Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
"Mitzvoteem" <snicker>Uhh, your new covenant, according to your own Jesus, did not supplant any of the 613 mitzvoteem. Try again.You are correct. Homosexual relations (something Statistheilhitler knows a lot about) are condemnded as abomination. Eating shellfish is condemned as abomination. Others things probably are too.The butt hurt is strong in this one.You still lack the ability to discern and to understand context. Poor 2-dimensional fake Rabbi.
Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk
Do you maintain that the Bible condemns tattoos as an abomination? Yes or no, please.
The Bible does not condemn tattoos as an abomination. That's a fact
But tattoos are not condemned as abomination, even though they aer clearly prohibited.
But once Statistheilhitler made the claim he couldnt admit he was wrong as a matter of fact. He had to go on the attack and rationalize his answer with all sorts of excuses. Because he's a snowflake with a big easily bruised ego on the one hand and a lack of knowledge on the other.
Actually eating shellfish isn't an abomination, and never was for the Gentiles. They quote Mosaic ceremonial and dietary laws that were long done away with by the New Covenant. It's hilarious to hang them out in the wind with it
Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk
"Mitzvoteem" <snicker>Uhh, your new covenant, according to your own Jesus, did not supplant any of the 613 mitzvoteem. Try again.You are correct. Homosexual relations (something Statistheilhitler knows a lot about) are condemnded as abomination. Eating shellfish is condemned as abomination. Others things probably are too.The butt hurt is strong in this one.
Do you maintain that the Bible condemns tattoos as an abomination? Yes or no, please.
The Bible does not condemn tattoos as an abomination. That's a fact
But tattoos are not condemned as abomination, even though they aer clearly prohibited.
But once Statistheilhitler made the claim he couldnt admit he was wrong as a matter of fact. He had to go on the attack and rationalize his answer with all sorts of excuses. Because he's a snowflake with a big easily bruised ego on the one hand and a lack of knowledge on the other.
Actually eating shellfish isn't an abomination, and never was for the Gentiles. They quote Mosaic ceremonial and dietary laws that were long done away with by the New Covenant. It's hilarious to hang them out in the wind with it
Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk
We've added Hebrew to the list of things you dont know.
Gender matters in where you shower, in most cases, but I've never had a problem with communal locker rooms or bathrooms however most do. That has nothing to do with gays being denied access to a public accommodation even if now spouses end up in the same bathroom from time to time.Bathrooms are based on junk Pops, not desire. Sorry.A lesbian functions the same as a married male in this. Both are attracted to females, but only one will be arrested the other not.
I wonder what the public poles would be if the public ACCOMODATIONS laws would have to be changed for this?
Not sure a whole lot of people would appreciate this new equality, but I guess we'll have to see. If it's not accepted publicly, I wonder what the backlash could be?
Doesn't matter because they are all WOMEN.
And all married. Lesbians desire women in exactly the same way as married men. The male gets arrested and the lesbian doesn't.
The legal reasoning that this is not a violation of public accomodations laws?
Please
So gender matters? Hmmmm, I think I argued that and lost.
LOL!!! There is no such word as "mitzvoteem" Mitzva is a feminine word. "-eem" is a masculine plural ending. You are a hoot. When you dont know you just make up shit and then attack anyone who points this out."Mitzvoteem" <snicker>Uhh, your new covenant, according to your own Jesus, did not supplant any of the 613 mitzvoteem. Try again.You are correct. Homosexual relations (something Statistheilhitler knows a lot about) are condemnded as abomination. Eating shellfish is condemned as abomination. Others things probably are too.The Bible does not condemn tattoos as an abomination. That's a fact
But tattoos are not condemned as abomination, even though they aer clearly prohibited.
But once Statistheilhitler made the claim he couldnt admit he was wrong as a matter of fact. He had to go on the attack and rationalize his answer with all sorts of excuses. Because he's a snowflake with a big easily bruised ego on the one hand and a lack of knowledge on the other.
Actually eating shellfish isn't an abomination, and never was for the Gentiles. They quote Mosaic ceremonial and dietary laws that were long done away with by the New Covenant. It's hilarious to hang them out in the wind with it
Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk
We've added Hebrew to the list of things you dont know.
