🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

‘The fuse is lit’: Dan Rather says Trump-Russia scandal is about to go off like a bomb

Killian documents controversy - Wikipedia
Dan Rather announced on November 23, 2004 that he would step down in early 2005 and on March 9th, his 24th anniversary as anchor, he left the network. It is unclear whether or not Rather's retirement was directly caused by this incident, although many believe that he had to step down a year earlier than planned.[118] Les Moonves, CEO of CBS, stated "Dan Rather has already apologized for the segment and taken responsibility for his part in the broadcast. He voluntarily moved to set a date to step down from the 'CBS Evening News' in March of 2005." He added, "We believe any further action would not be appropriate."[119]
 
You mean the Dan Rather who used forged documents to do a hit piece on Bush? That Dan Rather?
Time to grow up, son. Is there anything incorrect in Rathers piece?
He is a proven liar.
So is Trump but you voted for him

As was that corporate whore, Hillary, but you voted for HER!
Surely by now you know that no politician, of any level, has lied more than Trump.
 
Veteran CBS News anchor Dan Rather wrote on Facebook Thursday that the scandal over Pres. Donald Trump’s personal and political connections to the Russian government and those of his aides is like a bomb with a lit fuse.

“Every once in a while in Washington, the fuse is lit for what seems to be a big scandal,” said Rather. “Much more rarely does that fuse lead to an explosion of the magnitude we are seeing with Russia and the new Administration, and frankly the Republicans in Congress.”

With revelations that Attorney Gen. Jeff Sessions apparently perjured himself regarding contacts with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak, another key Trump appointee appears to be on the verge of going down in flames like national security adviser Gen. Mike Flynn.

Flynn resigned last month after wiretaps on Kislyak’s phone revealed that he and Flynn had multiple conversations prior to the president’s inauguration that Flynn later lied about to the public and to Vice President Mike Pence.

“Sessions is but the latest person close to President Trump who seems to be ensnared in a story that is more worthy of Hollywood melodrama than the reality of the governance of our country. Democrats are calling for Sessions to resign, and this story could move very quickly,” said Rather on Facebook.

I thought perjury was ok now, it was not a problem with hillery and she was on video.
Sessions didn't have intent,



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

When was Hillary charged with perjury?

She never was charged, that's what I'm saying. Remember Her hearing infront of congress.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Veteran CBS News anchor Dan Rather wrote on Facebook Thursday that the scandal over Pres. Donald Trump’s personal and political connections to the Russian government and those of his aides is like a bomb with a lit fuse.

“Every once in a while in Washington, the fuse is lit for what seems to be a big scandal,” said Rather. “Much more rarely does that fuse lead to an explosion of the magnitude we are seeing with Russia and the new Administration, and frankly the Republicans in Congress.”

With revelations that Attorney Gen. Jeff Sessions apparently perjured himself regarding contacts with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak, another key Trump appointee appears to be on the verge of going down in flames like national security adviser Gen. Mike Flynn.

Flynn resigned last month after wiretaps on Kislyak’s phone revealed that he and Flynn had multiple conversations prior to the president’s inauguration that Flynn later lied about to the public and to Vice President Mike Pence.

“Sessions is but the latest person close to President Trump who seems to be ensnared in a story that is more worthy of Hollywood melodrama than the reality of the governance of our country. Democrats are calling for Sessions to resign, and this story could move very quickly,” said Rather on Facebook.

I thought perjury was ok now, it was not a problem with hillery and she was on video.
Sessions didn't have intent,



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

When was Hillary charged with perjury?

She never was charged, that's what I'm saying. Remember Her hearing infront of congress.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
when was Hillary guilty of perjury? It never happened, only in your mind
 
Veteran CBS News anchor Dan Rather wrote on Facebook Thursday that the scandal over Pres. Donald Trump’s personal and political connections to the Russian government and those of his aides is like a bomb with a lit fuse.

“Every once in a while in Washington, the fuse is lit for what seems to be a big scandal,” said Rather. “Much more rarely does that fuse lead to an explosion of the magnitude we are seeing with Russia and the new Administration, and frankly the Republicans in Congress.”

With revelations that Attorney Gen. Jeff Sessions apparently perjured himself regarding contacts with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak, another key Trump appointee appears to be on the verge of going down in flames like national security adviser Gen. Mike Flynn.

Flynn resigned last month after wiretaps on Kislyak’s phone revealed that he and Flynn had multiple conversations prior to the president’s inauguration that Flynn later lied about to the public and to Vice President Mike Pence.

“Sessions is but the latest person close to President Trump who seems to be ensnared in a story that is more worthy of Hollywood melodrama than the reality of the governance of our country. Democrats are calling for Sessions to resign, and this story could move very quickly,” said Rather on Facebook.

