The Definitive Critical Race Theory Thread

The definitive reality check:
Yep… seems like elementary kids would eat this in-doctro-nashun shit up and straight turn commie. :uhoh3:
It sure isn't education. It's race hustling and deliberately trying to establish hateful divisions. It's sick and evil.


View attachment 506045
A stupid cartoon for the willfully ignorant. Here, deal with this: The Right Has Chosen Critical Race Theory as Its New Boogeyman to Scare Voters




Everything in every one of my posts is 100% true, accurate and correct.


Here's more proof of the racism you vote for:


you voted for this:


"Kristen Clarke, Joe Biden’s choice to lead the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division, believes black people are superior to white people because they possess more melanin.

Fox News host Tucker Carlson obtained shocking statements Clarke made in 1994.

“Melanin endows blacks with greater mental, physical, and spiritual abilities — something which cannot be measured by Eurocentric standards.” Kristen Clarke wrote."
thespectator.info





“Melanin Endows Blacks with Greater Mental, Physical and Spiritual Abilities” (VIDEO)
Kristen Clarke, Joe Biden’s choice to lead the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division, believes black people are superior to white people because they possess more melanin. Fox News host Tucker Carlson obtained shocking statements Clarke made in 1994. “Melanin endows blacks with greater ment ...
thespectator.info




thespectator.info




Soooo..... are you a fool or a liar????
tucker Carlson? That highly paid useful idiot?!!? :auiqs.jpg:

My goodness, you're bucking for 4th rate propagandist status now?

Here, for your education (or in your case, for your willful ignorance list):


and as they say, the devil is in the details:


The rational, objective reader will actually read each article thoroughly, and thus see your folly.

"tucker Carlson? That highly paid useful idiot?!!?"


I've noticed that when your sort can't deny the facts, you besmirch the source.


Is that from page one of the Democrat Racist Rule Book???
Yes, he is....as the the subsequent links I provided proved. Obviously you didn't read them.....typical willful ignorance of a Cheeto Jeezus acolyte.

It's like this sweetpea, when you make a claim, people will do research to see if that claim holds any water....they do so with a little thing called fact checking. The links I provided PROVE that Carlson is either a liar or too damned stupid to check his facts or both. This is his forte that he co-joins with his opinion. That makes him a useful idiot for the Cheeto Jeezus religion that has usurp the GOP. Carry on.


"...a Cheeto Jeezus acolyte."



The only folks who actually called their candidate god, Jesus and the messiah, are the Democrats.


Do you vote Democrat????
Mmm, not quite. That nonsense got started when in one of his speeches to the NOI rallies, Farrakhan EQUATED Obama with the "messiah". From them on, you had media wonks on both sides of the political aisle peppering their coverage of Obama with that word. Mind you, it was in effect a back handed attempt (promoted by the right wing media) to alienate any non-black voters from voting for him, and to paint black voters as dummies just following religious dogma and racial bias in voting en masse for a black candidate (IMHO, of course). But the people paid no attention to such silliness, and TWICE voted on the issues. Remember, the GOP gained control of both Houses because a large portion of voters withheld their congressional votes in protest over what they saw as Obama being too conciliatory to the GOP. They, and Obama, learned a hard lesson.

Oh, and FYI; the first time I heard the term "Cheeto Jeezus" was on a TV talk show called "The View"...it was uttered by Meaghan McCain, daughter of the late Sen. John McCain. She said it to point to the near fanatical religious approach that Trump supporters in Congress, the Media and the general public display even when Trump is caught flat footed lying.

And for the record, I'm a registered Independent. Hope this clears things up for you. Carry on.



And yet again I 'll ram the lie back down your throat.



Your side did, and you voted in support of same.

You bought it like it was on sale.


  1. The Hollywood celebrities pledge Go to 3:54:"I pledge to be a servant to our president and all mankind." Creepy?

    Demi Moore and Ashton Kutcher's I Pledge Video - YouTube


    2. Time's Nancy Gibbs who opened this week's cover story bycomparing Obama with Jesus:“Some princes are born in palaces. Some are born in mangers. But a few are born in the imagination, out of scraps of history and hope...” In the November 17 issue.

    3. Chris Matthews: "If you're in [a room] with Obama,you feel the spirit moving."Book Monitor (Current Edition)

    4. “Obama seemedthe political equivalent of a rainbow — a sudden preternatural event inspiring awe and ecstasy....” Time’s Joe Klein, October 23, 2006 cover story, "Why Barack Obama Could Be the Next President."



    5. NBC’s Matt Lauer noted that “people” have called Obama “ ‘The Savior,’ ‘The Messiah,’ ‘The Messenger of Change,’“ Today Show, NBC, October 20, 2008.

    6. The New York Time’s Judith Warner reported, “Many women- not too surprisingly – were dreaming about sex with the president [Obama]”.http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com...t-a-president/
    “…the Obamas are not just a beacon of hope, inspiration and“demigodlikeness,”Ibid.


    7. David Cordero, 24, made the sculpture for his senior show after noticing all the attention Obama has received: "All of this is a response to what I've been witnessing and hearing, this idea that Barack is sort ofa potential saviorthat might come and absolve the country of all its sins," Cordero said.Sculpture of Obama as Jesuscauses stir - politics - Decision '08 - Barack Obama News - msnbc.com

    8. . In its November 22, 2010 issue, Obama has been shown by Newsweek on its cover page with multiple arms balancing several policy issues while raising his left leg mimickingthe cosmic dance of the Hindu deity; considered a manifestation of Lord Shiva.
    ... Newsweek has named Obama "god of all things" on its cover.
    SOURCE: Times of India (November 20, 2010).


    9. “I haven’t seen a politician get this kind ofwalk-on-watercoverage since Colin Powell a dozen years ago flirted with making a run for the White House,” said Washington Post media critic Howard Kurtz on Meet the Press in February 2007

    10. Samantha Fennell, formerly an associate publisher of Elle, wrote on the magazine’s website a month later: “When I attended my second “Obama Live” fund-raiser last week at New York City’s Grand Hyatt, . . . I was on my feet as Senator Obama entered the room. Fate had blessed me in this moment. . . . In a moment of divine intervention,he saw me,…”

    11.Filmmaker Spike Lee, predicting an Obama victory, implicitly compared the candidate with Christ: “You’ll have to measure time by ‘Before Obama’ and ‘After Obama.’ . . .


    12. Jesse Jackson, Jr. called Obama’s securing the Democratic nomination “so extraordinary thatanother chapter could be added to the Bibleto chronicle its significance.”


    13. . Louis Farrakhan went one better, according to the website WorldNetDaily: “Barack has captured the youth. . . . That’s a sign.When the Messiah speaks,the youth will hear, andthe Messiah is absolutely speaking.


    14. His followers needed to re-elect him to a second term, so that he could continue to accomplish the promises he made, thus, realizing his vision of America as a more perfect political union or“heaven here on earth.”
    The Gospel According to Apostle Barack, by Barbara A. Thompson.

    15. "Does it not feel as ifsome special hand is guiding Obama on his journey, I mean, as he has said, the utter improbability of it all?"
    -- Daily Kos


    16"Obama's finest speeches do not excite. They do not inform. They don't even really inspire. They elevate. . . .He is not the Word made flesh, but the triumph of word over flesh . .. Obama is, at his best, able to call us back to our highest selves."
    - Ezra Klein

    17. "Obama has the capacity to summon heroic forces from the spiritual depths of ordinary citizens and to unleash therefrom a symphonic chorus of unique creative acts whose common purpose is to tame the soul and alleviate the great challenges facing mankind."
    -- Gerald Campbell

    18."We're here to evolve to a higher plane . . . he is an evolved leader . . . [he] has an ear for eloquence and a Tongue dipped in the Unvarnished Truth."
    -- Oprah Winfrey

    19. “I would characterize the Senate race as being a race where Obama was, let’s say, blessed and highly favored. That’s not routine. There’s something else going on. I think that Obama, his election to the Senate, was divinely ordered. . . . I know that that was God’s plan."
    -- Bill Rush



    20. "This is bigger than Kennedy. . . .This is the New Testament."| "I felt this thrill going up my leg. I mean, I don't have that too often. No, seriously. It's a dramatic event."
    -- Chris Matthews






Newsweek editor Evan Thomas said President Obama is "sort of God" in a way that's "standing above the country." Transcript below.




"CHRIS MATTHEWS (HOST):Evan Thomas is editor at large for Newsweek magazine. Evan, you remember 1984. It wasn't 100 years ago. Reagan and World War II and the sense of us as the good guys in the world, how are we doing?
EVAN THOMAS: Well, we were the good guys in 1984, it felt that way. It hasn't felt that way in recent years. So Obama's had, really, a different task We're seen too often as the bad guys. And he, he has a very different job from ... Reagan was all about America, and you talked about it. Obama is - we are above that now. We're not just parochial, we're not just chauvinistic, we're not just provincial. We stand for something, I mean in a way Obama's standing above the country, above above the world, he's sort of God."

Newsweek Editor Evan Thomas: Obama Is "Sort Of God" | RealClearPolitics



“Barbara Walters admits ‘we’ thought Obama was ‘the next messiah’”
Barbara Walters admits ‘we’ thought Obama was ‘the next messiah’




1608411396466.png









You're the human Piñata.....

View attachment 507451
You're not too bright, are ya sweetpea?

You seem to think that these canned responses somehow disprove my previous assessment of Tucker Carlson.

Hint: they don't.

As for the regurgitation of this "messiah" bilge the right wing STILL carries on about after getting their butts whupped by Obama in two elections (popular and electoral vote, don't cha know): you (once again) inadvertently prove my point. All these quasi-religious references to Obama's speeches from pundits, politicos and news promoters came on the heels of Farrakhan's decree to his followers. Just as I said . But the smart voters, (All Americans of all races, creeds and colors) weren't buying it. Interesting, n-cest pas'?

And of course, you omit this tidbit from your cache of cliches':


A 3rd rate propagandist such as yourself will just deny the conclusive logic, and continue to parrot your myopic mantra ad nausea. I expect nothing less from you at this point. Carry on.



‘I won’t be pathologized for being White’: Man resigns, shreds school district over ‘white privilege’ training

An after-school coordinator at a New Hampshire elementary school has gone viral for resigning over the school’s embrace of anti-white critical race theory propaganda.

In a public resignation letter released Monday on Twitter, former Northwest Elementary after-school program coordinator Daniel Concannon, 40, accused his school district of having endorsed the “dehumanization and hatred of White people, as evidenced by their dissemination of the imbecilic ‘White Privilege’ curriculum.”

In the letter, he purposefully referred to the Manchester School District as “The Frankfurt School.” It was a reference to the school responsible for creating contemporary Marxism, which is believed to be at the root of CRT."
translation: another clown who can't deal with FACTS that point to the congenital racism in the American fabric....much less that skin color greatly increases your chances of beneficial treatment and opportunities. No one is asking the fool to apologize, as individually no one gives a damn about him.

My assessment of Tucker Carlson is valid and documented....your "messiah" dodge was aptly deconstructed with FACTS....pity you don't have the cojones to just concede a point, and will just throw anything against the wall repeatedly, hoping it sticks....but I expect nothing less from 3rd rate David Duke wanna be's. Carry on.
You're a Weak Pathetic Pathological liar .



......and by that token......an excellent Democrat.
FYI: I put that useless clown on IA, as he clearly has no rational or logical refutation or retort when faced with basic logic and critical analysis.

You seem to add to that proud stupidity. Not surprising....carry on.



You can run, but you can't hide.
So saith the Brown Bomber.
And as you and the cretin you defend prove time and again, "stupid is as stupid does". Carry on, my little Davey Duke wanna be.



Once again, it appears that my role is to disabuse you of the lies your party and government school instituted.


David Duke was a Democrat, and believed as you do.


David Duke....the Democrat????

State Senator, 1975 (Baton Rouge Area)[edit]
Threshold > 50%

First Ballot, November 1, 1975

Louisiana State Senate, 1975
Party Candidate Votes %
Democratic Kenneth Osterberger 22,287 66
Democratic David Duke 11,079 33
N/A Others 1
Total 100
State Senator, 10th District, 1979 (Suburban New Orleans)[edit]
Threshold > 50% First Ballot, October 27, 1979

Louisiana State Senate, 10th District, 1979
Party Candidate Votes %
Democratic Joseph Tiemann 21,329 57
Democratic David Duke 9,897 26
N/A Others 6,459 17
Total 37,685 100
Democratic Nomination for United States Presidential Candidate, 1988 (Louisiana results)[edit]
Threshold = Plurality

1988 Democratic Presidential primary in Louisiana
Party Candidate Votes %
Democratic Jesse Jackson 221,522 35
Democratic Al Gore 174,971 28
Democratic Michael Dukakis 95,661 15
Democratic Dick Gephardt 67,029 11
Democratic Gary Hart 26,437 4
Democratic David Duke 23,391 4
Democratic Others 16,008 3
Total 625,019 100
Electoral history of David Duke - Wikipedia





Duke left the KKK long before he became a Republican....



"In 1979, after his first, abortive run for president (as a Democrat) and a series of highly publicized violent Klan incidents, Duke quietly incorporated the nonprofit National Association for the Advancement of White People (NAAWP) in an attempt to leave the baggage of the Klan behind."










The Democrats have always been associated with racism. The Democrat icon Franklin Roosevelt, in fact, made a KKKer his very first pick for the Supreme Court:

. "... [Hugo] Black was head of new members for the largest Klan cell in the South. New members of the KKK had to pledge their allegiance to the “eternal separation of Church and State.”... Separation was a crucial part of the KKK’s jurisprudential agenda. It was included in the Klansman’s Creed..."
http://egnorance.blogspot.com/2011/10/hugo-black-and-real-history-of-wall-of.html]
You must be a new type of stupid if you think you're going to somehow blame Duke's racism and bigotry on the Democratic Party and get away with it.

For your education:


And spare us your attempt to soft soap Duke, who NEVER disavowed his core racist beliefs no matter what party he chose in a state bitterly contentious of its congenital racism:



Duke was successful to a degree despite his painfully obvious bigotry and racism. YOU aren't even a cheap knock-off....just a wanna be with delusions of grandeur. Carry on, sweetpea. It's a guilty pleasure making a fool of you while you tell the mirror the opposite.



1. The Southern Strategy is a debunked conspiracy theory. Only lying assholes still push it.

2. Trump denounced Duke repeatedly. YOu people are lying assholes.

3. Duke ran for the Presidency. His utter crushing defeat showed the real power of w.s. ie none. Dumbasses.
1. Denied and revised by right wing/alt right wonks, but NEVER historically and factually "debunked"...take note:

Exclusive: Lee Atwater’s Infamous 1981 Interview on the Southern Strategy


2. Not quite....note the flip flop: Trump's David Duke Amnesia - FactCheck.org

3. President is a national contest.....state and local is quite another thing....take note:



seems when you use terms like "lying assholes" and "dumbasses", you were probably looking in the mirror at the time.
 
TheDefiantOne
The definitive reality check:
Yep… seems like elementary kids would eat this in-doctro-nashun shit up and straight turn commie. :uhoh3:
It sure isn't education. It's race hustling and deliberately trying to establish hateful divisions. It's sick and evil.


View attachment 506045
A stupid cartoon for the willfully ignorant. Here, deal with this: The Right Has Chosen Critical Race Theory as Its New Boogeyman to Scare Voters




Everything in every one of my posts is 100% true, accurate and correct.


Here's more proof of the racism you vote for:


you voted for this:


"Kristen Clarke, Joe Biden’s choice to lead the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division, believes black people are superior to white people because they possess more melanin.

Fox News host Tucker Carlson obtained shocking statements Clarke made in 1994.

“Melanin endows blacks with greater mental, physical, and spiritual abilities — something which cannot be measured by Eurocentric standards.” Kristen Clarke wrote."
thespectator.info





“Melanin Endows Blacks with Greater Mental, Physical and Spiritual Abilities” (VIDEO)
Kristen Clarke, Joe Biden’s choice to lead the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division, believes black people are superior to white people because they possess more melanin. Fox News host Tucker Carlson obtained shocking statements Clarke made in 1994. “Melanin endows blacks with greater ment ...
thespectator.info




thespectator.info




Soooo..... are you a fool or a liar????
tucker Carlson? That highly paid useful idiot?!!? :auiqs.jpg:

My goodness, you're bucking for 4th rate propagandist status now?

Here, for your education (or in your case, for your willful ignorance list):


and as they say, the devil is in the details:


The rational, objective reader will actually read each article thoroughly, and thus see your folly.

"tucker Carlson? That highly paid useful idiot?!!?"


I've noticed that when your sort can't deny the facts, you besmirch the source.


Is that from page one of the Democrat Racist Rule Book???
Yes, he is....as the the subsequent links I provided proved. Obviously you didn't read them.....typical willful ignorance of a Cheeto Jeezus acolyte.

It's like this sweetpea, when you make a claim, people will do research to see if that claim holds any water....they do so with a little thing called fact checking. The links I provided PROVE that Carlson is either a liar or too damned stupid to check his facts or both. This is his forte that he co-joins with his opinion. That makes him a useful idiot for the Cheeto Jeezus religion that has usurp the GOP. Carry on.


"...a Cheeto Jeezus acolyte."



The only folks who actually called their candidate god, Jesus and the messiah, are the Democrats.


Do you vote Democrat????
Mmm, not quite. That nonsense got started when in one of his speeches to the NOI rallies, Farrakhan EQUATED Obama with the "messiah". From them on, you had media wonks on both sides of the political aisle peppering their coverage of Obama with that word. Mind you, it was in effect a back handed attempt (promoted by the right wing media) to alienate any non-black voters from voting for him, and to paint black voters as dummies just following religious dogma and racial bias in voting en masse for a black candidate (IMHO, of course). But the people paid no attention to such silliness, and TWICE voted on the issues. Remember, the GOP gained control of both Houses because a large portion of voters withheld their congressional votes in protest over what they saw as Obama being too conciliatory to the GOP. They, and Obama, learned a hard lesson.

Oh, and FYI; the first time I heard the term "Cheeto Jeezus" was on a TV talk show called "The View"...it was uttered by Meaghan McCain, daughter of the late Sen. John McCain. She said it to point to the near fanatical religious approach that Trump supporters in Congress, the Media and the general public display even when Trump is caught flat footed lying.

And for the record, I'm a registered Independent. Hope this clears things up for you. Carry on.



And yet again I 'll ram the lie back down your throat.



Your side did, and you voted in support of same.

You bought it like it was on sale.


  1. The Hollywood celebrities pledge Go to 3:54:"I pledge to be a servant to our president and all mankind." Creepy?

    Demi Moore and Ashton Kutcher's I Pledge Video - YouTube


    2. Time's Nancy Gibbs who opened this week's cover story bycomparing Obama with Jesus:“Some princes are born in palaces. Some are born in mangers. But a few are born in the imagination, out of scraps of history and hope...” In the November 17 issue.

    3. Chris Matthews: "If you're in [a room] with Obama,you feel the spirit moving."Book Monitor (Current Edition)

    4. “Obama seemedthe political equivalent of a rainbow — a sudden preternatural event inspiring awe and ecstasy....” Time’s Joe Klein, October 23, 2006 cover story, "Why Barack Obama Could Be the Next President."



    5. NBC’s Matt Lauer noted that “people” have called Obama “ ‘The Savior,’ ‘The Messiah,’ ‘The Messenger of Change,’“ Today Show, NBC, October 20, 2008.

    6. The New York Time’s Judith Warner reported, “Many women- not too surprisingly – were dreaming about sex with the president [Obama]”.http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com...t-a-president/
    “…the Obamas are not just a beacon of hope, inspiration and“demigodlikeness,”Ibid.


    7. David Cordero, 24, made the sculpture for his senior show after noticing all the attention Obama has received: "All of this is a response to what I've been witnessing and hearing, this idea that Barack is sort ofa potential saviorthat might come and absolve the country of all its sins," Cordero said.Sculpture of Obama as Jesuscauses stir - politics - Decision '08 - Barack Obama News - msnbc.com

    8. . In its November 22, 2010 issue, Obama has been shown by Newsweek on its cover page with multiple arms balancing several policy issues while raising his left leg mimickingthe cosmic dance of the Hindu deity; considered a manifestation of Lord Shiva.
    ... Newsweek has named Obama "god of all things" on its cover.
    SOURCE: Times of India (November 20, 2010).


    9. “I haven’t seen a politician get this kind ofwalk-on-watercoverage since Colin Powell a dozen years ago flirted with making a run for the White House,” said Washington Post media critic Howard Kurtz on Meet the Press in February 2007

    10. Samantha Fennell, formerly an associate publisher of Elle, wrote on the magazine’s website a month later: “When I attended my second “Obama Live” fund-raiser last week at New York City’s Grand Hyatt, . . . I was on my feet as Senator Obama entered the room. Fate had blessed me in this moment. . . . In a moment of divine intervention,he saw me,…”

    11.Filmmaker Spike Lee, predicting an Obama victory, implicitly compared the candidate with Christ: “You’ll have to measure time by ‘Before Obama’ and ‘After Obama.’ . . .


    12. Jesse Jackson, Jr. called Obama’s securing the Democratic nomination “so extraordinary thatanother chapter could be added to the Bibleto chronicle its significance.”


    13. . Louis Farrakhan went one better, according to the website WorldNetDaily: “Barack has captured the youth. . . . That’s a sign.When the Messiah speaks,the youth will hear, andthe Messiah is absolutely speaking.


    14. His followers needed to re-elect him to a second term, so that he could continue to accomplish the promises he made, thus, realizing his vision of America as a more perfect political union or“heaven here on earth.”
    The Gospel According to Apostle Barack, by Barbara A. Thompson.

    15. "Does it not feel as ifsome special hand is guiding Obama on his journey, I mean, as he has said, the utter improbability of it all?"
    -- Daily Kos


    16"Obama's finest speeches do not excite. They do not inform. They don't even really inspire. They elevate. . . .He is not the Word made flesh, but the triumph of word over flesh . .. Obama is, at his best, able to call us back to our highest selves."
    - Ezra Klein

    17. "Obama has the capacity to summon heroic forces from the spiritual depths of ordinary citizens and to unleash therefrom a symphonic chorus of unique creative acts whose common purpose is to tame the soul and alleviate the great challenges facing mankind."
    -- Gerald Campbell

    18."We're here to evolve to a higher plane . . . he is an evolved leader . . . [he] has an ear for eloquence and a Tongue dipped in the Unvarnished Truth."
    -- Oprah Winfrey

    19. “I would characterize the Senate race as being a race where Obama was, let’s say, blessed and highly favored. That’s not routine. There’s something else going on. I think that Obama, his election to the Senate, was divinely ordered. . . . I know that that was God’s plan."
    -- Bill Rush



    20. "This is bigger than Kennedy. . . .This is the New Testament."| "I felt this thrill going up my leg. I mean, I don't have that too often. No, seriously. It's a dramatic event."
    -- Chris Matthews






Newsweek editor Evan Thomas said President Obama is "sort of God" in a way that's "standing above the country." Transcript below.




"CHRIS MATTHEWS (HOST):Evan Thomas is editor at large for Newsweek magazine. Evan, you remember 1984. It wasn't 100 years ago. Reagan and World War II and the sense of us as the good guys in the world, how are we doing?
EVAN THOMAS: Well, we were the good guys in 1984, it felt that way. It hasn't felt that way in recent years. So Obama's had, really, a different task We're seen too often as the bad guys. And he, he has a very different job from ... Reagan was all about America, and you talked about it. Obama is - we are above that now. We're not just parochial, we're not just chauvinistic, we're not just provincial. We stand for something, I mean in a way Obama's standing above the country, above above the world, he's sort of God."

