The definitive guide to the "Global Warming" scam

And just what part of the Blaze is truth? There has never been a bit of truth to anything in the Blaze. Now when the entire modern world accepts global warming it kind of puts all the nay sayers in a position of desperation to prove themselves correct. Thanks for the laugh.

History has shown us that the entire world will often accept bullshit as the truth...quite often as a matter of fact.
 
Lets face it......either you have here one of two things........

1) A devotee to the religion who is just a sucker for anything stated by the government/science and is, thus, a mental case

or

2) An individual who knows this is a farce and has an uber-progressive agenda...........their way or the highway and fuck any information counter to the established narrative.


For those who follow the regular climate crusaders in here..........:bye1:all 4 of them:bye1:.........if you look closely enough at the substance of the posts, you can tell who are the mental cases and who are those with a progressive agenda, although, some are not astute enough to pick up on it.
 
That you continue to embrace your willful ignorance
This is vintage “projection”. Snowflake - let’s see if we can dumb this down to your level (I doubt that’s even possible but I’ll give it a shot). Here is a person you blindly believed.
Biologist Paul Ehrlich predicted in the 1970s that: “Population will inevitably and completely outstrip whatever small increases in food supplies we make,” and that “The death rate will increase until at least 100-200 million people per year will be starving to death during the next ten years.”
Did this happen? Yes or No?
 
Summary. The global temperature rose by 0.20C between the middle 1960's and 1980, yielding a warming of 0.4°C in the past century. This temperature increase is consistent with the calculated greenhouse effect due to measured increases of atmospheric carbon dioxide. Variations of volcanic aerosols and possibly solar luminosity appear to be primary causes of observed fluctuations about the mean trend of increasing temperature. It is shown that the anthropogenic carbon dioxide warming should emerge from the noise level of natural climate variability by the end of the century, and there is a high probability of warming in the 1980's. Potential effects on climate in the 21st century include the creation of drought-prone regions in North America and central Asia as part of a shifting of climatic zones, erosion of the West Antarctic ice sheet with a consequent worldwide rise in sea level, and opening of the fabled Northwest Passage.
https://pubs.giss.nasa.gov/docs/1981/1981_Hansen_ha04600x.pdf

Patriot, you dumb ass cocksuck, stick to the subject. Here is the 1981 prediction by Dr. Hansen concerning CO2 in the atmosphere. Yes, he was wrong. He predicted these things to happen toward the end of the 21st Century. They are already happening. The Northwest passage opened up for the first time in 2007, and, in 2016, a 1000 passenger luxury liner made the passage.
 
The odd part is they can be told in no uncertain terms that they have been lied to, just like the media admitted to lying, and they will march blindly on and believe exactly what they have been told. Look how many still quote CNN. It seems they can't be lied to enough.
Nothing can make them believe the truth. It's kind of eerie.. :eusa_doh:
Sounds like you when you're told Trump lies to your face.
 
Summary. The global temperature rose by 0.20C between the middle 1960's and 1980, yielding a warming of 0.4°C in the past century. This temperature increase is consistent with the calculated greenhouse effect due to measured increases of atmospheric carbon dioxide. Variations of volcanic aerosols and possibly solar luminosity appear to be primary causes of observed fluctuations about the mean trend of increasing temperature. It is shown that the anthropogenic carbon dioxide warming should emerge from the noise level of natural climate variability by the end of the century, and there is a high probability of warming in the 1980's. Potential effects on climate in the 21st century include the creation of drought-prone regions in North America and central Asia as part of a shifting of climatic zones, erosion of the West Antarctic ice sheet with a consequent worldwide rise in sea level, and opening of the fabled Northwest Passage.
https://pubs.giss.nasa.gov/docs/1981/1981_Hansen_ha04600x.pdf

Patriot, you dumb ass cocksuck, stick to the subject. Here is the 1981 prediction by Dr. Hansen concerning CO2 in the atmosphere. Yes, he was wrong. He predicted these things to happen toward the end of the 21st Century. They are already happening. The Northwest passage opened up for the first time in 2007, and, in 2016, a 1000 passenger luxury liner made the passage.
Hansen Et Al is a pile of garbage. His modeling has failed so badly that they wont even use it in the IPCC propaganda anymore. And your luxury liner was escorted by a state of the art ice breaker... do you know why? You really shouldn't be so deceptive...
 
Summary. The global temperature rose by 0.20C between the middle 1960's and 1980, yielding a warming of 0.4°C in the past century. This temperature increase is consistent with the calculated greenhouse effect due to measured increases of atmospheric carbon dioxide. Variations of volcanic aerosols and possibly solar luminosity appear to be primary causes of observed fluctuations about the mean trend of increasing temperature. It is shown that the anthropogenic carbon dioxide warming should emerge from the noise level of natural climate variability by the end of the century, and there is a high probability of warming in the 1980's. Potential effects on climate in the 21st century include the creation of drought-prone regions in North America and central Asia as part of a shifting of climatic zones, erosion of the West Antarctic ice sheet with a consequent worldwide rise in sea level, and opening of the fabled Northwest Passage.
https://pubs.giss.nasa.gov/docs/1981/1981_Hansen_ha04600x.pdf

Patriot, you dumb ass cocksuck, stick to the subject. Here is the 1981 prediction by Dr. Hansen concerning CO2 in the atmosphere. Yes, he was wrong. He predicted these things to happen toward the end of the 21st Century. They are already happening. The Northwest passage opened up for the first time in 2007, and, in 2016, a 1000 passenger luxury liner made the passage.
Hansen Et Al is a pile of garbage. His modeling has failed so badly that they wont even use it in the IPCC propaganda anymore. And your luxury liner was escorted by a state of the art ice breaker... do you know why? You really shouldn't be so deceptive...