Mitzvoteem is the correct plural form of "Mitzvah". You can also use "Mitzvot"
You are one wierd fake Jew.
guno
Since in both cases my side and my position won, the game you are attempting to play you are losing, badlyOf course you don't see the irony of your posts................If they refuse to put custom designs or wordings on the cakes then they must do so for all..............and not just a select group under the rulings.................In this case they did do custom cakes...........which means they refused the wording...................while doing the same for other customers...............thanks for playing.Nope, not even a little. My position is the same, bake the stupid cake. If you won't do the words or you don't sell the cake topper, so be it. I support clients who offend me all day long. It's business, neither pleasure nor faith...Either way.................you flipped when it was an anti gay cake versus a gay cake...
The easy answer is bake the damn cake. The more subtle one is here's your cake but the words and the cake topper are on you. Have a great day and that will be $59.95, plus tax...Before the recent incident..........it's obvious that others see a potential to make money off this via law suits.....
Azucar bakery that refused to ice cake with anti-gay slogans is slapped with religious discrimination complaint Daily Mail Online
Refused: Marjorie Silva, owner of Azucar Bakery, refused to create a homophobic cake for a customer
Read more: Azucar bakery that refused to ice cake with anti-gay slogans is slapped with religious discrimination complaint Daily Mail Online
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
And, look at that, she won and was right, of course: Denver s Azucar Bakery wins right to refuse to make anti-gay cake - 7NEWS Denver TheDenverChannel.com
Perhaps spell-check is in order...Gender matters in where you shower, in most cases, but I've never had a problem with communal locker rooms or bathrooms however most do. That has nothing to do with gays being denied access to a public accommodation even if now spouses end up in the same bathroom from time to time.Bathrooms are based on junk Pops, not desire. Sorry.Doesn't matter because they are all WOMEN.
And all married. Lesbians desire women in exactly the same way as married men. The male gets arrested and the lesbian doesn't.
The legal reasoning that this is not a violation of public accomodations laws?
Please
So gender matters? Hmmmm, I think I argued that and lost.
Transgendered? Do there junk matter?
Perhaps a rethinking of PUBLIC ACCOMOTATIONS ARE IN ORDER?
It's neither, it's a faith. Many came here seeking religious freedoms and is a major foundation of our system of government. Or it was.Is Christianity a race, or a behavior?
So it's not a race; it's a choice of lifestyle. Just like homosexuality.
Perhaps spell-check is in order...Gender matters in where you shower, in most cases, but I've never had a problem with communal locker rooms or bathrooms however most do. That has nothing to do with gays being denied access to a public accommodation even if now spouses end up in the same bathroom from time to time.Bathrooms are based on junk Pops, not desire. Sorry.And all married. Lesbians desire women in exactly the same way as married men. The male gets arrested and the lesbian doesn't.
The legal reasoning that this is not a violation of public accomodations laws?
Please
So gender matters? Hmmmm, I think I argued that and lost.
Transgendered? Do there junk matter?
Perhaps a rethinking of PUBLIC ACCOMOTATIONS ARE IN ORDER?
The liberals are playing to the wrong crowd.
Christians out way gays by 95%.
The legal immigrants out way illegal immigrants 95%.
Good luck with that. Lol
Which "way" is that?
Oh, you meant "outweigh!"
What are you, 6?
The liberals are playing to the wrong crowd.
Christians out way gays by 95%.
The legal immigrants out way illegal immigrants 95%.
Good luck with that. Lol
Which "way" is that?
Oh, you meant "outweigh!"
What are you, 6?
You do realize that hitler hated gays, sent them to concentration camps and murdered them don't you?
The actual true fact is that your beliefs about gay people are about the same as hitler's.
So it's not those who believe in equal rights who are behaving like hitler. It's you and those who don't want equal rights for everyone who are behaving like hitler.
Do you always dress your children in the same style of clothes as your hero hitler?
Persecution of homosexuals in Nazi Germany and the Holocaust - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
While I don't approve of making a game of it, the ADA is the law so unless you are grandfathered in, obey the law or be liable.Link?? Smells like utter BS, and the ADA has been on the books for decades.Perhaps the insanity of these cases are a Lawyers wet dream...........Find a place of business that believes a certain way............try to force them to sell you a product or service you know they will not do..............