LMAO! If you people had supported Bernie, none of this would be happening.
Dan Rather retired the year after the incident. The facts of the matter are vague, but the evidence is clear: "W" was an absolute disaster for America.
Rathers is still working

I don't care about Rather. I care that you supported the only person on Earth who could lose to Trump and now want to throw whatever mud you can scrape up at the wall in hopes that it will stick, rather than working for real solutions for Americans.
Surely you care that the Trump administration was involved with Russia in some yet unknown way. Just this afternoon it as revealed that Jared Kushner also met with the Russians in December
 
Veteran CBS News anchor Dan Rather wrote on Facebook Thursday that the scandal over Pres. Donald Trump’s personal and political connections to the Russian government and those of his aides is like a bomb with a lit fuse.

“Every once in a while in Washington, the fuse is lit for what seems to be a big scandal,” said Rather. “Much more rarely does that fuse lead to an explosion of the magnitude we are seeing with Russia and the new Administration, and frankly the Republicans in Congress.”

With revelations that Attorney Gen. Jeff Sessions apparently perjured himself regarding contacts with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak, another key Trump appointee appears to be on the verge of going down in flames like national security adviser Gen. Mike Flynn.

Flynn resigned last month after wiretaps on Kislyak’s phone revealed that he and Flynn had multiple conversations prior to the president’s inauguration that Flynn later lied about to the public and to Vice President Mike Pence.

“Sessions is but the latest person close to President Trump who seems to be ensnared in a story that is more worthy of Hollywood melodrama than the reality of the governance of our country. Democrats are calling for Sessions to resign, and this story could move very quickly,” said Rather on Facebook.


I hope Dan rather gets penis cancer and dies. He is a lying piece of shit. I don't care how many times he reported in NAM. Fuck him.
He was even involved in inventing fake news re: the JFK assassination - he put out a story that kids at a local elementary were cheering when they heard Kennedy was dead. What rather did not not know was that his boss at the time had a child in the school and the story was proven false - the local CBS people wanted him fired but someone higher up squashed it


Wow......

He is everything that is wrong with the media. A friend of mine worked at CBS in NYC in the mid 1990s. =She said he is a total DIVA and jackass and everyone who worked at CBS hated his guts.

The only news story involving DAN RATHER that I want to see is an obituary. He is scum.
Does that rant of yours preclude Dan Rather from a good job of reporting?
 
You mean the Dan Rather who used forged documents to do a hit piece on Bush? That Dan Rather?
Time to grow up, son. Is there anything incorrect in Rathers piece?
He is a proven liar.
So is Trump but you voted for him

As was that corporate whore, Hillary, but you voted for HER!
Surely by now you know that no politician, of any level, has lied more than Trump.

LMAO! Your perspective is showing, Hillaryboy.
 
Time to grow up, son. Is there anything incorrect in Rathers piece?
He is a proven liar.
So is Trump but you voted for him

As was that corporate whore, Hillary, but you voted for HER!
Surely by now you know that no politician, of any level, has lied more than Trump.

LMAO! Your perspective is showing, Hillaryboy.
No, I posted on Monday a list of 100 Trump lies in just his first 30 days in office. Can you imagine where he will be after a year?
 
Some on the far right and almost all of the alt right don't care about the truth of Sessions.

They want power to wrest America onto a fascist path for good.
 
Veteran CBS News anchor Dan Rather wrote on Facebook Thursday that the scandal over Pres. Donald Trump’s personal and political connections to the Russian government and those of his aides is like a bomb with a lit fuse.

“Every once in a while in Washington, the fuse is lit for what seems to be a big scandal,” said Rather. “Much more rarely does that fuse lead to an explosion of the magnitude we are seeing with Russia and the new Administration, and frankly the Republicans in Congress.”

With revelations that Attorney Gen. Jeff Sessions apparently perjured himself regarding contacts with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak, another key Trump appointee appears to be on the verge of going down in flames like national security adviser Gen. Mike Flynn.

Flynn resigned last month after wiretaps on Kislyak’s phone revealed that he and Flynn had multiple conversations prior to the president’s inauguration that Flynn later lied about to the public and to Vice President Mike Pence.

“Sessions is but the latest person close to President Trump who seems to be ensnared in a story that is more worthy of Hollywood melodrama than the reality of the governance of our country. Democrats are calling for Sessions to resign, and this story could move very quickly,” said Rather on Facebook.

LMAO! If you people had supported Bernie, none of this would be happening.
Dan Rather retired the year after the incident. The facts of the matter are vague, but the evidence is clear: "W" was an absolute disaster for America.
Rathers is still working

I don't care about Rather. I care that you supported the only person on Earth who could lose to Trump and now want to throw whatever mud you can scrape up at the wall in hopes that it will stick, rather than working for real solutions for Americans.
Surely you care that the Trump administration was involved with Russia in some yet unknown way. Just this afternoon it as revealed that Jared Kushner also met with the Russians in December

Does Trump bear the blame for Russia annexing the Crimea? Does Trump bear the blame for Russia's treatment of the Ukraine? Did Trump allow things to deteriorate to the point that armed conflict with NATO is again a possibility? Did the Russians blame Trump for U.S. of interference and inciting unrest, specifically saying that secretary of state Hillary Clinton had sent "a signal" to "some actors in our country"; his comments were seen as indication of a breakdown in the Obama administration's effort to "reset" the relationship? Did Trump tell Medvedev to tell Putin that he'd have more flexibility on issues like missile defense and then not follow through, giving Putin the idea he was untrustworthy

But, NOW, you're worried about Russia...you're a partisan clown.
 
