The Homosexual Dilemma

1, stmike is not the face of Christianity or its doctrines.

2. the anti-gay movement continues to lose traction.


you and wytch just don't get it. Being anti-gay marriage is not being anti-gay.

there is no anti-gay "movement". GRow the fuck up.
If you are anti-gay marriage...don't have a gay marriage, don't go to a gay marriage.

Hard to avoid your fag weddings when Christian business owners are being sued for not offering wedding services. You faggots are more belligerent than you pretend to be.
 
Here. I will link to the Royal College of Psychiatrists for you: http://www.rcpsych.ac.uk/pdf/PS02_2014.pdf

The College wishes to clarify that homosexuality is not a psychiatric disorder.

Funny. I wonder why the anti-gay site didn't mention that! Hmmm...

"Communism is responsible for the murder of 150 million innocent people in the mid-20th century."

This fact is found on any number of anti-communist sites... and that doesn't make it less than truth, thus something other than a fact.

But hey... there's no way for you to have known that. Such requires one posses the means to reason... .

That was one of the worst red herrings I...

Your concession is duly noted and summarily accepted.

Shut the fuck up. Seriously. Shut the fuck up.
 
groun
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

You worked really hard to convince yourself that list is true, didn't you? *chuckle
Fish breath? He called you Fish Breath and he questions YOUR intellect?
Wow. You cant make this stuff up.


Oh so now we have a make believe devil dog - :drillsergeant:
yep. Deal with it, homophobe.


You have anything of substance to add Penis Breath ?

Says the person who thinks 'substance' is calling someone 'fish breath'
If you say so Penis Breath
 
1, stmike is not the face of Christianity or its doctrines.

2. the anti-gay movement continues to lose traction.


you and wytch just don't get it. Being anti-gay marriage is not being anti-gay.

there is no anti-gay "movement". GRow the fuck up.
If you are anti-gay marriage...don't have a gay marriage, don't go to a gay marriage.

Hard to avoid your fag weddings when Christian business owners are being sued for not offering wedding services. You faggots are more belligerent than you pretend to be.
Either follow the law or go out of business? Baking cakes isn't serving God. Your call.
 
Here. I will link to the Royal College of Psychiatrists for you: http://www.rcpsych.ac.uk/pdf/PS02_2014.pdf

The College wishes to clarify that homosexuality is not a psychiatric disorder.

Funny. I wonder why the anti-gay site didn't mention that! Hmmm...

"Communism is responsible for the murder of 150 million innocent people in the mid-20th century."

This fact is found on any number of anti-communist sites... and that doesn't make it less than truth, thus something other than a fact.

But hey... there's no way for you to have known that. Such requires one posses the means to reason... .

That was one of the worst red herrings I...

Your concession is duly noted and summarily accepted.

Shut the fuck up. Seriously. Shut the fuck up.

Or what?
hahaha-024.gif
 
Greenbean and the other social cons can't grasp that their opinion about anal sex (which heterosexuals loves as much as homosexuals), their opinions about the Bible, and the Bible itself has no standing in federal courts.

All of their above whining is . . . unhappy whining.

Another one of your lies, Jake the Fake Retardsky.

Most heterosexuals do not like anal sex.

Yet a large proportion of heterosexuals have had anal sex- 44% of men, 36% of women.
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr036.pdf

Survey reveals US sex habits - NHS Choices - Health News
  • 21% of the women in the 25-29 and 30-39 age groups had experienced anal sex in the last year.
  • About 20% of girls aged 18-19 had had anal sex at least once.
And its the third most common male sexual fantasy, right after threesomes and oral sex.

Top 10 Sexual Fantasies for Men - Men s Health - Everyday Health

Anal sex doesn't ring a woman's bell, so it only benefits one sex partner. True sex is conducted for the mutual benefit of both partners.
 
Greenbean and the other social cons can't grasp that their opinion about anal sex (which heterosexuals loves as much as homosexuals), their opinions about the Bible, and the Bible itself has no standing in federal courts.

All of their above whining is . . . unhappy whining.

