dems certainly attempted not to count votes, objected in the House....and continued to all Bush illegit.That tradition was tossed out the window in 2000 when the left wouldn't accept they lost the election and went out about Bush being illegit, and even went on and on and on and on and on about how the his brother and tour Court was involved in some vast conspiracy....it only got worse in 2016, when they began insurrections across the country started a faux Russian hoax to undermind his admin, called his win illegit, and abused their office with faux impeachmentsYes Komrades ...Yet, it was the left that has objected and claimed all but one of the last Presidential elections they lost was illegit this centuryThe Dems have objected to every Presidential election they lost this centuryA reminder that this dispute of election results is nothing new. From another thread/post;
"Which we saw here a couple decades back(2004) with our state(Washington) governor's race between Rossi(R) and Gregoire(D).
Initially Rossi(R) won, but the count was too close to certify and by law required a recount. Seems the auditor office(the vote counters) of King County/Seattle found a box of "misplaced ballots" which shifted the win to the Democrat Gregoire. But the difference was still too close to be valid (guess the Dems weren't good at math back then).
So another "recount" and another box of "misplaced ballots" was found and this time the Dems got their math correct.
So, having done the trial balloon back then, they've been honing the process ever since and "franchised" it nation wide. "
Actually a bit more complicated and convoluted than my glib and shortcut version. Here's the fully tale;
2004 Washington gubernatorial election - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Trumpybear is the only candidate who planned to sow the seeds of doubt on our election system. He is the only candidate to ever claim that if he looses the election it will be because it was RIGGED. Twice!
Their goal is to undermine the US Constitution.
Now you're stretching it. Democrats have never rejected the courts decisions and most have always called for the country to unify behind the newly elected president.
... We must all march in lock-step(Unity) to the "New World Order" of Socialist Totalitarian Order.
So the American tradition of the losing candidate symbolically asking the country to unify behind the winner after a hard fought election is now "marching in lock step to the "New World Order", "Socialist Totalitarian" ?
If that's what your saying Dr. Orwell, Captain Hyperbole agrees 2000%!
It was the closest election in history and hinged on one state with less than a thousand votes separating the two. After it went to the Supreme Court, Gore not only publicly conceded but presided over the EC count on Jan 6th 2001, where he had to put down objections from House members of his own party before announcing the victory for President Bush.
You know all the things you all suggested you didn't do, and say the GOP is violating the Constitution for doing.
and no, it wasn't the closest in "history" 5 of the closest Presidential elections in US history
These thing are recorded, we don't have to wonder who did or said what. Here's Al not calling for an insurrection becuase he lost.
".....
Republicans objected, saying debate was not allowed during the session. But it was Gore, in his role as president of the Senate, who repeatedly stopped the Democrats' efforts, banging his gavel to interrupt his supporters. And as Gore politely knocked down one Democratic objection after another, the mood turned almost farcical.
"The chair thanks the gentleman from Illinois. But, hey," Gore told Illinois Rep. Jesse L. Jackson Jr., signaling that there was nothing left that could be done to reverse the closest presidential election in the nation's history. Democrats and Republicans chuckled.
Gore said the protesting Democrats - who included several who are not Black Caucus members - could not challenge the Florida count unless they presented a written objection signed by at least one member each from the House and Senate.
Defying the exasperated hoots of their Republican colleagues, the 15 Democrats slipped in arguments about the Florida election process before they were forced to acknowledge that they had not persuaded a senator to sign onto the objection.
"The objection is in writing, and I don't care that it is not signed by a senator," said angry Rep. Maxine Waters, a California Democrat.
"The chair would advise that the rules do care," Gore replied.
Gore quells challenge to Bush win
WASHINGTON – Closing the book on the tumultuous 2000 election, a good-natured Vice President Al Gore methodically blocked his supporters’ attempts yesterday to prolong the drama and pro…www.baltimoresun.com
Electoral College Ballot Count
Meeting in joint session, representatives and senators certified Electoral College ballots submitted by the states. Following the reading of the Florida vote, objections from several members of the Congressional Black Caucus were voiced but not heard due to lack of Senate support. After voicing...www.c-span.org
With that said, the left certainly called for insurrections after 2016....some even helped fund it...these things are on record.
Bail fund backed by Kamala Harris freed same rioter twice – now he's been charged again
A man who was twice bailed out of jail in separate cases by a fund supported by Vice President Kamala Harris has been arrested again while under investigation for another possible case, Minnesota prosecutors said.
www.foxnews.com