The blueprint for prosperity

[P@triot]

I am a federalist

No. No, you're an idiot. And a PRT (Paid Russian Troll).

 

[danielpalos]

The social power of socialism, at work.

The U.S. Constitution doesn't authorize socialism, sparky. If you want that, you need the votes to amend the U.S. Constitution. If you can't get those votes, respect the fact that We the People have spoken...

Government costs money.

Yes it does. And in return for that money, the American people receive a service.

Socialism starts with a social Contract.

 

[danielpalos]

Unemployment compensation for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment is a capital vehicle of to improve social services.

"Of to"?

Dude...Vladimir is going to be very disappointed in your performance today. You do know what he does to people who disappoint him, don't you?

Unemployment compensation for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment is a capital vehicle to improve social services.

 

[danielpalos]

Unemployment compensation for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment is a capital vehicle of to improve social services.

Social services are improved by turning it back over to private charity - where it belongs. History has proven that. Just like it has proven that every claim you have made it complete and total bullshit.

private charity only cover multitudes of sins, not official poverty in our Republic.

 

[danielpalos]

I am a federalist

No. No, you're an idiot. And a PRT (Paid Russian Troll).

you don't know what you are talking about, right winger; conspiracy or coincidence?

 

[P@triot]

Solving for Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment via market friendly means is a general dilemma under the comprehension of the general welfare clause.

Snowflake, the federal government has no authority to "solve" unemployment. That is the job of the unemployed. If they actually work and make themselves marketable, they wouldn't be unemployed.

 

[P@triot]

private charity only cover multitudes of sins, not official poverty in our Republic.

It covers everything it should cover and nothing it shouldn't. That's the beauty of it.

 

[P@triot]

you don't know what you are talking about, right winger; conspiracy or coincidence?

Snowflake, your atrocious grammar and profound ignorance of U.S. government gave you away. You didn't even know why our founders instituted government.

 

[P@triot]

You have only right wing fantasy, not reality.

Says the PRT (Paid Russian Troll) who ignores the reality of the failed experiments in Seattle and Oakland, in favor of his disturbed left-wing fantasy.

 

[P@triot]

solving for problems is why the power to tax exists.

Yeah....um....no...it’s not. At all. The power of tax exists to cover the costs of government. Things like the patent office. The post office. The Supreme Court. Etc.

Yes, it is. the common defense and general welfare cover all civil contingencies.

Defense is protecting against foreign and domestic threats of a U.S. invasion, takeover, etc. It has nothing to do with socialism no matter how hard you try to make it that way. And the general welfare clause explicitly applies to the 18 enumerated powers.

 

[P@triot]

Socialism starts with a social Contract.

Thank goodness the American people never signed that contract. That would suck. Just like Paid Russian Trolls.

 

[P@triot]

Unemployment compensation for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment is a capital vehicle to improve social services.

No, no. Unemployment compensation is an idiotic vehicle to collapse an economy. Paying people not to work doesn't work.

And even if it did work, we're $21 trillion in debt. We couldn't afford it anyway. These are basic realities that you're incapable of comprehending. Now go read your emails from Vladimir and let the adults talk, ok?

 

[danielpalos]

Solving for Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment via market friendly means is a general dilemma under the comprehension of the general welfare clause.

Snowflake, the federal government has no authority to "solve" unemployment. That is the job of the unemployed. If they actually work and make themselves marketable, they wouldn't be unemployed.

Yes, there is as long as it promotes and provides for the general welfare.

 

[danielpalos]

private charity only cover multitudes of sins, not official poverty in our Republic.

It covers everything it should cover and nothing it shouldn't. That's the beauty of it.

only in right wing fantasy does the right wing not whine about the cost of social services.

 

[danielpalos]

solving for problems is why the power to tax exists.

Yeah....um....no...it’s not. At all. The power of tax exists to cover the costs of government. Things like the patent office. The post office. The Supreme Court. Etc.

Yes, it is. the common defense and general welfare cover all civil contingencies.

Defense is protecting against foreign and domestic threats of a U.S. invasion, takeover, etc. It has nothing to do with socialism no matter how hard you try to make it that way. And the general welfare clause explicitly applies to the 18 enumerated powers.

it has to do with the common defense; there is no enumerated common offense or general warfare powers delegated to Congress.

 

[danielpalos]

Socialism starts with a social Contract.

Thank goodness the American people never signed that contract. That would suck. Just like Paid Russian Trolls.

Only infidels, protestants, and renegades should complain about the delegated power to Tax.

Lousy Christians?

 

[danielpalos]

Unemployment compensation for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment is a capital vehicle to improve social services.

No, no. Unemployment compensation is an idiotic vehicle to collapse an economy. Paying people not to work doesn't work.

And even if it did work, we're $21 trillion in debt. We couldn't afford it anyway. These are basic realities that you're incapable of comprehending. Now go read your emails from Vladimir and let the adults talk, ok?

Unemployment compensation could be harnessed as a means of production to the extent, higher paid labor pay more in taxes and create more in demand; a positive multiplier effect means we will be generating revenue and circulating money in our institution of money based markets and form of Capitalism.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

it has to do with the common defense; there is no enumerated common offense or general warfare powers delegated to Congress.

There's also no enumerated power of specific welfare. It's only general welfare.

So no federal government program can benefit an individual specifically. So social services are unconstitutional.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Unemployment compensation for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment is a capital vehicle to improve social services.

No, no. Unemployment compensation is an idiotic vehicle to collapse an economy. Paying people not to work doesn't work.

And even if it did work, we're $21 trillion in debt. We couldn't afford it anyway. These are basic realities that you're incapable of comprehending. Now go read your emails from Vladimir and let the adults talk, ok?

Unemployment compensation could be harnessed as a means of production to the extent, higher paid labor pay more in taxes and create more in demand; a positive multiplier effect means we will be generating revenue and circulating money in our institution of money based markets and form of Capitalism.

Will somebody please send Dan a basic economics book?

 

[Thinker101]

Unemployment compensation for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment is a capital vehicle to improve social services.

No, no. Unemployment compensation is an idiotic vehicle to collapse an economy. Paying people not to work doesn't work.

And even if it did work, we're $21 trillion in debt. We couldn't afford it anyway. These are basic realities that you're incapable of comprehending. Now go read your emails from Vladimir and let the adults talk, ok?

Unemployment compensation could be harnessed as a means of production to the extent, higher paid labor pay more in taxes and create more in demand; a positive multiplier effect means we will be generating revenue and circulating money in our institution of money based markets and form of Capitalism.

Will somebody please send Dan a basic economics book?