Another one of your lies, Jake the Fake Retardsky.

Most heterosexuals do not like anal sex.

Yet a large proportion of heterosexuals have had anal sex- 44% of men, 36% of women.
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr036.pdf

Survey reveals US sex habits - NHS Choices - Health News
  • 21% of the women in the 25-29 and 30-39 age groups had experienced anal sex in the last year.
  • About 20% of girls aged 18-19 had had anal sex at least once.
And its the third most common male sexual fantasy, right after threesomes and oral sex.

Top 10 Sexual Fantasies for Men - Men s Health - Everyday Health

Anal sex doesn't ring a woman's bell, so it only benefits one sex partner. True sex is conducted for the mutual benefit of both partners.
A whole lot of sex with men doesn't ring a woman's bell...
 
Greenbean and the other social cons can't grasp that their opinion about anal sex (which heterosexuals loves as much as homosexuals), their opinions about the Bible, and the Bible itself has no standing in federal courts.

All of their above whining is . . . unhappy whining.

Another one of your lies, Jake the Fake Retardsky.

Most heterosexuals do not like anal sex. When one walks down the side walk and sees a pile of shit, one doesn't step in it even with shoes on. IF one were barefoot that would be something I think 99% of us can agree is not going to be set in that shit.

Why would any guy with an IQ above room temperature put his DICK into shit?

ITs pretty damned stupid, you cocksucking ape.

They not only put their organ into it - they suck it off when finished . That is the reason Shigella dysentery or shigelosis is rampant in the Gay community . It is a disease contracted by ingesting feces and is found primarily among the mentally disturbed and homosexuals- actually - the mentally ill which of course includes homosexuals .
 
Look, from this thread it is very clear that there is a wide difference of opinion on gay marriage, homosexuality in general, and whether it is a normal or abnormal human condition.

When societies face such differences they vote and the majority opinion is accepted, or dealt with, by all.

So, lets let america vote on whether the nation should sanction gay unions as marriages, allow them but call them something else, or ban them totally.

let the people speak.

whether you comprehend it or not, all of our rights in this country were originally established by majority vote. We may say they were "God-given" but we made them valid by majority vote.

Lets do the same on the gay issues and put the issue to bed (poor choice of words) for a while.

The same sex marriage supporters claim a majority of the people in the country support it. If that is true, why would they be opposed to having a vote. If they hold the majority they claim, wouldn't that guarantee a win for them.
No problems now....but again.....you think civil rights should be up for a vote? How about we have a vote on the civil rights of....let's say.....Mormons. A vote, mind you.

Or how about a vote on the civil rights of obese people. A vote.

Or how about a vote on the civil rights of homeless people. A vote.

Made up civil rights that aren't in the Constitution are by default consigned the venue of the democratic process.

Fish breath.
 
Greenbean and the other social cons can't grasp that their opinion about anal sex (which heterosexuals loves as much as homosexuals), their opinions about the Bible, and the Bible itself has no standing in federal courts.

All of their above whining is . . . unhappy whining.

Another one of your lies, Jake the Fake Retardsky.

Most heterosexuals do not like anal sex. When one walks down the side walk and sees a pile of shit, one doesn't step in it even with shoes on. IF one were barefoot that would be something I think 99% of us can agree is not going to be set in that shit.

Why would any guy with an IQ above room temperature put his DICK into shit?

ITs pretty damned stupid, you cocksucking ape.

They not only put their organ into it - they suck it off when finished . That is the reason Shigella dysentery or shigelosis is rampant in the Gay community . It is a disease contracted by ingesting feces and is found primarily among the mentally disturbed and homosexuals- actually - the mentally ill which of course includes homosexuals .

It's also called coprophagia, though I think that "fag" being part of that word might just be a coincidence.
 
Greenbean and the other social cons can't grasp that their opinion about anal sex (which heterosexuals loves as much as homosexuals), their opinions about the Bible, and the Bible itself has no standing in federal courts.

All of their above whining is . . . unhappy whining.

Another one of your lies, Jake the Fake Retardsky.