Newsweek Editor Evan Thomas: Obama Is "Sort Of God" | RealClearPolitics



“Barbara Walters admits ‘we’ thought Obama was ‘the next messiah’”
Barbara Walters admits ‘we’ thought Obama was ‘the next messiah’




1608411396466.png









You're the human Piñata.....

View attachment 507451
You're not too bright, are ya sweetpea?

You seem to think that these canned responses somehow disprove my previous assessment of Tucker Carlson.

Hint: they don't.

As for the regurgitation of this "messiah" bilge the right wing STILL carries on about after getting their butts whupped by Obama in two elections (popular and electoral vote, don't cha know): you (once again) inadvertently prove my point. All these quasi-religious references to Obama's speeches from pundits, politicos and news promoters came on the heels of Farrakhan's decree to his followers. Just as I said . But the smart voters, (All Americans of all races, creeds and colors) weren't buying it. Interesting, n-cest pas'?

And of course, you omit this tidbit from your cache of cliches':


A 3rd rate propagandist such as yourself will just deny the conclusive logic, and continue to parrot your myopic mantra ad nausea. I expect nothing less from you at this point. Carry on.



‘I won’t be pathologized for being White’: Man resigns, shreds school district over ‘white privilege’ training

An after-school coordinator at a New Hampshire elementary school has gone viral for resigning over the school’s embrace of anti-white critical race theory propaganda.

In a public resignation letter released Monday on Twitter, former Northwest Elementary after-school program coordinator Daniel Concannon, 40, accused his school district of having endorsed the “dehumanization and hatred of White people, as evidenced by their dissemination of the imbecilic ‘White Privilege’ curriculum.”

In the letter, he purposefully referred to the Manchester School District as “The Frankfurt School.” It was a reference to the school responsible for creating contemporary Marxism, which is believed to be at the root of CRT."
translation: another clown who can't deal with FACTS that point to the congenital racism in the American fabric....much less that skin color greatly increases your chances of beneficial treatment and opportunities. No one is asking the fool to apologize, as individually no one gives a damn about him.

My assessment of Tucker Carlson is valid and documented....your "messiah" dodge was aptly deconstructed with FACTS....pity you don't have the cojones to just concede a point, and will just throw anything against the wall repeatedly, hoping it sticks....but I expect nothing less from 3rd rate David Duke wanna be's. Carry on.
You're a Weak Pathetic Pathological liar .



......and by that token......an excellent Democrat.
FYI: I put that useless clown on IA, as he clearly has no rational or logical refutation or retort when faced with basic logic and critical analysis.

You seem to add to that proud stupidity. Not surprising....carry on.



You can run, but you can't hide.
So saith the Brown Bomber.
And as you and the cretin you defend prove time and again, "stupid is as stupid does". Carry on, my little Davey Duke wanna be.



Once again, it appears that my role is to disabuse you of the lies your party and government school instituted.


David Duke was a Democrat, and believed as you do.


David Duke....the Democrat????

State Senator, 1975 (Baton Rouge Area)[edit]
Threshold > 50%

First Ballot, November 1, 1975

Louisiana State Senate, 1975
Party Candidate Votes %
Democratic Kenneth Osterberger 22,287 66
Democratic David Duke 11,079 33
N/A Others 1
Total 100
State Senator, 10th District, 1979 (Suburban New Orleans)[edit]
Threshold > 50% First Ballot, October 27, 1979

Louisiana State Senate, 10th District, 1979
Party Candidate Votes %
Democratic Joseph Tiemann 21,329 57
Democratic David Duke 9,897 26
N/A Others 6,459 17
Total 37,685 100
Democratic Nomination for United States Presidential Candidate, 1988 (Louisiana results)[edit]
Threshold = Plurality

1988 Democratic Presidential primary in Louisiana
Party Candidate Votes %
Democratic Jesse Jackson 221,522 35
Democratic Al Gore 174,971 28
Democratic Michael Dukakis 95,661 15
Democratic Dick Gephardt 67,029 11
Democratic Gary Hart 26,437 4
Democratic David Duke 23,391 4
Democratic Others 16,008 3
Total 625,019 100
Electoral history of David Duke - Wikipedia





Duke left the KKK long before he became a Republican....



"In 1979, after his first, abortive run for president (as a Democrat) and a series of highly publicized violent Klan incidents, Duke quietly incorporated the nonprofit National Association for the Advancement of White People (NAAWP) in an attempt to leave the baggage of the Klan behind."










The Democrats have always been associated with racism. The Democrat icon Franklin Roosevelt, in fact, made a KKKer his very first pick for the Supreme Court:

. "... [Hugo] Black was head of new members for the largest Klan cell in the South. New members of the KKK had to pledge their allegiance to the “eternal separation of Church and State.”... Separation was a crucial part of the KKK’s jurisprudential agenda. It was included in the Klansman’s Creed..."
http://egnorance.blogspot.com/2011/10/hugo-black-and-real-history-of-wall-of.html]
You must be a new type of stupid if you think you're going to somehow blame Duke's racism and bigotry on the Democratic Party and get away with it.

For your education:


And spare us your attempt to soft soap Duke, who NEVER disavowed his core racist beliefs no matter what party he chose in a state bitterly contentious of its congenital racism:



Duke was successful to a degree despite his painfully obvious bigotry and racism. YOU aren't even a cheap knock-off....just a wanna be with delusions of grandeur. Carry on, sweetpea. It's a guilty pleasure making a fool of you while you tell the mirror the opposite.





David Duke was a Democrat his entire racist career.

When he eschewed his earlier racism, he became a Republican.

You're just too stupid to realize you vote racist.



Duke left the KKK long before he became a Republican....



"In 1979, after his first, abortive run for president (as a Democrat) and a series of highly publicized violent Klan incidents, Duke quietly incorporated the nonprofit National Association for the Advancement of White People (NAAWP) in an attempt to leave the baggage of the Klan behind."










1. I was totally accurate in showing David Duke to be, in both his formative years, when he learned to be a racist, and in his political career....A DEMOCRAT.



2. As you have been trained to toss the word 'racist' at anyone who disagrees with Liberal propaganda, let's remember that the most frequent visitor to Obama, in the White House was racist Al Sharpton.



3. The Democrats have always been associated with racism. The Democrat icon Franklin Roosevelt, in fact, made a KKKer his very first pick for the Supreme Court:

. "... [Hugo] Black was head of new members for the largest Klan cell in the South. New members of the KKK had to pledge their allegiance to the “eternal separation of Church and State.”... Separation was a crucial part of the KKK’s jurisprudential agenda. It was included in the Klansman’s Creed..."
http://egnorance.blogspot.com/2011/10/hugo-black-and-real-history-of-wall-of.html]












In this race to fill a vacant seat, he is running for the first time as a Republican. The Republican Party, which is trying nationally to draw more black support, is mounting efforts to defeat him that are rare for an obscure state representative's race. The party has two candidates because state election laws allow an open primary whose top two finishers, regardless of party, are in a runoff. Klan's Ghost Haunts Louisiana Vote (Published 1989)





What factors led to 39% of the voters being willing to support a former KKK leader for governor?

"Louisiana used to have an open primary. Basically, any candidate would run, even multiple from the same party, and if one person secured 50% of the vote, they won. If not, the top two would go on to a run-off. This means that there were multiple Republicans and multiple Democrats in the first round of elections, making party loyalty less important and the ability to organize and round up supporters more important, and Duke did a good job of that. In the run-off election, he faced Edwin Edwards. Edwards had already served multiple terms as governor, and was known for his charisma and his political skills, but also for his corruption. He was the subject of several ethical investigations, and later (in 2001) he would be sentenced to ten years for racketeering. In fact, some Edwards supporters used the slogan "vote for the lizard, not the wizard". Had Duke's opponent been a more conventional candidate, it is fair to assume that Duke wouldn't have got 39% of the vote."



His white protest agenda, which includes opposition to crime, quotas and the welfare system, has broad support, national polls show. Like more conventional "outsider" candidates, Mr. Duke has successfully exploited the epidemic of anti-incumbent fever sweeping the nation.

The Edwards-Duke campaign quickly degenerated into a polarizing personal battle between two unpopular politicians, and many voters expressed disgust over the choice they were forced to make.







News article: Edwards tops Duke in exit polls in La. Ex-governor aided by drive to halt former Klansman





Ku Klux Klan Grand Dragon Will Quigg Endorses Hillary Clinton for President​






Will Quigg, a grand dragon of the Klan’s California chapter and responsible for recruitment in the western United States, is less keen to give Mr Trump the dubious benefit of his support.

“We want Hillary Clinton to win,” Mr Quigg told The Telegraph. “She is telling everybody one thing, but she has a hidden agenda. She’s telling everybody what they want to hear so she can get elected, because she’s Bill Clinton’s wife, she’s close to the Bushes. [But] once she’s in the presidency, she’s going to come out and her true colours are going to show.


But did Sharpton know he was visiting the first Arab POTUS and not the first black POTUS?

Are you STILL pushing the failed venom spewing campaign blather that lost the GOP 2 Presidential elections? Sad.
 
TheDefiantOne
The definitive reality check:
Yep… seems like elementary kids would eat this in-doctro-nashun shit up and straight turn commie. :uhoh3:
It sure isn't education. It's race hustling and deliberately trying to establish hateful divisions. It's sick and evil.


View attachment 506045
A stupid cartoon for the willfully ignorant. Here, deal with this: The Right Has Chosen Critical Race Theory as Its New Boogeyman to Scare Voters




Everything in every one of my posts is 100% true, accurate and correct.


Here's more proof of the racism you vote for:


you voted for this:


"Kristen Clarke, Joe Biden’s choice to lead the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division, believes black people are superior to white people because they possess more melanin.

Fox News host Tucker Carlson obtained shocking statements Clarke made in 1994.

“Melanin endows blacks with greater mental, physical, and spiritual abilities — something which cannot be measured by Eurocentric standards.” Kristen Clarke wrote."
thespectator.info





“Melanin Endows Blacks with Greater Mental, Physical and Spiritual Abilities” (VIDEO)
Kristen Clarke, Joe Biden’s choice to lead the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division, believes black people are superior to white people because they possess more melanin. Fox News host Tucker Carlson obtained shocking statements Clarke made in 1994. “Melanin endows blacks with greater ment ...
thespectator.info




thespectator.info




Soooo..... are you a fool or a liar????
tucker Carlson? That highly paid useful idiot?!!? :auiqs.jpg:

My goodness, you're bucking for 4th rate propagandist status now?

Here, for your education (or in your case, for your willful ignorance list):


and as they say, the devil is in the details:


The rational, objective reader will actually read each article thoroughly, and thus see your folly.

"tucker Carlson? That highly paid useful idiot?!!?"


I've noticed that when your sort can't deny the facts, you besmirch the source.


Is that from page one of the Democrat Racist Rule Book???
Yes, he is....as the the subsequent links I provided proved. Obviously you didn't read them.....typical willful ignorance of a Cheeto Jeezus acolyte.

It's like this sweetpea, when you make a claim, people will do research to see if that claim holds any water....they do so with a little thing called fact checking. The links I provided PROVE that Carlson is either a liar or too damned stupid to check his facts or both. This is his forte that he co-joins with his opinion. That makes him a useful idiot for the Cheeto Jeezus religion that has usurp the GOP. Carry on.


"...a Cheeto Jeezus acolyte."



The only folks who actually called their candidate god, Jesus and the messiah, are the Democrats.


Do you vote Democrat????
Mmm, not quite. That nonsense got started when in one of his speeches to the NOI rallies, Farrakhan EQUATED Obama with the "messiah". From them on, you had media wonks on both sides of the political aisle peppering their coverage of Obama with that word. Mind you, it was in effect a back handed attempt (promoted by the right wing media) to alienate any non-black voters from voting for him, and to paint black voters as dummies just following religious dogma and racial bias in voting en masse for a black candidate (IMHO, of course). But the people paid no attention to such silliness, and TWICE voted on the issues. Remember, the GOP gained control of both Houses because a large portion of voters withheld their congressional votes in protest over what they saw as Obama being too conciliatory to the GOP. They, and Obama, learned a hard lesson.

Oh, and FYI; the first time I heard the term "Cheeto Jeezus" was on a TV talk show called "The View"...it was uttered by Meaghan McCain, daughter of the late Sen. John McCain. She said it to point to the near fanatical religious approach that Trump supporters in Congress, the Media and the general public display even when Trump is caught flat footed lying.

And for the record, I'm a registered Independent. Hope this clears things up for you. Carry on.



And yet again I 'll ram the lie back down your throat.



Your side did, and you voted in support of same.

You bought it like it was on sale.


  1. The Hollywood celebrities pledge Go to 3:54:"I pledge to be a servant to our president and all mankind." Creepy?

    Demi Moore and Ashton Kutcher's I Pledge Video - YouTube


    2. Time's Nancy Gibbs who opened this week's cover story bycomparing Obama with Jesus:“Some princes are born in palaces. Some are born in mangers. But a few are born in the imagination, out of scraps of history and hope...” In the November 17 issue.

    3. Chris Matthews: "If you're in [a room] with Obama,you feel the spirit moving."Book Monitor (Current Edition)

    4. “Obama seemedthe political equivalent of a rainbow — a sudden preternatural event inspiring awe and ecstasy....” Time’s Joe Klein, October 23, 2006 cover story, "Why Barack Obama Could Be the Next President."



    5. NBC’s Matt Lauer noted that “people” have called Obama “ ‘The Savior,’ ‘The Messiah,’ ‘The Messenger of Change,’“ Today Show, NBC, October 20, 2008.

    6. The New York Time’s Judith Warner reported, “Many women- not too surprisingly – were dreaming about sex with the president [Obama]”.http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com...t-a-president/
    “…the Obamas are not just a beacon of hope, inspiration and“demigodlikeness,”Ibid.


    7. David Cordero, 24, made the sculpture for his senior show after noticing all the attention Obama has received: "All of this is a response to what I've been witnessing and hearing, this idea that Barack is sort ofa potential saviorthat might come and absolve the country of all its sins," Cordero said.Sculpture of Obama as Jesuscauses stir - politics - Decision '08 - Barack Obama News - msnbc.com

    8. . In its November 22, 2010 issue, Obama has been shown by Newsweek on its cover page with multiple arms balancing several policy issues while raising his left leg mimickingthe cosmic dance of the Hindu deity; considered a manifestation of Lord Shiva.
    ... Newsweek has named Obama "god of all things" on its cover.
    SOURCE: Times of India (November 20, 2010).


    9. “I haven’t seen a politician get this kind ofwalk-on-watercoverage since Colin Powell a dozen years ago flirted with making a run for the White House,” said Washington Post media critic Howard Kurtz on Meet the Press in February 2007

    10. Samantha Fennell, formerly an associate publisher of Elle, wrote on the magazine’s website a month later: “When I attended my second “Obama Live” fund-raiser last week at New York City’s Grand Hyatt, . . . I was on my feet as Senator Obama entered the room. Fate had blessed me in this moment. . . . In a moment of divine intervention,he saw me,…”

    11.Filmmaker Spike Lee, predicting an Obama victory, implicitly compared the candidate with Christ: “You’ll have to measure time by ‘Before Obama’ and ‘After Obama.’ . . .


    12. Jesse Jackson, Jr. called Obama’s securing the Democratic nomination “so extraordinary thatanother chapter could be added to the Bibleto chronicle its significance.”


    13. . Louis Farrakhan went one better, according to the website WorldNetDaily: “Barack has captured the youth. . . . That’s a sign.When the Messiah speaks,the youth will hear, andthe Messiah is absolutely speaking.


    14. His followers needed to re-elect him to a second term, so that he could continue to accomplish the promises he made, thus, realizing his vision of America as a more perfect political union or“heaven here on earth.”
    The Gospel According to Apostle Barack, by Barbara A. Thompson.

    15. "Does it not feel as ifsome special hand is guiding Obama on his journey, I mean, as he has said, the utter improbability of it all?"
    -- Daily Kos


    16"Obama's finest speeches do not excite. They do not inform. They don't even really inspire. They elevate. . . .He is not the Word made flesh, but the triumph of word over flesh . .. Obama is, at his best, able to call us back to our highest selves."
    - Ezra Klein

    17. "Obama has the capacity to summon heroic forces from the spiritual depths of ordinary citizens and to unleash therefrom a symphonic chorus of unique creative acts whose common purpose is to tame the soul and alleviate the great challenges facing mankind."
    -- Gerald Campbell

    18."We're here to evolve to a higher plane . . . he is an evolved leader . . . [he] has an ear for eloquence and a Tongue dipped in the Unvarnished Truth."
    -- Oprah Winfrey

    19. “I would characterize the Senate race as being a race where Obama was, let’s say, blessed and highly favored. That’s not routine. There’s something else going on. I think that Obama, his election to the Senate, was divinely ordered. . . . I know that that was God’s plan."
    -- Bill Rush



    20. "This is bigger than Kennedy. . . .This is the New Testament."| "I felt this thrill going up my leg. I mean, I don't have that too often. No, seriously. It's a dramatic event."
    -- Chris Matthews






Newsweek editor Evan Thomas said President Obama is "sort of God" in a way that's "standing above the country." Transcript below.




"CHRIS MATTHEWS (HOST):Evan Thomas is editor at large for Newsweek magazine. Evan, you remember 1984. It wasn't 100 years ago. Reagan and World War II and the sense of us as the good guys in the world, how are we doing?
EVAN THOMAS: Well, we were the good guys in 1984, it felt that way. It hasn't felt that way in recent years. So Obama's had, really, a different task We're seen too often as the bad guys. And he, he has a very different job from ... Reagan was all about America, and you talked about it. Obama is - we are above that now. We're not just parochial, we're not just chauvinistic, we're not just provincial. We stand for something, I mean in a way Obama's standing above the country, above above the world, he's sort of God."

Newsweek Editor Evan Thomas: Obama Is "Sort Of God" | RealClearPolitics



“Barbara Walters admits ‘we’ thought Obama was ‘the next messiah’”
Barbara Walters admits ‘we’ thought Obama was ‘the next messiah’




1608411396466.png









You're the human Piñata.....

View attachment 507451
You're not too bright, are ya sweetpea?

You seem to think that these canned responses somehow disprove my previous assessment of Tucker Carlson.

Hint: they don't.

As for the regurgitation of this "messiah" bilge the right wing STILL carries on about after getting their butts whupped by Obama in two elections (popular and electoral vote, don't cha know): you (once again) inadvertently prove my point. All these quasi-religious references to Obama's speeches from pundits, politicos and news promoters came on the heels of Farrakhan's decree to his followers. Just as I said . But the smart voters, (All Americans of all races, creeds and colors) weren't buying it. Interesting, n-cest pas'?

And of course, you omit this tidbit from your cache of cliches':


A 3rd rate propagandist such as yourself will just deny the conclusive logic, and continue to parrot your myopic mantra ad nausea. I expect nothing less from you at this point. Carry on.



‘I won’t be pathologized for being White’: Man resigns, shreds school district over ‘white privilege’ training

An after-school coordinator at a New Hampshire elementary school has gone viral for resigning over the school’s embrace of anti-white critical race theory propaganda.

In a public resignation letter released Monday on Twitter, former Northwest Elementary after-school program coordinator Daniel Concannon, 40, accused his school district of having endorsed the “dehumanization and hatred of White people, as evidenced by their dissemination of the imbecilic ‘White Privilege’ curriculum.”

In the letter, he purposefully referred to the Manchester School District as “The Frankfurt School.” It was a reference to the school responsible for creating contemporary Marxism, which is believed to be at the root of CRT."
translation: another clown who can't deal with FACTS that point to the congenital racism in the American fabric....much less that skin color greatly increases your chances of beneficial treatment and opportunities. No one is asking the fool to apologize, as individually no one gives a damn about him.

My assessment of Tucker Carlson is valid and documented....your "messiah" dodge was aptly deconstructed with FACTS....pity you don't have the cojones to just concede a point, and will just throw anything against the wall repeatedly, hoping it sticks....but I expect nothing less from 3rd rate David Duke wanna be's. Carry on.
You're a Weak Pathetic Pathological liar .



......and by that token......an excellent Democrat.
FYI: I put that useless clown on IA, as he clearly has no rational or logical refutation or retort when faced with basic logic and critical analysis.

You seem to add to that proud stupidity. Not surprising....carry on.



You can run, but you can't hide.
So saith the Brown Bomber.
And as you and the cretin you defend prove time and again, "stupid is as stupid does". Carry on, my little Davey Duke wanna be.



Once again, it appears that my role is to disabuse you of the lies your party and government school instituted.


David Duke was a Democrat, and believed as you do.


David Duke....the Democrat????

State Senator, 1975 (Baton Rouge Area)[edit]
Threshold > 50%

First Ballot, November 1, 1975

Louisiana State Senate, 1975
Party Candidate Votes %
Democratic Kenneth Osterberger 22,287 66
Democratic David Duke 11,079 33
N/A Others 1
Total 100
State Senator, 10th District, 1979 (Suburban New Orleans)[edit]
Threshold > 50% First Ballot, October 27, 1979

Louisiana State Senate, 10th District, 1979
Party Candidate Votes %
Democratic Joseph Tiemann 21,329 57
Democratic David Duke 9,897 26
N/A Others 6,459 17
Total 37,685 100
Democratic Nomination for United States Presidential Candidate, 1988 (Louisiana results)[edit]
Threshold = Plurality

1988 Democratic Presidential primary in Louisiana
Party Candidate Votes %
Democratic Jesse Jackson 221,522 35
Democratic Al Gore 174,971 28
Democratic Michael Dukakis 95,661 15
Democratic Dick Gephardt 67,029 11
Democratic Gary Hart 26,437 4
Democratic David Duke 23,391 4
Democratic Others 16,008 3
Total 625,019 100
Electoral history of David Duke - Wikipedia





Duke left the KKK long before he became a Republican....



"In 1979, after his first, abortive run for president (as a Democrat) and a series of highly publicized violent Klan incidents, Duke quietly incorporated the nonprofit National Association for the Advancement of White People (NAAWP) in an attempt to leave the baggage of the Klan behind."










The Democrats have always been associated with racism. The Democrat icon Franklin Roosevelt, in fact, made a KKKer his very first pick for the Supreme Court:

. "... [Hugo] Black was head of new members for the largest Klan cell in the South. New members of the KKK had to pledge their allegiance to the “eternal separation of Church and State.”... Separation was a crucial part of the KKK’s jurisprudential agenda. It was included in the Klansman’s Creed..."
http://egnorance.blogspot.com/2011/10/hugo-black-and-real-history-of-wall-of.html]
You must be a new type of stupid if you think you're going to somehow blame Duke's racism and bigotry on the Democratic Party and get away with it.

For your education:


And spare us your attempt to soft soap Duke, who NEVER disavowed his core racist beliefs no matter what party he chose in a state bitterly contentious of its congenital racism:



Duke was successful to a degree despite his painfully obvious bigotry and racism. YOU aren't even a cheap knock-off....just a wanna be with delusions of grandeur. Carry on, sweetpea. It's a guilty pleasure making a fool of you while you tell the mirror the opposite.





David Duke was a Democrat his entire racist career.

When he eschewed his earlier racism, he became a Republican.

You're just too stupid to realize you vote racist.



Duke left the KKK long before he became a Republican....