What else is new about old rocks half truths and outright lies ..

A Luxury Cruise Liner Is About to Sail the Arctic’s Northwest Passage


Despite the melting trends, Arctic waters aren’t exactly smooth sailing even in August, and Crystal says it is planning accordingly. The cruise willhave an escort from the R.R.S.Ernest Shackleton, a research vessel with icebreaking capability and two helicopters aboard. The Serenity itself is outfitted with ice detection radar, two ice pilots, and other safety upgrades.
 
It’s as hilarious as it is sad how the left is so easy to dupe...
“’It is so hot that it actually circled completely around back to cold,’” Pat jokingly paraphrased Gore’s tweet.
One doesn’t need “scientists”, data, or Al Gore to understand “Global Warming” is a hoax. One need only to look outside. The left claimed that we would completely run out of food by 1980. The left claimed we would all die by 2000. The left claimed that the polar ice-cap would be completely melted by 2014 (instead it expanded 60%). The left claimed that New York City would be completely submerged by the ocean on January 1st, 2018. None of that has happened. All it takes is an acceptance of reality to understand that “Global Warming” is the most ridiculous hoax ever.

In This Freezing Weather, Al Gore Wants to Reassure You That Global Warming Is Real
 
The “Global Warming” scam is completely collapsing. Yes, it has its ardent supporters who were easy to dupe. But as more and more time goes by and people see that none of the warnings came to fruition - they are waking up to the fact that it was a scam.
Australian science writer Joanne Nova recently wrote a tongue-in-cheek article pointing out that to climate change advocates, “this extreme cold is just weather, but all heat waves are climate change.” Why do global warming experts point to every heat wave as evidence while trying to ignore unusually cold winters that don’t fit their argument?

Science Writer Points out What We’re All Thinking About Climate Change Experts
 
The assholes calling it a scam are the real scam. Pure idiocy...This truly is the age of making shit up and attacking real evidence based thought with it. Sad.

Hey science rocks...funny you should mention evidence based science...I am still waiting for that single piece of observed, measured, quantified evidence that supports the AGW hypothesis over natural variability...and while you are on the evidence based kick...lets see a single piece of actual evidence gathered with an instrument at ambient temperature that suggests a coherent relationship between the absorption of IR by a gas and warming in the atmosphere...

You are making the claim that climate science is evidence based...lets see some actual evidence...the two requests above should be bedrock basic for any claim that climate science is evidence based. waiting................
 
Summary. The global temperature rose by 0.20C between the middle 1960's and 1980, yielding a warming of 0.4°C in the past century. This temperature increase is consistent with the calculated greenhouse effect due to measured increases of atmospheric carbon dioxide. Variations of volcanic aerosols and possibly solar luminosity appear to be primary causes of observed fluctuations about the mean trend of increasing temperature. It is shown that the anthropogenic carbon dioxide warming should emerge from the noise level of natural climate variability by the end of the century, and there is a high probability of warming in the 1980's. Potential effects on climate in the 21st century include the creation of drought-prone regions in North America and central Asia as part of a shifting of climatic zones, erosion of the West Antarctic ice sheet with a consequent worldwide rise in sea level, and opening of the fabled Northwest Passage.
https://pubs.giss.nasa.gov/docs/1981/1981_Hansen_ha04600x.pdf

Patriot, you dumb ass cocksuck, stick to the subject. Here is the 1981 prediction by Dr. Hansen concerning CO2 in the atmosphere. Yes, he was wrong. He predicted these things to happen toward the end of the 21st Century. They are already happening. The Northwest passage opened up for the first time in 2007, and, in 2016, a 1000 passenger luxury liner made the passage.
Hansen Et Al is a pile of garbage. His modeling has failed so badly that they wont even use it in the IPCC propaganda anymore. And your luxury liner was escorted by a state of the art ice breaker... do you know why? You really shouldn't be so deceptive...

Deceptive is all he has these days, what with the scam falling apart around his ears.
 
Once again, reality (and now history) proves that “Global Warming” is a scam...
Three thresher sharks have washed up in Cape Cod due to record low temperatures in the US
So much for the whole “Global Warming” false narrative. The article is incredible - a zoo had to bring penguins inside because it was so cold. Road salt isn’t working because it is so cold. And yet brain-washed progressives believe that CO2 gases are “trapped” in the atmosphere and heating up the planet.

It’s so cold in the US that sharks are freezing to death
 
Yep. Lot's of electricity, at a high price. Capitalism and market economics like low prices for the same products.


Power Plant Type Cost
$/kW-hr
Coal $0.11-0.12
Natural Gas $0.053-0.11
Nuclear $0.096
Wind $0.044-0.20
Solar PV $0.058
Solar Thermal $0.184
Geothermal $0.05
Biomass $0.098
Hydro $0.064
Adapted from US DOE

Renewable Energy Sources: Cost Comparison

And if something goes wrong with one of the nukes, you have a generations long cleanup process at extreme cost. Fukushima.

How stupid are you rocks...look at the nations that have the most renewable energy...they invariably have the least stable grid and the highest prices. Only a true moron would suggest that renewables are cheaper when even the most cursory observation says otherwise.
 

Forum List

Back
Top