Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Continuing to repeat the same thing over and over while continuing to duck the fact that the US IG also declared Strzok violated FBI protocols and procedures in the IMPROPER interview of Hillary Clinton does not change the fact that it happened and that the US IG recommended Strzok be investigated for his actions, bias or not.Sorry liar, you start off lying with your very 1st point. The US IG reported that STRZOK BROKE FBI PROTOCOL / PROCEDURES BY FAILING TO PUT HILLARY UNDER OATH BEFORE INTERVIEWING HER AND BY NOT RECORDING THE INTERVIEW.Getting back to the thread topic - STRZOK - again:
WHO INTERVIEWED HILLARY AND BROKE FBI PROTOCOL / STANDARDS BY NOT PUTTING HER UNDER OATH AND NOT RECORDING THE INTERVIEW?
STRZOK.
WHO PERSONALLY MODIFIED THE FBI'S FINAL REPORT ON THE HILLARY INVESTIGATION, MODIFYING THE VERBIAGE IN THE REPORT TO PROTECT HILLARY FROM INDICTMENT?
STRZOK
WHO INTERVIEWED HILLARY AIDES MILLS AND ABEDIN AND PROTECTED THEM FROM INDICTMENT FOR PERJURY WHEN THE RECORDS SHOW THEY LIED ABOYUT KNOWING ABOUT HILARY'S SERVER?
STRZOK
WHO INTERVIEWED FLYNN AND INDICTED HIM FOR PERJURY DESPITE COMEY TESTIFYING THAT HIS FBI AGENTS BELIEVED FLYNN DID NOT LIE WHEN INTERVIEWED?
STRZOK
WHO SENT TEXT MESSAGES REVEALING THE EXISTENCE OF A SECRET SOCIETY THAT HAD ALREADY MET TO DISCUSS STOPPING TRUMP FROM BECOMING PRESIDENT?
STRZOK
WHO SENT TEXT MESSAGES REVEALING DEPUTY DIRECTOR ANDREW McCABE HAVIG AN 'INSURANCE POLITY' TO USE AGAINST TRUMP, REVEALING THE CONSPIRACTY WITHIN THE FBI BY DECLARING 'WE WILL STOP HIM'?
STRZOK
Anyone who can NOT see the connection if not all the evidence collected that Strzok should be perp-walked, interrogated, and given a chance to roll over on HIS co--conspirators is blinder than Stevie Wonder.
Ah, the conspiracy spamming continues.
Alas, the same holes in your nonsense argument remain. You can't prove that the Steele Dossier was the sole basis of the Mueller investigation. While I disproved that conspiracy batshit by citing the Deputy AG who cited Comey's testimony before congress as the basis of the Mueller Investigatin.
You lose.
Oh, and the IG report found that there was no evidence of improper considerations, including political bias that affected the investigative decisions by the FBI.
However, we did not find documentary or testimonial evidence that improper considerations, including political bias, directly affected the specific investigative decisions we reviewed in Chapter Five, or that the justifications offered for these decisions were pretextual.
Scathing Justice Dept. watchdog report rebukes James B. Comey, cites major missteps by FBI
Laughing......now why would I or any other rational person ignore the investigation of the IG on the matter and instead believe your batshit conspiracy theory, backed by nothing?
You lose again. You certainly live up to your name, Easy. As debunking your nonsense is so simple.
Your entire BS at that point was completely rejected. Try again...or better yet, just go away.
And by lying, you mean quoting the IG report accurately?
Again, from the IG report itself:
There were clearly tensions and disagreements in a number of important areas between Midyear agents and prosecutors. However, we did not find documentary or testimonial evidence that improper considerations, including political bias, directly affected the specific
investigative decisions we reviewed in Chapter Five, or that the justifications offered for these decisions were pretextual.
Scathing Justice Dept. watchdog report rebukes James B. Comey, cites major missteps by FBI
NO evidence that improper considerations, including political bias, affected the investigative decisions.
Debunking your batshit conspiracy. And again, specifially in reference to the text messages:
But our review did not find evidence to connect the political views expressed in these messages to the specific investigative decisions that we reviewed; rather, consistent with the analytic approach described above, we found that these specific decisions were the result of discretionary judgments made during the course of an investigation by the Midyear agents and prosecutors and that these judgment calls were not unreasonable.
Scathing Justice Dept. watchdog report rebukes James B. Comey, cites major missteps by FBI
No evidence to connect political views with specific investigative decisions.
