The Bolton Bombshell (from his book)

[jc456]

If Republicans believe Bolton is lying, compel him to testify as a witness under oath.

Do us a favor and jump off a cliff.

The world a favor

 

[jc456]

Lol because they don’t have executive privilege, he objected to the first 2 witnesses and didn’t care about the rest. And it was his lawyers not trump .. just playing hard ball

He objected to every witness that testified in the House. They all testified over his objection. You’re not being truthful.

Lol no he didn’t, if he did it would be in court,, your talking about a brief reaction, he could have held them all up if he wanted .. don’t get confused with trumps powers

Nope. He did object. They testified anyway. It’s not in court because he has no legal basis to take them to court.

View attachment 302940

You don’t know what you’re talking about.

Irony

 

[BluesLegend]

Some book written by a fired DC swamp creature was leaked to the NY Times...got it.

yep you are right and its another leak by somebody about something somebody believes who is mad at the president .......so what !! if all Boltons got is his opinion it means nothing .and even if the president delayed funds thats within his power to do for whatever reason he deems fit ! it may not look good but there is no way republicans are going to remove him for something as trivial as that ... leave it to dems to scream quid pro quo when the president wants to investigate a quid pro quo !

Doesn't even matter Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz obliterated the Bolton nonsense. Even if true its not an impeachable offense. He gave an example, if a president told Israel U.S. aid would be withheld unless Israel agreed to stop building settlements a clear quid pro quo that's not an impeachable offense. In fact presidents have long exercised that authority.

 

[colfax_m]

He objected to every witness that testified in the House. They all testified over his objection. You’re not being truthful.

Lol no he didn’t, if he did it would be in court,, your talking about a brief reaction, he could have held them all up if he wanted .. don’t get confused with trumps powers

Nope. He did object. They testified anyway. It’s not in court because he has no legal basis to take them to court.

View attachment 302940

You don’t know what you’re talking about.

Irony

Oh good. You’re back to make shit up again?

 

[karpenter]

Doesn't even matter Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz obliterated the Bolton nonsense. Even if true its not an impeachable offense. He gave an example, if a president told Israel U.S. aid would be withheld unless Israel agreed to stop building settlements a clear quid pro quo that's not an impeachable offense. In fact presidents have long exercised that authority.

AND Ukraine Got Their Aid Weeks Before The Deadline
AND With-Out Ukraine Firing Up Another Investigation
AND With-Out Ukraine Noticing If The Funds Were Held Up
AND With-Out Zelensky Knowing He Had To Do Anything

Ukraine President Zelensky: I feel 'no pressure' to investigate Bidens - CNN Video

 

[ThisIsMe]

So, I've not seen a lot about this yet, but heard about it on the radio today. They said it was leaked by the NY times, and there were parts missing and parts selectively leaked.

Sounds like we need the full story before jumping to conclusions?

 

[jc456]

Lol no he didn’t, if he did it would be in court,, your talking about a brief reaction, he could have held them all up if he wanted .. don’t get confused with trumps powers

Nope. He did object. They testified anyway. It’s not in court because he has no legal basis to take them to court.

View attachment 302940

You don’t know what you’re talking about.

Irony

Oh good. You’re back to make shit up again?

Naw, that’s your specialty. Did you watch the trump lawyer on Biden? Hahaha hahaha

 

[colfax_m]

Some book written by a fired DC swamp creature was leaked to the NY Times...got it.

yep you are right and its another leak by somebody about something somebody believes who is mad at the president .......so what !! if all Boltons got is his opinion it means nothing .and even if the president delayed funds thats within his power to do for whatever reason he deems fit ! it may not look good but there is no way republicans are going to remove him for something as trivial as that ... leave it to dems to scream quid pro quo when the president wants to investigate a quid pro quo !

Doesn't even matter Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz obliterated the Bolton nonsense. Even if true its not an impeachable offense. He gave an example, if a president told Israel U.S. aid would be withheld unless Israel agreed to stop building settlements a clear quid pro quo that's not an impeachable offense. In fact presidents have long exercised that authority.

So I guess you all can agree that Biden didn’t do anything wrong then.

 

[candycorn]

Some book written by a fired DC swamp creature was leaked to the NY Times...got it.

Your blob hired a swamp creature? I thought he was supposed to be draining it.

 

[colfax_m]

Nope. He did object. They testified anyway. It’s not in court because he has no legal basis to take them to court.

View attachment 302940

You don’t know what you’re talking about.

Irony

Oh good. You’re back to make shit up again?

Naw, that’s your specialty. Did you watch the trump lawyer on Biden? Hahaha hahaha

I did. It was boring. She didn’t have any evidence of any wrongdoing by Biden. No new information. Just a rehash of the same boring fake news.

 

[BluesLegend]

Some book written by a fired DC swamp creature was leaked to the NY Times...got it.

yep you are right and its another leak by somebody about something somebody believes who is mad at the president .......so what !! if all Boltons got is his opinion it means nothing .and even if the president delayed funds thats within his power to do for whatever reason he deems fit ! it may not look good but there is no way republicans are going to remove him for something as trivial as that ... leave it to dems to scream quid pro quo when the president wants to investigate a quid pro quo !

Doesn't even matter Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz obliterated the Bolton nonsense. Even if true its not an impeachable offense. He gave an example, if a president told Israel U.S. aid would be withheld unless Israel agreed to stop building settlements a clear quid pro quo that's not an impeachable offense. In fact presidents have long exercised that authority.

So I guess you all can agree that Biden didn’t do anything wrong then.

What are you blabbering about?

 

[BluesLegend]

Some book written by a fired DC swamp creature was leaked to the NY Times...got it.