Most heterosexuals do not like anal sex.

Yet a large proportion of heterosexuals have had anal sex- 44% of men, 36% of women.
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr036.pdf

Survey reveals US sex habits - NHS Choices - Health News
  • 21% of the women in the 25-29 and 30-39 age groups had experienced anal sex in the last year.
  • About 20% of girls aged 18-19 had had anal sex at least once.
And its the third most common male sexual fantasy, right after threesomes and oral sex.

Top 10 Sexual Fantasies for Men - Men s Health - Everyday Health


ONE : The research is tied to the Kinsey Institute - the legacy of Alfred Kinsey - the pervert zoologist who published troves of falsified and long since debunked studies Which brings its validity into question.



TWO : Found in the conclusion of the study - at the link you provided - is an off handed vague concession of the studies unreliability

...... it should be noted that,..... the findings are not based on in-depth interviews but on internet research and therefore may be less reliable.

THREE : What the article fails to address adequately is the fact that most heterosexuals who confessed to anal sex - did not do it on a regular basis - heck I myself even tried it with a girlfriend years ago -I didn't like it - nor did she.
 
Look, from this thread it is very clear that there is a wide difference of opinion on gay marriage, homosexuality in general, and whether it is a normal or abnormal human condition.

When societies face such differences they vote and the majority opinion is accepted, or dealt with, by all.

So, lets let america vote on whether the nation should sanction gay unions as marriages, allow them but call them something else, or ban them totally.

let the people speak.

whether you comprehend it or not, all of our rights in this country were originally established by majority vote. We may say they were "God-given" but we made them valid by majority vote.

Lets do the same on the gay issues and put the issue to bed (poor choice of words) for a while.

The same sex marriage supporters claim a majority of the people in the country support it. If that is true, why would they be opposed to having a vote. If they hold the majority they claim, wouldn't that guarantee a win for them.
No problems now....but again.....you think civil rights should be up for a vote? How about we have a vote on the civil rights of....let's say.....Mormons. A vote, mind you.

Or how about a vote on the civil rights of obese people. A vote.

Or how about a vote on the civil rights of homeless people. A vote.

Made up civil rights that aren't in the Constitution are by default consigned the venue of the democratic process.

Fish breath.
I say Bodecea has a new Moniker -gonna call her/it Fish Breath from now on ....lol
 
Greenbean and the other social cons can't grasp that their opinion about anal sex (which heterosexuals loves as much as homosexuals), their opinions about the Bible, and the Bible itself has no standing in federal courts.

All of their above whining is . . . unhappy whining.

Another one of your lies, Jake the Fake Retardsky.

Most heterosexuals do not like anal sex. When one walks down the side walk and sees a pile of shit, one doesn't step in it even with shoes on. IF one were barefoot that would be something I think 99% of us can agree is not going to be set in that shit.

Why would any guy with an IQ above room temperature put his DICK into shit?

ITs pretty damned stupid, you cocksucking ape.

They not only put their organ into it - they suck it off when finished . That is the reason Shigella dysentery or shigelosis is rampant in the Gay community . It is a disease contracted by ingesting feces and is found primarily among the mentally disturbed and homosexuals- actually - the mentally ill which of course includes homosexuals .

It's also called coprophagia, though I think that "fag" being part of that word might just be a coincidence.

Or possibly a Freudian slip by whomever coined the term ...LOL
 
THREE : What the article fails to address adequately is the fact that most heterosexuals who confessed to anal sex - did not do it on a regular basis - heck I myself even tried it with a girlfriend years ago -I didn't like it - nor did she.
Deviant. Guess you didn't know how to do it right then rug muncher.
 
but thats exactly what you want. you want a minority to dictate to the majority.

The 3 branches of government were established to prevent the tyranny of the majority over the minority. No one is forcing you to become gay, attend a gay wedding, condone or endorse gay marriage, or marry gay people. But, you don't get to determine what someone else's rights should be.

