The bigget differance on obama and bush

Wyatt earp

Diamond Member
Apr 21, 2012
69,975
16,396
2,180
Bush jr took sadamm to trial

Obama just killed bin laden and the duck

No trial needed
 
Death tolls, Bush II had 9/11/01, Katrina, AND Iraq, plus many deaths like those at Sago Mine, due to "industry self policing". And yes, Obama was President when attention finally focused on those who attacked the US 9/11/01.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GvliUuXjbL4]Bush laughs at no WMD in Iraq - YouTube[/ame]
 
Obama refuses to take people to trial
He just kills them
 
Obama refuses to take people to trial
He just kills them

Saddam was handed over to Iraqis, his execution was filmed, with cheering from the excutioners. Barbaric, many are pleased there was no trial for bin Laden, it would have served as a recruitment tool. There is a big difference between those two, Saddam was going sooner or later, from within; taking the heat off bin Laden, as Bush did, allowed him to continue as a symbol for radical Islam.
 
In 49 years oj my life neverseen a president just kill

A high profile.

Just saying
 
Also the duck ran so did sadam we captured sadam. Ya just dont outright kill a highprofle target
 
When did the rules of assanition change under Obama?
 

Forum List

Back
Top