Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The Bible means something is true? What does that even mean?
The Bible is a fairy tale. Virtually none of it is true.
.
Which is absurd, of course. The Bible is infallible?The Bible means something is true? What does that even mean?
The Bible is a fairy tale. Virtually none of it is true.
It means the Bible is complete, inerrant, and infallible, but you go on believing whatever.
It isn't a fairy tale like evolution, so put it together and it means you are wrong and not one of the chosen ones. It means you are on the same side as Toddsterpatriot who knows nothing, RWS who is a commie, and have Fort Fun Indiana as spokesman in terms of S&T.
Ta ta haha
[
The Bible is a fairy tale. Virtually none of it is true.
Which parts of the old testament are proven to be correct?[
The Bible is a fairy tale. Virtually none of it is true.
That is not exactly correct. There are actually many parts of it that are historically correct.
However, it is neither a science book or a history book. It is basically a book about the relationship between Man and God.
The Bible means something is true? What does that even mean?
The Bible is a fairy tale. Virtually none of it is true.
It means the Bible is complete, inerrant, and infallible, but you go on believing whatever.
It isn't a fairy tale like evolution, so put it together and it means you are wrong and not one of the chosen ones. It means you are on the same side as Toddsterpatriot who knows nothing, RWS who is a commie, and have Fort Fun Indiana as spokesman in terms of S&T.
Ta ta haha
Which is absurd, of course. The Bible is infallible?The Bible means something is true? What does that even mean?
The Bible is a fairy tale. Virtually none of it is true.
It means the Bible is complete, inerrant, and infallible, but you go on believing whatever.
It isn't a fairy tale like evolution, so put it together and it means you are wrong and not one of the chosen ones. It means you are on the same side as Toddsterpatriot who knows nothing, RWS who is a commie, and have Fort Fun Indiana as spokesman in terms of S&T.
Ta ta haha
1. Who incited David to count the fighting men of Israel?
2. In that count how many fighting men were found in Israel?
- God did (2 Samuel 24: 1)
- Satan did (I Chronicles 2 1:1)
3. How many fighting men were found in Judah?
- Eight hundred thousand (2 Samuel 24:9)
- One million, one hundred thousand (I Chronicles 21:5)
4. God sent his prophet to threaten David with how many years of famine?
- Five hundred thousand (2 Samuel 24:9)
- Four hundred and seventy thousand (I Chronicles 21:5)
5. How old was Ahaziah when he began to rule over Jerusalem?
- Seven (2 Samuel 24:13)
- Three (I Chronicles 21:12)
6. How old was Jehoiachin when he became king of Jerusalem?
- Twenty-two (2 Kings 8:26)
- Forty-two (2 Chronicles 22:2)
7. How long did he rule over Jerusalem?
- Eighteen (2 Kings 24:8)
- Eight (2 Chronicles 36:9)
8. The chief of the mighty men of David lifted up his spear and killed how many men at one time?
- Three months (2 Kings 24:8)
- Three months and ten days (2 Chronicles 36:9)
9. When did David bring the Ark of the Covenant to Jerusalem? Before defeating the Philistines or after?
- Eight hundred (2 Samuel 23:8)
- Three hundred (I Chronicles 11: 11)
10. How many pairs of clean animals did God tell Noah to take into the Ark?
- After (2 Samuel 5 and 6)
- Before (I Chronicles 13 and 14)
- Two (Genesis 6:19, 20)
- Seven (Genesis 7:2). But despite this last instruction only two pairs went into the ark (Genesis 7:8-9)
You said the Bible is infallible. Are you now admitting the Bible has errors? You can't seem to address the errors in the Bible that I pointed out.Which is absurd, of course. The Bible is infallible?The Bible means something is true? What does that even mean?
The Bible is a fairy tale. Virtually none of it is true.
It means the Bible is complete, inerrant, and infallible, but you go on believing whatever.
It isn't a fairy tale like evolution, so put it together and it means you are wrong and not one of the chosen ones. It means you are on the same side as Toddsterpatriot who knows nothing, RWS who is a commie, and have Fort Fun Indiana as spokesman in terms of S&T.
