HandleTheTruth
Platinum Member
- Apr 26, 2022
- 3,547
- 1,940
- 903
- Banned
- #41
The key words in citizen united is unlimited donates.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How does that treat a gun advocacy group differently from a gun control advocacy group?The key words in citizen united is unlimited donates.
The key words in citizen united is unlimited donates.
Nope. I'm a gun owner. I don't want to restrict law abiding criminals from owning guns.
You are the one that doesn't want to stop these people from get and using guns irresponsible.
You are part of the problem.
Exactly how many law abiding criminals do you know?Nope. I'm a gun owner. I don't want to restrict law abiding criminals from owning guns.
SOO RIN KIM
Tue, May 31, 2022, 2:04 AM
Texas Sens. Ted Cruz and John Cornyn, who represent the state where an 18-year-old gunman carried out one of the nation's deadliest school shootings last week, are among Congress' top recipients of contributions from pro-gun donors, campaign finance records show.
Cruz, in particular, has taken in the most money from pro-gun individuals and groups of anyone in the current Congress, amassing $442,000 over the course of his career, according to an analysis of disclosure reports by the nonpartisan campaign finance research group OpenSecrets.
Cornyn ranks third among current U.S. senators and representatives, receiving a total of $340,000 in contributions from pro-gun donors over his career, after Rep. Steve Scalise, R-La., who has amassed $396,000, according to the analysis.
In Texas and beyond, many politicians receive mega donations from pro-gun supporters and lobbyists, and their dollars keep them in office.
In fact, our elections are flooded with emoluments given to Members of Congress, and that was made possible by a 5-4 decision in the Supreme Court.
![]()
Citizens United Explained
The 2010 Supreme Court decision further tilted political influence toward wealthy donors and corporations.www.brennancenter.org
"
A 5–4 majority of the Supreme Court sided with Citizens United, ruling that corporations and other outside groups can spend unlimited money on elections.
What was the rationale for the ruling?
In the court’s opinion, Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote that limiting “independent political spending” from corporations and other groups violates the First Amendment right to free speech. The justices who voted with the majority assumed that independent spending cannot be corrupt and that the spending would be transparent, but both assumptions have proven to be incorrect.
No there was limits on donations from all those groups. Learn something before you type anything. It makes us want to take you seriously.
You act like nationwide gun control advocacy groups don't exist.
That makes you the hack-twat you are.
The gun lobby are the voters who support the Second Amendment. They vote anti-gun politicians out of office.SOO RIN KIM
Tue, May 31, 2022, 2:04 AM
Texas Sens. Ted Cruz and John Cornyn, who represent the state where an 18-year-old gunman carried out one of the nation's deadliest school shootings last week, are among Congress' top recipients of contributions from pro-gun donors, campaign finance records show.
Cruz, in particular, has taken in the most money from pro-gun individuals and groups of anyone in the current Congress, amassing $442,000 over the course of his career, according to an analysis of disclosure reports by the nonpartisan campaign finance research group OpenSecrets.
Cornyn ranks third among current U.S. senators and representatives, receiving a total of $340,000 in contributions from pro-gun donors over his career, after Rep. Steve Scalise, R-La., who has amassed $396,000, according to the analysis.
In Texas and beyond, many politicians receive mega donations from pro-gun supporters and lobbyists, and their dollars keep them in office.
In fact, our elections are flooded with emoluments given to Members of Congress, and that was made possible by a 5-4 decision in the Supreme Court.
![]()
Citizens United Explained
The 2010 Supreme Court decision further tilted political influence toward wealthy donors and corporations.www.brennancenter.org
"
A 5–4 majority of the Supreme Court sided with Citizens United, ruling that corporations and other outside groups can spend unlimited money on elections.
What was the rationale for the ruling?
In the court’s opinion, Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote that limiting “independent political spending” from corporations and other groups violates the First Amendment right to free speech. The justices who voted with the majority assumed that independent spending cannot be corrupt and that the spending would be transparent, but both assumptions have proven to be incorrect.
Yeah, I listened to a guy on the radio today talking about how Cruz has received $442,000 in donations from the gun lobby over his career.....................AND A TOTAL FROM ALL SOURCES OF ABOUT $180 MILLION.SOO RIN KIM
Tue, May 31, 2022, 2:04 AM
Texas Sens. Ted Cruz and John Cornyn, who represent the state where an 18-year-old gunman carried out one of the nation's deadliest school shootings last week, are among Congress' top recipients of contributions from pro-gun donors, campaign finance records show.
Cruz, in particular, has taken in the most money from pro-gun individuals and groups of anyone in the current Congress, amassing $442,000 over the course of his career, according to an analysis of disclosure reports by the nonpartisan campaign finance research group OpenSecrets.
Cornyn ranks third among current U.S. senators and representatives, receiving a total of $340,000 in contributions from pro-gun donors over his career, after Rep. Steve Scalise, R-La., who has amassed $396,000, according to the analysis.
In Texas and beyond, many politicians receive mega donations from pro-gun supporters and lobbyists, and their dollars keep them in office.
In fact, our elections are flooded with emoluments given to Members of Congress, and that was made possible by a 5-4 decision in the Supreme Court.
![]()
Citizens United Explained
The 2010 Supreme Court decision further tilted political influence toward wealthy donors and corporations.www.brennancenter.org
"
A 5–4 majority of the Supreme Court sided with Citizens United, ruling that corporations and other outside groups can spend unlimited money on elections.
What was the rationale for the ruling?
In the court’s opinion, Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote that limiting “independent political spending” from corporations and other groups violates the First Amendment right to free speech. The justices who voted with the majority assumed that independent spending cannot be corrupt and that the spending would be transparent, but both assumptions have proven to be incorrect.
Only the RW can own guns, right?Bullshit you are a gun owner, a super-soaker doesn't count.
In what way?But you won't do anything to protect Americans from crazy people. You are part of the problem.
Well said!Yeah, I listened to a guy on the radio today talking about how Cruz has received $442,000 in donations from the gun lobby over his career.....................AND A TOTAL FROM ALL SOURCES OF ABOUT $180 MILLION.
So tell me how .002 of his donations are what kept him in office, Dipshit.
You have never had an original thought, not once. All you can do is come here and regurgitate dipshittery fed to you by your libtard handlers.
You are just babblingNope. I'm a gun owner. I don't want to restrict law abiding criminals from owning guns.
You are the one that doesn't want to stop these people from get and using guns irresponsible.
You are part of the problem.
S#1" Me tooI am an ordinary gun owner who has never used a gun illegally
And I’m part of the “gun lobby” that you seek to vilify
If you outlaw guns honest citizens will obey but the criminals will not, and Americans will be less safe
UNLIMITED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!The key words in citizen united is unlimited donates.
You are full of shit. The abortion rights group protest in the streets, they are identifiable, gun advocates don't march and hide behind $$$ millions.And the Abortion rights groups, the gun control groups, and the Soros based DA election support groups don't exist either, right?
Oh wait, that's money you agree with so obviously it's good money while money for things you don't agree with is EVILBADWORSTHINGSEVAAAAHHHH
So let 18-year-old psychopaths legally purchase AR-15 rifles to murder a bunch of children. That’s your plan to make America safe?I am an ordinary gun owner who has never used a gun illegally
And I’m part of the “gun lobby” that you seek to vilify
If you outlaw guns honest citizens will obey but the criminals will not, and Americans will be less safe
It's clear.You are just babbling
Be specific
The entire gun shops, that sell not only guns but large magazines and large amounts of bullets.How does that treat a gun advocacy group differently from a gun control advocacy group?