Nope. You faggots are just forcing people to conduct the ceremonies, bake wedding cakes, and offer photography services for fag weddings. I love how how you turd pirates pretend like you're not in everyone's face and not forcing your beliefs on anyone. Bull fcking shit!

Have you abandoned all pretext of being a Christian?

Did you know that Public Accommodation laws protect Christians in all 50 states but gays in only a handful? Gays must serve Christians in all 50 states, but Christians don't have to serve gays in all 50. You aren't really going to try to pretend that the law treats Christians unfairly are you?
 
but thats exactly what you want. you want a minority to dictate to the majority.

The 3 branches of government were established to prevent the tyranny of the majority over the minority. No one is forcing you to become gay, attend a gay wedding, condone or endorse gay marriage, or marry gay people. But, you don't get to determine what someone else's rights should be.

Nope. You faggots are just forcing people to conduct the ceremonies, bake wedding cakes, and offer photography services for fag weddings. I love how how you turd pirates pretend like you're not in everyone's face and not forcing your beliefs on anyone. Bull fcking shit!

Oh! I didn't realize the extent of the oppression! Christians in untold numbers are being forced to conduct ceremonies (untrue), bake cakes, and take photographs of gay people getting married! It's as if this is Nero's Rome! What terrible persecution!
 
but thats exactly what you want. you want a minority to dictate to the majority.

The 3 branches of government were established to prevent the tyranny of the majority over the minority. No one is forcing you to become gay, attend a gay wedding, condone or endorse gay marriage, or marry gay people. But, you don't get to determine what someone else's rights should be.

Nope. You faggots are just forcing people to conduct the ceremonies, bake wedding cakes, and offer photography services for fag weddings. I love how how you turd pirates pretend like you're not in everyone's face and not forcing your beliefs on anyone. Bull fcking shit!

Have you abandoned all pretext of being a Christian?

Did you know that Public Accommodation laws protect Christians in all 50 states but gays in only a handful? Gays must serve Christians in all 50 states, but Christians don't have to serve gays in all 50. You aren't really going to try to pretend that the law treats Christians unfairly are you?

False Premise... Christians are those who profess to have accepted Jesus Christ as their Lord and Savior and to adhere to the objectively reasoned tenets of his good word.

While "Gays" are professed sexual deviants; which is to say those who readily admit to having little to no control over their perverse desire for sexual gratification through sexual interaction with those of their own gender; thus having presented with profound mental disorder.

Not sure what you're driving at... Sexual Abnormality is a serious mental disorder which axiomatically indicates that caution is required when dealing with such a person.
 
You ask many people, perhaps even most, they'll tell you that they don't care what people do in the privacy of their bedroom, they just don't want it rubbed in their face.

So what has the homosexual movement been doing for the past several years?

Yeah, you got it.

Consider how pervasive the gay agenda has become.

1. The forcing of gay marriage not by persuasion and winning hearts and minds, but through judicial activism. Never in U.S. history has there ever been an overturning of the will of the people that didn't lead to war.

2. Workplaces have become a nightmare as gays and transgenders are given special rights and considerations and political correctness is enforced so that everyone is forced to walk on eggshells

3. Schools. Now parents have to wonder if their teenage daughter has to share the girls restroom with a boy who thinks he's a girl. The homosexual and transgender agenda is pushed unabashed onto young minds.

4. Football. Players seek fame not the old fashioned way, through athletic accomplishment, but by "coming out". Since when is being homosexual an accomplishment?

5. Homosexuality pervades our media, our television, and virtually all facets of American life. Why do these people think they're so important? What if Christians or Jews acted like this?

uganda-anit-gay-parade1.jpg


But I haven't even gotten to the dilemma. Gay activists have noted a rise in anger toward homosexuals and point to it as proof that the nation is riddled with homophobia. They fail to notice that the rise in anti homosexual sentiment happened in direct proportion and timing to the belligerence of the gay movement. When people said they don't want homosexuals' lifestyle shoved in their faces, they meant it.

Conservatives don't hate homosexuals, we just don't care as long as it's kept private. But here the aggressive homosexual lobby has made sure that it's our business. So now we're noticing you and now we're pissed.