"In 1979, after his first, abortive run for president (as a Democrat) and a series of highly publicized violent Klan incidents, Duke quietly incorporated the nonprofit National Association for the Advancement of White People (NAAWP) in an attempt to leave the baggage of the Klan behind."










1. I was totally accurate in showing David Duke to be, in both his formative years, when he learned to be a racist, and in his political career....A DEMOCRAT.



2. As you have been trained to toss the word 'racist' at anyone who disagrees with Liberal propaganda, let's remember that the most frequent visitor to Obama, in the White House was racist Al Sharpton.



3. The Democrats have always been associated with racism. The Democrat icon Franklin Roosevelt, in fact, made a KKKer his very first pick for the Supreme Court:

. "... [Hugo] Black was head of new members for the largest Klan cell in the South. New members of the KKK had to pledge their allegiance to the “eternal separation of Church and State.”... Separation was a crucial part of the KKK’s jurisprudential agenda. It was included in the Klansman’s Creed..."
http://egnorance.blogspot.com/2011/10/hugo-black-and-real-history-of-wall-of.html]












In this race to fill a vacant seat, he is running for the first time as a Republican. The Republican Party, which is trying nationally to draw more black support, is mounting efforts to defeat him that are rare for an obscure state representative's race. The party has two candidates because state election laws allow an open primary whose top two finishers, regardless of party, are in a runoff. Klan's Ghost Haunts Louisiana Vote (Published 1989)





What factors led to 39% of the voters being willing to support a former KKK leader for governor?

"Louisiana used to have an open primary. Basically, any candidate would run, even multiple from the same party, and if one person secured 50% of the vote, they won. If not, the top two would go on to a run-off. This means that there were multiple Republicans and multiple Democrats in the first round of elections, making party loyalty less important and the ability to organize and round up supporters more important, and Duke did a good job of that. In the run-off election, he faced Edwin Edwards. Edwards had already served multiple terms as governor, and was known for his charisma and his political skills, but also for his corruption. He was the subject of several ethical investigations, and later (in 2001) he would be sentenced to ten years for racketeering. In fact, some Edwards supporters used the slogan "vote for the lizard, not the wizard". Had Duke's opponent been a more conventional candidate, it is fair to assume that Duke wouldn't have got 39% of the vote."



His white protest agenda, which includes opposition to crime, quotas and the welfare system, has broad support, national polls show. Like more conventional "outsider" candidates, Mr. Duke has successfully exploited the epidemic of anti-incumbent fever sweeping the nation.

The Edwards-Duke campaign quickly degenerated into a polarizing personal battle between two unpopular politicians, and many voters expressed disgust over the choice they were forced to make.







News article: Edwards tops Duke in exit polls in La. Ex-governor aided by drive to halt former Klansman





Ku Klux Klan Grand Dragon Will Quigg Endorses Hillary Clinton for President​






Will Quigg, a grand dragon of the Klan’s California chapter and responsible for recruitment in the western United States, is less keen to give Mr Trump the dubious benefit of his support.

“We want Hillary Clinton to win,” Mr Quigg told The Telegraph. “She is telling everybody one thing, but she has a hidden agenda. She’s telling everybody what they want to hear so she can get elected, because she’s Bill Clinton’s wife, she’s close to the Bushes. [But] once she’s in the presidency, she’s going to come out and her true colours are going to show.


It's a pleasure to see you stupidly repeat the same shot gun response to any facts that derail your lame propaganda.

Let me just topple your screed with ease. Your first 2 sentences:
David Duke was a Democrat his entire racist career.
When he eschewed his earlier racism, he became a Republican.



For your education: In 1998, after several years largely out of the political limelight, Duke published his autobiography, My Awakening: A Path to Racial Understanding, signifying a return to public anti-Semitism and racist activism. In 2000, while raising funds for Buchanan's ill-starred presidential campaign on the Reform Party ticket, Duke formed NOFEAR, or the National Organization For European American Rights. The following year he changed the name to EURO (European-American Unity and Rights Organization) because a clothing line already owned the name NOFEAR and was threatening a lawsuit. EURO remains Duke's primary organizing and fundraising vehicle, along with his books and personal website.

For edification:


Yep, a documented racists and bigot that never gave up the rhetoric or the ownership of the nasty little organizations he created EVEN WHEN HE WAS A DECLARED REPUBLICAN. Kind of pulls the rug out from under your blogging.

As to your 3rd sentence
You're just too stupid to realize you vote racist.
I can only assume you were looking in the mirror when you wrote that. Carry on, my little Duke acolyte in denial.
 
The definitive reality check:
Yep… seems like elementary kids would eat this in-doctro-nashun shit up and straight turn commie. :uhoh3:
It sure isn't education. It's race hustling and deliberately trying to establish hateful divisions. It's sick and evil.


View attachment 506045
A stupid cartoon for the willfully ignorant. Here, deal with this: The Right Has Chosen Critical Race Theory as Its New Boogeyman to Scare Voters




Everything in every one of my posts is 100% true, accurate and correct.


Here's more proof of the racism you vote for:


you voted for this:


"Kristen Clarke, Joe Biden’s choice to lead the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division, believes black people are superior to white people because they possess more melanin.

Fox News host Tucker Carlson obtained shocking statements Clarke made in 1994.

“Melanin endows blacks with greater mental, physical, and spiritual abilities — something which cannot be measured by Eurocentric standards.” Kristen Clarke wrote."
thespectator.info





“Melanin Endows Blacks with Greater Mental, Physical and Spiritual Abilities” (VIDEO)
Kristen Clarke, Joe Biden’s choice to lead the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division, believes black people are superior to white people because they possess more melanin. Fox News host Tucker Carlson obtained shocking statements Clarke made in 1994. “Melanin endows blacks with greater ment ...
thespectator.info




thespectator.info




Soooo..... are you a fool or a liar????
tucker Carlson? That highly paid useful idiot?!!? :auiqs.jpg:

My goodness, you're bucking for 4th rate propagandist status now?

Here, for your education (or in your case, for your willful ignorance list):


and as they say, the devil is in the details:


The rational, objective reader will actually read each article thoroughly, and thus see your folly.

"tucker Carlson? That highly paid useful idiot?!!?"


I've noticed that when your sort can't deny the facts, you besmirch the source.


Is that from page one of the Democrat Racist Rule Book???
Yes, he is....as the the subsequent links I provided proved. Obviously you didn't read them.....typical willful ignorance of a Cheeto Jeezus acolyte.

It's like this sweetpea, when you make a claim, people will do research to see if that claim holds any water....they do so with a little thing called fact checking. The links I provided PROVE that Carlson is either a liar or too damned stupid to check his facts or both. This is his forte that he co-joins with his opinion. That makes him a useful idiot for the Cheeto Jeezus religion that has usurp the GOP. Carry on.


"...a Cheeto Jeezus acolyte."



The only folks who actually called their candidate god, Jesus and the messiah, are the Democrats.


Do you vote Democrat????
Mmm, not quite. That nonsense got started when in one of his speeches to the NOI rallies, Farrakhan EQUATED Obama with the "messiah". From them on, you had media wonks on both sides of the political aisle peppering their coverage of Obama with that word. Mind you, it was in effect a back handed attempt (promoted by the right wing media) to alienate any non-black voters from voting for him, and to paint black voters as dummies just following religious dogma and racial bias in voting en masse for a black candidate (IMHO, of course). But the people paid no attention to such silliness, and TWICE voted on the issues. Remember, the GOP gained control of both Houses because a large portion of voters withheld their congressional votes in protest over what they saw as Obama being too conciliatory to the GOP. They, and Obama, learned a hard lesson.

Oh, and FYI; the first time I heard the term "Cheeto Jeezus" was on a TV talk show called "The View"...it was uttered by Meaghan McCain, daughter of the late Sen. John McCain. She said it to point to the near fanatical religious approach that Trump supporters in Congress, the Media and the general public display even when Trump is caught flat footed lying.

And for the record, I'm a registered Independent. Hope this clears things up for you. Carry on.



And yet again I 'll ram the lie back down your throat.



Your side did, and you voted in support of same.

You bought it like it was on sale.


  1. The Hollywood celebrities pledge Go to 3:54:"I pledge to be a servant to our president and all mankind." Creepy?

    Demi Moore and Ashton Kutcher's I Pledge Video - YouTube


    2. Time's Nancy Gibbs who opened this week's cover story bycomparing Obama with Jesus:“Some princes are born in palaces. Some are born in mangers. But a few are born in the imagination, out of scraps of history and hope...” In the November 17 issue.

    3. Chris Matthews: "If you're in [a room] with Obama,you feel the spirit moving."Book Monitor (Current Edition)

    4. “Obama seemedthe political equivalent of a rainbow — a sudden preternatural event inspiring awe and ecstasy....” Time’s Joe Klein, October 23, 2006 cover story, "Why Barack Obama Could Be the Next President."



    5. NBC’s Matt Lauer noted that “people” have called Obama “ ‘The Savior,’ ‘The Messiah,’ ‘The Messenger of Change,’“ Today Show, NBC, October 20, 2008.

    6. The New York Time’s Judith Warner reported, “Many women- not too surprisingly – were dreaming about sex with the president [Obama]”.http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com...t-a-president/
    “…the Obamas are not just a beacon of hope, inspiration and“demigodlikeness,”Ibid.


    7. David Cordero, 24, made the sculpture for his senior show after noticing all the attention Obama has received: "All of this is a response to what I've been witnessing and hearing, this idea that Barack is sort ofa potential saviorthat might come and absolve the country of all its sins," Cordero said.Sculpture of Obama as Jesuscauses stir - politics - Decision '08 - Barack Obama News - msnbc.com

    8. . In its November 22, 2010 issue, Obama has been shown by Newsweek on its cover page with multiple arms balancing several policy issues while raising his left leg mimickingthe cosmic dance of the Hindu deity; considered a manifestation of Lord Shiva.
    ... Newsweek has named Obama "god of all things" on its cover.
    SOURCE: Times of India (November 20, 2010).


    9. “I haven’t seen a politician get this kind ofwalk-on-watercoverage since Colin Powell a dozen years ago flirted with making a run for the White House,” said Washington Post media critic Howard Kurtz on Meet the Press in February 2007

    10. Samantha Fennell, formerly an associate publisher of Elle, wrote on the magazine’s website a month later: “When I attended my second “Obama Live” fund-raiser last week at New York City’s Grand Hyatt, . . . I was on my feet as Senator Obama entered the room. Fate had blessed me in this moment. . . . In a moment of divine intervention,he saw me,…”

    11.Filmmaker Spike Lee, predicting an Obama victory, implicitly compared the candidate with Christ: “You’ll have to measure time by ‘Before Obama’ and ‘After Obama.’ . . .


    12. Jesse Jackson, Jr. called Obama’s securing the Democratic nomination “so extraordinary thatanother chapter could be added to the Bibleto chronicle its significance.”


    13. . Louis Farrakhan went one better, according to the website WorldNetDaily: “Barack has captured the youth. . . . That’s a sign.When the Messiah speaks,the youth will hear, andthe Messiah is absolutely speaking.


    14. His followers needed to re-elect him to a second term, so that he could continue to accomplish the promises he made, thus, realizing his vision of America as a more perfect political union or“heaven here on earth.”
    The Gospel According to Apostle Barack, by Barbara A. Thompson.

    15. "Does it not feel as ifsome special hand is guiding Obama on his journey, I mean, as he has said, the utter improbability of it all?"
    -- Daily Kos


    16"Obama's finest speeches do not excite. They do not inform. They don't even really inspire. They elevate. . . .He is not the Word made flesh, but the triumph of word over flesh . .. Obama is, at his best, able to call us back to our highest selves."
    - Ezra Klein

    17. "Obama has the capacity to summon heroic forces from the spiritual depths of ordinary citizens and to unleash therefrom a symphonic chorus of unique creative acts whose common purpose is to tame the soul and alleviate the great challenges facing mankind."
    -- Gerald Campbell

    18."We're here to evolve to a higher plane . . . he is an evolved leader . . . [he] has an ear for eloquence and a Tongue dipped in the Unvarnished Truth."
    -- Oprah Winfrey

    19. “I would characterize the Senate race as being a race where Obama was, let’s say, blessed and highly favored. That’s not routine. There’s something else going on. I think that Obama, his election to the Senate, was divinely ordered. . . . I know that that was God’s plan."
    -- Bill Rush



    20. "This is bigger than Kennedy. . . .This is the New Testament."| "I felt this thrill going up my leg. I mean, I don't have that too often. No, seriously. It's a dramatic event."
    -- Chris Matthews






Newsweek editor Evan Thomas said President Obama is "sort of God" in a way that's "standing above the country." Transcript below.




"CHRIS MATTHEWS (HOST):Evan Thomas is editor at large for Newsweek magazine. Evan, you remember 1984. It wasn't 100 years ago. Reagan and World War II and the sense of us as the good guys in the world, how are we doing?
EVAN THOMAS: Well, we were the good guys in 1984, it felt that way. It hasn't felt that way in recent years. So Obama's had, really, a different task We're seen too often as the bad guys. And he, he has a very different job from ... Reagan was all about America, and you talked about it. Obama is - we are above that now. We're not just parochial, we're not just chauvinistic, we're not just provincial. We stand for something, I mean in a way Obama's standing above the country, above above the world, he's sort of God."

Newsweek Editor Evan Thomas: Obama Is "Sort Of God" | RealClearPolitics



“Barbara Walters admits ‘we’ thought Obama was ‘the next messiah’”
Barbara Walters admits ‘we’ thought Obama was ‘the next messiah’




1608411396466.png









You're the human Piñata.....

View attachment 507451
You're not too bright, are ya sweetpea?

You seem to think that these canned responses somehow disprove my previous assessment of Tucker Carlson.

Hint: they don't.

As for the regurgitation of this "messiah" bilge the right wing STILL carries on about after getting their butts whupped by Obama in two elections (popular and electoral vote, don't cha know): you (once again) inadvertently prove my point. All these quasi-religious references to Obama's speeches from pundits, politicos and news promoters came on the heels of Farrakhan's decree to his followers. Just as I said . But the smart voters, (All Americans of all races, creeds and colors) weren't buying it. Interesting, n-cest pas'?

And of course, you omit this tidbit from your cache of cliches':


A 3rd rate propagandist such as yourself will just deny the conclusive logic, and continue to parrot your myopic mantra ad nausea. I expect nothing less from you at this point. Carry on.



‘I won’t be pathologized for being White’: Man resigns, shreds school district over ‘white privilege’ training

An after-school coordinator at a New Hampshire elementary school has gone viral for resigning over the school’s embrace of anti-white critical race theory propaganda.

In a public resignation letter released Monday on Twitter, former Northwest Elementary after-school program coordinator Daniel Concannon, 40, accused his school district of having endorsed the “dehumanization and hatred of White people, as evidenced by their dissemination of the imbecilic ‘White Privilege’ curriculum.”

In the letter, he purposefully referred to the Manchester School District as “The Frankfurt School.” It was a reference to the school responsible for creating contemporary Marxism, which is believed to be at the root of CRT."
translation: another clown who can't deal with FACTS that point to the congenital racism in the American fabric....much less that skin color greatly increases your chances of beneficial treatment and opportunities. No one is asking the fool to apologize, as individually no one gives a damn about him.

My assessment of Tucker Carlson is valid and documented....your "messiah" dodge was aptly deconstructed with FACTS....pity you don't have the cojones to just concede a point, and will just throw anything against the wall repeatedly, hoping it sticks....but I expect nothing less from 3rd rate David Duke wanna be's. Carry on.
You're a Weak Pathetic Pathological liar .



......and by that token......an excellent Democrat.
FYI: I put that useless clown on IA, as he clearly has no rational or logical refutation or retort when faced with basic logic and critical analysis.

You seem to add to that proud stupidity. Not surprising....carry on.



You can run, but you can't hide.
So saith the Brown Bomber.
And as you and the cretin you defend prove time and again, "stupid is as stupid does". Carry on, my little Davey Duke wanna be.



Once again, it appears that my role is to disabuse you of the lies your party and government school instituted.


David Duke was a Democrat, and believed as you do.


David Duke....the Democrat????

State Senator, 1975 (Baton Rouge Area)[edit]
Threshold > 50%

First Ballot, November 1, 1975

Louisiana State Senate, 1975
Party Candidate Votes %
Democratic Kenneth Osterberger 22,287 66
Democratic David Duke 11,079 33
N/A Others 1
Total 100
State Senator, 10th District, 1979 (Suburban New Orleans)[edit]
Threshold > 50% First Ballot, October 27, 1979

Louisiana State Senate, 10th District, 1979
Party Candidate Votes %
Democratic Joseph Tiemann 21,329 57
Democratic David Duke 9,897 26
N/A Others 6,459 17
Total 37,685 100
Democratic Nomination for United States Presidential Candidate, 1988 (Louisiana results)[edit]
Threshold = Plurality

1988 Democratic Presidential primary in Louisiana
Party Candidate Votes %
Democratic Jesse Jackson 221,522 35
Democratic Al Gore 174,971 28
Democratic Michael Dukakis 95,661 15
Democratic Dick Gephardt 67,029 11
Democratic Gary Hart 26,437 4
Democratic David Duke 23,391 4
Democratic Others 16,008 3
Total 625,019 100
Electoral history of David Duke - Wikipedia





Duke left the KKK long before he became a Republican....



"In 1979, after his first, abortive run for president (as a Democrat) and a series of highly publicized violent Klan incidents, Duke quietly incorporated the nonprofit National Association for the Advancement of White People (NAAWP) in an attempt to leave the baggage of the Klan behind."










The Democrats have always been associated with racism. The Democrat icon Franklin Roosevelt, in fact, made a KKKer his very first pick for the Supreme Court:

. "... [Hugo] Black was head of new members for the largest Klan cell in the South. New members of the KKK had to pledge their allegiance to the “eternal separation of Church and State.”... Separation was a crucial part of the KKK’s jurisprudential agenda. It was included in the Klansman’s Creed..."
http://egnorance.blogspot.com/2011/10/hugo-black-and-real-history-of-wall-of.html]
You must be a new type of stupid if you think you're going to somehow blame Duke's racism and bigotry on the Democratic Party and get away with it.

For your education:


And spare us your attempt to soft soap Duke, who NEVER disavowed his core racist beliefs no matter what party he chose in a state bitterly contentious of its congenital racism:



Duke was successful to a degree despite his painfully obvious bigotry and racism. YOU aren't even a cheap knock-off....just a wanna be with delusions of grandeur. Carry on, sweetpea. It's a guilty pleasure making a fool of you while you tell the mirror the opposite.



There never was any such Southern Strategy.....gads, you're a moron.




Here are the facts:


1.George Wallace votes went to Democrats.

Wallace was a Democrat, and the same people who voted for Wallace voted Democrat...

Slavers, segregationists, and other racists.


"Four years after Goldwater, the segregationist vote went right back to Democrats:Humphrey got half of Wallace’s supporters on election day. Nixon got none of ‘em. “When the '68 campaign began, Nixon was at 42 percent, Humphrey at 29 percent, Wallace at 22 percent. When it ended, Nixon and Humphrey were tied at 43 percent, with Wallace at 13 percent. The 9 percent of the national vote that had been peeled off from Wallace had gone to Humphrey.” Pat Buchanan - The neocons & Nixon's southern strategy


Watch how Buchanan characterizes the Democrat Party:
"Richard Nixon kicked off his historic comeback in 1966 with a column on the South (by Buchanan) that declared we would build our Republican Party on a foundation of states rights, human rights, small government and a strong national defense, and leave it to the "party of Maddox, Mahoney and Wallace to squeeze the last ounces of political juice out of the rotting fruit of racial injustice."





2. "When the '68 campaign began, Nixon was at 42 percent, Humphrey at 29 percent, Wallace at 22 percent. When it ended, Nixon and Humphrey were tied at 43 percent, with Wallace at 13 percent. The 9 percent of the national vote that had been peeled off from Wallace had gone to Humphrey." The neocons & Nixon's southern strategy





3. "Between 1969 and 1974, Nixon, who believed that blacks had gotten a raw deal in America and wanted to extend a helping hand:

-- raised the civil rights enforcement budget 800 percent;

-- doubled the budget for black colleges;

-- appointed more blacks to federal posts and high positions than any president, including LBJ;

-- adopted the Philadelphia Plan mandating quotas for blacks in unions, and for black scholars in colleges and universities;

-- invented "Black Capitalism" (the Office of Minority Business Enterprise), raised U.S. purchases from black businesses from $9 million to $153 million, increased small business loans to minorities 1,000 percent, increased U.S. deposits in minority-owned banks 4000 percent;

-- raised the share of Southern schools that were desegregated from 10 percent to 70 percent. Wrote the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights in 1975, "It has only been since 1968 that substantial reduction of racial segregation has taken place in the South." The charge that we built our Republican coalition on race is a lie." The neocons & Nixon's southern strategy




Now....let's see if reality has any effect on you.
You're first sentence is a repeat of the mantra a lot of your right wing/alt right wonks parrot...usually followed by the SOS pile of myopic historical takes coupled with what "good deeds" your heroes did for black folk as to absolve them of all sins. Here's how I educated one of your like minded compadres The Definitive Critical Race Theory Thread

And you really should stop looking in the mirror when you type...calling yourself a moron isn't helpful. Carry on.
 
The definitive reality check:
Yep… seems like elementary kids would eat this in-doctro-nashun shit up and straight turn commie. :uhoh3:
It sure isn't education. It's race hustling and deliberately trying to establish hateful divisions. It's sick and evil.


View attachment 506045
A stupid cartoon for the willfully ignorant. Here, deal with this: The Right Has Chosen Critical Race Theory as Its New Boogeyman to Scare Voters




Everything in every one of my posts is 100% true, accurate and correct.


Here's more proof of the racism you vote for:


you voted for this:


"Kristen Clarke, Joe Biden’s choice to lead the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division, believes black people are superior to white people because they possess more melanin.

Fox News host Tucker Carlson obtained shocking statements Clarke made in 1994.

“Melanin endows blacks with greater mental, physical, and spiritual abilities — something which cannot be measured by Eurocentric standards.” Kristen Clarke wrote."
thespectator.info





“Melanin Endows Blacks with Greater Mental, Physical and Spiritual Abilities” (VIDEO)
Kristen Clarke, Joe Biden’s choice to lead the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division, believes black people are superior to white people because they possess more melanin. Fox News host Tucker Carlson obtained shocking statements Clarke made in 1994. “Melanin endows blacks with greater ment ...
thespectator.info




thespectator.info




Soooo..... are you a fool or a liar????
tucker Carlson? That highly paid useful idiot?!!? :auiqs.jpg:

My goodness, you're bucking for 4th rate propagandist status now?

Here, for your education (or in your case, for your willful ignorance list):


and as they say, the devil is in the details:


The rational, objective reader will actually read each article thoroughly, and thus see your folly.

"tucker Carlson? That highly paid useful idiot?!!?"


I've noticed that when your sort can't deny the facts, you besmirch the source.


Is that from page one of the Democrat Racist Rule Book???
Yes, he is....as the the subsequent links I provided proved. Obviously you didn't read them.....typical willful ignorance of a Cheeto Jeezus acolyte.

It's like this sweetpea, when you make a claim, people will do research to see if that claim holds any water....they do so with a little thing called fact checking. The links I provided PROVE that Carlson is either a liar or too damned stupid to check his facts or both. This is his forte that he co-joins with his opinion. That makes him a useful idiot for the Cheeto Jeezus religion that has usurp the GOP. Carry on.


