Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No. You’re trying to connect two things that don’t need to be connected as an excuse to justify your refusal to do anything about your stance on giving 18-yea—old psychopaths access to AR-15 rifles.Are you willing to raise the voting age to 21 also?
So?The entire gun shops, that sell not only guns but large magazines and large amounts of bullets.
So you want a good portion of our military to be unarmed.
I didn’t say that.So you want a good portion of our military to be unarmed.
Moron.
Is an adult entitled to all individual rights or not?No. You’re trying to connect two things that don’t need to be connected as an excuse to justify your refusal to do anything about your stance on giving 18-yea—old psychopaths access to AR-15 rifles.
We already don’t allow 18-year-olds to buy hand guns. You tell me.Is an adult entitled to all individual rights or not?
And?Ask Florida.
They allow 18-year-olds to vote but not to purchase AR-15 rifles.
Your inability to follow the conversation isn’t my problem.And?
Your post was stupid, hence I mocked it. Some states allow 18 year olds to purchase AR rifles, there the counter argument. Demonstrating how impotent your post was. Unless you propose that everyone do as Florida has done. I'm pretty sure that's not going to work if we discuss Florida election laws.Your inability to follow the conversation isn’t my problem.
The argument was that we need to raise the age of voting if we raise the age of purchasing AR rifles. I showed that that’s not the case.Your post was stupid, hence I mocked it. Some states allow 18 year olds to purchase AR rifles, there the counter argument. Demonstrating how impotent your post was. Unless you propose that everyone do as Florida has done. I'm pretty sure that's not going to work if we discuss Florida election laws.
And that is bullshit. Right?We already don’t allow 18-year-olds to buy hand guns. You tell me.
To you. Not to me.And that is bullshit. Right?
Hypocrite much?I didn’t say that.
I’m fine with exceptions for people in jobs that require use of weapons.
Seems reasonable to me.Hypocrite much?
It violates the First Amendment, moron.SOO RIN KIM
Tue, May 31, 2022, 2:04 AM
Texas Sens. Ted Cruz and John Cornyn, who represent the state where an 18-year-old gunman carried out one of the nation's deadliest school shootings last week, are among Congress' top recipients of contributions from pro-gun donors, campaign finance records show.
Cruz, in particular, has taken in the most money from pro-gun individuals and groups of anyone in the current Congress, amassing $442,000 over the course of his career, according to an analysis of disclosure reports by the nonpartisan campaign finance research group OpenSecrets.
Cornyn ranks third among current U.S. senators and representatives, receiving a total of $340,000 in contributions from pro-gun donors over his career, after Rep. Steve Scalise, R-La., who has amassed $396,000, according to the analysis.
In Texas and beyond, many politicians receive mega donations from pro-gun supporters and lobbyists, and their dollars keep them in office.
In fact, our elections are flooded with emoluments given to Members of Congress, and that was made possible by a 5-4 decision in the Supreme Court.
Citizens United Explained
The 2010 Supreme Court decision further tilted political influence toward wealthy donors and corporations.www.brennancenter.org
"
A 5–4 majority of the Supreme Court sided with Citizens United, ruling that corporations and other outside groups can spend unlimited money on elections.
What was the rationale for the ruling?
In the court’s opinion, Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote that limiting “independent political spending” from corporations and other groups violates the First Amendment right to free speech. The justices who voted with the majority assumed that independent spending cannot be corrupt and that the spending would be transparent, but both assumptions have proven to be incorrect.
If you dont trust 18 year olds to not become mass murderers then they should not be voting eitherNo. You’re trying to connect two things that don’t need to be connected as an excuse to justify your refusal to do anything about your stance on giving 18-yea—old psychopaths access to AR-15 rifles.
Explain that to Florida who passed exactly what I’m proposing. They allow 18-year-olds to vote and they don’t allow them to legally purchase AR-15 rifles.If you dont trust 18 year olds to not become mass murderers then they should not be voting either
Thats easyExplain that to Florida who passed exactly what I’m proposing. They allow 18-year-olds to vote and they don’t allow them to legally purchase AR-15 rifles.
