Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
You're purposely not taking the comments in context, which tells me you're obfuscating.He was asked point blank if he had met with any Russians, and he said NO. Is that a lie or not?So let's get this straight: Sessions said he did not meet with Russians as a Trump surrogate, but you don't know what they met about, and you're still saying he's lying.Either way he lied. Don't spin something that isn't therePerhaps you missed the point.No one said that, its all about Sessions lying to Congress, and he is the attorney general?Looking at the video and reading the transcript it's pretty clear that both Franken's question and Sessions' answer are in the context of communication with Russians while acting as a campaign surrogate.
So then, are Democrats saying that they know what he and the Russian talked about when they met, and if so, what was it?
.
If Sessions' answer was in the context of speaking to the Russian as a Trump campaign surrogate, then yeah, he was clearly lying.
But if he and the Russian met in another capacity, then no, he wasn't lying.
So, when they met, what did they talk about?
.
.
Obviously you never bothered to read them, since shortly after a poster listed what he said were Hillary lies. So we have 75 Hillary lies in 8 years, and 100 Trump lies in 30 daysNo, I posted on Monday a list of 100 Trump lies in just his first 30 days in office. Can you imagine where he will be after a year?Surely by now you know that no politician, of any level, has lied more than Trump.As was that corporate whore, Hillary, but you voted for HER!
LMAO! Your perspective is showing, Hillaryboy.
While your list was made up not of lies but things you think are lies because you don't agree with them, the answer to your question is that he'll be chasing Hillary to have a longer list of lies.
He was asked point blank if he had met with any Russians, and he said NO. Is that a lie or not?So let's get this straight: Sessions said he did not meet with Russians as a Trump surrogate, but you don't know what they met about, and you're still saying he's lying.Either way he lied. Don't spin something that isn't therePerhaps you missed the point.No one said that, its all about Sessions lying to Congress, and he is the attorney general?Looking at the video and reading the transcript it's pretty clear that both Franken's question and Sessions' answer are in the context of communication with Russians while acting as a campaign surrogate.
So then, are Democrats saying that they know what he and the Russian talked about when they met, and if so, what was it?
.
If Sessions' answer was in the context of speaking to the Russian as a Trump campaign surrogate, then yeah, he was clearly lying.
But if he and the Russian met in another capacity, then no, he wasn't lying.
So, when they met, what did they talk about?
.
.
Believe what you want, spin what you wantYou're purposely not taking the comments in context, which tells me you're obfuscating.He was asked point blank if he had met with any Russians, and he said NO. Is that a lie or not?So let's get this straight: Sessions said he did not meet with Russians as a Trump surrogate, but you don't know what they met about, and you're still saying he's lying.Either way he lied. Don't spin something that isn't therePerhaps you missed the point.No one said that, its all about Sessions lying to Congress, and he is the attorney general?
If Sessions' answer was in the context of speaking to the Russian as a Trump campaign surrogate, then yeah, he was clearly lying.
But if he and the Russian met in another capacity, then no, he wasn't lying.
So, when they met, what did they talk about?
.
.
Franken asked him if he met with any Russians as a Trump surrogate, and if you actually heard the question, or the answer, you would know that.
This is just political.
.
And the entire answer.He was asked point blank if he had met with any Russians, and he said NO. Is that a lie or not?So let's get this straight: Sessions said he did not meet with Russians as a Trump surrogate, but you don't know what they met about, and you're still saying he's lying.Either way he lied. Don't spin something that isn't therePerhaps you missed the point.No one said that, its all about Sessions lying to Congress, and he is the attorney general?
If Sessions' answer was in the context of speaking to the Russian as a Trump campaign surrogate, then yeah, he was clearly lying.
But if he and the Russian met in another capacity, then no, he wasn't lying.
So, when they met, what did they talk about?
.
.
Post the entire question so we can all see what you think is "point blank".
