The Cliven Bundy Fan-Club DEATHWATCH thread

Look, people, start from the beginning. Bundy lost in court, he threatened armed resistance, Feds showed up to enforce the court order, rednecks who don't know shit about the situation drove from everywhere to stand up for the rich criminal, the Feds backed down, rednecks blew each other in celebration, the rich criminal admitted that he's an asshole, rednecks are now going into overdrive trying to make it look like they never supported the rich racist criminal.

Good job, racist gun-toting Republican rednecks. You took up sniper positions behind human shields to defend a rich racist criminal, and now you're trying to justify it to yourselves.

How can any of you people be called 'sane'?
 
No, it didn't. You just lied.

The Times recorded it, exactly word for word as he spoke it on video. WORD. FOR. WORD.


Nice try.

Yeah, out of context and everything.


Wonder what led up to that statement. That would be interesting to know.

Why was he even talking about blacks in the first place. He rarely sees them. Could he have been set up?

Nah.....the media doesn't set up conservatives.....no way Jose.



No.

He made the statements of his own free will. You do understand the concept of free-will, right?

What would a liberal like you know of "free will?"
 
It is great that conservatives are condemning racism! That is what conservatives should always do. What is the problem?

Perhaps liberals should spend more time denouncing racism and less time making race an issue about everything.


There is no problem. This thread is simply a repository... Cons should be GLAD I started it, so then they can prove that their brethren indeed condemned this horrible racism.

Can't wait to hear from the names I listed in posting no. 21!!!

Oh, and I denounce and fight racism at every turn, that is part of why I started this thread.

Like most left wingers, you always look for a high horse to ride, and hope to hell that no none notices that you are what you condemn.

Bundy is entitled to his opinion, and people who do not like his opinion are entitled to condemn that opinion. Is that too difficult for you to understand.

I have to wonder why you believe that conservatives are required to condemn racist statements, while liberal/socialists are not. You haven't condemned the statements, and that means you believe you are holier than thou.

No, there is little doubt that you ride the short bus.
 
Apparently [MENTION=46168]Statistikhengst[/MENTION] believes that turning black cities and communities into death camps (Chicago for instance) is not racist.

Who exactly has benefited from the Welfare State? It's certainly not blacks, and it's certainly not whites, nor any other racial group...but it sure made all blacks and whites a hell of a lot poorer!
 
Of your list, how many openly and ardently supported Bundy? If they have remained mum, why should they go out of their way? Have all democratic leaders denounced Bundy's remarks?

I believe that every single name on that list has supported him this week. I know for sure that Cruz and Perry have. Researching Palin right now.

But should that matter?

They are all Republicans with a national profile, so whether or not they are - or were - "ardent" fans, is moot. If The Rabbi is so right to say that Righties always denounce racism, well, here is his chance to prove it, what?
So this is a personal argument/ thread between you and Rabbi?

Again, why aren't the dems denouncing Bundy for his racist remarks if having no dog in the fight means you have to comment on every event?

BTW, O'Reilly just denounced Bundy.
 
It is great that conservatives are condemning racism! That is what conservatives should always do. What is the problem?

Perhaps liberals should spend more time denouncing racism and less time making race an issue about everything.


There is no problem. This thread is simply a repository... Cons should be GLAD I started it, so then they can prove that their brethren indeed condemned this horrible racism.

Can't wait to hear from the names I listed in posting no. 21!!!

Oh, and I denounce and fight racism at every turn, that is part of why I started this thread.

Like most left wingers, you always look for a high horse to ride, and hope to hell that no none notices that you are what you condemn.

Bundy is entitled to his opinion, and people who do not like his opinion are entitled to condemn that opinion. Is that too difficult for you to understand.

I have to wonder why you believe that conservatives are required to condemn racist statements, while liberal/socialists are not. You haven't condemned the statements, and that means you believe you are holier than thou.

No, there is little doubt that you ride the short bus.


Why sure, buddy, that is EXACTLY what I am doing.

And if you don't like it, then tough fuck for you.


I never said that Righties had to condemn him. If they don't and want to out themselves for the disgusting racists they may be, well, hell, that's their right. This thread is simply a repository. You do understand that simple idea, right?

:lol:
 
Of your list, how many openly and ardently supported Bundy? If they have remained mum, why should they go out of their way? Have all democratic leaders denounced Bundy's remarks?