Ta ta haha
1. Who incited David to count the fighting men of Israel?
2. In that count how many fighting men were found in Israel?
- God did (2 Samuel 24: 1)
- Satan did (I Chronicles 2 1:1)
3. How many fighting men were found in Judah?
- Eight hundred thousand (2 Samuel 24:9)
- One million, one hundred thousand (I Chronicles 21:5)
4. God sent his prophet to threaten David with how many years of famine?
- Five hundred thousand (2 Samuel 24:9)
- Four hundred and seventy thousand (I Chronicles 21:5)
5. How old was Ahaziah when he began to rule over Jerusalem?
- Seven (2 Samuel 24:13)
- Three (I Chronicles 21:12)
6. How old was Jehoiachin when he became king of Jerusalem?
- Twenty-two (2 Kings 8:26)
- Forty-two (2 Chronicles 22:2)
7. How long did he rule over Jerusalem?
- Eighteen (2 Kings 24:8)
- Eight (2 Chronicles 36:9)
8. The chief of the mighty men of David lifted up his spear and killed how many men at one time?
- Three months (2 Kings 24:8)
- Three months and ten days (2 Chronicles 36:9)
9. When did David bring the Ark of the Covenant to Jerusalem? Before defeating the Philistines or after?
- Eight hundred (2 Samuel 23:8)
- Three hundred (I Chronicles 11: 11)
10. How many pairs of clean animals did God tell Noah to take into the Ark?
- After (2 Samuel 5 and 6)
- Before (I Chronicles 13 and 14)
- Two (Genesis 6:19, 20)
- Seven (Genesis 7:2). But despite this last instruction only two pairs went into the ark (Genesis 7:8-9)
We are in the S&T forum, so it shows you do not know the difference between religion and science. You do not know what parts of the Bible is science.
It proves you have not read the Bible and taken it seriously. All you are doing is being a low brow internet atheist.
You are atheist and atheists are usually wrong. In this case, you were 100% wrong in claiming the Bible is not infallible. For example, both are correct in question 1.
Who incited David to count the fighting men of Israel? God or Satan? | CARM.org
You can google to get the answers for all your questions.
Anyway, you had no scientific answers like Toddsterpatriot and Fort Fun Indiana could not answer nor make an argument for the points I brought up. Thus, it's your side who believes in magic. I was able to explain why we, the heavens, and Earth are here while you could explain one item.
Can't you see that you and your fellow atheists cannot answer the items that were brought up scientifically? If any of you did, then you wouldn't have anything to be worried about. However, we discovered science backs up the Bible and science does not back up evolution.
I'll let you go now as you could not present any scientific argument, you are not chosen, and there isn't much point as my time is too valuable to be wasted. Good day.
Which is absurd, of course. The Bible is infallible?The Bible means something is true? What does that even mean?
The Bible is a fairy tale. Virtually none of it is true.
It means the Bible is complete, inerrant, and infallible, but you go on believing whatever.
It isn't a fairy tale like evolution, so put it together and it means you are wrong and not one of the chosen ones. It means you are on the same side as Toddsterpatriot who knows nothing, RWS who is a commie, and have Fort Fun Indiana as spokesman in terms of S&T.
Ta ta haha
1. Who incited David to count the fighting men of Israel?
2. In that count how many fighting men were found in Israel?
- God did (2 Samuel 24: 1)
- Satan did (I Chronicles 2 1:1)
3. How many fighting men were found in Judah?
- Eight hundred thousand (2 Samuel 24:9)
- One million, one hundred thousand (I Chronicles 21:5)
4. God sent his prophet to threaten David with how many years of famine?
- Five hundred thousand (2 Samuel 24:9)
- Four hundred and seventy thousand (I Chronicles 21:5)
5. How old was Ahaziah when he began to rule over Jerusalem?
- Seven (2 Samuel 24:13)
- Three (I Chronicles 21:12)