Ironic post is ironic.Believe what you want, spin what you wantYou're purposely not taking the comments in context, which tells me you're obfuscating.He was asked point blank if he had met with any Russians, and he said NO. Is that a lie or not?So let's get this straight: Sessions said he did not meet with Russians as a Trump surrogate, but you don't know what they met about, and you're still saying he's lying.Either way he lied. Don't spin something that isn't therePerhaps you missed the point.
If Sessions' answer was in the context of speaking to the Russian as a Trump campaign surrogate, then yeah, he was clearly lying.
But if he and the Russian met in another capacity, then no, he wasn't lying.
So, when they met, what did they talk about?
.
.
Franken asked him if he met with any Russians as a Trump surrogate, and if you actually heard the question, or the answer, you would know that.
This is just political.
.
A lie is a lie unless you try to pretend it isn'tObviously you never bothered to read them, since shortly after a poster listed what he said were Hillary lies. So we have 75 Hillary lies in 8 years, and 100 Trump lies in 30 daysNo, I posted on Monday a list of 100 Trump lies in just his first 30 days in office. Can you imagine where he will be after a year?Surely by now you know that no politician, of any level, has lied more than Trump.
LMAO! Your perspective is showing, Hillaryboy.
While your list was made up not of lies but things you think are lies because you don't agree with them, the answer to your question is that he'll be chasing Hillary to have a longer list of lies.
We have what you CLAIM are 100 lies in 30 days. I'm not a Trump fan, but your partisan interpretations are NOT proof.
(CNN)Attorney General Jeff Sessions met twice last year with the top Russian diplomat in Washington whose interactions with President Donald Trump's former national security adviser Michael Flynn led to Flynn's firing, according to the Justice Department.They won't take either the question or the answer in context.
This is political.
.
Did he not say that he had no communications with the Russians?The exchange, in context this time, and the context is painfully obvious:
Franken: CNN just published a story alleging that the intelligence community provided documents to the president-elect last week that included information that quote, ‘Russian operatives claimed to have compromising personal and financial information about Mr. Trump.’ These documents also allegedly say quote, ‘There was a continuing exchange of information during the campaign between Trump's surrogates and intermediaries for the Russian government.’
Now, again, I'm telling you this as it's coming out, so you know. But if it's true, it's obviously extremely serious and if there is any evidence that anyone affiliated with the Trump campaign communicated with the Russian government in the course of this campaign, what will you do?
Sessions: I'm not aware of any of those activities. I have been called a surrogate at a time or two in that campaign and I did not have communications with the Russians, and I'm unable to comment on it.
.
A lie is a lie unless you try to pretend it isn'tObviously you never bothered to read them, since shortly after a poster listed what he said were Hillary lies. So we have 75 Hillary lies in 8 years, and 100 Trump lies in 30 daysNo, I posted on Monday a list of 100 Trump lies in just his first 30 days in office. Can you imagine where he will be after a year?LMAO! Your perspective is showing, Hillaryboy.
While your list was made up not of lies but things you think are lies because you don't agree with them, the answer to your question is that he'll be chasing Hillary to have a longer list of lies.
We have what you CLAIM are 100 lies in 30 days. I'm not a Trump fan, but your partisan interpretations are NOT proof.
As a surrogate. Why are you choosing to ignore the word BOTH GUYS USED?Did he not say that he had no communications with the Russians?The exchange, in context this time, and the context is painfully obvious:
Franken: CNN just published a story alleging that the intelligence community provided documents to the president-elect last week that included information that quote, ‘Russian operatives claimed to have compromising personal and financial information about Mr. Trump.’ These documents also allegedly say quote, ‘There was a continuing exchange of information during the campaign between Trump's surrogates and intermediaries for the Russian government.’
Now, again, I'm telling you this as it's coming out, so you know. But if it's true, it's obviously extremely serious and if there is any evidence that anyone affiliated with the Trump campaign communicated with the Russian government in the course of this campaign, what will you do?
Sessions: I'm not aware of any of those activities. I have been called a surrogate at a time or two in that campaign and I did not have communications with the Russians, and I'm unable to comment on it.
