🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

The Campaign To Make You Care About Climate Change Is Failing Miserably

Quoth the link:
Since 1989, there’s been no significant change in the public’s concern level over global warming. To put this in perspective, note that the most expensive public-relations campaign in history—one that includes most governmental agencies, a long list of welfare-sucking corporations, the public school system, the universities, an infinite parade of celebrities, think tanks, well-funded environmental groups and an entire major political party—has, over the past 25 years or so, increased the number of Democrats who “worry greatly” about global warming by a mere four percentage points.

The Campaign To Make You Care About Climate Change Is Failing Miserably

We may not be able to alter the natural cycles of the climate but it is wrong headed to tempt fate by hiding under rocks thinking the issue will go away.
That "climatologists" have sold out to secure lucrative government grants and joined the global warming bandwagon has cast a shadow over real science that doesn't depend on skewed speculation about what will happen years, decades even a century from now when, as we all know, weather forecasters often can't accurately predict the local weather much more than a few hours in advance.
And this is with not given the climate cycles

Easy fix. Direct marketing. :)

"Climate Change is bad. Here's why, dying sucks."
 
Real scientists welcome debate, skepticism and rigorous testing of their theories; on the other hand, Doomsday Cults attempt to silence critics by insisting they have "consensus" which is a term with no place in real science

Want to watch OR crumble?

What does your "law" say about the temperature increase from an instantaneous 120ppm increase of CO2 in a closed container
What is the pressure change? The question seems ridiculous on the face of it. I mean the container could have a vacuum. What's 120 ppm of a vacuum?
 
Real scientists welcome debate, skepticism and rigorous testing of their theories; on the other hand, Doomsday Cults attempt to silence critics by insisting they have "consensus" which is a term with no place in real science

Want to watch OR crumble?

What does your "law" say about the temperature increase from an instantaneous 120ppm increase of CO2 in a closed container
What is the pressure change? The question seems ridiculous on the face of it. I mean the container could have a vacuum. What's 120 ppm of a vacuum?

Do you not know the AGWCult theory?
 
As the changes in climate accelerate, and more people are harmed by those changes, a political debt will be payed by those that pandered to willfull ignorance.
Nearly 40% of americans don`t believe in Evolution either. Being ignorant is one thing but the OP thinks it`s a badge of honor. We no longer have a president that foreigners laugh at but they still have us.
Before, we had a president that foreigners laughed at because our press made fun of him. Foreigners never liked us anyway.

Now we have a president foreigners hate and laugh at at the same time. At least Bush was a lovable buffoon. There's nothing lovable about Obama.
 
Quoth the link:
Since 1989, there’s been no significant change in the public’s concern level over global warming. To put this in perspective, note that the most expensive public-relations campaign in history—one that includes most governmental agencies, a long list of welfare-sucking corporations, the public school system, the universities, an infinite parade of celebrities, think tanks, well-funded environmental groups and an entire major political party—has, over the past 25 years or so, increased the number of Democrats who “worry greatly” about global warming by a mere four percentage points.

The Campaign To Make You Care About Climate Change Is Failing Miserably

We may not be able to alter the natural cycles of the climate but it is wrong headed to tempt fate by hiding under rocks thinking the issue will go away.
That "climatologists" have sold out to secure lucrative government grants and joined the global warming bandwagon has cast a shadow over real science that doesn't depend on skewed speculation about what will happen years, decades even a century from now when, as we all know, weather forecasters often can't accurately predict the local weather much more than a few hours in advance.
And this is with not given the climate cycles

Easy fix. Direct marketing. :)

"Climate Change is bad. Here's why, dying sucks."

Climate change is normal. Climate change has made dozens of Democrat politicians rich as fuck....so climate change is good.:)
 
Is this why they skipped earth day. It usually gets big build up, didn't hear anything this time.
Do you mean Earth Hour?
That's it....turn your lights out and feel righteous
"Earth Hour" is meaningless as a direct action to reduce energy consumption as well as power-generating turbines at stations can not be stopped for a small period of time.
Many actions of conservationists disregard the physical laws.
It is impossible to reduce the generation of electricity for such a short time. It still will be produced. Turbines can not be stopped for an hour. Accumulating of energy also impossible. As a result, carbon dioxide will be discarded in the atmosphere anyway, but without any benefits.
 