If you homos had any inkling what unrelenting instigating assholes you've become, you'd blush in embarrassment. But instead, you take the reaction of people who are sick of hearing about you as proof that you have more work to do. Talk about a destructive circular paradox!

So I have something to say to you on behalf of America. F*** you.

BTW, Notice the picture? Even Kenyans don't like things being shoved in their faces.


Consider how those who describe themselves as homophobic are always more turned on by gay porn than self-identified gay men. They conceal they're own homosexuality by coming out (heh) against it.

We're on to you. :)
 
but thats exactly what you want. you want a minority to dictate to the majority.

The 3 branches of government were established to prevent the tyranny of the majority over the minority. No one is forcing you to become gay, attend a gay wedding, condone or endorse gay marriage, or marry gay people. But, you don't get to determine what someone else's rights should be.

Nope. You faggots are just forcing people to conduct the ceremonies, bake wedding cakes, and offer photography services for fag weddings. I love how how you turd pirates pretend like you're not in everyone's face and not forcing your beliefs on anyone. Bull fcking shit!

Oh! I didn't realize the extent of the oppression! Christians in untold numbers are being forced to conduct ceremonies (untrue), bake cakes, and take photographs of gay people getting married! It's as if this is Nero's Rome! What terrible persecution!

Is there some distinction in principle where one person is forced into servitude, as opposed to a million or ten million?

What would that distinction be? And do you see any potential for expansion of forced servitude, where the first passes without contest, then the second and third and so on?

I ask, because it is clear that tens of millions of voters disagreed in the last election, wherein a large percentage of the political clout of the Advocacy to Normalize Sexual Abnormality was kicked to the curb by that significant majority.
 
You ask many people, perhaps even most, they'll tell you that they don't care what people do in the privacy of their bedroom, they just don't want it rubbed in their face.

So what has the homosexual movement been doing for the past several years?

Yeah, you got it.

Consider how pervasive the gay agenda has become.

1. The forcing of gay marriage not by persuasion and winning hearts and minds, but through judicial activism. Never in U.S. history has there ever been an overturning of the will of the people that didn't lead to war.

2. Workplaces have become a nightmare as gays and transgenders are given special rights and considerations and political correctness is enforced so that everyone is forced to walk on eggshells

3. Schools. Now parents have to wonder if their teenage daughter has to share the girls restroom with a boy who thinks he's a girl. The homosexual and transgender agenda is pushed unabashed onto young minds.

4. Football. Players seek fame not the old fashioned way, through athletic accomplishment, but by "coming out". Since when is being homosexual an accomplishment?

5. Homosexuality pervades our media, our television, and virtually all facets of American life. Why do these people think they're so important? What if Christians or Jews acted like this?

uganda-anit-gay-parade1.jpg


But I haven't even gotten to the dilemma. Gay activists have noted a rise in anger toward homosexuals and point to it as proof that the nation is riddled with homophobia. They fail to notice that the rise in anti homosexual sentiment happened in direct proportion and timing to the belligerence of the gay movement. When people said they don't want homosexuals' lifestyle shoved in their faces, they meant it.

Conservatives don't hate homosexuals, we just don't care as long as it's kept private. But here the aggressive homosexual lobby has made sure that it's our business. So now we're noticing you and now we're pissed.

If you homos had any inkling what unrelenting instigating assholes you've become, you'd blush in embarrassment. But instead, you take the reaction of people who are sick of hearing about you as proof that you have more work to do. Talk about a destructive circular paradox!

So I have something to say to you on behalf of America. F*** you.

BTW, Notice the picture? Even Kenyans don't like things being shoved in their faces.


Consider how those who describe themselves as homophobic are always more turned on by gay porn than self-identified gay men. They conceal they're own homosexuality by coming out (heh) against it.

We're on to you. :)

'Homophobe' is a fraudulent contrivance of the cult of socialism... the word literally means 'irrational fear of self'; meaning that there is no such thing as a homophobe, therefore there are precisely zero people who describe themselves as such.
 

Forum List

Back
Top