Sue there asses off and make millions...................Sounds like a liberal lawyers wet dream.............
This is the path we chosen.................and let the court cases pile up...............
well weve seen that happen with handicap access putting some small businesses like mom and pop restaurants out and making lawyers rich
Abuse of ADA a plague on California small businesses - The Orange County Register
Sure Paint My House, I made it all up. Ive heard people talking about this on the radio for years, but i dont have a link to that. Sorry.
But you can find real cases of this online if you look
Since your positions are nonsense you are correct.Perhaps spell-check is in order...Gender matters in where you shower, in most cases, but I've never had a problem with communal locker rooms or bathrooms however most do. That has nothing to do with gays being denied access to a public accommodation even if now spouses end up in the same bathroom from time to time.Bathrooms are based on junk Pops, not desire. Sorry.
So gender matters? Hmmmm, I think I argued that and lost.
Transgendered? Do there junk matter?
Perhaps a rethinking of PUBLIC ACCOMOTATIONS ARE IN ORDER?
Perhaps anything close to a compelling argument from you is in order.
I fear it's too much to ask.
Since your positions are nonsense you are correct.Perhaps spell-check is in order...Gender matters in where you shower, in most cases, but I've never had a problem with communal locker rooms or bathrooms however most do. That has nothing to do with gays being denied access to a public accommodation even if now spouses end up in the same bathroom from time to time.So gender matters? Hmmmm, I think I argued that and lost.
Transgendered? Do there junk matter?
Perhaps a rethinking of PUBLIC ACCOMOTATIONS ARE IN ORDER?
Perhaps anything close to a compelling argument from you is in order.
I fear it's too much to ask.
While I don't approve of making a game of it, the ADA is the law so unless you are grandfathered in, obey the law or be liable.Link?? Smells like utter BS, and the ADA has been on the books for decades.Perhaps the insanity of these cases are a Lawyers wet dream...........Find a place of business that believes a certain way............try to force them to sell you a product or service you know they will not do..............
Sue there asses off and make millions...................Sounds like a liberal lawyers wet dream.............
This is the path we chosen.................and let the court cases pile up...............
well weve seen that happen with handicap access putting some small businesses like mom and pop restaurants out and making lawyers rich
Abuse of ADA a plague on California small businesses - The Orange County Register
Sure Paint My House, I made it all up. Ive heard people talking about this on the radio for years, but i dont have a link to that. Sorry.
But you can find real cases of this online if you look
Well thats the thing, they have gone after small businesses many times in old buildings that were already existing before the owners started their business. These people roll up with a tape measure and if something is off by a 1/4 inch its extortion time. most of the time these places are still accesible, its just that the measurements may be off.
Abuse of ADA a plague on California small businesses - The Orange County Register
Wouldnt want to see professional plaintiffs going around suing bakeries either.
You dont get this, do you?damn, I thought you were coming around, now you have reverted to being as dumb as a sack of frog feet.
I'm sorry, but that's how I view you too.Very ignorant.
maybe a sack of frog feet was too complimentary, how about a sack of cat shit?
That is a CROCK. You are buying into the Prog agenda of voiding Property Rights and Individual Liberty.
One person's liberty stops at the boundary of someone else's. A bakery not wanting to bake a cake for someone doesn't prevent the gay couple from getting a cake elsewhere.
Where does this end? Isn't it discrimination to not provide a cake to people with no money? Because that is where this is headed.
Lol. Okay. If you cannot see the value of anti-discrimination laws, I can't help you. If you don't understand that American laws are not based upon any one particular religious principal, then I can't help you.
what you don't, or won't, get is that anti discrimination goes both ways.
Businesses are not allowed to discriminate period. When someone comes in and asks you, as a public accommodation business, to bake a cake, and you refuse. They are not discriminating against you! Good grief! It's you who is discriminating against them!
Someone asks me to do something contrary to my relgigious beliefs and then forces me to, it's discrimination. What part of that do you fail to understand?
As a business owner choosing to cater to the general public, you put yourself in the position where that was possible. Maybe some of these businesses should promote themselves as Christian oriented businesses and the gays would stay away.
Call yourself " The Glory of God Baking Company" or some such. They may have a leg to stand on if they choose to discriminate. They could argue that their name makes it apparent that they adhere to christian values.