"...a Cheeto Jeezus acolyte."



The only folks who actually called their candidate god, Jesus and the messiah, are the Democrats.


Do you vote Democrat????
Mmm, not quite. That nonsense got started when in one of his speeches to the NOI rallies, Farrakhan EQUATED Obama with the "messiah". From them on, you had media wonks on both sides of the political aisle peppering their coverage of Obama with that word. Mind you, it was in effect a back handed attempt (promoted by the right wing media) to alienate any non-black voters from voting for him, and to paint black voters as dummies just following religious dogma and racial bias in voting en masse for a black candidate (IMHO, of course). But the people paid no attention to such silliness, and TWICE voted on the issues. Remember, the GOP gained control of both Houses because a large portion of voters withheld their congressional votes in protest over what they saw as Obama being too conciliatory to the GOP. They, and Obama, learned a hard lesson.

Oh, and FYI; the first time I heard the term "Cheeto Jeezus" was on a TV talk show called "The View"...it was uttered by Meaghan McCain, daughter of the late Sen. John McCain. She said it to point to the near fanatical religious approach that Trump supporters in Congress, the Media and the general public display even when Trump is caught flat footed lying.

And for the record, I'm a registered Independent. Hope this clears things up for you. Carry on.



And yet again I 'll ram the lie back down your throat.



Your side did, and you voted in support of same.

You bought it like it was on sale.


  1. The Hollywood celebrities pledge Go to 3:54:"I pledge to be a servant to our president and all mankind." Creepy?

    Demi Moore and Ashton Kutcher's I Pledge Video - YouTube


    2. Time's Nancy Gibbs who opened this week's cover story bycomparing Obama with Jesus:“Some princes are born in palaces. Some are born in mangers. But a few are born in the imagination, out of scraps of history and hope...” In the November 17 issue.

    3. Chris Matthews: "If you're in [a room] with Obama,you feel the spirit moving."Book Monitor (Current Edition)

    4. “Obama seemedthe political equivalent of a rainbow — a sudden preternatural event inspiring awe and ecstasy....” Time’s Joe Klein, October 23, 2006 cover story, "Why Barack Obama Could Be the Next President."



    5. NBC’s Matt Lauer noted that “people” have called Obama “ ‘The Savior,’ ‘The Messiah,’ ‘The Messenger of Change,’“ Today Show, NBC, October 20, 2008.

    6. The New York Time’s Judith Warner reported, “Many women- not too surprisingly – were dreaming about sex with the president [Obama]”.http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com...t-a-president/
    “…the Obamas are not just a beacon of hope, inspiration and“demigodlikeness,”Ibid.


    7. David Cordero, 24, made the sculpture for his senior show after noticing all the attention Obama has received: "All of this is a response to what I've been witnessing and hearing, this idea that Barack is sort ofa potential saviorthat might come and absolve the country of all its sins," Cordero said.Sculpture of Obama as Jesuscauses stir - politics - Decision '08 - Barack Obama News - msnbc.com

    8. . In its November 22, 2010 issue, Obama has been shown by Newsweek on its cover page with multiple arms balancing several policy issues while raising his left leg mimickingthe cosmic dance of the Hindu deity; considered a manifestation of Lord Shiva.
    ... Newsweek has named Obama "god of all things" on its cover.
    SOURCE: Times of India (November 20, 2010).


    9. “I haven’t seen a politician get this kind ofwalk-on-watercoverage since Colin Powell a dozen years ago flirted with making a run for the White House,” said Washington Post media critic Howard Kurtz on Meet the Press in February 2007

    10. Samantha Fennell, formerly an associate publisher of Elle, wrote on the magazine’s website a month later: “When I attended my second “Obama Live” fund-raiser last week at New York City’s Grand Hyatt, . . . I was on my feet as Senator Obama entered the room. Fate had blessed me in this moment. . . . In a moment of divine intervention,he saw me,…”

    11.Filmmaker Spike Lee, predicting an Obama victory, implicitly compared the candidate with Christ: “You’ll have to measure time by ‘Before Obama’ and ‘After Obama.’ . . .


    12. Jesse Jackson, Jr. called Obama’s securing the Democratic nomination “so extraordinary thatanother chapter could be added to the Bibleto chronicle its significance.”


    13. . Louis Farrakhan went one better, according to the website WorldNetDaily: “Barack has captured the youth. . . . That’s a sign.When the Messiah speaks,the youth will hear, andthe Messiah is absolutely speaking.


    14. His followers needed to re-elect him to a second term, so that he could continue to accomplish the promises he made, thus, realizing his vision of America as a more perfect political union or“heaven here on earth.”
    The Gospel According to Apostle Barack, by Barbara A. Thompson.

    15. "Does it not feel as ifsome special hand is guiding Obama on his journey, I mean, as he has said, the utter improbability of it all?"
    -- Daily Kos


    16"Obama's finest speeches do not excite. They do not inform. They don't even really inspire. They elevate. . . .He is not the Word made flesh, but the triumph of word over flesh . .. Obama is, at his best, able to call us back to our highest selves."
    - Ezra Klein

    17. "Obama has the capacity to summon heroic forces from the spiritual depths of ordinary citizens and to unleash therefrom a symphonic chorus of unique creative acts whose common purpose is to tame the soul and alleviate the great challenges facing mankind."
    -- Gerald Campbell

    18."We're here to evolve to a higher plane . . . he is an evolved leader . . . [he] has an ear for eloquence and a Tongue dipped in the Unvarnished Truth."
    -- Oprah Winfrey

    19. “I would characterize the Senate race as being a race where Obama was, let’s say, blessed and highly favored. That’s not routine. There’s something else going on. I think that Obama, his election to the Senate, was divinely ordered. . . . I know that that was God’s plan."
    -- Bill Rush



    20. "This is bigger than Kennedy. . . .This is the New Testament."| "I felt this thrill going up my leg. I mean, I don't have that too often. No, seriously. It's a dramatic event."
    -- Chris Matthews






Newsweek editor Evan Thomas said President Obama is "sort of God" in a way that's "standing above the country." Transcript below.




"CHRIS MATTHEWS (HOST):Evan Thomas is editor at large for Newsweek magazine. Evan, you remember 1984. It wasn't 100 years ago. Reagan and World War II and the sense of us as the good guys in the world, how are we doing?
EVAN THOMAS: Well, we were the good guys in 1984, it felt that way. It hasn't felt that way in recent years. So Obama's had, really, a different task We're seen too often as the bad guys. And he, he has a very different job from ... Reagan was all about America, and you talked about it. Obama is - we are above that now. We're not just parochial, we're not just chauvinistic, we're not just provincial. We stand for something, I mean in a way Obama's standing above the country, above above the world, he's sort of God."

Newsweek Editor Evan Thomas: Obama Is "Sort Of God" | RealClearPolitics



“Barbara Walters admits ‘we’ thought Obama was ‘the next messiah’”
Barbara Walters admits ‘we’ thought Obama was ‘the next messiah’




1608411396466.png









You're the human Piñata.....

View attachment 507451
You're not too bright, are ya sweetpea?

You seem to think that these canned responses somehow disprove my previous assessment of Tucker Carlson.

Hint: they don't.

As for the regurgitation of this "messiah" bilge the right wing STILL carries on about after getting their butts whupped by Obama in two elections (popular and electoral vote, don't cha know): you (once again) inadvertently prove my point. All these quasi-religious references to Obama's speeches from pundits, politicos and news promoters came on the heels of Farrakhan's decree to his followers. Just as I said . But the smart voters, (All Americans of all races, creeds and colors) weren't buying it. Interesting, n-cest pas'?

And of course, you omit this tidbit from your cache of cliches':


A 3rd rate propagandist such as yourself will just deny the conclusive logic, and continue to parrot your myopic mantra ad nausea. I expect nothing less from you at this point. Carry on.



‘I won’t be pathologized for being White’: Man resigns, shreds school district over ‘white privilege’ training

An after-school coordinator at a New Hampshire elementary school has gone viral for resigning over the school’s embrace of anti-white critical race theory propaganda.

In a public resignation letter released Monday on Twitter, former Northwest Elementary after-school program coordinator Daniel Concannon, 40, accused his school district of having endorsed the “dehumanization and hatred of White people, as evidenced by their dissemination of the imbecilic ‘White Privilege’ curriculum.”

In the letter, he purposefully referred to the Manchester School District as “The Frankfurt School.” It was a reference to the school responsible for creating contemporary Marxism, which is believed to be at the root of CRT."
translation: another clown who can't deal with FACTS that point to the congenital racism in the American fabric....much less that skin color greatly increases your chances of beneficial treatment and opportunities. No one is asking the fool to apologize, as individually no one gives a damn about him.

My assessment of Tucker Carlson is valid and documented....your "messiah" dodge was aptly deconstructed with FACTS....pity you don't have the cojones to just concede a point, and will just throw anything against the wall repeatedly, hoping it sticks....but I expect nothing less from 3rd rate David Duke wanna be's. Carry on.
You're a Weak Pathetic Pathological liar .



......and by that token......an excellent Democrat.
FYI: I put that useless clown on IA, as he clearly has no rational or logical refutation or retort when faced with basic logic and critical analysis.

You seem to add to that proud stupidity. Not surprising....carry on.



You can run, but you can't hide.
So saith the Brown Bomber.
And as you and the cretin you defend prove time and again, "stupid is as stupid does". Carry on, my little Davey Duke wanna be.



Once again, it appears that my role is to disabuse you of the lies your party and government school instituted.


David Duke was a Democrat, and believed as you do.


David Duke....the Democrat????

State Senator, 1975 (Baton Rouge Area)[edit]
Threshold > 50%

First Ballot, November 1, 1975

Louisiana State Senate, 1975
Party Candidate Votes %
Democratic Kenneth Osterberger 22,287 66
Democratic David Duke 11,079 33
N/A Others 1
Total 100
State Senator, 10th District, 1979 (Suburban New Orleans)[edit]
Threshold > 50% First Ballot, October 27, 1979

Louisiana State Senate, 10th District, 1979
Party Candidate Votes %
Democratic Joseph Tiemann 21,329 57
Democratic David Duke 9,897 26
N/A Others 6,459 17
Total 37,685 100
Democratic Nomination for United States Presidential Candidate, 1988 (Louisiana results)[edit]
Threshold = Plurality

1988 Democratic Presidential primary in Louisiana
Party Candidate Votes %
Democratic Jesse Jackson 221,522 35
Democratic Al Gore 174,971 28
Democratic Michael Dukakis 95,661 15
Democratic Dick Gephardt 67,029 11
Democratic Gary Hart 26,437 4
Democratic David Duke 23,391 4
Democratic Others 16,008 3
Total 625,019 100
Electoral history of David Duke - Wikipedia





Duke left the KKK long before he became a Republican....



"In 1979, after his first, abortive run for president (as a Democrat) and a series of highly publicized violent Klan incidents, Duke quietly incorporated the nonprofit National Association for the Advancement of White People (NAAWP) in an attempt to leave the baggage of the Klan behind."










The Democrats have always been associated with racism. The Democrat icon Franklin Roosevelt, in fact, made a KKKer his very first pick for the Supreme Court:

. "... [Hugo] Black was head of new members for the largest Klan cell in the South. New members of the KKK had to pledge their allegiance to the “eternal separation of Church and State.”... Separation was a crucial part of the KKK’s jurisprudential agenda. It was included in the Klansman’s Creed..."
http://egnorance.blogspot.com/2011/10/hugo-black-and-real-history-of-wall-of.html]
You must be a new type of stupid if you think you're going to somehow blame Duke's racism and bigotry on the Democratic Party and get away with it.

For your education:


And spare us your attempt to soft soap Duke, who NEVER disavowed his core racist beliefs no matter what party he chose in a state bitterly contentious of its congenital racism:



Duke was successful to a degree despite his painfully obvious bigotry and racism. YOU aren't even a cheap knock-off....just a wanna be with delusions of grandeur. Carry on, sweetpea. It's a guilty pleasure making a fool of you while you tell the mirror the opposite.



There never was any such Southern Strategy.....gads, you're a moron.




Here are the facts:


1.George Wallace votes went to Democrats.

Wallace was a Democrat, and the same people who voted for Wallace voted Democrat...

Slavers, segregationists, and other racists.


"Four years after Goldwater, the segregationist vote went right back to Democrats:Humphrey got half of Wallace’s supporters on election day. Nixon got none of ‘em. “When the '68 campaign began, Nixon was at 42 percent, Humphrey at 29 percent, Wallace at 22 percent. When it ended, Nixon and Humphrey were tied at 43 percent, with Wallace at 13 percent. The 9 percent of the national vote that had been peeled off from Wallace had gone to Humphrey.” Pat Buchanan - The neocons & Nixon's southern strategy


Watch how Buchanan characterizes the Democrat Party:
"Richard Nixon kicked off his historic comeback in 1966 with a column on the South (by Buchanan) that declared we would build our Republican Party on a foundation of states rights, human rights, small government and a strong national defense, and leave it to the "party of Maddox, Mahoney and Wallace to squeeze the last ounces of political juice out of the rotting fruit of racial injustice."





2. "When the '68 campaign began, Nixon was at 42 percent, Humphrey at 29 percent, Wallace at 22 percent. When it ended, Nixon and Humphrey were tied at 43 percent, with Wallace at 13 percent. The 9 percent of the national vote that had been peeled off from Wallace had gone to Humphrey." The neocons & Nixon's southern strategy





3. "Between 1969 and 1974, Nixon, who believed that blacks had gotten a raw deal in America and wanted to extend a helping hand:

-- raised the civil rights enforcement budget 800 percent;

-- doubled the budget for black colleges;

-- appointed more blacks to federal posts and high positions than any president, including LBJ;

-- adopted the Philadelphia Plan mandating quotas for blacks in unions, and for black scholars in colleges and universities;

-- invented "Black Capitalism" (the Office of Minority Business Enterprise), raised U.S. purchases from black businesses from $9 million to $153 million, increased small business loans to minorities 1,000 percent, increased U.S. deposits in minority-owned banks 4000 percent;

-- raised the share of Southern schools that were desegregated from 10 percent to 70 percent. Wrote the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights in 1975, "It has only been since 1968 that substantial reduction of racial segregation has taken place in the South." The charge that we built our Republican coalition on race is a lie." The neocons & Nixon's southern strategy




Now....let's see if reality has any effect on you.
You're first sentence is a repeat of the mantra a lot of your right wing/alt right wonks parrot...usually followed by the SOS pile of myopic historical takes coupled with what "good deeds" your heroes did for black folk as to absolve them of all sins. Here's how I educated one of your like minded compadres The Definitive Critical Race Theory Thread

And you really should stop looking in the mirror when you type...calling yourself a moron isn't helpful. Carry on.
Lame amateur .
 
You think that centuries of ingrained racism can be erased in a generation? Civil rights only passed in the LATE 60s. It is going to take a lot longer than 50 years to remove all the tentacles that have wound their way into our system and culture.

What is wrong with examining why racial inequality still persists, even decades after these laws have passed? How do you fix it if you don’t know why it keeps going?


America's system is a TWO PARTY system. THe reasons are not important in this context.


For quite a while the republicans were pushing for racial equality for blacks, and the democrats were fighting that.


When the dems stopped fighting it, and started supporting it, suddenly in just a few years, Racists had no voice in national policy.

The moral and intellectual Debate, they had already lost well before that.


At that point, White Racists became marginalized. I grew up not long after wards and ALL the education and media and culture I got, supported the BI-Party line, of racial equality and blah, blah, blah, to the point I was bored with it. Indeed, i did not understand as a child why they kept harping on it.

For most people today, the time when white racism was openly practiced and had real political power and actual policy based on their agenda, seems...like another world.


TODAY, and indeed, even then, though not as bad as now, the message is not "examining why racial inequality still exists", but ASSUMING any inequality is because of Wacism and blaming white people and mobilizing EVERYTHING to fight it/them.


ANY voice raised, discussing an "inequality" that says ANTHING, other than "white people's fault" is dogpiled and shouted down with cries of wacism.


This is tearing this nation apart. It is teaching blacks that whites hate them, and teaching whites that they are always going to be fucked and discriminated against.


After all, if there is an "inequality" and the cause is NOT evul whites, but the solution implemented is based on the idea that is it evul whites, whites will be punished and suffer for shit that they did not do.
Politicians deciding something in DC did not change society and culture.

Blacks don’t have to be taught that a lot of whites hate them, believe stereotypes about them, fear them…they live it every day. That you refuse to see it just perpetuates it.



I like the way you dismiss law and national policy as "politicians deciding something".


My parents were working class dems, from the Depression Era. They were primary motivated by the Union culture of the Rust Belt. Based on what I saw, long after the fact, the long standing alliance of the dem party to southern racists must have been a negative that they were forced to ignore because of overriding economic issues.


When the politicians flipped on that issue, it would not have been a problem for working class dems in the Rust Belt. They were already there on that issue, long before the Party that they supported DESPITE their racist allilance.


You are living in a fantasy land, where you imagine that your enemies are villains, so that you can be the hero.
I’m afraid it is you that is living in a fantasy land. You seem to think that legislation was passed and suddenly unicorns were farting daisies. It didn’t happen that way. It still hasn’t happened that way.

Racism was baked into our system for centuries and you think it can be a erased in a couple of decades?


I addressed that point. My point was that, imo, the dem party was FOLLOWING society, not the other way around.

I supported my point, with personal observation of my family and community in the Rust Belt.

You ignored everything I said, and just repeated your previous assertion, with a sprinkling of hyperbole and ridicule.
You weren't trying to make a point beyond "derp, dems bad, derp". The thing you keep fucking up is that you idiots think the division on civil rights was Democrats vs Republicans. It wasn't. It was North vs South...again.

We know that institutional racism exists. What is so wrong at looking at why it prevails over half a century after the civil rights act?


My point was in response to that question. I am celebrating the fact that, long ago, the Democratic Party embraced the idea of racial equality for blacks. That is not "dem bad". When I have bad things to say about the dems, I say them clearly and loudly. YOu don't have to search for nuance.


Institutional anti-black racism does NOT exist. That is a lie. This nation has had a bi-partisan consensus on racial equality for blacks since the early 60s. National policy has been based on that, since then. Federal and State law has been based on that since then. Culture and media and education has constantly and strongly indoctrinated generation after generation of Americans in that consensus since then.
It exists. Your refusal to see it perpetuates it.



You see being anti-racism as being anti-white. That tells us a lot about you.


Policy, law, cultural, media, education, for 60 years has been united in pushing a bi-partisan consensus in favor of racial equality for blacks.

Schools? Have you ever met a teacher or a school administrator? They are some of the most liberal people on the fucking planet.

I reject the claim that our schools are wacist.
Gee, color me surprised that you eschew facts. Typical Trump supporter.


Pointing to the fact that teachers and administrators are overwhelmingly liberals dedicated to fighting wacism, is not eschewing facts, but embracing them.


SOmetimes I talk to them, and try to get understand how they feel about how they are constantly thrown under the bus by their fellow liberals.

I can't seem to get a straight answer. They do seem to appreciate that I point out that they are not wacist.
Teachers are only one layer of the education system. An education system that has had racism baked into it.

Data consistently shows that students of color are more likely to be disciplined than their White peers and receive harsher punishments for the same infractions. Black and Hispanic students are less likely to be placed in advanced or enriched classes, starting in elementary school. Many experts say school curriculums have failed to adequately reflect the perspectives of Indigenous and marginalized communities. And students and parents themselves often report that school culture does not feel welcoming.


Most administrators are promoted teachers. And as a group they tend to be liberals committed to racial equality for minority students.

If they are not, they are almost certainly moderates committed to racial equality for minority students.

The few that do not fit those two categories? Walk softly and try to not be noticed.

Studies? I call bullshit. Teachers are more likely to give minority students a pass for bad behavior, for fear of being called wacist, or to retreat behind some idiocy of a zero tolerance policy so they can punish both/all students involved to avoid assigning true blame, or something along those lines.
You don’t believe studies that tell you it exists. You don’t believe actual black people that tell you it exists. All you have to go on is your “feelings“.
:lol:

Yeah, I think I’ll go with studies and the people that are experienced it and not some white guy that thinks Trump is delightful.


Personal, direct observations are not "feelings".

And when you people blatantly lie, we notice. You don't get to lie to our faces and stone wall on it, when called on it, and expect to be given any credibility after that.

My point stands.


Policy, law, cultural, media, education, for 60 years has been united in pushing a bi-partisan consensus in favor of racial equality for blacks.

Schools? Have you ever met a teacher or a school administrator? They are some of the most liberal people on the fucking planet.

I reject the claim that our schools are wacist.
Your "observations" are also not hard data. The experience of one white guy that thinks blacks aren't as intelligent as whites and that being anti racist equals anti white, doesn't add up to a hill of beans.

...

Traditionally "hard data" was given more weight than anecdotal evidence. But with the increasing politicalization of EVERYTHING, and the dangerous increase of cancel culture, not to mention actual violent mobs in the streets,

No. Liberals and academics can't be trusted.


DO YOU KNOW ANY TEACHERS AND/OR SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS?
Translation: with the increasing insanity of the Republican Party, they must eschew facts and evidence because facts don’t support their twisted worldview.

Are you denying the power of cancel culture or the violent mobs in the streets? Are you claiming they don't exist?


What exactly is your defense against my point other than the logical fallacy of Proof by Ridicule?


Which by the way is invalid and you lose. You got anything else, or, you want to concede?
What point? You haven’t made any points. You’ve denied facts and keep repeating your feelings. You feel that teachers are overwhelmingly liberal, but completely ignore factual studies on the subject. You keep rejecting facts.

...

I pointed out that cancel culture makes such studies unreliable. And that those claims contradict our personal observations.

Do you know any teachers and/or school administrators?
I do. I have two children that just finished school in the last few years. I found their teachers and administrators to be the same mix I find all over the country. Some conservative some liberal.

And again, just because one layer of the cake is strawberry doesn’t make the whole cake strawberry. Study after study points out the systemic and institutionalized racism in the education system but you don’t believe it because a few teachers are liberal. How utterly a child like view of the world…

Do you support or reject this statement from the Racists Trump supporter, BSFilter, yes or no?

Maybe if the jigaboos work on their attitudes they might find people more welcoming.

1. Your claim that teachers are a "mix" of conservatives and liberals is absurd. As a group they lean HARD left and it shows in their work. To claim that the problems of blacks are because of teachers is nonsense.

2. Plenty of blacks do have very poor attitudes. If you are half as world wise as you claim, you know that. I'm sure that many people are turned off by the "attitude" of radicalized blacks who get more attention than they deserve.
I give you a teed up opportunity to not be a racist and you fail.


All you are doing is reasserting an absurd point.

Policy, law, cultural, media, education, for 60 years has been united in pushing a bi-partisan consensus in favor of racial equality for blacks.

Schools? Have you ever met a teacher or a school administrator? They are some of the most liberal people on the fucking planet.

I reject the claim that our schools are wacist.
You reject facts because they don't fit with your racist narrative.

Your wace baiting is noted and dismissed.


All you are doing is reasserting an absurd point.

Policy, law, cultural, media, education, for 60 years has been united in pushing a bi-partisan consensus in favor of racial equality for blacks.

Schools? Have you ever met a teacher or a school administrator? They are some of the most liberal people on the fucking planet.

I reject the claim that our schools are wacist.
Yes, we know you reject facts. No need to keep repeating yourself.



