The Evidence Against Trump

364112722_612591987716869_2781346304663773049_n.jpg
 
None of those are legal defenses to the J6 indictments. To be a legal defense the argument has to support evidence that the Defendant did not commit one of the legal or factual tests of the crime, or superimposes a specified legal defense.
 

Two instances of election illegalities were confirmed by the Wisconsin Supreme Court.

Well the entire thing is bullshit. Number five is Fulton County which was the subject of a two year investigation and cleared the people you all are still swearing cheated.

We know that assertion is false and still listed two months after the announcement of the results of the investigation.

Two months after.
 
Well the entire thing is bullshit. Number five is Fulton County which was the subject of a two year investigation and cleared the people you all are still swearing cheated.

We know that assertion is false and still listed two months after the announcement of the results of the investigation.

Two months after.
An investigation by corrupt people means 0.
 
Its the capitol police board responsible, which consists of 3 people:
Sergeant-at-arms of House
Sergeant-at-arms of Senate
Architect of Capitol. mainly not this guy, the first two.

Neither of those 3 were Pelosi.
But they reported to politicians who reported to Pelosi. it was a set up plain and simple to enable an emergency session where Pelosi changed the rules so no objections could be heard. That is the truth. It is backed by evidence that mounts up each day.
 
For example, there is no question that some of the Leftist operatives paid for by Zuckerberg filled out ballots for voters in ghettos, nursing homes, and probably homeless encampments.
This is false.

What there is no question of is the fact that multiple Republicans have gone to court for voting illegally and voting multiple times.
 
But they reported to politicians who reported to Pelosi. it was a set up plain and simple to enable an emergency session where Pelosi changed the rules so no objections could be heard. That is the truth. It is backed by evidence that mounts up each day.
prove your assertion

the Speaker of the House does not oversee security of the US Capitol, nor does this official oversee the Capitol Police Board.

Pelosi also cannot unduly influence who is appointed to the Board, which consists of the House and Senate Sergeants at Arms, the Architect of the Capitol and the Chief of the Capitol Police. The Sergeants at Arms are elected and must be confirmed by their respective chambers and the Architect must be confirmed by both chambers of Congress.

And according to testimony from the former Capitol Police chief, Pelosi was not involved in the decisions made ahead of January 6 regarding the National Guard. In his testimony before the Senate in February, former US Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund said that he approached both Sergeants at Arms on the House and Senate side on January 4 to request the National Guard through an Emergency Declaration from the Capitol Police Board.

His request, according to Sund, was not approved. Instead, the Senate Sergeant at Arms Michael C. Stenger “suggested I ask (the National Guard) how quickly we could get support if needed and to ‘lean forward’ in case we had to request assistance on January 6,” according to Sund’s testimony.
 
prove your assertion

the Speaker of the House does not oversee security of the US Capitol, nor does this official oversee the Capitol Police Board.

Pelosi also cannot unduly influence who is appointed to the Board, which consists of the House and Senate Sergeants at Arms, the Architect of the Capitol and the Chief of the Capitol Police. The Sergeants at Arms are elected and must be confirmed by their respective chambers and the Architect must be confirmed by both chambers of Congress.

And according to testimony from the former Capitol Police chief, Pelosi was not involved in the decisions made ahead of January 6 regarding the National Guard. In his testimony before the Senate in February, former US Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund said that he approached both Sergeants at Arms on the House and Senate side on January 4 to request the National Guard through an Emergency Declaration from the Capitol Police Board.


His request, according to Sund, was not approved. Instead, the Senate Sergeant at Arms Michael C. Stenger “suggested I ask (the National Guard) how quickly we could get support if needed and to ‘lean forward’ in case we had to request assistance on January 6,” according to Sund’s testimony.
Total bullshit.
 
As soon as I read this nonsense "There going to be a lot of evidence" I just turned it off.

You dumbasses were told the same GD thing for years about Russian Collusion and it all turned out to be a hoax.
You dumbasses were told the same GOD DAMNED thing about the Russian Collusion also ....that Trump was NOT EXONERATED . He skated because he was president
 
An investigation by corrupt people means 0.

I mentioned this earlier. Just to make sure I understand. Taking Georgia for one example.

You would need a few dozen people to gin up the fake ballots. The people involved would have to do hundreds. They would have to change their handwriting style. They would have to change pens. And nobody would know until the day how many they would need. If they cranked out ten thousand and needed more, there would be no time to get more made. So they would have to create an insane amount. Perhaps as many as fifty thousand bogus ballots.

But for some reason, they didn’t push this to win all the statewide office. They defeated Trump and the Senators, and then what? Gave up?

Pretty unlikely.

That’s the problem. The claims from the insane are that four or five people were involved. It would take them months to fake that many bogus ballots. The research alone to use existing registered voters who were not going to vote would be a task of months.

The name couldn’t appear on two lists.

The investigators were from the GBI, FBI, and SOS. Three different groups. The odds of getting nothing but corrupt cops involved is pretty low. Most of them were probably Trump supporters. Many in Law Enforcement are.

So how the hell do you find the people to do this. Have it pulled off. Then have it investigated by three organizations with not one single person involved who would blow the whistle.

Not one. This conspiracy of yours is getting less probable all the time isn’t it?
 
The sick feeling in the pit of our stomachs that we felt watching the MAGA mob attack has long ago left us.
That's why there should have been votes to ban him from ruinning again while it was fresh, while Lady G and Moscow Mitch were voicing their disgust, and Lady G was saying "I'm done with Trump".
 
I mentioned this earlier. Just to make sure I understand. Taking Georgia for one example.

You would need a few dozen people to gin up the fake ballots. The people involved would have to do hundreds. They would have to change their handwriting style. They would have to change pens. And nobody would know until the day how many they would need. If they cranked out ten thousand and needed more, there would be no time to get more made. So they would have to create an insane amount. Perhaps as many as fifty thousand bogus ballots.

But for some reason, they didn’t push this to win all the statewide office. They defeated Trump and the Senators, and then what? Gave up?

Pretty unlikely.

That’s the problem. The claims from the insane are that four or five people were involved. It would take them months to fake that many bogus ballots. The research alone to use existing registered voters who were not going to vote would be a task of months.

The name couldn’t appear on two lists.

The investigators were from the GBI, FBI, and SOS. Three different groups. The odds of getting nothing but corrupt cops involved is pretty low. Most of them were probably Trump supporters. Many in Law Enforcement are.

So how the hell do you find the people to do this. Have it pulled off. Then have it investigated by three organizations with not one single person involved who would blow the whistle.

Not one. This conspiracy of yours is getting less probable all the time isn’t it?
It is not a conspiracy. You are spouting the conspiracy from the people that let this happen. Fraud happened and it will be proven eventually.
 

Forum List

Back
Top