Debunking your batshit again.
Laughing....but tell us how accurately quoting the IG report is 'lying' again. It makes me giggle.
There were clearly tensions and disagreements in a number of important areas between Midyear agents and prosecutors. However, we did not find documentary or testimonial evidence that improper considerations, including political bias, directly affected the specific
investigative decisions we reviewed in Chapter Five, or that the justifications offered for these decisions were pretextual.
Scathing Justice Dept. watchdog report rebukes James B. Comey, cites major missteps by FBI
Remember kids, Jeff Sessions is part of the Old Boy Network... i.e. The Deep State.
This is why he appointed an IG instead of an Independent Counsel.
Remember kids, Jeff Sessions is part of the Old Boy Network... i.e. The Deep State.
This is why he appointed an IG instead of an Independent Counsel.
Sessions goes out with Mueller, Comey et. al. during the Corleone Baptism Event -- this fall
Remember kids, Jeff Sessions is part of the Old Boy Network... i.e. The Deep State.
This is why he appointed an IG instead of an Independent Counsel.
Sessions goes out with Mueller, Comey et. al. during the Corleone Baptism Event -- this fall
Says.....your imagination!
Remember kids, Jeff Sessions is part of the Old Boy Network... i.e. The Deep State.
This is why he appointed an IG instead of an Independent Counsel.
Sessions goes out with Mueller, Comey et. al. during the Corleone Baptism Event -- this fall
Says.....your imagination!
Yeah...and?
US IG Horowitz:
"Strzok and other FBI employees “brought discredit to themselves” and hurt the bureau’s reputation"
US IG Horowitz:
“FBI Director Comey usurped the authority of the Attorney General,” “chose to deviate” from established procedures, and engaged “in his own subjective, ad hoc decision-making.”
US IG Horowitz:
Two Clinton lawyers who were also fact witnesses in the case should NOT have been allowed to sit in on Hillary's interview, which the FBI wrongly allowed.
CITING DIRECTLY FROM THE US IG REPORT:
"It is Strzok, though, whom he singles out for the most scrutiny. He is particularly concerned about an August 8, 2016, message in which, in response to a text from Page expressing fear that Trump would win the election, Strzok wrote back: “No. No he’s not. We’ll stop it.”
This, Horowitz wrote, is “not only indicative of a biased state of mind” but implies “a willingness to take official action to impact a presidential candidate’s electoral prospects” — something he calls “antithetical to the core values of the FBI and the Department of Justice.”
So Horowitz reported that he believed Strzok was not politically mpotivated by still was motivated nonetheless, showing "a willingness to take official action to impact a presidential candidate’s electoral prospects”
-- No kidding! Again, EVIDENCE shows that Abedin and Mills lied in their interview with Strzok - 'Lying to the FBI'.
Following through with that 'willingness to take official actions, Strzok perpetrated OBSTRUCTION by protecting them from indictment. BUSTED - proven by EVIDENCE (interview transcripts)
There were clearly tensions and disagreements in a number of important areas between Midyear agents and prosecutors. However, we did not find documentary or testimonial evidence that improper considerations, including political bias, directly affected the specific
investigative decisions we reviewed in Chapter Five, or that the justifications offered for these decisions were pretextual.
Scathing Justice Dept. watchdog report rebukes James B. Comey, cites major missteps by FBI
From the US IG report:
Horowitz expressed concern about a choice Strzok made late in the campaign to prioritize the Trump campaign/Russia investigation over investigating new Hillary Clinton emails found on Anthony Weiner’s laptop.
It was revealed that Hillary Aide Huma Abedin sent copies of every Hillary file and e-mail - including her TOP SECRET documents - to her EXTREMELY Illegal un-authorized unencrypted unsecured personal laptop at her home...the lap top she shared with her pedophile sexting husband, which most times sat on his naked junk while he sexted kids.
THIS WAS ILLEGAL AS HELL...and when brought to the FBI's attention they took no action for about a MONTH! Horowitz wrote, “we also did not identify a consistent or persuasive explanation for the FBI’s failure to act for almost a month.”
Information Obama himself called 'so classified it can not be released in any format without causing grave damage to our national security' sat illegally on a laptop in the Weiner's possession (with no idea why she did it / had it - espionage?) for a month with the FBI knowing about it and they did nothing?
