🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

The Latest From Americas New Socialist Titan

Speaking to a friendly Trevor Noah, Ocasio-Cortez revealed that she does not know the difference between a one-year and a ten-year budget; confused the recent increase in defence spending with the entire annual cost of the military; implied that the population of the United States was around 800 million strong; and, having been asked to defend her coveted $15 minimum wage, launched into a rambling and inscrutable diatribe about “private equity” firms that would have been a touch too harsh as a parody on South Park.

But she’s not an old white man, so she is more qualified than the white man she defeated.

Liberals are tired of old white men running the country.
They do not represent the population of this country anymore.
Like the inscription in Jefferson's Memorial says, the country is like a boy who will outgrow his clothes, therefore changes will have to come:

""I am not an advocate for frequent changes in laws and constitutions, but laws and institutions must go hand in hand with the progress of the human mind. As that becomes more developed, more enlightened, as new discoveries are made, new truths discovered and manners and opinions change, with the change of circumstances, institutions must advance also to keep pace with the times. We might as well require a man to wear still the coat which fitted him when a boy as a civilized society to remain ever under the regimen of their barbarous ancestors."
 
Speaking to a friendly Trevor Noah, Ocasio-Cortez revealed that she does not know the difference between a one-year and a ten-year budget; confused the recent increase in defence spending with the entire annual cost of the military; implied that the population of the United States was around 800 million strong; and, having been asked to defend her coveted $15 minimum wage, launched into a rambling and inscrutable diatribe about “private equity” firms that would have been a touch too harsh as a parody on South Park.

But she’s not an old white man, so she is more qualified than the white man she defeated.

Liberals are tired of old white men running the country.
They do not represent the population of this country anymore.
Like the inscription in Jefferson's Memorial says, the country is like a boy who will outgrow his clothes, therefore changes will have to come:

""I am not an advocate for frequent changes in laws and constitutions, but laws and institutions must go hand in hand with the progress of the human mind. As that becomes more developed, more enlightened, as new discoveries are made, new truths discovered and manners and opinions change, with the change of circumstances, institutions must advance also to keep pace with the times. We might as well require a man to wear still the coat which fitted him when a boy as a civilized society to remain ever under the regimen of their barbarous ancestors."
New Reich, uh.

Good luck.
 
Speaking to a friendly Trevor Noah, Ocasio-Cortez revealed that she does not know the difference between a one-year and a ten-year budget; confused the recent increase in defence spending with the entire annual cost of the military; implied that the population of the United States was around 800 million strong; and, having been asked to defend her coveted $15 minimum wage, launched into a rambling and inscrutable diatribe about “private equity” firms that would have been a touch too harsh as a parody on South Park.

But she’s not an old white man, so she is more qualified than the white man she defeated.

Liberals are tired of old white men running the country.
They do not represent the population of this country anymore.
Like the inscription in Jefferson's Memorial says, the country is like a boy who will outgrow his clothes, therefore changes will have to come:

""I am not an advocate for frequent changes in laws and constitutions, but laws and institutions must go hand in hand with the progress of the human mind. As that becomes more developed, more enlightened, as new discoveries are made, new truths discovered and manners and opinions change, with the change of circumstances, institutions must advance also to keep pace with the times. We might as well require a man to wear still the coat which fitted him when a boy as a civilized society to remain ever under the regimen of their barbarous ancestors."
New Reich, uh.

Good luck.

Those are Thomas Jefferson's words, not mine, moron.
 
ima, have you ever watched a Trump rally on TV? All he does is brag about himself and try to make himself look good by running everyone else down, especially those who check his facts... and in poor language too..repeating himself over and over. And the crowd loves it. So please lighten up on left voters, because you got no room to talk about them as you support those whopper-lovers.

Comrade dumbfuck, do you think attacking Trump is a valid defense of Ocasio-Cortez?
 
Is that a differentiating factor between trumps numbers and Obama’s numbers?

No, that would hold true for Trumps numbers, although the GDP and confidence levels should provide supporting indications.
Here are the GDP numbers. I don’t see a yuge Trump bump, looks like it’s been holding steady, right? What’s next?

us-gdp.jpg

Considering the number of dollars I would say 1% is pretty significant.
What’s 1%?

