Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If destroying property without anyone being injured is terrorism, we know what Democrats do when they destroy a thousand times that property value AND PEOPLE ARE MURDERED.A horde of White men disguised themselves as Native Americans — coppering their faces and donning headdresses in the same tradition that would lead to blackfaced minstrel shows decades later — to commit seditious conspiracy and destroy private property. The riotous mob trespassed on three ships and destroyed goods worth nearly $2 million in today’s money — all because they didn’t want to obey a duly passed law.
I love this article, if for nothing else that it speaks truths, while asking serious questions.
Opinion | Was the Boston Tea Party an act of terrorism? It depends.
The Boston Tea Party took on the British 250 years ago. It pitted one American value against another.web.archive.org
If destroying property without anyone being injured is terrorism, we know what Democrats do when they destroy a thousand times that property value AND PEOPLE ARE MURDERED.
Thanks for clarifying that Democrats are terrorists.
BTW - the ship carrying the tea only suffered a broken lock. The next day the lock was replaced by the tea party.
In the BTP, was anyone injured? Was anyone actually subjected to “terror?”Did Dante claim "destroying property without anyone being injured is terrorism?" No he did not. And why focus exclusively on a ship, and not all of it and the not wanting to obey a duly passed law?
next
In the BTP, was anyone injured? Was anyone actually subjected to “terror?”
No?
So much for your thread.
With you? Nope.Physically? No. Financially yes. And?
That would depend on HOW you attack the state.
Is there any hope of a point?
Yes, you did say destroyed property is terrorism.Did Dante claim "destroying property without anyone being injured is terrorism?" No he did not. And why focus exclusively on a ship, and not all of it and the not wanting to obey a duly passed law?
next
to commit seditious conspiracy and destroy private property. The riotous mob trespassed on three ships and destroyed goods worth nearly $2 million in today’s money
It was a quote from an article. I agree with much of the article. I also think the 'party' could be classified as a terrorist act. You must learn how to read and comprehend.Yes, you did say destroyed property is terrorism.
A mere $2M worth too.
It’s your OP.It was a quote from an article. I agree with much of the article. I also think the 'party' could be classified as a terrorist act. You must learn how to read and comprehend.
It’s your OP.
Thanks for clarifying Democrats are terrorists.
But that is wrong right awayA horde of White men disguised themselves as Native Americans — coppering their faces and donning headdresses in the same tradition that would lead to blackfaced minstrel shows decades later — to commit seditious conspiracy and destroy private property. The riotous mob trespassed on three ships and destroyed goods worth nearly $2 million in today’s money — all because they didn’t want to obey a duly passed law.
I love this article, if for nothing else that it speaks truths, while asking serious questions.
Opinion | Was the Boston Tea Party an act of terrorism? It depends.
The Boston Tea Party took on the British 250 years ago. It pitted one American value against another.web.archive.org
Under what conceivable and accurate definition of “terrorism” would dumping physical property in the water be considered a “terrorist act?”It was a quote from an article. I agree with much of the article. I also think the 'party' could be classified as a terrorist act. You must learn how to read and comprehend.
Neither the article, nor Dante has claimed dumping physical property in the water is considered a “terrorist act?”Under what conceivable and accurate definition of “terrorism” would dumping physical property in the water be considered a “terrorist act?”
Notice that The Dainty cannot (and will not even try to) supply a coherent answer to that obvious question.
Actually, you kind of did, the Dainty.Neither the article, nor Dante has claimed dumping physical property in the water is considered a “terrorist act?”
kind of?Actually, you kind of did, the Dainty.
You’re the idiot who had just posted: “I also think the 'party' could be classified as a terrorist act.”
Uh, what is this wacko referring to yourself in the Third Person all about? Is it contagious?Neither the article, nor Dante has claimed dumping physical property in the water is considered a “terrorist act?”
cuckooBut that is wrong right away
There were several such events across the Colonies.
The main anger was against Britain, Governor Hutchinson who insisnted that the ships would not leave until emptied.ZSAALL
ALL WRONG please learn some history, please
View attachment 873618
Did you or did you not write: “I also think the 'party' could be classified as a terrorist act.”kind of?
Okay. Are you kind of pregnant?