šŸŒŸ Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! šŸŒŸ

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs šŸŽ

The Bolton Bombshell (from his book)

No one is stopping the house witnesses from testifying
THE Schiff Sham deserves all the bullshit it get's
Trump is stopping them.
no he isn't lol

Sure he is. He has told people not to testify. They complied with his orders.
Maybe the democrats should have fought to get him into the Schiff sham
You don't get to have a do over.
No fight needed. Not asking for a do over. Just asking for the Senate to treat the trial seriously.
Itā€™s over buddy move on
 
Nope. Remember all the people that already testified? No ā€œsanctionsā€.
Why would they be? Whitehouse didnā€™t object trump has nothing to hide
Yes. Trump did object. They testified over his objections. You really havenā€™t been paying attention.
Lol because they donā€™t have executive privilege, he objected to the first 2 witnesses and didnā€™t care about the rest. And it was his lawyers not trump .. just playing hard ball
He objected to every witness that testified in the House. They all testified over his objection. Youā€™re not being truthful.
Lol no he didnā€™t, if he did it would be in court,, your talking about a brief reaction, he could have held them all up if he wanted .. donā€™t get confused with trumps powers

Nope. He did object. They testified anyway. Itā€™s not in court because he has no legal basis to take them to court.
 
Trump is stopping them.
no he isn't lol

Sure he is. He has told people not to testify. They complied with his orders.
Maybe the democrats should have fought to get him into the Schiff sham
You don't get to have a do over.
No fight needed. Not asking for a do over. Just asking for the Senate to treat the trial seriously.
Itā€™s over buddy move on
Itā€™s just getting started. We arenā€™t even done with opening arguments
 
Why would they be? Whitehouse didnā€™t object trump has nothing to hide
Yes. Trump did object. They testified over his objections. You really havenā€™t been paying attention.
Lol because they donā€™t have executive privilege, he objected to the first 2 witnesses and didnā€™t care about the rest. And it was his lawyers not trump .. just playing hard ball
He objected to every witness that testified in the House. They all testified over his objection. Youā€™re not being truthful.
Lol no he didnā€™t, if he did it would be in court,, your talking about a brief reaction, he could have held them all up if he wanted .. donā€™t get confused with trumps powers

Nope. He did object. They testified anyway. Itā€™s not in court because he has no legal basis to take them to court.
ECF0A56A-C75E-43B1-BDA3-72BE9D1D7DE9.jpeg
 
no he isn't lol

Sure he is. He has told people not to testify. They complied with his orders.
Maybe the democrats should have fought to get him into the Schiff sham
You don't get to have a do over.
No fight needed. Not asking for a do over. Just asking for the Senate to treat the trial seriously.
Itā€™s over buddy move on
Itā€™s just getting started. We arenā€™t even done with opening arguments
Friday they vote,, itā€™s not looking good
 
Chaos defines the first three years of the Trump Administration, it has now infected the members of the Trump's Lawyers, from Rudy to the current crop of lawyers now putting all watchers to sleep.

In wake of Bolton book news, White House allies say Trump lawyers bungled defense



Reports that John Bolton has written a firsthand account of the presidentā€™s direct involvement in withholding aid to Ukraine has left some Republicans confused and angry over the legal strategy by the presidentā€™s defense team ā€” which has devoted much of its arguments in the Senate impeachment trial to arguing that no such firsthand evidence existed.

One Republican operative who advises the White House said he was ā€œflabbergasted at how stupidly they have handled this.ā€

Trump attorney Mike Purpura argued Saturday that ā€œnot a single witness testified that the president himself said that there was any connection between any investigations and security assistance, a presidential meeting or anything else.ā€
 
Bolton is a witness to the events that transpired. And he is publicly stating that Trump absolutely was engaging in an electoral quid pro quo with as foreign government...a drug deal was how he phrased it because of the illegality and absurdity of it.

Yea...he needs to testify
 
Not if involves undermining the people of the US. Elections have consquences, so do big, fat, ugly, misogynic Orange Buffoons when they open their fat traps trying to undermine the US political process. Ya see, almost all politicians do it - on both sides of the fence. The Fat Retard in the Oval Office has one of two things happening for him - he's either too dumb to realise what he has done is illegal; or he believes he is above the law. Either way, he's still a piece of shit.
lol...I see you've been reading your "Big Book Of Liberal Adjectives"

Haven't even started! And I don't call them 'Liberal' Adjectives. I call call them 'Normal People' adjectives.
 
Some book written by a fired DC swamp creature was leaked to the NY Times...got it. :icon_rolleyes:
yep you are right and its another leak by somebody about something somebody believes who is mad at the president .......so what !! if all Boltons got is his opinion it means nothing .and even if the president delayed funds thats within his power to do for whatever reason he deems fit ! it may not look good but there is no way republicans are going to remove him for something as trivial as that ... leave it to dems to scream quid pro quo when the president wants to investigate a quid pro quo !
 
Yes. Trump did object. They testified over his objections. You really havenā€™t been paying attention.
Lol because they donā€™t have executive privilege, he objected to the first 2 witnesses and didnā€™t care about the rest. And it was his lawyers not trump .. just playing hard ball
He objected to every witness that testified in the House. They all testified over his objection. Youā€™re not being truthful.
Lol no he didnā€™t, if he did it would be in court,, your talking about a brief reaction, he could have held them all up if he wanted .. donā€™t get confused with trumps powers

Nope. He did object. They testified anyway. Itā€™s not in court because he has no legal basis to take them to court.
View attachment 302940
You donā€™t know what youā€™re talking about.
 
Chaos defines the first three years of the Trump Administration, it has now infected the members of the Trump's Lawyers, from Rudy to the current crop of lawyers now putting all watchers to sleep.

In wake of Bolton book news, White House allies say Trump lawyers bungled defense



Reports that John Bolton has written a firsthand account of the presidentā€™s direct involvement in withholding aid to Ukraine has left some Republicans confused and angry over the legal strategy by the presidentā€™s defense team ā€” which has devoted much of its arguments in the Senate impeachment trial to arguing that no such firsthand evidence existed.

One Republican operative who advises the White House said he was ā€œflabbergasted at how stupidly they have handled this.ā€

Trump attorney Mike Purpura argued Saturday that ā€œnot a single witness testified that the president himself said that there was any connection between any investigations and security assistance, a presidential meeting or anything else.ā€

:auiqs.jpg:
 

Forum List

Back
Top