A 1% change.
Yeah 1% change is great. I hope it keeps going up. Of course Obama had 2.66% and 2.7% in 2013 and 2014, that’s right where Trump is now. Again not seeing a significant change in the numbers yet. Wanna look at anything else?
 
ima, have you ever watched a Trump rally on TV? All he does is brag about himself and try to make himself look good by running everyone else down, especially those who check his facts... and in poor language too..repeating himself over and over. And the crowd loves it. So please lighten up on left voters, because you got no room to talk about them as you support those whopper-lovers.

Comrade dumbfuck, do you think attacking Trump is a valid defense of Ocasio-Cortez?
It’s the only defense they have of their messiah.
 
No, that would hold true for Trumps numbers, although the GDP and confidence levels should provide supporting indications.
Here are the GDP numbers. I don’t see a yuge Trump bump, looks like it’s been holding steady, right? What’s next?

us-gdp.jpg

Considering the number of dollars I would say 1% is pretty significant.
What’s 1%?

A 1% change.
Yeah 1% change is great. I hope it keeps going up. Of course Obama had 2.66% and 2.7% in 2013 and 2014, that’s right where Trump is now. Again not seeing a significant change in the numbers yet. Wanna look at anything else?

I dunno, I'd say 2.7 to 4.1 is significant.
 
Speaking to a friendly Trevor Noah, Ocasio-Cortez revealed that she does not know the difference between a one-year and a ten-year budget; confused the recent increase in defence spending with the entire annual cost of the military; implied that the population of the United States was around 800 million strong; and, having been asked to defend her coveted $15 minimum wage, launched into a rambling and inscrutable diatribe about “private equity” firms that would have been a touch too harsh as a parody on South Park.

But she’s not an old white man, so she is more qualified than the white man she defeated.

Liberals are tired of old white men running the country.
They do not represent the population of this country anymore.
Like the inscription in Jefferson's Memorial says, the country is like a boy who will outgrow his clothes, therefore changes will have to come:

""I am not an advocate for frequent changes in laws and constitutions, but laws and institutions must go hand in hand with the progress of the human mind. As that becomes more developed, more enlightened, as new discoveries are made, new truths discovered and manners and opinions change, with the change of circumstances, institutions must advance also to keep pace with the times. We might as well require a man to wear still the coat which fitted him when a boy as a civilized society to remain ever under the regimen of their barbarous ancestors."
New Reich, uh.

Good luck.

Those are Thomas Jefferson's words, not mine, moron.
Yes, I know. Too bad the Left are retro.
 
Speaking to a friendly Trevor Noah, Ocasio-Cortez revealed that she does not know the difference between a one-year and a ten-year budget; confused the recent increase in defence spending with the entire annual cost of the military; implied that the population of the United States was around 800 million strong; and, having been asked to defend her coveted $15 minimum wage, launched into a rambling and inscrutable diatribe about “private equity” firms that would have been a touch too harsh as a parody on South Park.

But she’s not an old white man, so she is more qualified than the white man she defeated.

Liberals are tired of old white men running the country.
They do not represent the population of this country anymore.
Like the inscription in Jefferson's Memorial says, the country is like a boy who will outgrow his clothes, therefore changes will have to come:

""I am not an advocate for frequent changes in laws and constitutions, but laws and institutions must go hand in hand with the progress of the human mind. As that becomes more developed, more enlightened, as new discoveries are made, new truths discovered and manners and opinions change, with the change of circumstances, institutions must advance also to keep pace with the times. We might as well require a man to wear still the coat which fitted him when a boy as a civilized society to remain ever under the regimen of their barbarous ancestors."
Hahahahaha liberals are tired of old white men running the country......yet they keep on nominating & electing them. Good chance Biden is their next nominee for potus. Old? Check. White? Check.

I think what you ment to say was that racist leftist twats are tired of old white men.
 
Speaking to a friendly Trevor Noah, Ocasio-Cortez revealed that she does not know the difference between a one-year and a ten-year budget; confused the recent increase in defence spending with the entire annual cost of the military; implied that the population of the United States was around 800 million strong; and, having been asked to defend her coveted $15 minimum wage, launched into a rambling and inscrutable diatribe about “private equity” firms that would have been a touch too harsh as a parody on South Park.


