The Goebbelization of Trump

[Billo_Really]

I don't know about Nazis, but a former anchor of RT runs it, and it is basically a propaganda network spreading the point of view of Russia's puppet in the White House.

I don't see how this could have existed 10 years ago.

It's similar in respect to a big step towards state run news. If the Sinclair Group is allowed to buy the Tribune, they will be able to reach 70% of the households in the US. Legally, they are not supposed to go over 39%. But because of that piece of right wing shit in charge at the FCC, they are going to be able to get around that rule.

 

[Billo_Really]

The Fascists, Nazis and Communists are all formed on the left.

Those are all authoritarian regimes, which is definitely right wing.

The right wants smaller government,...

Unless it has to do with a woman's uterus or gay marriage, then the right wants government to be all up in that vagina.

...which is against what the left stands for (big government, huge taxes and ruling the people by the barrel of a gun.

The type of people that wants to rule by the barrel of a gun, are members of the NRA, a right wing organization.

 

[tyroneweaver]

As we take one more step towards Nazi Germany, the Sinclair Group is trying to set up a state run propaganda news machine similar to Josef Goebbels.

'Stuff of Nightmares': Viral Video Shows Sinclair Forcing Local TV Anchors to Recite Trumpian Propaganda


​

It's a joke watching all these Fox zombies reciting the same shit word for word.

Josef Goebbels would be proud.

Godwin’s Law

 

[EverCurious]

You cannot compare the ideal of "murdering innocent babies" to "wanting smaller government," ya'll lefties seriously need stop being so intellectually dishonest about that kind of comparison. Regardless of if you agree or not, it is both "right" and "good" for people to stand against the murder of innocents - throwing that particular argument around as though its an insult just makes ya'll look like close-minded assholes. Pro-choice/anti-abortion is a moral and scientific disagreement about the origins and beginning of life - both sides are actually "in the right" and "in the wrong" at the same time.

Frankly, it's not really something the /government/ should be involved in for either side. It is no more "proper" for our government to stand idly by whilst innocents are murdered than it is "proper" for the government to regulate an adult woman's vagina - there is no winning in this argument as the government, because either way you are going against the fundamental moral beliefs of vast numbers of the American population. They should have never gotten involved in the first place.


Gay marriage is just a bullshit issue these days, ya'll partisan lefties think you can milk a few thousand fear votes out of a long dead horse. The only recent argument has been against PA laws that infringe upon "freedom of religious expression." Yet another issue that the government should have stayed out of [PA laws that attempt to dictate morals.]

 

[Marion Morrison]

 

[Billo_Really]

Godwin’s Law

Godwin does not address on whether the comparison is valid or not. In this case, it is.

 

[tyroneweaver]

Godwin’s Law

Godwin does not address on whether the comparison is valid or not. In this case, it is.

ya know, you could give these people some U huals and take em where the food is.
This is a desert. Nothing is going to grow here. See this, this is sand.

 

[Billo_Really]

ya know, you could give these people some U huals and take em where the food is.
This is a desert. Nothing is going to grow here. See this, this is sand.

You know what its going to be in a 100 years? Its going to be SAND!