Your blob hired a swamp creature? I thought he was supposed to be draining it.

Don't worry he fired him.

 

[colfax_m]

Some book written by a fired DC swamp creature was leaked to the NY Times...got it.

yep you are right and its another leak by somebody about something somebody believes who is mad at the president .......so what !! if all Boltons got is his opinion it means nothing .and even if the president delayed funds thats within his power to do for whatever reason he deems fit ! it may not look good but there is no way republicans are going to remove him for something as trivial as that ... leave it to dems to scream quid pro quo when the president wants to investigate a quid pro quo !

Doesn't even matter Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz obliterated the Bolton nonsense. Even if true its not an impeachable offense. He gave an example, if a president told Israel U.S. aid would be withheld unless Israel agreed to stop building settlements a clear quid pro quo that's not an impeachable offense. In fact presidents have long exercised that authority.

So I guess you all can agree that Biden didn’t do anything wrong then.

What are you blabbering about?

Quid pro quo’s are normal. That’s what you’re accusing Biden of doing.

 

[BULLDOG]

Some book written by a fired DC swamp creature was leaked to the NY Times...got it.

yep you are right and its another leak by somebody about something somebody believes who is mad at the president .......so what !! if all Boltons got is his opinion it means nothing .and even if the president delayed funds thats within his power to do for whatever reason he deems fit ! it may not look good but there is no way republicans are going to remove him for something as trivial as that ... leave it to dems to scream quid pro quo when the president wants to investigate a quid pro quo !

Doesn't even matter Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz obliterated the Bolton nonsense. Even if true its not an impeachable offense. He gave an example, if a president told Israel U.S. aid would be withheld unless Israel agreed to stop building settlements a clear quid pro quo that's not an impeachable offense. In fact presidents have long exercised that authority.

Not sure how Israel not building settlements would personally help Trump in the coming election. Demanding that Ukraine announce an investigation of Trump's main political opponent obviously would.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

Well, yeah. Cries wolf is a stretch.

I think "being kind" better describes it

So far the case against Trump is going almost exactly like the whistleblower claimed.

there is no whistleblower

The real crying wolf is 30 years of conservatives whining about imagined corruption. They took the practice and applied it to Biden.

wolf wolf wolf

No whistleblower? Better tell the ICIG.

Here I thought y’all were going to lock Clinton up. Whatever happened to that?

It got buried under Russiagate.

What happened to that.

 

[Osiris-ODS]

So, I've not seen a lot about this yet, but heard about it on the radio today. They said it was leaked by the NY times, and there were parts missing and parts selectively leaked.

Sounds like we need the full story before jumping to conclusions?

There were no quotes at all from the so-called transcript of the book. According to what's been revealed so far, this all comes from someone who supposedly saw it, who told a NYT reporter what it supposedly generally said, and that's what the NYT published.

 

[BluesLegend]

Some book written by a fired DC swamp creature was leaked to the NY Times...got it.

yep you are right and its another leak by somebody about something somebody believes who is mad at the president .......so what !! if all Boltons got is his opinion it means nothing .and even if the president delayed funds thats within his power to do for whatever reason he deems fit ! it may not look good but there is no way republicans are going to remove him for something as trivial as that ... leave it to dems to scream quid pro quo when the president wants to investigate a quid pro quo !

Doesn't even matter Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz obliterated the Bolton nonsense. Even if true its not an impeachable offense. He gave an example, if a president told Israel U.S. aid would be withheld unless Israel agreed to stop building settlements a clear quid pro quo that's not an impeachable offense. In fact presidents have long exercised that authority.

So I guess you all can agree that Biden didn’t do anything wrong then.

What are you blabbering about?

Quid pro quo’s are normal. That’s what you’re accusing Biden of doing.

Unlike president Trump the Bidens committed actual crimes, money changed hands, they belong in prison with countless other scum of the earth Democrats.

 

[amethyst]

Dershowitz made it clear that bolton's testimony is meaningless since there was no crime, so there is no reason for the Senate to move forward with a trial.

 

[BluesLegend]

Some book written by a fired DC swamp creature was leaked to the NY Times...got it.

yep you are right and its another leak by somebody about something somebody believes who is mad at the president .......so what !! if all Boltons got is his opinion it means nothing .and even if the president delayed funds thats within his power to do for whatever reason he deems fit ! it may not look good but there is no way republicans are going to remove him for something as trivial as that ... leave it to dems to scream quid pro quo when the president wants to investigate a quid pro quo !

Doesn't even matter Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz obliterated the Bolton nonsense. Even if true its not an impeachable offense. He gave an example, if a president told Israel U.S. aid would be withheld unless Israel agreed to stop building settlements a clear quid pro quo that's not an impeachable offense. In fact presidents have long exercised that authority.

Not sure how Israel not building settlements would personally help Trump in the coming election. Demanding that Ukraine announce an investigation of Trump's main political opponent obviously would.

Politicians do this all the time, just relax.

 

[colfax_m]

Well, yeah. Cries wolf is a stretch.

I think "being kind" better describes it

So far the case against Trump is going almost exactly like the whistleblower claimed.

there is no whistleblower

The real crying wolf is 30 years of conservatives whining about imagined corruption. They took the practice and applied it to Biden.

wolf wolf wolf

No whistleblower? Better tell the ICIG.

Here I thought y’all were going to lock Clinton up. Whatever happened to that?

It got buried under Russiagate.

What happened to that.

Turns out Russia was responsible for attacking the Democratic Party to help Trump get elected. Trump knew and didn’t care. He likes to pretend it was someone else because he’s embarrassed by it.