And no predictions of disaster have come to pass.
What disaster have climate scientists predicted?
New Climate Change Report Warns of Dire Consequences

Climate change It s even worse than we thought - New Scientist


Look I do not deny the climate changes.
I do not deny that the earth is trending slightly warmer
I do not deny that people and the pollution they produce impact the climate

I just don't think it's a harbinger of biblical disaster.

I find it particularly ironic that those who are all trusting the science seem to dismiss nuclear power as an option.

Nukes are the best option for large scale emission free power that we have
 
You have to love the denialists tactics. They find some idiotic goofball making dingbat predictions, then attribute those predictions to real scientists that never said any such thing.

Here is what our leading climate scientist said 34 years ago;


Pubs.GISS Hansen et al. 1981 Climate impact of increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide

Publication Abstracts
Hansen et al. 1981
Hansen, J., D. Johnson, A. Lacis, S. Lebedeff, P. Lee, D. Rind, and G. Russell, 1981: Climate impact of increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide. Science, 213, 957-966, doi:10.1126/science.213.4511.957.

The global temperature rose 0.2°C between the middle 1960s and 1980, yielding a warming of 0.4°C in the past century. This temperature increase is consistent with the calculated effect due to measured increases of atmospheric carbon dioxide. Variations of volcanic aerosols and possibly solar luminosity appear to be primary causes of observed fluctuations about the mean trend of increasing temperature. It is shown that the anthropogenic carbon dioxide warming should emerge from the noise level of natural climate variability by the end of the century, and there is a high probability of warming in the 1980s. Potential effects on climate in the 21st century include the creation of drought-prone regions in North America and central Asia as part of a shifting of climatic zones, erosion of the West Antarctic ice sheet with a consequent worldwide rise in sea level, and opening of the fabled Northwest Passage

Now we are less than 15 years into the 21st century, so, have with seen an increase in droughts in the drought prone areas of North America and central Asia? Have we seen the Northwest Passage open up a couple of times? Have we seen the erosian of the West Anarctica ice sheet, and an accelerating rise in sea level?

Not only all of that, but much more.
 
As the changes in climate accelerate, and more people are harmed by those changes, a political debt will be payed by those that pandered to willfull ignorance.
Nearly 40% of americans don`t believe in Evolution either. Being ignorant is one thing but the OP thinks it`s a badge of honor. We no longer have a president that foreigners laugh at but they still have us.
Before, we had a president that foreigners laughed at because our press made fun of him. Foreigners never liked us anyway.

Now we have a president foreigners hate and laugh at at the same time. At least Bush was a lovable buffoon. There's nothing lovable about Obama.
Bush was a "lovable buffoon? Try murderous buffoon who`s living his life in exile.
The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder Vincent Bugliosi 8601419748136 Amazon.com Books
 
You have to love the denialists tactics. They find some idiotic goofball making dingbat predictions, then attribute those predictions to real scientists that never said any such thing.

Here is what our leading climate scientist said 34 years ago;


Pubs.GISS Hansen et al. 1981 Climate impact of increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide

Publication Abstracts
Hansen et al. 1981
Hansen, J., D. Johnson, A. Lacis, S. Lebedeff, P. Lee, D. Rind, and G. Russell, 1981: Climate impact of increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide. Science, 213, 957-966, doi:10.1126/science.213.4511.957.

The global temperature rose 0.2°C between the middle 1960s and 1980, yielding a warming of 0.4°C in the past century. This temperature increase is consistent with the calculated effect due to measured increases of atmospheric carbon dioxide. Variations of volcanic aerosols and possibly solar luminosity appear to be primary causes of observed fluctuations about the mean trend of increasing temperature. It is shown that the anthropogenic carbon dioxide warming should emerge from the noise level of natural climate variability by the end of the century, and there is a high probability of warming in the 1980s. Potential effects on climate in the 21st century include the creation of drought-prone regions in North America and central Asia as part of a shifting of climatic zones, erosion of the West Antarctic ice sheet with a consequent worldwide rise in sea level, and opening of the fabled Northwest Passage

Now we are less than 15 years into the 21st century, so, have with seen an increase in droughts in the drought prone areas of North America and central Asia? Have we seen the Northwest Passage open up a couple of times? Have we seen the erosian of the West Anarctica ice sheet, and an accelerating rise in sea level?

Not only all of that, but much more.

Face it, dipshit. Climate change isn't about the planet. It's about income concentrations. Socialism run amuck.
 

Forum List

Back
Top