Ignorant voters are a Leftist politicians best friend. The dumber the voter, the easier it is for the Leftist politician to convince them of the utopia the Left wants. How can they lose? Utopia will be great, and only the rich will pay for it, which means it will all be free to the voter.

By the way; I have heard Ocassio-Cortez went to college, and has some sort of degree in economics. If this is true, she is the poster child for why we should stop funding all colleges with public money, immediately!
ima, have you ever watched a Trump rally on TV? All he does is brag about himself and try to make himself look good by running everyone else down, especially those who check his facts... and in poor language too..repeating himself over and over. And the crowd loves it. So please lighten up on left voters, because you got no room to talk about them as you support those whopper-lovers.


Ummm, point is--------> Is the economy better, yes or no! That is all that matters. You don't have to be a genius to figure that out.

Now, you can dislike Trump all you want, but are we better off today, or the last year of Obama?!?!?!?!?!?!

And that is why Trump can say whatever he wants, and we don't care. RESULTS is what matters-) Obama was a great at speechifying, but his results SUCKED. That is all that matters, and the sooner you realize reality, the sooner you will be prepared for the GDP of next quarter, which will probably finish burying the Left for the midterms-)
This is what cracks me up. Which element of the booming economy are you crediting to Trump? Pick one and then let’s look at those numbers over the past 5 years. Let’s try and compare how Trump changed those numbers from where they were under the Obama administration...

Ummm, point is--------> Is the economy better, yes or no! That is all that matters. You don't have to be a genius to figure that out.

Now, you can dislike Trump all you want, but are we better off today, or the last year of Obama?!?!?!?!?!?!

And that is why Trump can say whatever he wants, and we don't care. RESULTS is what matters-) Obama was a great at speechifying, but his results SUCKED. That is all that matters, and the sooner you realize reality, the sooner you will be prepared for the GDP of next quarter, which will probably finish burying the Left for the midterms-)
This is what cracks me up. Which element of the booming economy are you crediting to Trump? Pick one and then let’s look at those numbers over the past 5 years. Let’s try and compare how Trump changed those numbers from where they were under the Obama administration...


presidents get credit or blame for what happens during their terms. When did Obama have 3.9% unemployment? when did he have all time low black, Hispanic and female unemployment?

What he did have is the largest numbers ever on food stamps, welfare, and underemployed. He also doubled the national debt with not one quarter of GDP over 3%.

so, yeah, lets compare numbers. Go for it.
Happy to! Shall we start with the first one you mentioned... Unemployment? Here’s the historical chart. Is it fair to say that Trump has roughly the same impact as obama on unemployment? If you don’t agree then say why, if you do then what stat do you want to compare next

5.8.18.png

You do realize what happens when a person's unemployment extends beyond the unemployment payment timeline?
Is that a differentiating factor between trumps numbers and Obama’s numbers?

Now ya see Slade, this is what we laugh about, lol!

You could win the midterms in 1 part of the government, or you could win 2, or then again, you could get your a## handed to ya! But the truth is----------> You guys are a circle jerk, lol! You VERIFY what is actually going on, by checking with each other, hehehhehehehehe.

Do you realize, that when it all falls apart for your side BEFORE the midterms, 1/2 of your clueless side, will have no idea what happened. That should tell you how bad you have pulled people off the of reality.

Let me put it this way----------> Trump tells tales. Obama told tales. But, how much do YOU have to lie, to even make things close this midterm, and are you happy doing it!

I gotta tell ya, I think you are going to be sorely disappointed when the count comes in, because before the election happens...……..your side is going to be exposed, and not in a sexual way-)

Don't believe me? Let us watch and see-)
 
Here are the GDP numbers. I don’t see a yuge Trump bump, looks like it’s been holding steady, right? What’s next?

us-gdp.jpg

Considering the number of dollars I would say 1% is pretty significant.
What’s 1%?

A 1% change.
Yeah 1% change is great. I hope it keeps going up. Of course Obama had 2.66% and 2.7% in 2013 and 2014, that’s right where Trump is now. Again not seeing a significant change in the numbers yet. Wanna look at anything else?