6. How old was Jehoiachin when he became king of Jerusalem?
- Twenty-two (2 Kings 8:26)
- Forty-two (2 Chronicles 22:2)
7. How long did he rule over Jerusalem?
- Eighteen (2 Kings 24:8)
- Eight (2 Chronicles 36:9)
8. The chief of the mighty men of David lifted up his spear and killed how many men at one time?
- Three months (2 Kings 24:8)
- Three months and ten days (2 Chronicles 36:9)
9. When did David bring the Ark of the Covenant to Jerusalem? Before defeating the Philistines or after?
- Eight hundred (2 Samuel 23:8)
- Three hundred (I Chronicles 11: 11)
10. How many pairs of clean animals did God tell Noah to take into the Ark?
- After (2 Samuel 5 and 6)
- Before (I Chronicles 13 and 14)
- Two (Genesis 6:19, 20)
- Seven (Genesis 7:2). But despite this last instruction only two pairs went into the ark (Genesis 7:8-9)
We are in the S&T forum, so it shows you do not know the difference between religion and science. You do not know what parts of the Bible is science.
It proves you have not read the Bible and taken it seriously. All you are doing is being a low brow internet atheist.
You are atheist and atheists are usually wrong. In this case, you were 100% wrong in claiming the Bible is not infallible. For example, both are correct in question 1.
Who incited David to count the fighting men of Israel? God or Satan? | CARM.org
You can google to get the answers for all your questions.
Anyway, you had no scientific answers like Toddsterpatriot and Fort Fun Indiana could not answer nor make an argument for the points I brought up. Thus, it's your side who believes in magic. I was able to explain why we, the heavens, and Earth are here while you could explain one item.
Can't you see that you and your fellow atheists cannot answer the items that were brought up scientifically? If any of you did, then you wouldn't have anything to be worried about. However, we discovered science backs up the Bible and science does not back up evolution.
I'll let you go now as you could not present any scientific argument, you are not chosen, and there isn't much point as my time is too valuable to be wasted. Good day.
You said the Bible is infallible. Are you now admitting the Bible has errors? You can't seem to address the errors in the Bible that I pointed out.
We certainly haven't discovered that science backs up the Bible. We have know precisely the opposite for 150 years.
. I'm not going to worry about it.
You do not know what parts of the Bible is science.
Show us. Start with the part about orbits.
could not answer nor make an argument for the points I brought up.
Your "argument" was that scientists couldn't explain orbits, but the Bible could.
Both lies.
I'll let you go now
Yes, you'd best run away.
Why God really killed the dinosaurs...
. Again, atheists and their scientists are usually wrong. They ignore the evidence that marine fossils make up much of the fossil record. They and you cannot explain why the Earth is covered with 3/4 surface water. The evidence is right in front of you, but you will not believe.
You do not know what parts of the Bible is science.
Show us. Start with the part about orbits.
could not answer nor make an argument for the points I brought up.
Your "argument" was that scientists couldn't explain orbits, but the Bible could.
Both lies.
I'll let you go now
Yes, you'd best run away.
I didn't lie, you lied. There you go. Why don't you go run along now while the adults are talking?
The Bible is not infallible. I just proved it.You said the Bible is infallible. Are you now admitting the Bible has errors? You can't seem to address the errors in the Bible that I pointed out.
We certainly haven't discovered that science backs up the Bible. We have know precisely the opposite for 150 years.
You can go to google to find out you are wrong about your questions. I'm not going to waste time on such blather as I'm smarter than you in science and Biblical matters.
In terms of both science and religion, the Bible is complete, inerrant, and infallible. I've said as much stating going to it first isn't a bad idea. Of course, ti doesn't mean that is the only reference. One should go to other books and formulate new thought and ideas in science from the facts. Thus, evolution is not a fact, but a huge lie.
This is what's so upsetting about evolution in regards to science as it contradicts every single scientific thing God said. For example, how he focused on the Earth and thus made Earth special. It's the Anthropic principle, not the Copernican principle. While Copernicus was correct in his time, we've found out the Milky Way resides in the center. But what good is real science if the creation scientists are not allowed to publish their papers?