All you are doing is reasserting an absurd point.

Policy, law, cultural, media, education, for 60 years has been united in pushing a bi-partisan consensus in favor of racial equality for blacks.

Schools? Have you ever met a teacher or a school administrator? They are some of the most liberal people on the fucking planet.

I reject the claim that our schools are wacist.
All you are doing is denying facts. Not surprising from a Trumpster.
All you are doing is reasserting an absurd point.

Policy, law, cultural, media, education, for 60 years has been united in pushing a bi-partisan consensus in favor of racial equality for blacks.

Schools? Have you ever met a teacher or a school administrator? They are some of the most liberal people on the fucking planet.

I reject the claim that our schools are wacist.
Yeah, I guess facts, evidence and studies would be "absurd" to a Trumpster living on Earth 2. Here on Earth One, facts speak for themselves.



(You, notably, have provided zero)
 
Jews came up with this demonic theory in the 1930's, obtained control of academia in the 1960's and inserted the demonic theory. Now that Whites appear to be genocided, they kick it up a notch.
 
"School Choice Only Option in Divided Nation
a survey done by Pew Research last October, just prior to the presidential election, 80% of Donald Trump supporters and 77% of Joe Biden supporters said, regarding the opposition, “Not only do we have different priorities when it comes to politics, but we fundamentally disagree about core American values.”

If half the country disagrees with the other half about “core American values,” what exactly can we expect public schools receiving federal funds to teach regarding the nature and purpose of our Constitution or about our nation’s history?

In a recent survey done by Morning Consult/Politico, of those who said they had seen, read, or heard “a lot” about critical race theory, 7% of Democrats and 78% of Republicans described it negatively."





Jews came up with this demonic theory in the 1930's, obtained control of academia in the 1960's and inserted the demonic theory. Now that Whites appear to be genocided, they kick it up a notch.


Karl Marx wasn't Jewish.

He, like you....anti-Semitic.

What other characteristics and beliefs do you share with this Satan worshiper?
 
Last edited:
TheDefiantOne
The definitive reality check:
Yep… seems like elementary kids would eat this in-doctro-nashun shit up and straight turn commie. :uhoh3:
It sure isn't education. It's race hustling and deliberately trying to establish hateful divisions. It's sick and evil.


View attachment 506045
A stupid cartoon for the willfully ignorant. Here, deal with this: The Right Has Chosen Critical Race Theory as Its New Boogeyman to Scare Voters




Everything in every one of my posts is 100% true, accurate and correct.


Here's more proof of the racism you vote for:


you voted for this:


"Kristen Clarke, Joe Biden’s choice to lead the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division, believes black people are superior to white people because they possess more melanin.

Fox News host Tucker Carlson obtained shocking statements Clarke made in 1994.

“Melanin endows blacks with greater mental, physical, and spiritual abilities — something which cannot be measured by Eurocentric standards.” Kristen Clarke wrote."
thespectator.info





“Melanin Endows Blacks with Greater Mental, Physical and Spiritual Abilities” (VIDEO)
Kristen Clarke, Joe Biden’s choice to lead the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division, believes black people are superior to white people because they possess more melanin. Fox News host Tucker Carlson obtained shocking statements Clarke made in 1994. “Melanin endows blacks with greater ment ...
thespectator.info




thespectator.info




Soooo..... are you a fool or a liar????
tucker Carlson? That highly paid useful idiot?!!? :auiqs.jpg:

My goodness, you're bucking for 4th rate propagandist status now?

Here, for your education (or in your case, for your willful ignorance list):


and as they say, the devil is in the details:


The rational, objective reader will actually read each article thoroughly, and thus see your folly.

"tucker Carlson? That highly paid useful idiot?!!?"


I've noticed that when your sort can't deny the facts, you besmirch the source.


Is that from page one of the Democrat Racist Rule Book???
Yes, he is....as the the subsequent links I provided proved. Obviously you didn't read them.....typical willful ignorance of a Cheeto Jeezus acolyte.

It's like this sweetpea, when you make a claim, people will do research to see if that claim holds any water....they do so with a little thing called fact checking. The links I provided PROVE that Carlson is either a liar or too damned stupid to check his facts or both. This is his forte that he co-joins with his opinion. That makes him a useful idiot for the Cheeto Jeezus religion that has usurp the GOP. Carry on.


"...a Cheeto Jeezus acolyte."



The only folks who actually called their candidate god, Jesus and the messiah, are the Democrats.


Do you vote Democrat????
Mmm, not quite. That nonsense got started when in one of his speeches to the NOI rallies, Farrakhan EQUATED Obama with the "messiah". From them on, you had media wonks on both sides of the political aisle peppering their coverage of Obama with that word. Mind you, it was in effect a back handed attempt (promoted by the right wing media) to alienate any non-black voters from voting for him, and to paint black voters as dummies just following religious dogma and racial bias in voting en masse for a black candidate (IMHO, of course). But the people paid no attention to such silliness, and TWICE voted on the issues. Remember, the GOP gained control of both Houses because a large portion of voters withheld their congressional votes in protest over what they saw as Obama being too conciliatory to the GOP. They, and Obama, learned a hard lesson.

Oh, and FYI; the first time I heard the term "Cheeto Jeezus" was on a TV talk show called "The View"...it was uttered by Meaghan McCain, daughter of the late Sen. John McCain. She said it to point to the near fanatical religious approach that Trump supporters in Congress, the Media and the general public display even when Trump is caught flat footed lying.

And for the record, I'm a registered Independent. Hope this clears things up for you. Carry on.



And yet again I 'll ram the lie back down your throat.



Your side did, and you voted in support of same.

You bought it like it was on sale.


  1. The Hollywood celebrities pledge Go to 3:54:"I pledge to be a servant to our president and all mankind." Creepy?

    Demi Moore and Ashton Kutcher's I Pledge Video - YouTube


    2. Time's Nancy Gibbs who opened this week's cover story bycomparing Obama with Jesus:“Some princes are born in palaces. Some are born in mangers. But a few are born in the imagination, out of scraps of history and hope...” In the November 17 issue.

    3. Chris Matthews: "If you're in [a room] with Obama,you feel the spirit moving."Book Monitor (Current Edition)

    4. “Obama seemedthe political equivalent of a rainbow — a sudden preternatural event inspiring awe and ecstasy....” Time’s Joe Klein, October 23, 2006 cover story, "Why Barack Obama Could Be the Next President."



    5. NBC’s Matt Lauer noted that “people” have called Obama “ ‘The Savior,’ ‘The Messiah,’ ‘The Messenger of Change,’“ Today Show, NBC, October 20, 2008.

    6. The New York Time’s Judith Warner reported, “Many women- not too surprisingly – were dreaming about sex with the president [Obama]”.http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com...t-a-president/
    “…the Obamas are not just a beacon of hope, inspiration and“demigodlikeness,”Ibid.


    7. David Cordero, 24, made the sculpture for his senior show after noticing all the attention Obama has received: "All of this is a response to what I've been witnessing and hearing, this idea that Barack is sort ofa potential saviorthat might come and absolve the country of all its sins," Cordero said.Sculpture of Obama as Jesuscauses stir - politics - Decision '08 - Barack Obama News - msnbc.com

    8. . In its November 22, 2010 issue, Obama has been shown by Newsweek on its cover page with multiple arms balancing several policy issues while raising his left leg mimickingthe cosmic dance of the Hindu deity; considered a manifestation of Lord Shiva.
    ... Newsweek has named Obama "god of all things" on its cover.
    SOURCE: Times of India (November 20, 2010).


    9. “I haven’t seen a politician get this kind ofwalk-on-watercoverage since Colin Powell a dozen years ago flirted with making a run for the White House,” said Washington Post media critic Howard Kurtz on Meet the Press in February 2007

    10. Samantha Fennell, formerly an associate publisher of Elle, wrote on the magazine’s website a month later: “When I attended my second “Obama Live” fund-raiser last week at New York City’s Grand Hyatt, . . . I was on my feet as Senator Obama entered the room. Fate had blessed me in this moment. . . . In a moment of divine intervention,he saw me,…”

    11.Filmmaker Spike Lee, predicting an Obama victory, implicitly compared the candidate with Christ: “You’ll have to measure time by ‘Before Obama’ and ‘After Obama.’ . . .


    12. Jesse Jackson, Jr. called Obama’s securing the Democratic nomination “so extraordinary thatanother chapter could be added to the Bibleto chronicle its significance.”


    13. . Louis Farrakhan went one better, according to the website WorldNetDaily: “Barack has captured the youth. . . . That’s a sign.When the Messiah speaks,the youth will hear, andthe Messiah is absolutely speaking.


    14. His followers needed to re-elect him to a second term, so that he could continue to accomplish the promises he made, thus, realizing his vision of America as a more perfect political union or“heaven here on earth.”
    The Gospel According to Apostle Barack, by Barbara A. Thompson.

    15. "Does it not feel as ifsome special hand is guiding Obama on his journey, I mean, as he has said, the utter improbability of it all?"
    -- Daily Kos


    16"Obama's finest speeches do not excite. They do not inform. They don't even really inspire. They elevate. . . .He is not the Word made flesh, but the triumph of word over flesh . .. Obama is, at his best, able to call us back to our highest selves."
    - Ezra Klein

    17. "Obama has the capacity to summon heroic forces from the spiritual depths of ordinary citizens and to unleash therefrom a symphonic chorus of unique creative acts whose common purpose is to tame the soul and alleviate the great challenges facing mankind."
    -- Gerald Campbell

    18."We're here to evolve to a higher plane . . . he is an evolved leader . . . [he] has an ear for eloquence and a Tongue dipped in the Unvarnished Truth."
    -- Oprah Winfrey

    19. “I would characterize the Senate race as being a race where Obama was, let’s say, blessed and highly favored. That’s not routine. There’s something else going on. I think that Obama, his election to the Senate, was divinely ordered. . . . I know that that was God’s plan."
    -- Bill Rush



    20. "This is bigger than Kennedy. . . .This is the New Testament."| "I felt this thrill going up my leg. I mean, I don't have that too often. No, seriously. It's a dramatic event."
    -- Chris Matthews






Newsweek editor Evan Thomas said President Obama is "sort of God" in a way that's "standing above the country." Transcript below.




"CHRIS MATTHEWS (HOST):Evan Thomas is editor at large for Newsweek magazine. Evan, you remember 1984. It wasn't 100 years ago. Reagan and World War II and the sense of us as the good guys in the world, how are we doing?
EVAN THOMAS: Well, we were the good guys in 1984, it felt that way. It hasn't felt that way in recent years. So Obama's had, really, a different task We're seen too often as the bad guys. And he, he has a very different job from ... Reagan was all about America, and you talked about it. Obama is - we are above that now. We're not just parochial, we're not just chauvinistic, we're not just provincial. We stand for something, I mean in a way Obama's standing above the country, above above the world, he's sort of God."

Newsweek Editor Evan Thomas: Obama Is "Sort Of God" | RealClearPolitics



“Barbara Walters admits ‘we’ thought Obama was ‘the next messiah’”
Barbara Walters admits ‘we’ thought Obama was ‘the next messiah’




1608411396466.png









You're the human Piñata.....

View attachment 507451
You're not too bright, are ya sweetpea?

You seem to think that these canned responses somehow disprove my previous assessment of Tucker Carlson.

Hint: they don't.

As for the regurgitation of this "messiah" bilge the right wing STILL carries on about after getting their butts whupped by Obama in two elections (popular and electoral vote, don't cha know): you (once again) inadvertently prove my point. All these quasi-religious references to Obama's speeches from pundits, politicos and news promoters came on the heels of Farrakhan's decree to his followers. Just as I said . But the smart voters, (All Americans of all races, creeds and colors) weren't buying it. Interesting, n-cest pas'?

And of course, you omit this tidbit from your cache of cliches':


A 3rd rate propagandist such as yourself will just deny the conclusive logic, and continue to parrot your myopic mantra ad nausea. I expect nothing less from you at this point. Carry on.



‘I won’t be pathologized for being White’: Man resigns, shreds school district over ‘white privilege’ training

An after-school coordinator at a New Hampshire elementary school has gone viral for resigning over the school’s embrace of anti-white critical race theory propaganda.

In a public resignation letter released Monday on Twitter, former Northwest Elementary after-school program coordinator Daniel Concannon, 40, accused his school district of having endorsed the “dehumanization and hatred of White people, as evidenced by their dissemination of the imbecilic ‘White Privilege’ curriculum.”

In the letter, he purposefully referred to the Manchester School District as “The Frankfurt School.” It was a reference to the school responsible for creating contemporary Marxism, which is believed to be at the root of CRT."
translation: another clown who can't deal with FACTS that point to the congenital racism in the American fabric....much less that skin color greatly increases your chances of beneficial treatment and opportunities. No one is asking the fool to apologize, as individually no one gives a damn about him.

My assessment of Tucker Carlson is valid and documented....your "messiah" dodge was aptly deconstructed with FACTS....pity you don't have the cojones to just concede a point, and will just throw anything against the wall repeatedly, hoping it sticks....but I expect nothing less from 3rd rate David Duke wanna be's. Carry on.
You're a Weak Pathetic Pathological liar .



......and by that token......an excellent Democrat.
FYI: I put that useless clown on IA, as he clearly has no rational or logical refutation or retort when faced with basic logic and critical analysis.

You seem to add to that proud stupidity. Not surprising....carry on.



You can run, but you can't hide.
So saith the Brown Bomber.
And as you and the cretin you defend prove time and again, "stupid is as stupid does". Carry on, my little Davey Duke wanna be.



Once again, it appears that my role is to disabuse you of the lies your party and government school instituted.


David Duke was a Democrat, and believed as you do.


David Duke....the Democrat????

State Senator, 1975 (Baton Rouge Area)[edit]
Threshold > 50%

First Ballot, November 1, 1975

Louisiana State Senate, 1975
Party Candidate Votes %
Democratic Kenneth Osterberger 22,287 66
Democratic David Duke 11,079 33
N/A Others 1
Total 100
State Senator, 10th District, 1979 (Suburban New Orleans)[edit]
Threshold > 50% First Ballot, October 27, 1979

Louisiana State Senate, 10th District, 1979
Party Candidate Votes %
Democratic Joseph Tiemann 21,329 57
Democratic David Duke 9,897 26
N/A Others 6,459 17
Total 37,685 100
Democratic Nomination for United States Presidential Candidate, 1988 (Louisiana results)[edit]
Threshold = Plurality

1988 Democratic Presidential primary in Louisiana
Party Candidate Votes %
Democratic Jesse Jackson 221,522 35
Democratic Al Gore 174,971 28
Democratic Michael Dukakis 95,661 15
Democratic Dick Gephardt 67,029 11
Democratic Gary Hart 26,437 4
Democratic David Duke 23,391 4
Democratic Others 16,008 3
Total 625,019 100
Electoral history of David Duke - Wikipedia





Duke left the KKK long before he became a Republican....



"In 1979, after his first, abortive run for president (as a Democrat) and a series of highly publicized violent Klan incidents, Duke quietly incorporated the nonprofit National Association for the Advancement of White People (NAAWP) in an attempt to leave the baggage of the Klan behind."










The Democrats have always been associated with racism. The Democrat icon Franklin Roosevelt, in fact, made a KKKer his very first pick for the Supreme Court:

. "... [Hugo] Black was head of new members for the largest Klan cell in the South. New members of the KKK had to pledge their allegiance to the “eternal separation of Church and State.”... Separation was a crucial part of the KKK’s jurisprudential agenda. It was included in the Klansman’s Creed..."
http://egnorance.blogspot.com/2011/10/hugo-black-and-real-history-of-wall-of.html]
You must be a new type of stupid if you think you're going to somehow blame Duke's racism and bigotry on the Democratic Party and get away with it.

For your education:


And spare us your attempt to soft soap Duke, who NEVER disavowed his core racist beliefs no matter what party he chose in a state bitterly contentious of its congenital racism:



Duke was successful to a degree despite his painfully obvious bigotry and racism. YOU aren't even a cheap knock-off....just a wanna be with delusions of grandeur. Carry on, sweetpea. It's a guilty pleasure making a fool of you while you tell the mirror the opposite.





David Duke was a Democrat his entire racist career.

When he eschewed his earlier racism, he became a Republican.

You're just too stupid to realize you vote racist.



Duke left the KKK long before he became a Republican....



"In 1979, after his first, abortive run for president (as a Democrat) and a series of highly publicized violent Klan incidents, Duke quietly incorporated the nonprofit National Association for the Advancement of White People (NAAWP) in an attempt to leave the baggage of the Klan behind."










1. I was totally accurate in showing David Duke to be, in both his formative years, when he learned to be a racist, and in his political career....A DEMOCRAT.



2. As you have been trained to toss the word 'racist' at anyone who disagrees with Liberal propaganda, let's remember that the most frequent visitor to Obama, in the White House was racist Al Sharpton.



3. The Democrats have always been associated with racism. The Democrat icon Franklin Roosevelt, in fact, made a KKKer his very first pick for the Supreme Court:

. "... [Hugo] Black was head of new members for the largest Klan cell in the South. New members of the KKK had to pledge their allegiance to the “eternal separation of Church and State.”... Separation was a crucial part of the KKK’s jurisprudential agenda. It was included in the Klansman’s Creed..."
http://egnorance.blogspot.com/2011/10/hugo-black-and-real-history-of-wall-of.html]












In this race to fill a vacant seat, he is running for the first time as a Republican. The Republican Party, which is trying nationally to draw more black support, is mounting efforts to defeat him that are rare for an obscure state representative's race. The party has two candidates because state election laws allow an open primary whose top two finishers, regardless of party, are in a runoff. Klan's Ghost Haunts Louisiana Vote (Published 1989)





What factors led to 39% of the voters being willing to support a former KKK leader for governor?

"Louisiana used to have an open primary. Basically, any candidate would run, even multiple from the same party, and if one person secured 50% of the vote, they won. If not, the top two would go on to a run-off. This means that there were multiple Republicans and multiple Democrats in the first round of elections, making party loyalty less important and the ability to organize and round up supporters more important, and Duke did a good job of that. In the run-off election, he faced Edwin Edwards. Edwards had already served multiple terms as governor, and was known for his charisma and his political skills, but also for his corruption. He was the subject of several ethical investigations, and later (in 2001) he would be sentenced to ten years for racketeering. In fact, some Edwards supporters used the slogan "vote for the lizard, not the wizard". Had Duke's opponent been a more conventional candidate, it is fair to assume that Duke wouldn't have got 39% of the vote."



His white protest agenda, which includes opposition to crime, quotas and the welfare system, has broad support, national polls show. Like more conventional "outsider" candidates, Mr. Duke has successfully exploited the epidemic of anti-incumbent fever sweeping the nation.

The Edwards-Duke campaign quickly degenerated into a polarizing personal battle between two unpopular politicians, and many voters expressed disgust over the choice they were forced to make.







News article: Edwards tops Duke in exit polls in La. Ex-governor aided by drive to halt former Klansman





Ku Klux Klan Grand Dragon Will Quigg Endorses Hillary Clinton for President​






Will Quigg, a grand dragon of the Klan’s California chapter and responsible for recruitment in the western United States, is less keen to give Mr Trump the dubious benefit of his support.

“We want Hillary Clinton to win,” Mr Quigg told The Telegraph. “She is telling everybody one thing, but she has a hidden agenda. She’s telling everybody what they want to hear so she can get elected, because she’s Bill Clinton’s wife, she’s close to the Bushes. [But] once she’s in the presidency, she’s going to come out and her true colours are going to show.


But did Sharpton know he was visiting the first Arab POTUS and not the first black POTUS?

Are you STILL pushing the failed venom spewing campaign blather that lost the GOP 2 Presidential elections? Sad.

Dumb cocksuckers such as yourself comprise the collective IQ that would not pack a thimble, to legitimately get a glob of sewage slime such as JoeXi into the White House. You dumb automatonic bastards also perfomed fellatio on racist marxist babons and did a passover imitation on your t-shirts and houses. Literally drenched with credibility.
 
I'm sure this is better left unsaid, but let's imagine that "white" people think that their fellow "white" people are in some way superior to "black" people. This is not to say that any PARTICULAR white person is any "better" than any PARTICULAR "black" person, but that those in the "white" demographic have overall contributed much more to the culture, economy, and overall society than those in the "black" demographic.

Where would such an idea originate? Let me count the ways...
  • Science,
  • Technology,
  • the Arts,
  • Literature,
  • Architecture,
  • Philosophy,
  • Entertainment (note that the sports which Blacks dominate were all created by "white" men),
  • Civil law (the redress of personal grievances),
  • Jurisprudence (the redress of social grievances),
  • the Social Sciences (psychology, sociology),
  • Humanities,
  • Religion and ethics.
Have I left anything out? Surely I have.

But you get the picture. As one takes in the world in which we live, one is overwhelmed by the wonders that have been created and produced by...white men. Others have contributed, certainly - white women, Blacks, Asians, Latin Americans, even indigenous populations to a microscopic extent.

The superior contribution of "white" men to our society is so overwhelming that to deny it is pure fantasy. And yet CRT does exactly that: it denies the superiority of a group that is manifestly superior. It viciously slanders them for behavior and activities that were totally normal and accepted in their time, and most of which were gradually or precipitously eliminated VOLUNTARILY once their impacts were fully understood.

Again, this does not assert that any INDIVIDUALS are superior or inferior because of their "color", merely that if one must look at such trivialities as color/race, there is no doubt which color/race comes out ahead.

And if it is "racist" to notice a fact, then mea culpa, I am guilty as charged.
Well, I agree. You are a racist.

Remember when MLB was "superior" to the Negro Leagues? Well, except for those "barnstormers" who got kicked in fair games and MLB itself dominated by "inferior" players.
Remember when the all White NBA was "superior" to Black teams? Well, except for the Globetrotters who consistently crushed the White boys.
How about that Constitution that guaranteed freedom to all Americans. Well, if you happened to be a White Adult Property Owner, otherwise SOL.
Pretty sure your attitudes and actual US history validates most of CRT.
 
I'm sure this is better left unsaid, but let's imagine that "white" people think that their fellow "white" people are in some way superior to "black" people. This is not to say that any PARTICULAR white person is any "better" than any PARTICULAR "black" person, but that those in the "white" demographic have overall contributed much more to the culture, economy, and overall society than those in the "black" demographic.

Where would such an idea originate? Let me count the ways...
  • Science,
  • Technology,
  • the Arts,
  • Literature,
  • Architecture,
  • Philosophy,
  • Entertainment (note that the sports which Blacks dominate were all created by "white" men),
  • Civil law (the redress of personal grievances),
  • Jurisprudence (the redress of social grievances),
  • the Social Sciences (psychology, sociology),
  • Humanities,
  • Religion and ethics.
Have I left anything out? Surely I have.

But you get the picture. As one takes in the world in which we live, one is overwhelmed by the wonders that have been created and produced by...white men. Others have contributed, certainly - white women, Blacks, Asians, Latin Americans, even indigenous populations to a microscopic extent.

The superior contribution of "white" men to our society is so overwhelming that to deny it is pure fantasy. And yet CRT does exactly that: it denies the superiority of a group that is manifestly superior. It viciously slanders them for behavior and activities that were totally normal and accepted in their time, and most of which were gradually or precipitously eliminated VOLUNTARILY once their impacts were fully understood.

Again, this does not assert that any INDIVIDUALS are superior or inferior because of their "color", merely that if one must look at such trivialities as color/race, there is no doubt which color/race comes out ahead.

