Couchpotato
Platinum Member
- Mar 2, 2021
- 12,347
- 5,852
Not to the extent they once were due to the government taking over that role in large part.They would be paying for it. That's how that works. The "charities" are already involved.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not to the extent they once were due to the government taking over that role in large part.They would be paying for it. That's how that works. The "charities" are already involved.
I think many people consider their taxes as the "charity" they are paying to take care of these issues. Certainly the lefter leaning side of the spectrum trends that direction. People dont get involved because they assume the government is taking care of it.
Yeah, you said that before and I acknowledged it. What else do you want me to do? I also said government had a role, im not sure what else I can say to you.The church can not remove children from a situation of abuse.
Why is it the tax payer's responsibility to take care of Odette's children? Why isn't it her responsibility?Part of the reason that Florida's child protective services is so poor is because of the transient population.
Why is it the tax payer's responsibility to take care of Odette's children? Why isn't it her responsibility?
It's society's responsibility. It isnt The Lord of the Flies out there. That's not to say our welfare system is structured the way it should be but the answer isnt fuck everyone.Why is it the tax payer's responsibility to take care of Odette's children? Why isn't it her responsibility?
What are the odds of a "societal understanding" when everything these days is broken down along party lines?
You recently started a thread about teacher shortages, I could easily start one about the same for nurses. If we cannot get enough people to fill the slots now, where will we find them to fill the needs for orphanages?
"Are there no prisons? Are there no workhouses?"
I think you are crazy. People will not vote to pay more taxes to have mental asylums or orphanages. These people you think will vote for that are the same ones that vote against every tax hike to pay for our current schools.
People wont and shouldnt vote for our politicians to spend more money on anything. We spend plenty already. What they should and might vote for is people who will prioritize our problems and spend the money better. I know that's a pipe dream but outside that happening Im not sure how we fix our problems.I think you are crazy. People will not vote to pay more taxes to have mental asylums or orphanages. These people you think will vote for that are the same ones that vote against every tax hike to pay for our current schools.
The Moon Bats sure as hell don't think that it is their responsibility to protect the lives of children when it comes to killing them for a birth control method, do they?It's society's responsibility. It isnt The Lord of the Flies out there. That's not to say our welfare system is structured the way it should be but the answer isnt fuck everyone.
No one in this thread has mentioned that the whole entire responsibility belongs with the parents. No one else.How we reverse this is the question, and I am not sure it can be. We are just to divided along party lines to help those that need our support the most
We have a very extensive welfare program. Could it be better? Sure, but poor people in the US have cell phones, food, clean water, housing, tv's, cable, internet, etc.Soooo, pro life until born then too bad? Things that make you go hmmmmmm. And yet we do little to promote contraception. This situation is only going to get exponentially worse.
Lol kid you are hilarious. Way to twist things. To bad the only reason you started this thread was to try and make a political statement and not because you actually cared about children.Great, so we have declared that tax payers have no skin the game. So from now on I will argue they just need to shut up.
The Charitable Choice Act under Clinton (we know this as the Faith Based Initiative) which created a partnership. The charities receive most of their funding through tax dollars at the Federal, State and local level and are able to pick and choose who it is that they want to work with. If you are wanting to give your child up for adoption then they are still available. There are faith based foster care agencies, faith based service providers (therapists, etc.) and faith based treatment centers.Not to the extent they once were due to the government taking over that role in large part.
Cash payments for sterilization, and probably contraceptives in the water supply.What is anyone supposed to do?
The caretakers are exhausted and burned out. Nurses. Doctors, Cops, teachers, social workers, etc. The needs are profound and the people willing to go where the needs are diminish seemingly by the day.
This is unsustainable. I don't know where we go from here tbh.
Couldn't cost more than a couple trillion dollars.As I stated previously: the needs are so profound we really need institutions back. Mental hospitals, live in. And also, yes, orphanages. Lots and lots of oversight of course with exceedingly well paid positions. The cost savings in the end will pay for itself. Bring some of these children up in good orphanages will save money in the prison pipelines.
I know it sounds harsh; downright Gothic. But go cruise through some of the neighborhoods these children are apparently being "raised" in.