Anyway, the discussion of science has been relegated to these types of forums. We have 50% of the people who believe today's science while people, including secular scientists, do not believe in evolution but just go along with it to get their funding. Certain fields like paleontology emphasize the ToE and evolutionary thinking like Nazis so we get stupid and silly things such as
These images show dinosaurs aren't really 'extinct' after all
The world has gone mad. None of this is observable, so Disney will capitulate and make weird Jurassic Park based movies in the future.
The world may as well be destroyed by the big fire or giant asteroid -- pick your own poison
You do not know what parts of the Bible is science.
Show us. Start with the part about orbits.
could not answer nor make an argument for the points I brought up.
Your "argument" was that scientists couldn't explain orbits, but the Bible could.
Both lies.
I'll let you go now
Yes, you'd best run away.
I didn't lie, you lied. There you go. Why don't you go run along now while the adults are talking?
I didn't lie
You said scientists couldn't explain orbits.
Inverse square law is proof you lied.
You said only the Bible could explain orbits.
Still haven't posted the passage.
Liar.
The Bible is not infallible. I just proved it.You said the Bible is infallible. Are you now admitting the Bible has errors? You can't seem to address the errors in the Bible that I pointed out.
We certainly haven't discovered that science backs up the Bible. We have know precisely the opposite for 150 years.
You can go to google to find out you are wrong about your questions. I'm not going to waste time on such blather as I'm smarter than you in science and Biblical matters.
In terms of both science and religion, the Bible is complete, inerrant, and infallible. I've said as much stating going to it first isn't a bad idea. Of course, ti doesn't mean that is the only reference. One should go to other books and formulate new thought and ideas in science from the facts. Thus, evolution is not a fact, but a huge lie.
This is what's so upsetting about evolution in regards to science as it contradicts every single scientific thing God said. For example, how he focused on the Earth and thus made Earth special. It's the Anthropic principle, not the Copernican principle. While Copernicus was correct in his time, we've found out the Milky Way resides in the center. But what good is real science if the creation scientists are not allowed to publish their papers?
Anyway, the discussion of science has been relegated to these types of forums. We have 50% of the people who believe today's science while people, including secular scientists, do not believe in evolution but just go along with it to get their funding. Certain fields like paleontology emphasize the ToE and evolutionary thinking like Nazis so we get stupid and silly things such as
These images show dinosaurs aren't really 'extinct' after all
The world has gone mad. None of this is observable, so Disney will capitulate and make weird Jurassic Park based movies in the future.
The world may as well be destroyed by the big fire or giant asteroid -- pick your own poison
I won't waste my time addressing the rest of your idiotic drek.
The Bible is not infallible. I just proved it.You said the Bible is infallible. Are you now admitting the Bible has errors? You can't seem to address the errors in the Bible that I pointed out.
We certainly haven't discovered that science backs up the Bible. We have know precisely the opposite for 150 years.
You can go to google to find out you are wrong about your questions. I'm not going to waste time on such blather as I'm smarter than you in science and Biblical matters.
In terms of both science and religion, the Bible is complete, inerrant, and infallible. I've said as much stating going to it first isn't a bad idea. Of course, ti doesn't mean that is the only reference. One should go to other books and formulate new thought and ideas in science from the facts. Thus, evolution is not a fact, but a huge lie.
This is what's so upsetting about evolution in regards to science as it contradicts every single scientific thing God said. For example, how he focused on the Earth and thus made Earth special. It's the Anthropic principle, not the Copernican principle. While Copernicus was correct in his time, we've found out the Milky Way resides in the center. But what good is real science if the creation scientists are not allowed to publish their papers?
Anyway, the discussion of science has been relegated to these types of forums. We have 50% of the people who believe today's science while people, including secular scientists, do not believe in evolution but just go along with it to get their funding. Certain fields like paleontology emphasize the ToE and evolutionary thinking like Nazis so we get stupid and silly things such as
These images show dinosaurs aren't really 'extinct' after all
The world has gone mad. None of this is observable, so Disney will capitulate and make weird Jurassic Park based movies in the future.
