Zincwarrior
Platinum Member
- Nov 18, 2021
- 18,221
- 11,061
- 1,138
Thats not a legal defense.What's your point?
Trump urged Pence to do what everyone in Hollywood and every Democrat in Congress urged Biden to do in 2017.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Thats not a legal defense.What's your point?
Trump urged Pence to do what everyone in Hollywood and every Democrat in Congress urged Biden to do in 2017.
I do not expect you to believe the truth. Truth is no longer part of your life. It will catch up to you one way or the other.
you're SO convincing..............
I think the evidence in both the documents case and in the J6 case are overwhelming. And I just do not see a reasonable line of defense in either, except, he was the president and should not be prosecuted. That won't fly in court.
He just planned and sent the crowd there, but without legal permit requested from Park Authorities, to March and protest there....Neither was Trump.
He wasn't anywhere near the Capital on Jan 6th.
Neither were the people that the Capital Police let inside......not until the cops started beating the shit out of some of them and murdering them.They weren't trespassing or being violent.
Why don't you try watching the video instead of negging me like a reactionary?Trumpers were DUPED by a Con Artist...
No at all.Red herring fallacy.
False comparison fallacy.
Failed attempt to deflect.
I smell desperation.
you're SO convincing..............
I smell desperation.
As soon as I read this nonsense "There going to be a lot of evidence" I just turned it off.
You dumbasses were told the same GD thing for years about Russian Collusion and it all turned out to be a hoax.
STUPID MOTHERFUCKERS.....YOU'LL NEVER LEARN!!!
Let's get some things clear about "election fraud."
- The President is not precise in his use of words. When he calls something "fraud" he is stating that it is improper or illegal. The distinction between actual fraud and other election improprieties is lost on President Trump. In Trump's mind, the voting rules shenanigans in Pennsylvania were "fraud."
- The definitive fact about 2020 fraud is this: There was fraud, but probably not enough provable fraud to have determined the outcome of the election. For example, there is no question that some of the Leftist operatives paid for by Zuckerberg filled out ballots for voters in ghettos, nursing homes, and probably homeless encampments. That is fraud. It certainly happened thousands of times but is not provable, and not enough to impact the result of the election.
- The President was always operating and speaking after having conferred with both attorneys and political advisors. This alone removes his culpability.
- Politicians routinely lie ("If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor..." and so on), and are never legally prosecuted for it. At the time in question, the Mr. Trump WAS A SITTING PRESIDENT. End of story. The only remedy is impeachment, conviction, and removal from office.
- Every statement at issue is protected by the First Amendment. Just like Schiff's constant lies about "Russia collusion."
Neither were the people that the Capital Police let inside......not until the cops started beating the shit out of some of them and murdering them.
The Capital isn't a private residence, mkay?it was a massive flood of people trying to enter; too much for the few police present.
In new defense, dozens of Capitol rioters say law enforcement 'let us in' to building
At least 29 people arrested for their role in the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol claimed they thought they were free to enter because authorities didn't stop them.abcnews.go.com
"Whether or not people knew that it was not lawful to enter the grounds as they did, many are charged with parading, demonstrating, or picketing -- and that is prohibited, and no intent is required," Merkl said.
...
"If I leave my door open to my house, you can't bolt in, even though I left the door open," Shakhnevich said. "It's still trespassing ... and making the argument that I impliedly consented to access by leaving my door open is silly."
it was a massive flood of people trying to enter; too much for the few police present.
Five 2020 election irregularities, illegalities that collide with Jack Smith's Trump indictment
Two instances of election illegalities were confirmed by the Wisconsin Supreme Court.justthenews.com