I believe that every single name on that list has supported him this week. I know for sure that Cruz and Perry have. Researching Palin right now.

But should that matter?

They are all Republicans with a national profile, so whether or not they are - or were - "ardent" fans, is moot. If The Rabbi is so right to say that Righties always denounce racism, well, here is his chance to prove it, what?
So this is a personal argument/ thread between you and Rabbi?

Again, why aren't the dems denouncing Bundy for his racist remarks if having no dog in the fight means you have to comment on every event?

BTW, O'Reilly just denounced Bundy.

The bolded: Thanks for the information, that's exactly what this thread is for.

Oh, and it is pretty obvious that Dems are condemning him, what? Weak sauce, dude, weak sauce?

Oh, and Rabbi who?

:lol:
 
Apparently [MENTION=46168]Statistikhengst[/MENTION] believes that turning black cities and communities into death camps (Chicago for instance) is not racist.

Who exactly has benefited from the Welfare State? It's certainly not blacks, and it's certainly not whites, nor any other racial group...but it sure made all blacks and whites a hell of a lot poorer!


Nice attempt at deflection. No donut for you. Pay attention, if you can.
 
Apparently [MENTION=46168]Statistikhengst[/MENTION] believes that turning black cities and communities into death camps (Chicago for instance) is not racist.

Who exactly has benefited from the Welfare State? It's certainly not blacks, and it's certainly not whites, nor any other racial group...but it sure made all blacks and whites a hell of a lot poorer!


Nice attempt at deflection. No donut for you. Pay attention, if you can.

Deflect? BUndy's "racist" comments were about the Welfare state, or did you not even listen/read what he said?
 
Lol oh now dis guy's mad :laugh:

:lol:


Is that the same TK who just advocated for slavery on another thread?

Why yes, I think it's the same TK!!!!

Uh sure. I don't advocate slavery. Since when is making an analogy "advocating" for anything?


Why, sure you do, buddy. Here are your very own words:


It's better to be owned as property and have a purpose, than to be free unowned and without a purpose. Think about it.

No use trying to lie now. You wrote that.

That is ADVOCATING for slavery, just as I indicated.
 
Apparently [MENTION=46168]Statistikhengst[/MENTION] believes that turning black cities and communities into death camps (Chicago for instance) is not racist.

Who exactly has benefited from the Welfare State? It's certainly not blacks, and it's certainly not whites, nor any other racial group...but it sure made all blacks and whites a hell of a lot poorer!


Nice attempt at deflection. No donut for you. Pay attention, if you can.

Deflect? BUndy's "racist" comments were about the Welfare state, or did you not even listen/read what he said?


No.

His statments were about "the Negro".

Nice try. No donut for you.
 
Actually, this thread is just supposed to be the repository of Cons who denounce Cliven Bundy, cuz many more are sure to follow.

The only con I know of you came out strongly for Cliven Bundy today was Dana Loesch, on her radio show.

ummm..people can be racist if they choose to be. one doesn't have anything to do with the other. and this thread is idiotic....You cant force people to think the way you'd like them to think. orry...Disappointing thread indeed:cuckoo:
 
Actually, this thread is just supposed to be the repository of Cons who denounce Cliven Bundy, cuz many more are sure to follow.

The only con I know of you came out strongly for Cliven Bundy today was Dana Loesch, on her radio show.

I see. Hopefully some dems will see this thread and begin to realize conservatism does not equal racism.


No Liberal has ever said it did....I know many libs like myself that are very conservative financially.....but it's nice to hear a few denounce Bundy....especially the ones that were defending him just a while ago....:eusa_whistle:
 
Apparently [MENTION=46168]Statistikhengst[/MENTION] believes that turning black cities and communities into death camps (Chicago for instance) is not racist.

Who exactly has benefited from the Welfare State? It's certainly not blacks, and it's certainly not whites, nor any other racial group...but it sure made all blacks and whites a hell of a lot poorer!


Nice attempt at deflection. No donut for you. Pay attention, if you can.

Deflect? BUndy's "racist" comments were about the Welfare state, or did you not even listen/read what he said?

So you don't think those conservatives should have denounced Bundy. Did these conservatives not look at the entire comments made by Bundy? Hell, Megyn Kelly just denounced Bundy for a speech he gave today.
 

Forum List

Back
Top