And if it is "racist" to notice a fact, then mea culpa, I am guilty as charged.
Well, I agree. You are a racist.

Remember when MLB was "superior" to the Negro Leagues? Well, except for those "barnstormers" who got kicked in fair games and MLB itself dominated by "inferior" players.
Remember when the all White NBA was "superior" to Black teams? Well, except for the Globetrotters who consistently crushed the White boys.
How about that Constitution that guaranteed freedom to all Americans. Well, if you happened to be a White Adult Property Owner, otherwise SOL.
Pretty sure your attitudes and actual US history validates most of CRT.


"How about that Constitution that guaranteed freedom to all Americans."



Democrat’s Bountiful Gifts To Out Black Brethren

1.Doubling down on their support for slavery and segregation, the Democrat Party blocked every anti-lynching to come to the Senate.

2. Dragging their feet on post-war freedom for their slaves, they imposed poll taxes and Jim Crow laws.

3. The Obama ‘Promise Program’ made it almost impossible to remove thugs and criminals from ghetto schools, to make certain that learning was impeded.

4. Authored gun laws that only law abiding citizens would obey, preventing black citizens in crime ridden neighborhood from protecting themselves.

5. Promoted bogus anti-police hatred, while ignoring some 350,000 blacks killed by lawless blacks. 324,000 U.S. Blacks Killed by Blacks In Only 35 Years – American Free Press

6. In nearing a century of Democrat welfare, blacks remain as the lowest income racial group.

7. Allied with the International Left, the Democrat party makes certain that racial animosity never dies down.

8. The Democrats made and make certain that religion and morality is barred from the schools and from the public arena. “…will America be made better by curbing religion in the name of secularism, of vice versa?” Ben Shapiro


9. The Democrat judicial system is based on the idea that all blacks are felons, so felons must be released from jails. Carter-appointed judge Norma Shapiro “ is one of the worst offenders among that influential cadre of federal judges who have substituted the ACLU's prisoners' rights wish list for the Bill of Rights and have trifled with public safety concerns. …” In 1992, black youths were nine times more likely to be murdered than white youths. Democrats lied, kids died.

10. But wait…..they did manage to ban one single word from common parlance.
 
The definitive reality check:
Yep… seems like elementary kids would eat this in-doctro-nashun shit up and straight turn commie. :uhoh3:
It sure isn't education. It's race hustling and deliberately trying to establish hateful divisions. It's sick and evil.


View attachment 506045
A stupid cartoon for the willfully ignorant. Here, deal with this: The Right Has Chosen Critical Race Theory as Its New Boogeyman to Scare Voters




Everything in every one of my posts is 100% true, accurate and correct.


Here's more proof of the racism you vote for:


you voted for this:


"Kristen Clarke, Joe Biden’s choice to lead the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division, believes black people are superior to white people because they possess more melanin.

Fox News host Tucker Carlson obtained shocking statements Clarke made in 1994.

“Melanin endows blacks with greater mental, physical, and spiritual abilities — something which cannot be measured by Eurocentric standards.” Kristen Clarke wrote."
thespectator.info





“Melanin Endows Blacks with Greater Mental, Physical and Spiritual Abilities” (VIDEO)
Kristen Clarke, Joe Biden’s choice to lead the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division, believes black people are superior to white people because they possess more melanin. Fox News host Tucker Carlson obtained shocking statements Clarke made in 1994. “Melanin endows blacks with greater ment ...
thespectator.info




thespectator.info




Soooo..... are you a fool or a liar????
tucker Carlson? That highly paid useful idiot?!!? :auiqs.jpg:

My goodness, you're bucking for 4th rate propagandist status now?

Here, for your education (or in your case, for your willful ignorance list):


and as they say, the devil is in the details:


The rational, objective reader will actually read each article thoroughly, and thus see your folly.

"tucker Carlson? That highly paid useful idiot?!!?"


I've noticed that when your sort can't deny the facts, you besmirch the source.


Is that from page one of the Democrat Racist Rule Book???
Yes, he is....as the the subsequent links I provided proved. Obviously you didn't read them.....typical willful ignorance of a Cheeto Jeezus acolyte.

It's like this sweetpea, when you make a claim, people will do research to see if that claim holds any water....they do so with a little thing called fact checking. The links I provided PROVE that Carlson is either a liar or too damned stupid to check his facts or both. This is his forte that he co-joins with his opinion. That makes him a useful idiot for the Cheeto Jeezus religion that has usurp the GOP. Carry on.


"...a Cheeto Jeezus acolyte."



The only folks who actually called their candidate god, Jesus and the messiah, are the Democrats.


Do you vote Democrat????
Mmm, not quite. That nonsense got started when in one of his speeches to the NOI rallies, Farrakhan EQUATED Obama with the "messiah". From them on, you had media wonks on both sides of the political aisle peppering their coverage of Obama with that word. Mind you, it was in effect a back handed attempt (promoted by the right wing media) to alienate any non-black voters from voting for him, and to paint black voters as dummies just following religious dogma and racial bias in voting en masse for a black candidate (IMHO, of course). But the people paid no attention to such silliness, and TWICE voted on the issues. Remember, the GOP gained control of both Houses because a large portion of voters withheld their congressional votes in protest over what they saw as Obama being too conciliatory to the GOP. They, and Obama, learned a hard lesson.

Oh, and FYI; the first time I heard the term "Cheeto Jeezus" was on a TV talk show called "The View"...it was uttered by Meaghan McCain, daughter of the late Sen. John McCain. She said it to point to the near fanatical religious approach that Trump supporters in Congress, the Media and the general public display even when Trump is caught flat footed lying.

And for the record, I'm a registered Independent. Hope this clears things up for you. Carry on.



And yet again I 'll ram the lie back down your throat.



Your side did, and you voted in support of same.

You bought it like it was on sale.


  1. The Hollywood celebrities pledge Go to 3:54:"I pledge to be a servant to our president and all mankind." Creepy?

    Demi Moore and Ashton Kutcher's I Pledge Video - YouTube


    2. Time's Nancy Gibbs who opened this week's cover story bycomparing Obama with Jesus:“Some princes are born in palaces. Some are born in mangers. But a few are born in the imagination, out of scraps of history and hope...” In the November 17 issue.

    3. Chris Matthews: "If you're in [a room] with Obama,you feel the spirit moving."Book Monitor (Current Edition)

    4. “Obama seemedthe political equivalent of a rainbow — a sudden preternatural event inspiring awe and ecstasy....” Time’s Joe Klein, October 23, 2006 cover story, "Why Barack Obama Could Be the Next President."



    5. NBC’s Matt Lauer noted that “people” have called Obama “ ‘The Savior,’ ‘The Messiah,’ ‘The Messenger of Change,’“ Today Show, NBC, October 20, 2008.

    6. The New York Time’s Judith Warner reported, “Many women- not too surprisingly – were dreaming about sex with the president [Obama]”.http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com...t-a-president/
    “…the Obamas are not just a beacon of hope, inspiration and“demigodlikeness,”Ibid.


    7. David Cordero, 24, made the sculpture for his senior show after noticing all the attention Obama has received: "All of this is a response to what I've been witnessing and hearing, this idea that Barack is sort ofa potential saviorthat might come and absolve the country of all its sins," Cordero said.Sculpture of Obama as Jesuscauses stir - politics - Decision '08 - Barack Obama News - msnbc.com

    8. . In its November 22, 2010 issue, Obama has been shown by Newsweek on its cover page with multiple arms balancing several policy issues while raising his left leg mimickingthe cosmic dance of the Hindu deity; considered a manifestation of Lord Shiva.
    ... Newsweek has named Obama "god of all things" on its cover.
    SOURCE: Times of India (November 20, 2010).


    9. “I haven’t seen a politician get this kind ofwalk-on-watercoverage since Colin Powell a dozen years ago flirted with making a run for the White House,” said Washington Post media critic Howard Kurtz on Meet the Press in February 2007

    10. Samantha Fennell, formerly an associate publisher of Elle, wrote on the magazine’s website a month later: “When I attended my second “Obama Live” fund-raiser last week at New York City’s Grand Hyatt, . . . I was on my feet as Senator Obama entered the room. Fate had blessed me in this moment. . . . In a moment of divine intervention,he saw me,…”

    11.Filmmaker Spike Lee, predicting an Obama victory, implicitly compared the candidate with Christ: “You’ll have to measure time by ‘Before Obama’ and ‘After Obama.’ . . .


    12. Jesse Jackson, Jr. called Obama’s securing the Democratic nomination “so extraordinary thatanother chapter could be added to the Bibleto chronicle its significance.”


    13. . Louis Farrakhan went one better, according to the website WorldNetDaily: “Barack has captured the youth. . . . That’s a sign.When the Messiah speaks,the youth will hear, andthe Messiah is absolutely speaking.


    14. His followers needed to re-elect him to a second term, so that he could continue to accomplish the promises he made, thus, realizing his vision of America as a more perfect political union or“heaven here on earth.”
    The Gospel According to Apostle Barack, by Barbara A. Thompson.

    15. "Does it not feel as ifsome special hand is guiding Obama on his journey, I mean, as he has said, the utter improbability of it all?"
    -- Daily Kos


    16"Obama's finest speeches do not excite. They do not inform. They don't even really inspire. They elevate. . . .He is not the Word made flesh, but the triumph of word over flesh . .. Obama is, at his best, able to call us back to our highest selves."
    - Ezra Klein

    17. "Obama has the capacity to summon heroic forces from the spiritual depths of ordinary citizens and to unleash therefrom a symphonic chorus of unique creative acts whose common purpose is to tame the soul and alleviate the great challenges facing mankind."
    -- Gerald Campbell

    18."We're here to evolve to a higher plane . . . he is an evolved leader . . . [he] has an ear for eloquence and a Tongue dipped in the Unvarnished Truth."
    -- Oprah Winfrey

    19. “I would characterize the Senate race as being a race where Obama was, let’s say, blessed and highly favored. That’s not routine. There’s something else going on. I think that Obama, his election to the Senate, was divinely ordered. . . . I know that that was God’s plan."
    -- Bill Rush



    20. "This is bigger than Kennedy. . . .This is the New Testament."| "I felt this thrill going up my leg. I mean, I don't have that too often. No, seriously. It's a dramatic event."
    -- Chris Matthews






Newsweek editor Evan Thomas said President Obama is "sort of God" in a way that's "standing above the country." Transcript below.




"CHRIS MATTHEWS (HOST):Evan Thomas is editor at large for Newsweek magazine. Evan, you remember 1984. It wasn't 100 years ago. Reagan and World War II and the sense of us as the good guys in the world, how are we doing?
EVAN THOMAS: Well, we were the good guys in 1984, it felt that way. It hasn't felt that way in recent years. So Obama's had, really, a different task We're seen too often as the bad guys. And he, he has a very different job from ... Reagan was all about America, and you talked about it. Obama is - we are above that now. We're not just parochial, we're not just chauvinistic, we're not just provincial. We stand for something, I mean in a way Obama's standing above the country, above above the world, he's sort of God."

Newsweek Editor Evan Thomas: Obama Is "Sort Of God" | RealClearPolitics



“Barbara Walters admits ‘we’ thought Obama was ‘the next messiah’”
Barbara Walters admits ‘we’ thought Obama was ‘the next messiah’




1608411396466.png









You're the human Piñata.....

View attachment 507451
You're not too bright, are ya sweetpea?

You seem to think that these canned responses somehow disprove my previous assessment of Tucker Carlson.

Hint: they don't.

As for the regurgitation of this "messiah" bilge the right wing STILL carries on about after getting their butts whupped by Obama in two elections (popular and electoral vote, don't cha know): you (once again) inadvertently prove my point. All these quasi-religious references to Obama's speeches from pundits, politicos and news promoters came on the heels of Farrakhan's decree to his followers. Just as I said . But the smart voters, (All Americans of all races, creeds and colors) weren't buying it. Interesting, n-cest pas'?

And of course, you omit this tidbit from your cache of cliches':


A 3rd rate propagandist such as yourself will just deny the conclusive logic, and continue to parrot your myopic mantra ad nausea. I expect nothing less from you at this point. Carry on.



‘I won’t be pathologized for being White’: Man resigns, shreds school district over ‘white privilege’ training

An after-school coordinator at a New Hampshire elementary school has gone viral for resigning over the school’s embrace of anti-white critical race theory propaganda.

In a public resignation letter released Monday on Twitter, former Northwest Elementary after-school program coordinator Daniel Concannon, 40, accused his school district of having endorsed the “dehumanization and hatred of White people, as evidenced by their dissemination of the imbecilic ‘White Privilege’ curriculum.”

In the letter, he purposefully referred to the Manchester School District as “The Frankfurt School.” It was a reference to the school responsible for creating contemporary Marxism, which is believed to be at the root of CRT."
translation: another clown who can't deal with FACTS that point to the congenital racism in the American fabric....much less that skin color greatly increases your chances of beneficial treatment and opportunities. No one is asking the fool to apologize, as individually no one gives a damn about him.

My assessment of Tucker Carlson is valid and documented....your "messiah" dodge was aptly deconstructed with FACTS....pity you don't have the cojones to just concede a point, and will just throw anything against the wall repeatedly, hoping it sticks....but I expect nothing less from 3rd rate David Duke wanna be's. Carry on.
You're a Weak Pathetic Pathological liar .



......and by that token......an excellent Democrat.
FYI: I put that useless clown on IA, as he clearly has no rational or logical refutation or retort when faced with basic logic and critical analysis.

You seem to add to that proud stupidity. Not surprising....carry on.



You can run, but you can't hide.
So saith the Brown Bomber.
And as you and the cretin you defend prove time and again, "stupid is as stupid does". Carry on, my little Davey Duke wanna be.



Once again, it appears that my role is to disabuse you of the lies your party and government school instituted.


David Duke was a Democrat, and believed as you do.


David Duke....the Democrat????

State Senator, 1975 (Baton Rouge Area)[edit]
Threshold > 50%

First Ballot, November 1, 1975

Louisiana State Senate, 1975
Party Candidate Votes %
Democratic Kenneth Osterberger 22,287 66
Democratic David Duke 11,079 33
N/A Others 1
Total 100
State Senator, 10th District, 1979 (Suburban New Orleans)[edit]
Threshold > 50% First Ballot, October 27, 1979

Louisiana State Senate, 10th District, 1979
Party Candidate Votes %
Democratic Joseph Tiemann 21,329 57
Democratic David Duke 9,897 26
N/A Others 6,459 17
Total 37,685 100
Democratic Nomination for United States Presidential Candidate, 1988 (Louisiana results)[edit]
Threshold = Plurality

1988 Democratic Presidential primary in Louisiana
Party Candidate Votes %
Democratic Jesse Jackson 221,522 35
Democratic Al Gore 174,971 28
Democratic Michael Dukakis 95,661 15
Democratic Dick Gephardt 67,029 11
Democratic Gary Hart 26,437 4
Democratic David Duke 23,391 4
Democratic Others 16,008 3
Total 625,019 100
Electoral history of David Duke - Wikipedia





Duke left the KKK long before he became a Republican....



"In 1979, after his first, abortive run for president (as a Democrat) and a series of highly publicized violent Klan incidents, Duke quietly incorporated the nonprofit National Association for the Advancement of White People (NAAWP) in an attempt to leave the baggage of the Klan behind."










The Democrats have always been associated with racism. The Democrat icon Franklin Roosevelt, in fact, made a KKKer his very first pick for the Supreme Court:

. "... [Hugo] Black was head of new members for the largest Klan cell in the South. New members of the KKK had to pledge their allegiance to the “eternal separation of Church and State.”... Separation was a crucial part of the KKK’s jurisprudential agenda. It was included in the Klansman’s Creed..."
http://egnorance.blogspot.com/2011/10/hugo-black-and-real-history-of-wall-of.html]
You must be a new type of stupid if you think you're going to somehow blame Duke's racism and bigotry on the Democratic Party and get away with it.

For your education:


And spare us your attempt to soft soap Duke, who NEVER disavowed his core racist beliefs no matter what party he chose in a state bitterly contentious of its congenital racism:



Duke was successful to a degree despite his painfully obvious bigotry and racism. YOU aren't even a cheap knock-off....just a wanna be with delusions of grandeur. Carry on, sweetpea. It's a guilty pleasure making a fool of you while you tell the mirror the opposite.



1. The Southern Strategy is a debunked conspiracy theory. Only lying assholes still push it.

2. Trump denounced Duke repeatedly. YOu people are lying assholes.

3. Duke ran for the Presidency. His utter crushing defeat showed the real power of w.s. ie none. Dumbasses.
1. Denied and revised by right wing/alt right wonks, but NEVER historically and factually "debunked"...take note:

Exclusive: Lee Atwater’s Infamous 1981 Interview on the Southern Strategy


2. Not quite....note the flip flop: Trump's David Duke Amnesia - FactCheck.org

3. President is a national contest.....state and local is quite another thing....take note:



seems when you use terms like "lying assholes" and "dumbasses", you were probably looking in the mirror at the time.



1. So, your prime "evidence" for the theory is a consultant claiming credit? Wow. Why not cite a crack whore or a lawyer?

2. Trump denounced duke repeatedly. Your one counter is him blowing off a question? You do realize that that does not contradict his denouncements.

3. Yep. President is national. He's run for the President as both a dem and as gop. IN both cases he got less than 1% of the vote. A total that makes me wonder how much of that was errors.
 
You think that centuries of ingrained racism can be erased in a generation? Civil rights only passed in the LATE 60s. It is going to take a lot longer than 50 years to remove all the tentacles that have wound their way into our system and culture.

What is wrong with examining why racial inequality still persists, even decades after these laws have passed? How do you fix it if you don’t know why it keeps going?


America's system is a TWO PARTY system. THe reasons are not important in this context.


For quite a while the republicans were pushing for racial equality for blacks, and the democrats were fighting that.


When the dems stopped fighting it, and started supporting it, suddenly in just a few years, Racists had no voice in national policy.

The moral and intellectual Debate, they had already lost well before that.


At that point, White Racists became marginalized. I grew up not long after wards and ALL the education and media and culture I got, supported the BI-Party line, of racial equality and blah, blah, blah, to the point I was bored with it. Indeed, i did not understand as a child why they kept harping on it.

For most people today, the time when white racism was openly practiced and had real political power and actual policy based on their agenda, seems...like another world.


TODAY, and indeed, even then, though not as bad as now, the message is not "examining why racial inequality still exists", but ASSUMING any inequality is because of Wacism and blaming white people and mobilizing EVERYTHING to fight it/them.


ANY voice raised, discussing an "inequality" that says ANTHING, other than "white people's fault" is dogpiled and shouted down with cries of wacism.


This is tearing this nation apart. It is teaching blacks that whites hate them, and teaching whites that they are always going to be fucked and discriminated against.


After all, if there is an "inequality" and the cause is NOT evul whites, but the solution implemented is based on the idea that is it evul whites, whites will be punished and suffer for shit that they did not do.
Politicians deciding something in DC did not change society and culture.

Blacks don’t have to be taught that a lot of whites hate them, believe stereotypes about them, fear them…they live it every day. That you refuse to see it just perpetuates it.



I like the way you dismiss law and national policy as "politicians deciding something".


My parents were working class dems, from the Depression Era. They were primary motivated by the Union culture of the Rust Belt. Based on what I saw, long after the fact, the long standing alliance of the dem party to southern racists must have been a negative that they were forced to ignore because of overriding economic issues.


When the politicians flipped on that issue, it would not have been a problem for working class dems in the Rust Belt. They were already there on that issue, long before the Party that they supported DESPITE their racist allilance.


You are living in a fantasy land, where you imagine that your enemies are villains, so that you can be the hero.
I’m afraid it is you that is living in a fantasy land. You seem to think that legislation was passed and suddenly unicorns were farting daisies. It didn’t happen that way. It still hasn’t happened that way.

Racism was baked into our system for centuries and you think it can be a erased in a couple of decades?


I addressed that point. My point was that, imo, the dem party was FOLLOWING society, not the other way around.

I supported my point, with personal observation of my family and community in the Rust Belt.

You ignored everything I said, and just repeated your previous assertion, with a sprinkling of hyperbole and ridicule.
You weren't trying to make a point beyond "derp, dems bad, derp". The thing you keep fucking up is that you idiots think the division on civil rights was Democrats vs Republicans. It wasn't. It was North vs South...again.

We know that institutional racism exists. What is so wrong at looking at why it prevails over half a century after the civil rights act?


My point was in response to that question. I am celebrating the fact that, long ago, the Democratic Party embraced the idea of racial equality for blacks. That is not "dem bad". When I have bad things to say about the dems, I say them clearly and loudly. YOu don't have to search for nuance.


Institutional anti-black racism does NOT exist. That is a lie. This nation has had a bi-partisan consensus on racial equality for blacks since the early 60s. National policy has been based on that, since then. Federal and State law has been based on that since then. Culture and media and education has constantly and strongly indoctrinated generation after generation of Americans in that consensus since then.
It exists. Your refusal to see it perpetuates it.



You see being anti-racism as being anti-white. That tells us a lot about you.


Policy, law, cultural, media, education, for 60 years has been united in pushing a bi-partisan consensus in favor of racial equality for blacks.

Schools? Have you ever met a teacher or a school administrator? They are some of the most liberal people on the fucking planet.

I reject the claim that our schools are wacist.
Gee, color me surprised that you eschew facts. Typical Trump supporter.


Pointing to the fact that teachers and administrators are overwhelmingly liberals dedicated to fighting wacism, is not eschewing facts, but embracing them.


SOmetimes I talk to them, and try to get understand how they feel about how they are constantly thrown under the bus by their fellow liberals.

I can't seem to get a straight answer. They do seem to appreciate that I point out that they are not wacist.
Teachers are only one layer of the education system. An education system that has had racism baked into it.

Data consistently shows that students of color are more likely to be disciplined than their White peers and receive harsher punishments for the same infractions. Black and Hispanic students are less likely to be placed in advanced or enriched classes, starting in elementary school. Many experts say school curriculums have failed to adequately reflect the perspectives of Indigenous and marginalized communities. And students and parents themselves often report that school culture does not feel welcoming.


Most administrators are promoted teachers. And as a group they tend to be liberals committed to racial equality for minority students.

If they are not, they are almost certainly moderates committed to racial equality for minority students.

The few that do not fit those two categories? Walk softly and try to not be noticed.

Studies? I call bullshit. Teachers are more likely to give minority students a pass for bad behavior, for fear of being called wacist, or to retreat behind some idiocy of a zero tolerance policy so they can punish both/all students involved to avoid assigning true blame, or something along those lines.
You don’t believe studies that tell you it exists. You don’t believe actual black people that tell you it exists. All you have to go on is your “feelings“.
:lol:

Yeah, I think I’ll go with studies and the people that are experienced it and not some white guy that thinks Trump is delightful.


Personal, direct observations are not "feelings".

And when you people blatantly lie, we notice. You don't get to lie to our faces and stone wall on it, when called on it, and expect to be given any credibility after that.

My point stands.


Policy, law, cultural, media, education, for 60 years has been united in pushing a bi-partisan consensus in favor of racial equality for blacks.

Schools? Have you ever met a teacher or a school administrator? They are some of the most liberal people on the fucking planet.

I reject the claim that our schools are wacist.
Your "observations" are also not hard data. The experience of one white guy that thinks blacks aren't as intelligent as whites and that being anti racist equals anti white, doesn't add up to a hill of beans.

...