I dunno, I'd say 2.7 to 4.1 is significant.
Oh are we looking at quarterly now? Ok, in Q2 and Q3 of 2014 Obama hit 4.6% and 5.2%.

Let’s start being honest Thinker. That was a BS argument you just made.
 
Speaking to a friendly Trevor Noah, Ocasio-Cortez revealed that she does not know the difference between a one-year and a ten-year budget; confused the recent increase in defence spending with the entire annual cost of the military; implied that the population of the United States was around 800 million strong; and, having been asked to defend her coveted $15 minimum wage, launched into a rambling and inscrutable diatribe about “private equity” firms that would have been a touch too harsh as a parody on South Park.


Ignorant voters are a Leftist politicians best friend. The dumber the voter, the easier it is for the Leftist politician to convince them of the utopia the Left wants. How can they lose? Utopia will be great, and only the rich will pay for it, which means it will all be free to the voter.

By the way; I have heard Ocassio-Cortez went to college, and has some sort of degree in economics. If this is true, she is the poster child for why we should stop funding all colleges with public money, immediately!
ima, have you ever watched a Trump rally on TV? All he does is brag about himself and try to make himself look good by running everyone else down, especially those who check his facts... and in poor language too..repeating himself over and over. And the crowd loves it. So please lighten up on left voters, because you got no room to talk about them as you support those whopper-lovers.


Ummm, point is--------> Is the economy better, yes or no! That is all that matters. You don't have to be a genius to figure that out.

Now, you can dislike Trump all you want, but are we better off today, or the last year of Obama?!?!?!?!?!?!

And that is why Trump can say whatever he wants, and we don't care. RESULTS is what matters-) Obama was a great at speechifying, but his results SUCKED. That is all that matters, and the sooner you realize reality, the sooner you will be prepared for the GDP of next quarter, which will probably finish burying the Left for the midterms-)
This is what cracks me up. Which element of the booming economy are you crediting to Trump? Pick one and then let’s look at those numbers over the past 5 years. Let’s try and compare how Trump changed those numbers from where they were under the Obama administration...

This is what cracks me up. Which element of the booming economy are you crediting to Trump? Pick one and then let’s look at those numbers over the past 5 years. Let’s try and compare how Trump changed those numbers from where they were under the Obama administration...


presidents get credit or blame for what happens during their terms. When did Obama have 3.9% unemployment? when did he have all time low black, Hispanic and female unemployment?

What he did have is the largest numbers ever on food stamps, welfare, and underemployed. He also doubled the national debt with not one quarter of GDP over 3%.

so, yeah, lets compare numbers. Go for it.
Happy to! Shall we start with the first one you mentioned... Unemployment? Here’s the historical chart. Is it fair to say that Trump has roughly the same impact as obama on unemployment? If you don’t agree then say why, if you do then what stat do you want to compare next

5.8.18.png

You do realize what happens when a person's unemployment extends beyond the unemployment payment timeline?
Is that a differentiating factor between trumps numbers and Obama’s numbers?

Now ya see Slade, this is what we laugh about, lol!

You could win the midterms in 1 part of the government, or you could win 2, or then again, you could get your a## handed to ya! But the truth is----------> You guys are a circle jerk, lol! You VERIFY what is actually going on, by checking with each other, hehehhehehehehe.

Do you realize, that when it all falls apart for your side BEFORE the midterms, 1/2 of your clueless side, will have no idea what happened. That should tell you how bad you have pulled people off the of reality.

Let me put it this way----------> Trump tells tales. Obama told tales. But, how much do YOU have to lie, to even make things close this midterm, and are you happy doing it!

I gotta tell ya, I think you are going to be sorely disappointed when the count comes in, because before the election happens...……..your side is going to be exposed, and not in a sexual way-)

Don't believe me? Let us watch and see-)
Amazing how you can use so many words and say absolutely nothing. I’m not a Dem so I dont really care what team is “winning”. But I do like looking at numbers and engaging in honest debate. I’ve been posting numbers and making the case that the Trump economy is not all that different from Obama’s so far. You seem unable to discuss this with substance so you resort to the partisan attacks. Grow up.
 
