- Thread starter
- #41
You are 100% correct, but it's not "they" its Roberts, the AH that saved Obamacare and fucked-up our healthcare with $10,000 deductibles.November can't get here soon enough. We need to settle this "great divide" for another 4-years, and setup the USSC for a generation or two.November will be here soon enough.
Our great hope, a conservative Supreme Court, just proved they aren't either conservative nor the hope for America.
If their ruling was technically correct I'm okay with it. They did not give the DACA kids a pass.
Trump just needs to follow the USSC roadmap, then the dems will be forced into real immigration reform, or the DACA kids go.
I'm not a big fan of the Supreme Court, and this case is an example of my reasoning.
They have no right to legislate, which is what they did in this case.
The Congress had to write this category into the law......not the Supreme Court.
The USSC will need to rule on the democrats trying to overturn all of Trump's EOs.
Hopefully the USSC will keep some of them in-place using the same administrative roadblocks.
Gorsuch sold us out this time.....he re-wrote the legislation from the belt.
The next question is where the Constitution, the law of the land, the only set of laws that the people of this nation have agreed to be governed by, states that the Supreme Court has power over the executive or the legislative branches?
It says no such thing.
The authority for same does not exist.
The glaring, and momentous, mistake on the part of the Founders, was the Judicial (Supreme Court and lower Courts) Branch of the government.
...it should be noted that the Constitution does not provide for what is called ‘judicial review,’ nor is the concept found in English law.
The judicial decisions of the Supreme Court should be treated the same way Red and Green lights are treated in Rome....as merely a suggestion.