.
you are parsing words. He met with the Russians and said he didn't- thats itAs a surrogate. Why are you choosing to ignore the word BOTH GUYS USED?Did he not say that he had no communications with the Russians?The exchange, in context this time, and the context is painfully obvious:
Franken: CNN just published a story alleging that the intelligence community provided documents to the president-elect last week that included information that quote, ‘Russian operatives claimed to have compromising personal and financial information about Mr. Trump.’ These documents also allegedly say quote, ‘There was a continuing exchange of information during the campaign between Trump's surrogates and intermediaries for the Russian government.’
Now, again, I'm telling you this as it's coming out, so you know. But if it's true, it's obviously extremely serious and if there is any evidence that anyone affiliated with the Trump campaign communicated with the Russian government in the course of this campaign, what will you do?
Sessions: I'm not aware of any of those activities. I have been called a surrogate at a time or two in that campaign and I did not have communications with the Russians, and I'm unable to comment on it.
.
We both know why.
.
Did he not say that he had no communications with the Russians?The exchange, in context this time, and the context is painfully obvious:
Franken: CNN just published a story alleging that the intelligence community provided documents to the president-elect last week that included information that quote, ‘Russian operatives claimed to have compromising personal and financial information about Mr. Trump.’ These documents also allegedly say quote, ‘There was a continuing exchange of information during the campaign between Trump's surrogates and intermediaries for the Russian government.’
Now, again, I'm telling you this as it's coming out, so you know. But if it's true, it's obviously extremely serious and if there is any evidence that anyone affiliated with the Trump campaign communicated with the Russian government in the course of this campaign, what will you do?
Sessions: I'm not aware of any of those activities. I have been called a surrogate at a time or two in that campaign and I did not have communications with the Russians, and I'm unable to comment on it.
.
One thing seems quite clear now. Obama created a network of people to sabotage our leader and government. This needs to be investigated and the guilty sent to prison
you are parsing words. He met with the Russians and said he didn't- thats itAs a surrogate. Why are you choosing to ignore the word BOTH GUYS USED?Did he not say that he had no communications with the Russians?The exchange, in context this time, and the context is painfully obvious:
Franken: CNN just published a story alleging that the intelligence community provided documents to the president-elect last week that included information that quote, ‘Russian operatives claimed to have compromising personal and financial information about Mr. Trump.’ These documents also allegedly say quote, ‘There was a continuing exchange of information during the campaign between Trump's surrogates and intermediaries for the Russian government.’
Now, again, I'm telling you this as it's coming out, so you know. But if it's true, it's obviously extremely serious and if there is any evidence that anyone affiliated with the Trump campaign communicated with the Russian government in the course of this campaign, what will you do?
Sessions: I'm not aware of any of those activities. I have been called a surrogate at a time or two in that campaign and I did not have communications with the Russians, and I'm unable to comment on it.
.
We both know why.
.
You're ignoring the obvious.you are parsing words. He met with the Russians and said he didn't- thats itAs a surrogate. Why are you choosing to ignore the word BOTH GUYS USED?Did he not say that he had no communications with the Russians?The exchange, in context this time, and the context is painfully obvious:
Franken: CNN just published a story alleging that the intelligence community provided documents to the president-elect last week that included information that quote, ‘Russian operatives claimed to have compromising personal and financial information about Mr. Trump.’ These documents also allegedly say quote, ‘There was a continuing exchange of information during the campaign between Trump's surrogates and intermediaries for the Russian government.’
Now, again, I'm telling you this as it's coming out, so you know. But if it's true, it's obviously extremely serious and if there is any evidence that anyone affiliated with the Trump campaign communicated with the Russian government in the course of this campaign, what will you do?
Sessions: I'm not aware of any of those activities. I have been called a surrogate at a time or two in that campaign and I did not have communications with the Russians, and I'm unable to comment on it.
.
We both know why.
.
