Coloradomtnman
Rational and proud of it.
but thats exactly what you want. you want a minority to dictate to the majority.
The 3 branches of government were established to prevent the tyranny of the majority over the minority. No one is forcing you to become gay, attend a gay wedding, condone or endorse gay marriage, or marry gay people. But, you don't get to determine what someone else's rights should be.
Nope. You faggots are just forcing people to conduct the ceremonies, bake wedding cakes, and offer photography services for fag weddings. I love how how you turd pirates pretend like you're not in everyone's face and not forcing your beliefs on anyone. Bull fcking shit!
Oh! I didn't realize the extent of the oppression! Christians in untold numbers are being forced to conduct ceremonies (untrue), bake cakes, and take photographs of gay people getting married! It's as if this is Nero's Rome! What terrible persecution!
Is there some distinction in principle where one person is forced into servitude, as opposed to a million or ten million?
What would that distinction be? And do you see any potential for expansion of forced servitude, where the first passes without contest, then the second and third and so on?
I ask, because it is clear that tens of millions of voters disagreed in the last election, wherein a large percentage of the political clout of the Advocacy to Normalize Sexual Abnormality was kicked to the curb by that significant majority.
So having to bake a cake is equal to not having equality because one is attracted to one's own gender?
Are you saying that gay marriage is a slippery slope to Christian slavery?
Was marriage equality on the ballot last November? Would it matter if it was? Does the Constitution protect minorities from the tyranny of the majority?