Traditionally "hard data" was given more weight than anecdotal evidence. But with the increasing politicalization of EVERYTHING, and the dangerous increase of cancel culture, not to mention actual violent mobs in the streets,

No. Liberals and academics can't be trusted.


DO YOU KNOW ANY TEACHERS AND/OR SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS?
Translation: with the increasing insanity of the Republican Party, they must eschew facts and evidence because facts don’t support their twisted worldview.

Are you denying the power of cancel culture or the violent mobs in the streets? Are you claiming they don't exist?


What exactly is your defense against my point other than the logical fallacy of Proof by Ridicule?


Which by the way is invalid and you lose. You got anything else, or, you want to concede?
What point? You haven’t made any points. You’ve denied facts and keep repeating your feelings. You feel that teachers are overwhelmingly liberal, but completely ignore factual studies on the subject. You keep rejecting facts.

...

I pointed out that cancel culture makes such studies unreliable. And that those claims contradict our personal observations.

Do you know any teachers and/or school administrators?
I do. I have two children that just finished school in the last few years. I found their teachers and administrators to be the same mix I find all over the country. Some conservative some liberal.

And again, just because one layer of the cake is strawberry doesn’t make the whole cake strawberry. Study after study points out the systemic and institutionalized racism in the education system but you don’t believe it because a few teachers are liberal. How utterly a child like view of the world…

Do you support or reject this statement from the Racists Trump supporter, BSFilter, yes or no?

Maybe if the jigaboos work on their attitudes they might find people more welcoming.

1. Your claim that teachers are a "mix" of conservatives and liberals is absurd. As a group they lean HARD left and it shows in their work. To claim that the problems of blacks are because of teachers is nonsense.

2. Plenty of blacks do have very poor attitudes. If you are half as world wise as you claim, you know that. I'm sure that many people are turned off by the "attitude" of radicalized blacks who get more attention than they deserve.
I give you a teed up opportunity to not be a racist and you fail.


All you are doing is reasserting an absurd point.

Policy, law, cultural, media, education, for 60 years has been united in pushing a bi-partisan consensus in favor of racial equality for blacks.

Schools? Have you ever met a teacher or a school administrator? They are some of the most liberal people on the fucking planet.

I reject the claim that our schools are wacist.
You reject facts because they don't fit with your racist narrative.

Your wace baiting is noted and dismissed.


All you are doing is reasserting an absurd point.

Policy, law, cultural, media, education, for 60 years has been united in pushing a bi-partisan consensus in favor of racial equality for blacks.

Schools? Have you ever met a teacher or a school administrator? They are some of the most liberal people on the fucking planet.

I reject the claim that our schools are wacist.
Yes, we know you reject facts. No need to keep repeating yourself.



All you are doing is reasserting an absurd point.

Policy, law, cultural, media, education, for 60 years has been united in pushing a bi-partisan consensus in favor of racial equality for blacks.

Schools? Have you ever met a teacher or a school administrator? They are some of the most liberal people on the fucking planet.

I reject the claim that our schools are wacist.
All you are doing is denying facts. Not surprising from a Trumpster.
All you are doing is reasserting an absurd point.

Policy, law, cultural, media, education, for 60 years has been united in pushing a bi-partisan consensus in favor of racial equality for blacks.

Schools? Have you ever met a teacher or a school administrator? They are some of the most liberal people on the fucking planet.

I reject the claim that our schools are wacist.
Yeah, I guess facts, evidence and studies would be "absurd" to a Trumpster living on Earth 2. Here on Earth One, facts speak for themselves.



(You, notably, have provided zero)


Like I said, when people like you can listen to a man say, "not w.s." and insist that they heard, "w.s.", you can't trust what they say.

Me? I know teachers, plenty of them. Some of them have been promoted to be administrators. They are not wacists. They are ALL (that I've met) standard out of the box libs, well indoctrinated in anti-wacism.
 
You think that centuries of ingrained racism can be erased in a generation? Civil rights only passed in the LATE 60s. It is going to take a lot longer than 50 years to remove all the tentacles that have wound their way into our system and culture.

What is wrong with examining why racial inequality still persists, even decades after these laws have passed? How do you fix it if you don’t know why it keeps going?


America's system is a TWO PARTY system. THe reasons are not important in this context.


For quite a while the republicans were pushing for racial equality for blacks, and the democrats were fighting that.


When the dems stopped fighting it, and started supporting it, suddenly in just a few years, Racists had no voice in national policy.

The moral and intellectual Debate, they had already lost well before that.


At that point, White Racists became marginalized. I grew up not long after wards and ALL the education and media and culture I got, supported the BI-Party line, of racial equality and blah, blah, blah, to the point I was bored with it. Indeed, i did not understand as a child why they kept harping on it.

For most people today, the time when white racism was openly practiced and had real political power and actual policy based on their agenda, seems...like another world.


TODAY, and indeed, even then, though not as bad as now, the message is not "examining why racial inequality still exists", but ASSUMING any inequality is because of Wacism and blaming white people and mobilizing EVERYTHING to fight it/them.


ANY voice raised, discussing an "inequality" that says ANTHING, other than "white people's fault" is dogpiled and shouted down with cries of wacism.


This is tearing this nation apart. It is teaching blacks that whites hate them, and teaching whites that they are always going to be fucked and discriminated against.


After all, if there is an "inequality" and the cause is NOT evul whites, but the solution implemented is based on the idea that is it evul whites, whites will be punished and suffer for shit that they did not do.
Politicians deciding something in DC did not change society and culture.

Blacks don’t have to be taught that a lot of whites hate them, believe stereotypes about them, fear them…they live it every day. That you refuse to see it just perpetuates it.



I like the way you dismiss law and national policy as "politicians deciding something".


My parents were working class dems, from the Depression Era. They were primary motivated by the Union culture of the Rust Belt. Based on what I saw, long after the fact, the long standing alliance of the dem party to southern racists must have been a negative that they were forced to ignore because of overriding economic issues.


When the politicians flipped on that issue, it would not have been a problem for working class dems in the Rust Belt. They were already there on that issue, long before the Party that they supported DESPITE their racist allilance.


You are living in a fantasy land, where you imagine that your enemies are villains, so that you can be the hero.
I’m afraid it is you that is living in a fantasy land. You seem to think that legislation was passed and suddenly unicorns were farting daisies. It didn’t happen that way. It still hasn’t happened that way.

Racism was baked into our system for centuries and you think it can be a erased in a couple of decades?


I addressed that point. My point was that, imo, the dem party was FOLLOWING society, not the other way around.

I supported my point, with personal observation of my family and community in the Rust Belt.

You ignored everything I said, and just repeated your previous assertion, with a sprinkling of hyperbole and ridicule.
You weren't trying to make a point beyond "derp, dems bad, derp". The thing you keep fucking up is that you idiots think the division on civil rights was Democrats vs Republicans. It wasn't. It was North vs South...again.

We know that institutional racism exists. What is so wrong at looking at why it prevails over half a century after the civil rights act?


My point was in response to that question. I am celebrating the fact that, long ago, the Democratic Party embraced the idea of racial equality for blacks. That is not "dem bad". When I have bad things to say about the dems, I say them clearly and loudly. YOu don't have to search for nuance.


Institutional anti-black racism does NOT exist. That is a lie. This nation has had a bi-partisan consensus on racial equality for blacks since the early 60s. National policy has been based on that, since then. Federal and State law has been based on that since then. Culture and media and education has constantly and strongly indoctrinated generation after generation of Americans in that consensus since then.
It exists. Your refusal to see it perpetuates it.



You see being anti-racism as being anti-white. That tells us a lot about you.


Policy, law, cultural, media, education, for 60 years has been united in pushing a bi-partisan consensus in favor of racial equality for blacks.

Schools? Have you ever met a teacher or a school administrator? They are some of the most liberal people on the fucking planet.

I reject the claim that our schools are wacist.
Gee, color me surprised that you eschew facts. Typical Trump supporter.


Pointing to the fact that teachers and administrators are overwhelmingly liberals dedicated to fighting wacism, is not eschewing facts, but embracing them.


SOmetimes I talk to them, and try to get understand how they feel about how they are constantly thrown under the bus by their fellow liberals.

I can't seem to get a straight answer. They do seem to appreciate that I point out that they are not wacist.
Teachers are only one layer of the education system. An education system that has had racism baked into it.

Data consistently shows that students of color are more likely to be disciplined than their White peers and receive harsher punishments for the same infractions. Black and Hispanic students are less likely to be placed in advanced or enriched classes, starting in elementary school. Many experts say school curriculums have failed to adequately reflect the perspectives of Indigenous and marginalized communities. And students and parents themselves often report that school culture does not feel welcoming.


Most administrators are promoted teachers. And as a group they tend to be liberals committed to racial equality for minority students.

If they are not, they are almost certainly moderates committed to racial equality for minority students.

The few that do not fit those two categories? Walk softly and try to not be noticed.

Studies? I call bullshit. Teachers are more likely to give minority students a pass for bad behavior, for fear of being called wacist, or to retreat behind some idiocy of a zero tolerance policy so they can punish both/all students involved to avoid assigning true blame, or something along those lines.
You don’t believe studies that tell you it exists. You don’t believe actual black people that tell you it exists. All you have to go on is your “feelings“.
:lol:

Yeah, I think I’ll go with studies and the people that are experienced it and not some white guy that thinks Trump is delightful.


Personal, direct observations are not "feelings".

And when you people blatantly lie, we notice. You don't get to lie to our faces and stone wall on it, when called on it, and expect to be given any credibility after that.

My point stands.


Policy, law, cultural, media, education, for 60 years has been united in pushing a bi-partisan consensus in favor of racial equality for blacks.

Schools? Have you ever met a teacher or a school administrator? They are some of the most liberal people on the fucking planet.

I reject the claim that our schools are wacist.
Your "observations" are also not hard data. The experience of one white guy that thinks blacks aren't as intelligent as whites and that being anti racist equals anti white, doesn't add up to a hill of beans.

...

Traditionally "hard data" was given more weight than anecdotal evidence. But with the increasing politicalization of EVERYTHING, and the dangerous increase of cancel culture, not to mention actual violent mobs in the streets,

No. Liberals and academics can't be trusted.


DO YOU KNOW ANY TEACHERS AND/OR SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS?
Translation: with the increasing insanity of the Republican Party, they must eschew facts and evidence because facts don’t support their twisted worldview.

Are you denying the power of cancel culture or the violent mobs in the streets? Are you claiming they don't exist?


What exactly is your defense against my point other than the logical fallacy of Proof by Ridicule?


Which by the way is invalid and you lose. You got anything else, or, you want to concede?
What point? You haven’t made any points. You’ve denied facts and keep repeating your feelings. You feel that teachers are overwhelmingly liberal, but completely ignore factual studies on the subject. You keep rejecting facts.

...

I pointed out that cancel culture makes such studies unreliable. And that those claims contradict our personal observations.

Do you know any teachers and/or school administrators?
I do. I have two children that just finished school in the last few years. I found their teachers and administrators to be the same mix I find all over the country. Some conservative some liberal.

And again, just because one layer of the cake is strawberry doesn’t make the whole cake strawberry. Study after study points out the systemic and institutionalized racism in the education system but you don’t believe it because a few teachers are liberal. How utterly a child like view of the world…

Do you support or reject this statement from the Racists Trump supporter, BSFilter, yes or no?

Maybe if the jigaboos work on their attitudes they might find people more welcoming.

1. Your claim that teachers are a "mix" of conservatives and liberals is absurd. As a group they lean HARD left and it shows in their work. To claim that the problems of blacks are because of teachers is nonsense.

2. Plenty of blacks do have very poor attitudes. If you are half as world wise as you claim, you know that. I'm sure that many people are turned off by the "attitude" of radicalized blacks who get more attention than they deserve.
I give you a teed up opportunity to not be a racist and you fail.


All you are doing is reasserting an absurd point.

Policy, law, cultural, media, education, for 60 years has been united in pushing a bi-partisan consensus in favor of racial equality for blacks.

Schools? Have you ever met a teacher or a school administrator? They are some of the most liberal people on the fucking planet.

I reject the claim that our schools are wacist.
You reject facts because they don't fit with your racist narrative.

Your wace baiting is noted and dismissed.


All you are doing is reasserting an absurd point.

Policy, law, cultural, media, education, for 60 years has been united in pushing a bi-partisan consensus in favor of racial equality for blacks.

Schools? Have you ever met a teacher or a school administrator? They are some of the most liberal people on the fucking planet.

I reject the claim that our schools are wacist.
Yes, we know you reject facts. No need to keep repeating yourself.



All you are doing is reasserting an absurd point.

Policy, law, cultural, media, education, for 60 years has been united in pushing a bi-partisan consensus in favor of racial equality for blacks.

Schools? Have you ever met a teacher or a school administrator? They are some of the most liberal people on the fucking planet.

I reject the claim that our schools are wacist.
All you are doing is denying facts. Not surprising from a Trumpster.
All you are doing is reasserting an absurd point.

Policy, law, cultural, media, education, for 60 years has been united in pushing a bi-partisan consensus in favor of racial equality for blacks.

Schools? Have you ever met a teacher or a school administrator? They are some of the most liberal people on the fucking planet.

I reject the claim that our schools are wacist.
Yeah, I guess facts, evidence and studies would be "absurd" to a Trumpster living on Earth 2. Here on Earth One, facts speak for themselves.



(You, notably, have provided zero)


Like I said, when people like you can listen to a man say, "not w.s." and insist that they heard, "w.s.", you can't trust what they say.

Me? I know teachers, plenty of them. Some of them have been promoted to be administrators. They are not wacists. They are ALL (that I've met) standard out of the box libs, well indoctrinated in anti-wacism.
That’s a good boy…keep doubling down on your rejection of facts & reality. Such a perfect little Trumpster. :lol:
 
"We’re not talking here about a difference of opinion regarding enacting some new national holiday, or difference of opinion about particular government spending programs.

We’re talking about fundamentally different worldviews about our national history and culture.

In one view, our nation is rooted in and defined by racism and oppression [Democrats].
In the other view [Americans], the nation’s founding was a landmark moment in human history, in which, for the first time, a society would be defined by human liberty, justice, and equality before the law.

Can we have a school system that mixes oil and water? I don’t think so.

But critical race theory has already made it into many school curricula."
 
You think that centuries of ingrained racism can be erased in a generation? Civil rights only passed in the LATE 60s. It is going to take a lot longer than 50 years to remove all the tentacles that have wound their way into our system and culture.

What is wrong with examining why racial inequality still persists, even decades after these laws have passed? How do you fix it if you don’t know why it keeps going?


America's system is a TWO PARTY system. THe reasons are not important in this context.


For quite a while the republicans were pushing for racial equality for blacks, and the democrats were fighting that.


When the dems stopped fighting it, and started supporting it, suddenly in just a few years, Racists had no voice in national policy.

The moral and intellectual Debate, they had already lost well before that.


At that point, White Racists became marginalized. I grew up not long after wards and ALL the education and media and culture I got, supported the BI-Party line, of racial equality and blah, blah, blah, to the point I was bored with it. Indeed, i did not understand as a child why they kept harping on it.

For most people today, the time when white racism was openly practiced and had real political power and actual policy based on their agenda, seems...like another world.


TODAY, and indeed, even then, though not as bad as now, the message is not "examining why racial inequality still exists", but ASSUMING any inequality is because of Wacism and blaming white people and mobilizing EVERYTHING to fight it/them.


ANY voice raised, discussing an "inequality" that says ANTHING, other than "white people's fault" is dogpiled and shouted down with cries of wacism.


This is tearing this nation apart. It is teaching blacks that whites hate them, and teaching whites that they are always going to be fucked and discriminated against.


After all, if there is an "inequality" and the cause is NOT evul whites, but the solution implemented is based on the idea that is it evul whites, whites will be punished and suffer for shit that they did not do.
Politicians deciding something in DC did not change society and culture.

Blacks don’t have to be taught that a lot of whites hate them, believe stereotypes about them, fear them…they live it every day. That you refuse to see it just perpetuates it.



I like the way you dismiss law and national policy as "politicians deciding something".


My parents were working class dems, from the Depression Era. They were primary motivated by the Union culture of the Rust Belt. Based on what I saw, long after the fact, the long standing alliance of the dem party to southern racists must have been a negative that they were forced to ignore because of overriding economic issues.


When the politicians flipped on that issue, it would not have been a problem for working class dems in the Rust Belt. They were already there on that issue, long before the Party that they supported DESPITE their racist allilance.


You are living in a fantasy land, where you imagine that your enemies are villains, so that you can be the hero.
I’m afraid it is you that is living in a fantasy land. You seem to think that legislation was passed and suddenly unicorns were farting daisies. It didn’t happen that way. It still hasn’t happened that way.

Racism was baked into our system for centuries and you think it can be a erased in a couple of decades?


I addressed that point. My point was that, imo, the dem party was FOLLOWING society, not the other way around.

I supported my point, with personal observation of my family and community in the Rust Belt.

You ignored everything I said, and just repeated your previous assertion, with a sprinkling of hyperbole and ridicule.
You weren't trying to make a point beyond "derp, dems bad, derp". The thing you keep fucking up is that you idiots think the division on civil rights was Democrats vs Republicans. It wasn't. It was North vs South...again.

We know that institutional racism exists. What is so wrong at looking at why it prevails over half a century after the civil rights act?


My point was in response to that question. I am celebrating the fact that, long ago, the Democratic Party embraced the idea of racial equality for blacks. That is not "dem bad". When I have bad things to say about the dems, I say them clearly and loudly. YOu don't have to search for nuance.


Institutional anti-black racism does NOT exist. That is a lie. This nation has had a bi-partisan consensus on racial equality for blacks since the early 60s. National policy has been based on that, since then. Federal and State law has been based on that since then. Culture and media and education has constantly and strongly indoctrinated generation after generation of Americans in that consensus since then.
It exists. Your refusal to see it perpetuates it.



You see being anti-racism as being anti-white. That tells us a lot about you.


Policy, law, cultural, media, education, for 60 years has been united in pushing a bi-partisan consensus in favor of racial equality for blacks.

Schools? Have you ever met a teacher or a school administrator? They are some of the most liberal people on the fucking planet.

I reject the claim that our schools are wacist.
Gee, color me surprised that you eschew facts. Typical Trump supporter.


Pointing to the fact that teachers and administrators are overwhelmingly liberals dedicated to fighting wacism, is not eschewing facts, but embracing them.


SOmetimes I talk to them, and try to get understand how they feel about how they are constantly thrown under the bus by their fellow liberals.

I can't seem to get a straight answer. They do seem to appreciate that I point out that they are not wacist.
Teachers are only one layer of the education system. An education system that has had racism baked into it.

Data consistently shows that students of color are more likely to be disciplined than their White peers and receive harsher punishments for the same infractions. Black and Hispanic students are less likely to be placed in advanced or enriched classes, starting in elementary school. Many experts say school curriculums have failed to adequately reflect the perspectives of Indigenous and marginalized communities. And students and parents themselves often report that school culture does not feel welcoming.


Most administrators are promoted teachers. And as a group they tend to be liberals committed to racial equality for minority students.

If they are not, they are almost certainly moderates committed to racial equality for minority students.

The few that do not fit those two categories? Walk softly and try to not be noticed.

Studies? I call bullshit. Teachers are more likely to give minority students a pass for bad behavior, for fear of being called wacist, or to retreat behind some idiocy of a zero tolerance policy so they can punish both/all students involved to avoid assigning true blame, or something along those lines.
You don’t believe studies that tell you it exists. You don’t believe actual black people that tell you it exists. All you have to go on is your “feelings“.
:lol:

Yeah, I think I’ll go with studies and the people that are experienced it and not some white guy that thinks Trump is delightful.


Personal, direct observations are not "feelings".

And when you people blatantly lie, we notice. You don't get to lie to our faces and stone wall on it, when called on it, and expect to be given any credibility after that.

My point stands.


Policy, law, cultural, media, education, for 60 years has been united in pushing a bi-partisan consensus in favor of racial equality for blacks.

Schools? Have you ever met a teacher or a school administrator? They are some of the most liberal people on the fucking planet.

I reject the claim that our schools are wacist.
Your "observations" are also not hard data. The experience of one white guy that thinks blacks aren't as intelligent as whites and that being anti racist equals anti white, doesn't add up to a hill of beans.

...

Traditionally "hard data" was given more weight than anecdotal evidence. But with the increasing politicalization of EVERYTHING, and the dangerous increase of cancel culture, not to mention actual violent mobs in the streets,

No. Liberals and academics can't be trusted.


DO YOU KNOW ANY TEACHERS AND/OR SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS?
Translation: with the increasing insanity of the Republican Party, they must eschew facts and evidence because facts don’t support their twisted worldview.

Are you denying the power of cancel culture or the violent mobs in the streets? Are you claiming they don't exist?


What exactly is your defense against my point other than the logical fallacy of Proof by Ridicule?


Which by the way is invalid and you lose. You got anything else, or, you want to concede?
What point? You haven’t made any points. You’ve denied facts and keep repeating your feelings. You feel that teachers are overwhelmingly liberal, but completely ignore factual studies on the subject. You keep rejecting facts.

...

I pointed out that cancel culture makes such studies unreliable. And that those claims contradict our personal observations.

Do you know any teachers and/or school administrators?
I do. I have two children that just finished school in the last few years. I found their teachers and administrators to be the same mix I find all over the country. Some conservative some liberal.

And again, just because one layer of the cake is strawberry doesn’t make the whole cake strawberry. Study after study points out the systemic and institutionalized racism in the education system but you don’t believe it because a few teachers are liberal. How utterly a child like view of the world…

Do you support or reject this statement from the Racists Trump supporter, BSFilter, yes or no?

Maybe if the jigaboos work on their attitudes they might find people more welcoming.

1. Your claim that teachers are a "mix" of conservatives and liberals is absurd. As a group they lean HARD left and it shows in their work. To claim that the problems of blacks are because of teachers is nonsense.

2. Plenty of blacks do have very poor attitudes. If you are half as world wise as you claim, you know that. I'm sure that many people are turned off by the "attitude" of radicalized blacks who get more attention than they deserve.
I give you a teed up opportunity to not be a racist and you fail.


All you are doing is reasserting an absurd point.

Policy, law, cultural, media, education, for 60 years has been united in pushing a bi-partisan consensus in favor of racial equality for blacks.

Schools? Have you ever met a teacher or a school administrator? They are some of the most liberal people on the fucking planet.

I reject the claim that our schools are wacist.
You reject facts because they don't fit with your racist narrative.

Your wace baiting is noted and dismissed.


All you are doing is reasserting an absurd point.

Policy, law, cultural, media, education, for 60 years has been united in pushing a bi-partisan consensus in favor of racial equality for blacks.

Schools? Have you ever met a teacher or a school administrator? They are some of the most liberal people on the fucking planet.

I reject the claim that our schools are wacist.
Yes, we know you reject facts. No need to keep repeating yourself.



All you are doing is reasserting an absurd point.

Policy, law, cultural, media, education, for 60 years has been united in pushing a bi-partisan consensus in favor of racial equality for blacks.

Schools? Have you ever met a teacher or a school administrator? They are some of the most liberal people on the fucking planet.

I reject the claim that our schools are wacist.
All you are doing is denying facts. Not surprising from a Trumpster.
All you are doing is reasserting an absurd point.

Policy, law, cultural, media, education, for 60 years has been united in pushing a bi-partisan consensus in favor of racial equality for blacks.

Schools? Have you ever met a teacher or a school administrator? They are some of the most liberal people on the fucking planet.