The world may as well be destroyed by the big fire or giant asteroid -- pick your own poison
I won't waste my time addressing the rest of your idiotic drek.
If you did, then why don't you go write the Bible scholars? The Bible has withstood the test of time. Besides, I doubt you came up with any of it, but just copied and pasted from some idiotic internet atheist blog.
If this is such a big deal to you, the why don't you post it in the proper forum in Religion and Ethics? Thus, we can all discuss.
I am the one who discusses science here, but you do not even know about the evolution of birds from dinosaurs. I can provide a nice website to learn about evolution instead of just trying to win a dumb internet argument that has nothing to do with anything in S&T..
You do not know what parts of the Bible is science.
Show us. Start with the part about orbits.
could not answer nor make an argument for the points I brought up.
Your "argument" was that scientists couldn't explain orbits, but the Bible could.
Both lies.
I'll let you go now
Yes, you'd best run away.
I didn't lie, you lied. There you go. Why don't you go run along now while the adults are talking?
I didn't lie
You said scientists couldn't explain orbits.
Inverse square law is proof you lied.
You said only the Bible could explain orbits.
Still haven't posted the passage.
Liar.
It wasn't me then. I did not get involved with any discussions with you as such because you never answer my questions while I have answered yours. Quid pro quo. Besides, you ask leading questions. So, instead of being bored spit less as our conversations lead nowhere, I just ignore your silly posts. Why don't you go talk with someone else?
The Bible is not infallible. I just proved it.You said the Bible is infallible. Are you now admitting the Bible has errors? You can't seem to address the errors in the Bible that I pointed out.
We certainly haven't discovered that science backs up the Bible. We have know precisely the opposite for 150 years.
You can go to google to find out you are wrong about your questions. I'm not going to waste time on such blather as I'm smarter than you in science and Biblical matters.
In terms of both science and religion, the Bible is complete, inerrant, and infallible. I've said as much stating going to it first isn't a bad idea. Of course, ti doesn't mean that is the only reference. One should go to other books and formulate new thought and ideas in science from the facts. Thus, evolution is not a fact, but a huge lie.
This is what's so upsetting about evolution in regards to science as it contradicts every single scientific thing God said. For example, how he focused on the Earth and thus made Earth special. It's the Anthropic principle, not the Copernican principle. While Copernicus was correct in his time, we've found out the Milky Way resides in the center. But what good is real science if the creation scientists are not allowed to publish their papers?
Anyway, the discussion of science has been relegated to these types of forums. We have 50% of the people who believe today's science while people, including secular scientists, do not believe in evolution but just go along with it to get their funding. Certain fields like paleontology emphasize the ToE and evolutionary thinking like Nazis so we get stupid and silly things such as
These images show dinosaurs aren't really 'extinct' after all
The world has gone mad. None of this is observable, so Disney will capitulate and make weird Jurassic Park based movies in the future.
The world may as well be destroyed by the big fire or giant asteroid -- pick your own poison
I won't waste my time addressing the rest of your idiotic drek.
If you did, then why don't you go write the Bible scholars? The Bible has withstood the test of time. Besides, I doubt you came up with any of it, but just copied and pasted from some idiotic internet atheist blog.
If this is such a big deal to you, the why don't you post it in the proper forum in Religion and Ethics? Thus, we can all discuss.
I am the one who discusses science here, but you do not even know about the evolution of birds from dinosaurs. I can provide a nice website to learn about evolution instead of just trying to win a dumb internet argument that has nothing to do with anything in S&T..
Whether I came up with it is irrelevant. It's in the Bible that you claim is infallible.
Why would I waste my time writing to a bunch of fools like you? Also, I didn't start this thread in the Science and Technology section. I'm simply responded to the idiocies you post in here.
The Bible has not stood the test of time. It has been proven false time and time again.
You don't discuss science. You discuss magic and horse manure. Nothing in the Bible is science. It's a fairy tale.
