P F Tinmore
Diamond Member
- Dec 6, 2009
- 78,827
- 4,357
- 1,815
Of course you realize that all Palestinian refugees are Israeli citizens. That means that they have the right to live in their place of residence and to not be stripped of their land.P F Tinmore, et al,
The Arab prevented this themselves.
There is a reasonableness in the actual ability to implement process that were interrupted by the outbreak of hostilities.
(COMMENT)There are many items in Resolution 181.During today's brief meeting, Dr. Eduardo Morgan (Panama) said that this resolution of the Assembly merely "relieves responsibility. The Commission has not been dissolved. In fact the resolution of last November 29 has been implemented."
Can you provide a list of those that have not been implemented. Check out Chapter 3 paragraph 1.
https://unispal.un.org/DPA/DPR/unispal.nsf/0/7F0AF2BD897689B785256C330061D253
You cannot repatriate hostile parties that have pledge war.
The Palestinians in Hostile contact, did not exchange recognition until the Oslo Accords. However, the Palestinians all have stated that Jihad and armed conflict is the only solution. It is as true today as it was in 1948. The right-of-return concept presupposes that the repatriation act does not endanger the stability and internal security of the Jewish state. That is not self evident.
Palestinian citizens residing in sovereignty of Israel, outside the City of Jerusalem, as well as Arabs and Jews who, not holding Palestinian citizenship, reside in Palestine outside the City of Jerusalem shall, upon the recognition of independence Israel, become citizens of the State in which they are resident and enjoy full civil and political rights.
Most Respectfully,
R
BTW, Resolution 181 merely reiterates international law and applies with or without Resolution 181. The durable solution for refugees in Resolution 194 applies.