He is a proven liar.
So is Trump but you voted for him

As was that corporate whore, Hillary, but you voted for HER!
Surely by now you know that no politician, of any level, has lied more than Trump.

LMAO! Your perspective is showing, Hillaryboy.
No, I posted on Monday a list of 100 Trump lies in just his first 30 days in office. Can you imagine where he will be after a year?

While your list was made up not of lies but things you think are lies because you don't agree with them, the answer to your question is that he'll be chasing Hillary to have a longer list of lies.
 
So is Trump but you voted for him

As was that corporate whore, Hillary, but you voted for HER!
Surely by now you know that no politician, of any level, has lied more than Trump.

LMAO! Your perspective is showing, Hillaryboy.
No, I posted on Monday a list of 100 Trump lies in just his first 30 days in office. Can you imagine where he will be after a year?

While your list was made up not of lies but things you think are lies because you don't agree with them, the answer to your question is that he'll be chasing Hillary to have a longer list of lies.
Obviously you never bothered to read them, since shortly after a poster listed what he said were Hillary lies. So we have 75 Hillary lies in 8 years, and 100 Trump lies in 30 days
 
Looking at the video and reading the transcript it's pretty clear that both Franken's question and Sessions' answer are in the context of communication with Russians while acting as a campaign surrogate.

Okay.

So then, are Democrats saying that they know what he and the Russian talked about when they met, and if so, what was it?
.
 
Looking at the video and reading the transcript it's pretty clear that both Franken's question and Sessions' answer are in the context of communication with Russians while acting as a campaign surrogate.

So then, are Democrats saying that they know what he and the Russian talked about when they met, and if so, what was it?
.
No one said that, its all about Sessions lying to Congress, and he is the attorney general?
 
Looking at the video and reading the transcript it's pretty clear that both Franken's question and Sessions' answer are in the context of communication with Russians while acting as a campaign surrogate.

So then, are Democrats saying that they know what he and the Russian talked about when they met, and if so, what was it?
.
No one said that, its all about Sessions lying to Congress, and he is the attorney general?
Perhaps you missed the point.

If Sessions' answer was in the context of speaking to the Russian as a Trump campaign surrogate, then yeah, he was clearly lying.

But if he and the Russian met in another capacity, then no, he wasn't lying.

So, when they met, what did they talk about?
.
 
Looking at the video and reading the transcript it's pretty clear that both Franken's question and Sessions' answer are in the context of communication with Russians while acting as a campaign surrogate.

So then, are Democrats saying that they know what he and the Russian talked about when they met, and if so, what was it?
.
No one said that, its all about Sessions lying to Congress, and he is the attorney general?
Perhaps you missed the point.

If Sessions' answer was in the context of speaking to the Russian as a Trump campaign surrogate, then yeah, he was clearly lying.

But if he and the Russian met in another capacity, then no, he wasn't lying.

So, when they met, what did they talk about?
.
Either way he lied. Don't spin something that isn't there
 
Looking at the video and reading the transcript it's pretty clear that both Franken's question and Sessions' answer are in the context of communication with Russians while acting as a campaign surrogate.

So then, are Democrats saying that they know what he and the Russian talked about when they met, and if so, what was it?
.
No one said that, its all about Sessions lying to Congress, and he is the attorney general?
Perhaps you missed the point.

If Sessions' answer was in the context of speaking to the Russian as a Trump campaign surrogate, then yeah, he was clearly lying.

But if he and the Russian met in another capacity, then no, he wasn't lying.

So, when they met, what did they talk about?
.
Either way he lied. Don't spin something that isn't there
So let's get this straight: Sessions said he did not meet with Russians as a Trump surrogate, but you don't know what they met about, and you're still saying he's lying.
.
 
Looking at the video and reading the transcript it's pretty clear that both Franken's question and Sessions' answer are in the context of communication with Russians while acting as a campaign surrogate.

So then, are Democrats saying that they know what he and the Russian talked about when they met, and if so, what was it?
.
No one said that, its all about Sessions lying to Congress, and he is the attorney general?
Perhaps you missed the point.

If Sessions' answer was in the context of speaking to the Russian as a Trump campaign surrogate, then yeah, he was clearly lying.

But if he and the Russian met in another capacity, then no, he wasn't lying.

So, when they met, what did they talk about?
.
Either way he lied. Don't spin something that isn't there
So let's get this straight: Sessions said he did not meet with Russians as a Trump surrogate, but you don't know what they met about, and you're still saying he's lying.
.
He was asked point blank if he had met with any Russians, and he said NO. Is that a lie or not?
 

Forum List

Back
Top