Ignorant voters are a Leftist politicians best friend. The dumber the voter, the easier it is for the Leftist politician to convince them of the utopia the Left wants. How can they lose? Utopia will be great, and only the rich will pay for it, which means it will all be free to the voter.

By the way; I have heard Ocassio-Cortez went to college, and has some sort of degree in economics. If this is true, she is the poster child for why we should stop funding all colleges with public money, immediately!
ima, have you ever watched a Trump rally on TV? All he does is brag about himself and try to make himself look good by running everyone else down, especially those who check his facts... and in poor language too..repeating himself over and over. And the crowd loves it. So please lighten up on left voters, because you got no room to talk about them as you support those whopper-lovers.


Ummm, point is--------> Is the economy better, yes or no! That is all that matters. You don't have to be a genius to figure that out.

Now, you can dislike Trump all you want, but are we better off today, or the last year of Obama?!?!?!?!?!?!

And that is why Trump can say whatever he wants, and we don't care. RESULTS is what matters-) Obama was a great at speechifying, but his results SUCKED. That is all that matters, and the sooner you realize reality, the sooner you will be prepared for the GDP of next quarter, which will probably finish burying the Left for the midterms-)
This is what cracks me up. Which element of the booming economy are you crediting to Trump? Pick one and then let’s look at those numbers over the past 5 years. Let’s try and compare how Trump changed those numbers from where they were under the Obama administration...

presidents get credit or blame for what happens during their terms. When did Obama have 3.9% unemployment? when did he have all time low black, Hispanic and female unemployment?

What he did have is the largest numbers ever on food stamps, welfare, and underemployed. He also doubled the national debt with not one quarter of GDP over 3%.

so, yeah, lets compare numbers. Go for it.
Happy to! Shall we start with the first one you mentioned... Unemployment? Here’s the historical chart. Is it fair to say that Trump has roughly the same impact as obama on unemployment? If you don’t agree then say why, if you do then what stat do you want to compare next

5.8.18.png

You do realize what happens when a person's unemployment extends beyond the unemployment payment timeline?
Is that a differentiating factor between trumps numbers and Obama’s numbers?

Now ya see Slade, this is what we laugh about, lol!

You could win the midterms in 1 part of the government, or you could win 2, or then again, you could get your a## handed to ya! But the truth is----------> You guys are a circle jerk, lol! You VERIFY what is actually going on, by checking with each other, hehehhehehehehe.

Do you realize, that when it all falls apart for your side BEFORE the midterms, 1/2 of your clueless side, will have no idea what happened. That should tell you how bad you have pulled people off the of reality.

Let me put it this way----------> Trump tells tales. Obama told tales. But, how much do YOU have to lie, to even make things close this midterm, and are you happy doing it!

I gotta tell ya, I think you are going to be sorely disappointed when the count comes in, because before the election happens...……..your side is going to be exposed, and not in a sexual way-)

Don't believe me? Let us watch and see-)
Amazing how you can use so many words and say absolutely nothing. I’m not a Dem so I dont really care what team is “winning”. But I do like looking at numbers and engaging in honest debate. I’ve been posting numbers and making the case that the Trump economy is not all that different from Obama’s so far. You seem unable to discuss this with substance so you resort to the partisan attacks. Grow up.
Topic is your Socislist Messiah not knowing the difference between a 1 year and 10 year budget among many miscellaneous displays of ignorance.
 
Considering the number of dollars I would say 1% is pretty significant.
What’s 1%?

A 1% change.
Yeah 1% change is great. I hope it keeps going up. Of course Obama had 2.66% and 2.7% in 2013 and 2014, that’s right where Trump is now. Again not seeing a significant change in the numbers yet. Wanna look at anything else?

I dunno, I'd say 2.7 to 4.1 is significant.
Oh are we looking at quarterly now? Ok, in Q2 and Q3 of 2014 Obama hit 4.6% and 5.2%.

Let’s start being honest Thinker. That was a BS argument you just made.


I guess we could say he inherited those from Bush. that's what you are saying about Trump's numbers.
 

Forum List

Back
Top