The dominion Voting suit against Fox should fail

[Clipper]

we know it wasn't the "most honest election" in history now...we know that big tech actively censored news that was damaging to Xiden...and we know China and Iran actively interfereed on his behalf....so we know it wasn't "fair" as you claimed.

~YAWN~

 

[struth]

~YAWN~

oh I get you don't care....but I just wanted to set the record straight

 

[toobfreak]

No one care that you jack off in your spare time

Obviously YOU DO. Thanks for admitting you've been peeking in my windows!

 

[BackAgain]

Fox better hurry up and settle before DeSantis takes HB 991 federal.

Someday we’ll discuss Ex post facto application of laws.

 

[BackAgain]

You have been conned. It's all there. It's time for you to grow up and admit it.

You’ve been conned. Nothing substantive is there. Nothing.

But just as you’ve been lied to, as a liberal you wouldn’t admit reality even under torture.

 

[BackAgain]

If it gets the court approval and goes to trial, and makes that stage, FOX NEWS will LOSE....imo.

If the judge charges the law fairly and correctly, and the poor jury understands it, Fox News would kick ass. However, since there is zero guarantee of those conditions, I would anticipate some settlement. The Dominion damage figure is just silly, though.

Being a commentator on a NEWS Channel does not give you free reign to KNOWINGLY promote a lie

If a reporter (actually a commentator) doesn’t personally believe an account, that doesn’t make him or her a liar merely because he or she happens to convey the reports. You tend to miss those substantive distinctions.

and knowingly defame or book guests to defame another company or person....

No evidence that’s what happened. If I were Fox News or even MSLSD, I would still “book” Ms. Powell and/or Rudy Guilliani.

The key is they all knew their guests were lying,

No. They didn’t. The fact that they had their doubts or didn’t believe something isn’t the same as “knowing.”

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Fox's chances of settling out just nosedived. Dominion is taking it all the way to the end zone, now.

 

[Lesh]

If the judge charges the law fairly and correctly, and the poor jury understands it, Fox News would kick ass. However, since there is zero guarantee of those conditions, I would anticipate some settlement. The Dominion damage figure is just silly, though.

If a reporter (actually a commentator) doesn’t personally believe an account, that doesn’t make him or her a liar merely because he or she happens to convey the reports. You tend to miss those substantive distinctions.


No evidence that’s what happened. If I were Fox News or even MSLSD, I would still “book” Ms. Powell and/or Rudy Guilliani.

No. They didn’t. The fact that they had their doubts or didn’t believe something isn’t the same as “knowing.”

What you think means absolutely zero. The Courts will decide.

What matters is that Murdoch spilled the beans...the Big Lie was a fraud and everyone at Fox knew it.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

What you think means absolutely zero. The Courts will decide.

What matters is that Murdoch spilled the beans...the Big Lie was a fraud and everyone at Fox knew it.

And they kept telling it for profit.

Fox is fucked.

 

[BackAgain]

What you think means absolutely zero.

False.

The Courts will decide.

Obviously, Corporal Oblivious.

What matters is that Murdoch spilled the beans...the Big Lie was a fraud and everyone at Fox knew it.

False. He spoke only about what HE “believed.”

Your ongoing imbecility is still highly expected and amusing.

 

[dblack]

Someday we’ll discuss Ex post facto application of laws.

Whatever. Hypocrisy is just funny.

 

[BackAgain]

Whatever. Hypocrisy is just funny.

That’s odd. I don’t find you funny.

 

[dblack]

That’s odd. I don’t find you funny.

That's because the joke's on you. You're a DeSantis fan right? And here he is pushing for laws that would fuck Fox over. That's funny.

 

[BackAgain]

That's because the joke's on you. You're a DeSantis fan right? And here he is pushing for laws that would fuck Fox over. That's funny.

You’re very dull and rather dimwitted.

The proposed law would absolutely NOT “fuck Fox over,” you ignorant dolt. There is no ex post facto law implicated here.

In any event, wtf would Fox have to do with bloggers. You’re truly quite dumb.

 

[dblack]

You’re very dull and rather dimwitted.'

I see.

The proposed law would absolutely NOT “fuck Fox over,” you ignorant dolt. There is no ex post facto law implicated here.

In the future it would though. It changes the statutes protecting the press from defamation lawsuits.

But nevermind, you have a party to protect! Fight on!!

 

[BackAgain]

I see.

In the future it would though. It changes the statutes protecting the press from defamation lawsuits.

But nevermind, you have a party to protect! Fight on!!

Zzzz.

Man are you dim witted.

Muddle on.

 

[dblack]

Zzzz.

Man are you dim witted.

Muddle on.

Good answer, good answer!

 

[BackAgain]

Good answer, good answer!

Better than your witless efforts.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

"Whay he believed"

"What he knew"

Normal people understand that these are the same thing, in this case.

 

[Mac1958]

You’ve been conned. Nothing substantive is there. Nothing.

But just as you’ve been lied to, as a liberal you wouldn’t admit reality even under torture.

Neat.

So has Fox News been lying to you about the rigged election? Rupert Murdoch says so. They say so.

Have they?