Again, you continue to completely dodge what they DID find, hoping repeating the same thing over and over will make all the 'bad stuff' go away.US IG Horowitz:
"Strzok and other FBI employees “brought discredit to themselves” and hurt the bureau’s reputation"
US IG Horowitz:
“FBI Director Comey usurped the authority of the Attorney General,” “chose to deviate” from established procedures, and engaged “in his own subjective, ad hoc decision-making.”
US IG Horowitz:
Two Clinton lawyers who were also fact witnesses in the case should NOT have been allowed to sit in on Hillary's interview, which the FBI wrongly allowed.
CITING DIRECTLY FROM THE US IG REPORT:
"It is Strzok, though, whom he singles out for the most scrutiny. He is particularly concerned about an August 8, 2016, message in which, in response to a text from Page expressing fear that Trump would win the election, Strzok wrote back: “No. No he’s not. We’ll stop it.”
This, Horowitz wrote, is “not only indicative of a biased state of mind” but implies “a willingness to take official action to impact a presidential candidate’s electoral prospects” — something he calls “antithetical to the core values of the FBI and the Department of Justice.”
So Horowitz reported that he believed Strzok was not politically mpotivated by still was motivated nonetheless, showing "a willingness to take official action to impact a presidential candidate’s electoral prospects”
-- No kidding! Again, EVIDENCE shows that Abedin and Mills lied in their interview with Strzok - 'Lying to the FBI'.
Following through with that 'willingness to take official actions, Strzok perpetrated OBSTRUCTION by protecting them from indictment. BUSTED - proven by EVIDENCE (interview transcripts)
And yet the IG found ....
There were clearly tensions and disagreements in a number of important areas between Midyear agents and prosecutors. However, we did not find documentary or testimonial evidence that improper considerations, including political bias, directly affected the specific
investigative decisions we reviewed in Chapter Five, or that the justifications offered for these decisions were pretextual.
Scathing Justice Dept. watchdog report rebukes James B. Comey, cites major missteps by FBI
No evidence that improper considerations, including political bias, affected specific investigative decisions.
And your entire conspiracy goes 'poof'.
And since I've run you off the hapless nonsense that the Steele Dossier is the sole basis of the Mueller investigation, we can put the OP to bed.
Again, for the cheap seats.....the IG found no evidence that improper considerations, including political bias, affected specific investigative decisions.
Again, for the cheap seats.....the IG found no evidence that improper considerations, including political bias, affected specific investigative decisions.
You can continue to ignore the same US IG report you are trying to hide behind now, attempting to cherry-pick only what you think helps your argument.
Interesting, all of these 'investigations' were initiated by Obama and Clinton. Conveniently, no Democrats are currently being investigated. Only Trump and his associates are. That, despite knowing Clinton and Obama colluded with foreigners to influence our Election. All folks need to do is look to the Ohr-Steele connection.
I think common sense-thinking Americans know what happened. They now it was all a well-coordinated dirty political Witch Hunt. Clinton allowed to skate, and no Democrats being investigated? It is a scam. Hopefully most Americans see that.
Interesting, all of these 'investigations' were initiated by Obama and Clinton. Conveniently, no Democrats are currently being investigated. Only Trump and his associates are. That, despite knowing Clinton and Obama colluded with foreigners to influence our Election. All folks need to do is look to the Ohr-Steele connection.
Oooh! Conspiracy insinuations backed by jack shit?
Where have I seen that before? Ah, yes. This entire thread.
I think common sense-thinking Americans know what happened. They now it was all a well-coordinated dirty political Witch Hunt. Clinton allowed to skate, and no Democrats being investigated? It is a scam. Hopefully most Americans see that.
And by 'common sense' you mean claims you can't factually back up and conspiracies you can't support?
Shocker.
Under testimony before Congress, Former FBI Agent and Strzok's adulterous co-conspirator 'rolled over on' Strzok:
"From “we’ll stop it” and an “insurance policy,” both referring to the Trump presidency, GOP lawmakers want to know what Strzok meant.
Former FBI Lawyer Lisa Page Said Anti-Trump Texts With Peter Strzok 'Mean Exactly What They Say' "
“She's certainly more cooperative than Peter Strzok was and the pieces of information filled in some blanks along the way, but we've got a huge jigsaw puzzle to put together,”
When I questioned Lisa Page on Friday about the anti-Trump text messages that were sent between herself and Peter Strzok, there were significant differences in her testimony and Strzok’s
Uh-OH!
Former FBI Lawyer Lisa Page Said Anti-Trump Texts With Peter Strzok 'Mean Exactly What They Say'