I reject the claim that our schools are wacist.
Yeah, I guess facts, evidence and studies would be "absurd" to a Trumpster living on Earth 2. Here on Earth One, facts speak for themselves.



(You, notably, have provided zero)


Like I said, when people like you can listen to a man say, "not w.s." and insist that they heard, "w.s.", you can't trust what they say.

Me? I know teachers, plenty of them. Some of them have been promoted to be administrators. They are not wacists. They are ALL (that I've met) standard out of the box libs, well indoctrinated in anti-wacism.
That’s a good boy…keep doubling down on your rejection of facts & reality. Such a perfect little Trumpster. :lol:


Dealing with the fact that you libs are either A. completely delusional, or B. completely dishonest, is dealing with reality.


My point stands. Teachers and administrators are as a group, generally speaking, completely committed to racial equality and diversity and blah, blah, blah, blah.


YOur pretense otherwise is you avoiding reality.
 
You think that centuries of ingrained racism can be erased in a generation? Civil rights only passed in the LATE 60s. It is going to take a lot longer than 50 years to remove all the tentacles that have wound their way into our system and culture.

What is wrong with examining why racial inequality still persists, even decades after these laws have passed? How do you fix it if you don’t know why it keeps going?


America's system is a TWO PARTY system. THe reasons are not important in this context.


For quite a while the republicans were pushing for racial equality for blacks, and the democrats were fighting that.


When the dems stopped fighting it, and started supporting it, suddenly in just a few years, Racists had no voice in national policy.

The moral and intellectual Debate, they had already lost well before that.


At that point, White Racists became marginalized. I grew up not long after wards and ALL the education and media and culture I got, supported the BI-Party line, of racial equality and blah, blah, blah, to the point I was bored with it. Indeed, i did not understand as a child why they kept harping on it.

For most people today, the time when white racism was openly practiced and had real political power and actual policy based on their agenda, seems...like another world.


TODAY, and indeed, even then, though not as bad as now, the message is not "examining why racial inequality still exists", but ASSUMING any inequality is because of Wacism and blaming white people and mobilizing EVERYTHING to fight it/them.


ANY voice raised, discussing an "inequality" that says ANTHING, other than "white people's fault" is dogpiled and shouted down with cries of wacism.


This is tearing this nation apart. It is teaching blacks that whites hate them, and teaching whites that they are always going to be fucked and discriminated against.


After all, if there is an "inequality" and the cause is NOT evul whites, but the solution implemented is based on the idea that is it evul whites, whites will be punished and suffer for shit that they did not do.
Politicians deciding something in DC did not change society and culture.

Blacks don’t have to be taught that a lot of whites hate them, believe stereotypes about them, fear them…they live it every day. That you refuse to see it just perpetuates it.



I like the way you dismiss law and national policy as "politicians deciding something".


My parents were working class dems, from the Depression Era. They were primary motivated by the Union culture of the Rust Belt. Based on what I saw, long after the fact, the long standing alliance of the dem party to southern racists must have been a negative that they were forced to ignore because of overriding economic issues.


When the politicians flipped on that issue, it would not have been a problem for working class dems in the Rust Belt. They were already there on that issue, long before the Party that they supported DESPITE their racist allilance.


You are living in a fantasy land, where you imagine that your enemies are villains, so that you can be the hero.
I’m afraid it is you that is living in a fantasy land. You seem to think that legislation was passed and suddenly unicorns were farting daisies. It didn’t happen that way. It still hasn’t happened that way.

Racism was baked into our system for centuries and you think it can be a erased in a couple of decades?


I addressed that point. My point was that, imo, the dem party was FOLLOWING society, not the other way around.

I supported my point, with personal observation of my family and community in the Rust Belt.

You ignored everything I said, and just repeated your previous assertion, with a sprinkling of hyperbole and ridicule.
You weren't trying to make a point beyond "derp, dems bad, derp". The thing you keep fucking up is that you idiots think the division on civil rights was Democrats vs Republicans. It wasn't. It was North vs South...again.

We know that institutional racism exists. What is so wrong at looking at why it prevails over half a century after the civil rights act?


My point was in response to that question. I am celebrating the fact that, long ago, the Democratic Party embraced the idea of racial equality for blacks. That is not "dem bad". When I have bad things to say about the dems, I say them clearly and loudly. YOu don't have to search for nuance.


Institutional anti-black racism does NOT exist. That is a lie. This nation has had a bi-partisan consensus on racial equality for blacks since the early 60s. National policy has been based on that, since then. Federal and State law has been based on that since then. Culture and media and education has constantly and strongly indoctrinated generation after generation of Americans in that consensus since then.
It exists. Your refusal to see it perpetuates it.



You see being anti-racism as being anti-white. That tells us a lot about you.


Policy, law, cultural, media, education, for 60 years has been united in pushing a bi-partisan consensus in favor of racial equality for blacks.

Schools? Have you ever met a teacher or a school administrator? They are some of the most liberal people on the fucking planet.

I reject the claim that our schools are wacist.
Gee, color me surprised that you eschew facts. Typical Trump supporter.


Pointing to the fact that teachers and administrators are overwhelmingly liberals dedicated to fighting wacism, is not eschewing facts, but embracing them.


SOmetimes I talk to them, and try to get understand how they feel about how they are constantly thrown under the bus by their fellow liberals.

I can't seem to get a straight answer. They do seem to appreciate that I point out that they are not wacist.
Teachers are only one layer of the education system. An education system that has had racism baked into it.

Data consistently shows that students of color are more likely to be disciplined than their White peers and receive harsher punishments for the same infractions. Black and Hispanic students are less likely to be placed in advanced or enriched classes, starting in elementary school. Many experts say school curriculums have failed to adequately reflect the perspectives of Indigenous and marginalized communities. And students and parents themselves often report that school culture does not feel welcoming.


Most administrators are promoted teachers. And as a group they tend to be liberals committed to racial equality for minority students.

If they are not, they are almost certainly moderates committed to racial equality for minority students.

The few that do not fit those two categories? Walk softly and try to not be noticed.

Studies? I call bullshit. Teachers are more likely to give minority students a pass for bad behavior, for fear of being called wacist, or to retreat behind some idiocy of a zero tolerance policy so they can punish both/all students involved to avoid assigning true blame, or something along those lines.
You don’t believe studies that tell you it exists. You don’t believe actual black people that tell you it exists. All you have to go on is your “feelings“.
:lol:

Yeah, I think I’ll go with studies and the people that are experienced it and not some white guy that thinks Trump is delightful.


Personal, direct observations are not "feelings".

And when you people blatantly lie, we notice. You don't get to lie to our faces and stone wall on it, when called on it, and expect to be given any credibility after that.

My point stands.


Policy, law, cultural, media, education, for 60 years has been united in pushing a bi-partisan consensus in favor of racial equality for blacks.

Schools? Have you ever met a teacher or a school administrator? They are some of the most liberal people on the fucking planet.

I reject the claim that our schools are wacist.
Your "observations" are also not hard data. The experience of one white guy that thinks blacks aren't as intelligent as whites and that being anti racist equals anti white, doesn't add up to a hill of beans.

...

Traditionally "hard data" was given more weight than anecdotal evidence. But with the increasing politicalization of EVERYTHING, and the dangerous increase of cancel culture, not to mention actual violent mobs in the streets,

No. Liberals and academics can't be trusted.


DO YOU KNOW ANY TEACHERS AND/OR SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS?
Translation: with the increasing insanity of the Republican Party, they must eschew facts and evidence because facts don’t support their twisted worldview.

Are you denying the power of cancel culture or the violent mobs in the streets? Are you claiming they don't exist?


What exactly is your defense against my point other than the logical fallacy of Proof by Ridicule?


Which by the way is invalid and you lose. You got anything else, or, you want to concede?
What point? You haven’t made any points. You’ve denied facts and keep repeating your feelings. You feel that teachers are overwhelmingly liberal, but completely ignore factual studies on the subject. You keep rejecting facts.

...

I pointed out that cancel culture makes such studies unreliable. And that those claims contradict our personal observations.

Do you know any teachers and/or school administrators?
I do. I have two children that just finished school in the last few years. I found their teachers and administrators to be the same mix I find all over the country. Some conservative some liberal.

And again, just because one layer of the cake is strawberry doesn’t make the whole cake strawberry. Study after study points out the systemic and institutionalized racism in the education system but you don’t believe it because a few teachers are liberal. How utterly a child like view of the world…

Do you support or reject this statement from the Racists Trump supporter, BSFilter, yes or no?

Maybe if the jigaboos work on their attitudes they might find people more welcoming.

1. Your claim that teachers are a "mix" of conservatives and liberals is absurd. As a group they lean HARD left and it shows in their work. To claim that the problems of blacks are because of teachers is nonsense.

2. Plenty of blacks do have very poor attitudes. If you are half as world wise as you claim, you know that. I'm sure that many people are turned off by the "attitude" of radicalized blacks who get more attention than they deserve.
I give you a teed up opportunity to not be a racist and you fail.


All you are doing is reasserting an absurd point.

Policy, law, cultural, media, education, for 60 years has been united in pushing a bi-partisan consensus in favor of racial equality for blacks.

Schools? Have you ever met a teacher or a school administrator? They are some of the most liberal people on the fucking planet.

I reject the claim that our schools are wacist.
You reject facts because they don't fit with your racist narrative.

Your wace baiting is noted and dismissed.


All you are doing is reasserting an absurd point.

Policy, law, cultural, media, education, for 60 years has been united in pushing a bi-partisan consensus in favor of racial equality for blacks.

Schools? Have you ever met a teacher or a school administrator? They are some of the most liberal people on the fucking planet.

I reject the claim that our schools are wacist.
Yes, we know you reject facts. No need to keep repeating yourself.



All you are doing is reasserting an absurd point.

Policy, law, cultural, media, education, for 60 years has been united in pushing a bi-partisan consensus in favor of racial equality for blacks.

Schools? Have you ever met a teacher or a school administrator? They are some of the most liberal people on the fucking planet.

I reject the claim that our schools are wacist.
All you are doing is denying facts. Not surprising from a Trumpster.
All you are doing is reasserting an absurd point.

Policy, law, cultural, media, education, for 60 years has been united in pushing a bi-partisan consensus in favor of racial equality for blacks.

Schools? Have you ever met a teacher or a school administrator? They are some of the most liberal people on the fucking planet.

I reject the claim that our schools are wacist.
Yeah, I guess facts, evidence and studies would be "absurd" to a Trumpster living on Earth 2. Here on Earth One, facts speak for themselves.



(You, notably, have provided zero)


Like I said, when people like you can listen to a man say, "not w.s." and insist that they heard, "w.s.", you can't trust what they say.

Me? I know teachers, plenty of them. Some of them have been promoted to be administrators. They are not wacists. They are ALL (that I've met) standard out of the box libs, well indoctrinated in anti-wacism.
That’s a good boy…keep doubling down on your rejection of facts & reality. Such a perfect little Trumpster. :lol:


Dealing with the fact that you libs are either A. completely delusional, or B. completely dishonest, is dealing with reality.


My point stands. Teachers and administrators are as a group, generally speaking, completely committed to racial equality and diversity and blah, blah, blah, blah.


YOur pretense otherwise is you avoiding reality.
As a Trump supporter, you wouldn’t know reality if it bit you in the ass. Actual facts and studies run 100% counter to your feelings on the issue.
 
You think that centuries of ingrained racism can be erased in a generation? Civil rights only passed in the LATE 60s. It is going to take a lot longer than 50 years to remove all the tentacles that have wound their way into our system and culture.

What is wrong with examining why racial inequality still persists, even decades after these laws have passed? How do you fix it if you don’t know why it keeps going?


America's system is a TWO PARTY system. THe reasons are not important in this context.


For quite a while the republicans were pushing for racial equality for blacks, and the democrats were fighting that.


When the dems stopped fighting it, and started supporting it, suddenly in just a few years, Racists had no voice in national policy.

The moral and intellectual Debate, they had already lost well before that.


At that point, White Racists became marginalized. I grew up not long after wards and ALL the education and media and culture I got, supported the BI-Party line, of racial equality and blah, blah, blah, to the point I was bored with it. Indeed, i did not understand as a child why they kept harping on it.

For most people today, the time when white racism was openly practiced and had real political power and actual policy based on their agenda, seems...like another world.


TODAY, and indeed, even then, though not as bad as now, the message is not "examining why racial inequality still exists", but ASSUMING any inequality is because of Wacism and blaming white people and mobilizing EVERYTHING to fight it/them.


ANY voice raised, discussing an "inequality" that says ANTHING, other than "white people's fault" is dogpiled and shouted down with cries of wacism.


This is tearing this nation apart. It is teaching blacks that whites hate them, and teaching whites that they are always going to be fucked and discriminated against.


After all, if there is an "inequality" and the cause is NOT evul whites, but the solution implemented is based on the idea that is it evul whites, whites will be punished and suffer for shit that they did not do.
Politicians deciding something in DC did not change society and culture.

Blacks don’t have to be taught that a lot of whites hate them, believe stereotypes about them, fear them…they live it every day. That you refuse to see it just perpetuates it.



I like the way you dismiss law and national policy as "politicians deciding something".


My parents were working class dems, from the Depression Era. They were primary motivated by the Union culture of the Rust Belt. Based on what I saw, long after the fact, the long standing alliance of the dem party to southern racists must have been a negative that they were forced to ignore because of overriding economic issues.


When the politicians flipped on that issue, it would not have been a problem for working class dems in the Rust Belt. They were already there on that issue, long before the Party that they supported DESPITE their racist allilance.


You are living in a fantasy land, where you imagine that your enemies are villains, so that you can be the hero.
I’m afraid it is you that is living in a fantasy land. You seem to think that legislation was passed and suddenly unicorns were farting daisies. It didn’t happen that way. It still hasn’t happened that way.

Racism was baked into our system for centuries and you think it can be a erased in a couple of decades?


I addressed that point. My point was that, imo, the dem party was FOLLOWING society, not the other way around.

I supported my point, with personal observation of my family and community in the Rust Belt.

You ignored everything I said, and just repeated your previous assertion, with a sprinkling of hyperbole and ridicule.
You weren't trying to make a point beyond "derp, dems bad, derp". The thing you keep fucking up is that you idiots think the division on civil rights was Democrats vs Republicans. It wasn't. It was North vs South...again.

We know that institutional racism exists. What is so wrong at looking at why it prevails over half a century after the civil rights act?


My point was in response to that question. I am celebrating the fact that, long ago, the Democratic Party embraced the idea of racial equality for blacks. That is not "dem bad". When I have bad things to say about the dems, I say them clearly and loudly. YOu don't have to search for nuance.


Institutional anti-black racism does NOT exist. That is a lie. This nation has had a bi-partisan consensus on racial equality for blacks since the early 60s. National policy has been based on that, since then. Federal and State law has been based on that since then. Culture and media and education has constantly and strongly indoctrinated generation after generation of Americans in that consensus since then.
It exists. Your refusal to see it perpetuates it.



You see being anti-racism as being anti-white. That tells us a lot about you.


Policy, law, cultural, media, education, for 60 years has been united in pushing a bi-partisan consensus in favor of racial equality for blacks.

Schools? Have you ever met a teacher or a school administrator? They are some of the most liberal people on the fucking planet.

I reject the claim that our schools are wacist.
Gee, color me surprised that you eschew facts. Typical Trump supporter.


Pointing to the fact that teachers and administrators are overwhelmingly liberals dedicated to fighting wacism, is not eschewing facts, but embracing them.


SOmetimes I talk to them, and try to get understand how they feel about how they are constantly thrown under the bus by their fellow liberals.

I can't seem to get a straight answer. They do seem to appreciate that I point out that they are not wacist.
Teachers are only one layer of the education system. An education system that has had racism baked into it.

Data consistently shows that students of color are more likely to be disciplined than their White peers and receive harsher punishments for the same infractions. Black and Hispanic students are less likely to be placed in advanced or enriched classes, starting in elementary school. Many experts say school curriculums have failed to adequately reflect the perspectives of Indigenous and marginalized communities. And students and parents themselves often report that school culture does not feel welcoming.


Most administrators are promoted teachers. And as a group they tend to be liberals committed to racial equality for minority students.

If they are not, they are almost certainly moderates committed to racial equality for minority students.

The few that do not fit those two categories? Walk softly and try to not be noticed.

Studies? I call bullshit. Teachers are more likely to give minority students a pass for bad behavior, for fear of being called wacist, or to retreat behind some idiocy of a zero tolerance policy so they can punish both/all students involved to avoid assigning true blame, or something along those lines.
You don’t believe studies that tell you it exists. You don’t believe actual black people that tell you it exists. All you have to go on is your “feelings“.
:lol:

Yeah, I think I’ll go with studies and the people that are experienced it and not some white guy that thinks Trump is delightful.


Personal, direct observations are not "feelings".

And when you people blatantly lie, we notice. You don't get to lie to our faces and stone wall on it, when called on it, and expect to be given any credibility after that.

My point stands.


Policy, law, cultural, media, education, for 60 years has been united in pushing a bi-partisan consensus in favor of racial equality for blacks.

Schools? Have you ever met a teacher or a school administrator? They are some of the most liberal people on the fucking planet.

I reject the claim that our schools are wacist.
Your "observations" are also not hard data. The experience of one white guy that thinks blacks aren't as intelligent as whites and that being anti racist equals anti white, doesn't add up to a hill of beans.

...

Traditionally "hard data" was given more weight than anecdotal evidence. But with the increasing politicalization of EVERYTHING, and the dangerous increase of cancel culture, not to mention actual violent mobs in the streets,

No. Liberals and academics can't be trusted.


DO YOU KNOW ANY TEACHERS AND/OR SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS?
Translation: with the increasing insanity of the Republican Party, they must eschew facts and evidence because facts don’t support their twisted worldview.

Are you denying the power of cancel culture or the violent mobs in the streets? Are you claiming they don't exist?


What exactly is your defense against my point other than the logical fallacy of Proof by Ridicule?


Which by the way is invalid and you lose. You got anything else, or, you want to concede?
What point? You haven’t made any points. You’ve denied facts and keep repeating your feelings. You feel that teachers are overwhelmingly liberal, but completely ignore factual studies on the subject. You keep rejecting facts.

...

I pointed out that cancel culture makes such studies unreliable. And that those claims contradict our personal observations.

Do you know any teachers and/or school administrators?
I do. I have two children that just finished school in the last few years. I found their teachers and administrators to be the same mix I find all over the country. Some conservative some liberal.

And again, just because one layer of the cake is strawberry doesn’t make the whole cake strawberry. Study after study points out the systemic and institutionalized racism in the education system but you don’t believe it because a few teachers are liberal. How utterly a child like view of the world…

Do you support or reject this statement from the Racists Trump supporter, BSFilter, yes or no?

Maybe if the jigaboos work on their attitudes they might find people more welcoming.

1. Your claim that teachers are a "mix" of conservatives and liberals is absurd. As a group they lean HARD left and it shows in their work. To claim that the problems of blacks are because of teachers is nonsense.

2. Plenty of blacks do have very poor attitudes. If you are half as world wise as you claim, you know that. I'm sure that many people are turned off by the "attitude" of radicalized blacks who get more attention than they deserve.
I give you a teed up opportunity to not be a racist and you fail.


All you are doing is reasserting an absurd point.

Policy, law, cultural, media, education, for 60 years has been united in pushing a bi-partisan consensus in favor of racial equality for blacks.

Schools? Have you ever met a teacher or a school administrator? They are some of the most liberal people on the fucking planet.

I reject the claim that our schools are wacist.
You reject facts because they don't fit with your racist narrative.

Your wace baiting is noted and dismissed.


All you are doing is reasserting an absurd point.

Policy, law, cultural, media, education, for 60 years has been united in pushing a bi-partisan consensus in favor of racial equality for blacks.

Schools? Have you ever met a teacher or a school administrator? They are some of the most liberal people on the fucking planet.

I reject the claim that our schools are wacist.
Yes, we know you reject facts. No need to keep repeating yourself.



All you are doing is reasserting an absurd point.

Policy, law, cultural, media, education, for 60 years has been united in pushing a bi-partisan consensus in favor of racial equality for blacks.

Schools? Have you ever met a teacher or a school administrator? They are some of the most liberal people on the fucking planet.

I reject the claim that our schools are wacist.
All you are doing is denying facts. Not surprising from a Trumpster.
All you are doing is reasserting an absurd point.

Policy, law, cultural, media, education, for 60 years has been united in pushing a bi-partisan consensus in favor of racial equality for blacks.

Schools? Have you ever met a teacher or a school administrator? They are some of the most liberal people on the fucking planet.

I reject the claim that our schools are wacist.
Yeah, I guess facts, evidence and studies would be "absurd" to a Trumpster living on Earth 2. Here on Earth One, facts speak for themselves.



(You, notably, have provided zero)


Like I said, when people like you can listen to a man say, "not w.s." and insist that they heard, "w.s.", you can't trust what they say.

Me? I know teachers, plenty of them. Some of them have been promoted to be administrators. They are not wacists. They are ALL (that I've met) standard out of the box libs, well indoctrinated in anti-wacism.
That’s a good boy…keep doubling down on your rejection of facts & reality. Such a perfect little Trumpster. :lol:


Dealing with the fact that you libs are either A. completely delusional, or B. completely dishonest, is dealing with reality.


My point stands. Teachers and administrators are as a group, generally speaking, completely committed to racial equality and diversity and blah, blah, blah, blah.


YOur pretense otherwise is you avoiding reality.
As a Trump supporter, you wouldn’t know reality if it bit you in the ass. Actual facts and studies run 100% counter to your feelings on the issue.




Just last week they were saying that Critical Race Theory isn't being taught in school.....​

"National teacher's union president is accused of gaslighting parents by saying Critical Race Theory is NOT taught in schools and prepares to sue states banning the controversial lessons​

  • American Federation of Teachers President Randi Weingarten said critical race theory is not being taught in any primary schools on Tuesday
  • She claimed states are banning the controversial lessons to 'bully' teachers and prevent any discussion about race and discrimination
  • In her remarks to members, Weingarten said the union has created a legal defense fund for teachers accused of teaching the controversial topic
  • Her remarks came just a few days after the National Educator's Association passed a resolution supporting the critical race theory
  • But the union has since deleted its agenda item to discuss its support
  • At least six states have now banned critical race theory in schools and a dozen more are considering similar legislation "
  • www.dailymail.co.uk

    Teachers' union president says CRT is NOT being taught in schools

    American Federation of Teachers President Randi Weingarten said critical race theory is not being taught in schools, but the union has created a fund for anyone accused of teaching the theory.
    www.dailymail.co.uk
    www.dailymail.co.uk


Democrats lie about everything.
 
One can understand invoking unions. One can understand Real viruses.

’A crisis related to environments of enclosure....the family is an “interior” crisis like all other interiors — scholarly, professional, etc....Paul Virilio is also continually analyzing the ultrarapid forms of free-floating control that replaced the old disciplines operating in the time frame of an enclosed system....For the hospital system: the new medicine “without doctor or patient” that singles out potential sick people and subjects at risk, which in no way attests to individuation — as they say but substitutes for the individual or numerical body the code of a “dividual” material to be controlled....There is no need to fear and hope, but only to look for new weapons.’
(Deleuze and Guattari, Postscript on the Societies of Control)
 
In addition they add....

’One of the most important questions will concern the ineptitude of the unions.’
(D&G, ibid.)
 

Forum List

Back
Top