The leak is far worse than the resignation, obama's people really screwed up, jail may await them...

[Pop23]

How is any of this different then the wikileaks leaks on Hillary that you all were joyfully defending....?

It is completely different since the officials involved broke numerous laws and violated the agreements they made to serve. They can be charged with actual laws and we can find out who they were. How are you ok with the US Government spying on US citizens? Or better yet an outgoing US Government spying on an incoming Government?

Oh really?

Your argument, in defense of wikileaks was that it was justified in exposing potential "criminal conduct".

The leaks WERE an illegal act however.

Do you still justify it?

If so, how can you not justify the leaks on Flynn?

Ans: it's DIFFERENT when it's OUR side

Did wiki leaks obtain their information through a US covert operation against a United States citizen?

No?

So the difference is monumental.

 

[Synthaholic]

Standard fascist behavior. "Waaa! The treasonous conduct of our party was revealed! Jail whatever patriot did that! All must put party before country!"

So, JimBowie, 2aguy, AnCap'n and Death Angel aren't even pretending to be loyal Americans any more. That's probably for the best, as they never could pull off the charade. The party gives orders, they obey, and they don't care how that harms the USA. Their boy sold us out to the Russians, and since anything their side does is good by definition, they now think selling the USA out to the Russians is a good thing.

No treason whatsoever by Flynn........Russia was put in "time out" by the globalists whose asses you kiss on a daily basis.

He violated the Logan Act.

He also called the Russian ambassador 5 times that day. That's a man with a mission. The real question:

Who Told Flynn to Call Russia?

You should read this and learn something, dope.

Okay I learned that guys opinion. Thanks. I disagree with it and I think he's making a shit ton of assumptions in an attempt to convince readers to reach a preset conclusion.

OK, you answer the question then: Who told Flynn to call Russia?

 

[Synthaholic]

If those in the DOJ used illegal wiretaps on a retired 3 star general, what makes you think they would stop there.

Are you really this fucking stupid? This has been answered numerous times in this thread: they didn't wiretap Flynn, they wiretapped the Russian Ambassador.

 

[EverCurious]

I don't particularly think anyone "told" him to. The only reason anyone even brings that up is in some half-cocked attempt to say Trump told him to call, which in itself is entirely based on the false lie that Trump's in bed with the Russians.

The whole thing is a rediculious house of cards built with assumptions and opinions, and almost no facts to back anything up.

 

[Dale Smith]

Standard fascist behavior. "Waaa! The treasonous conduct of our party was revealed! Jail whatever patriot did that! All must put party before country!"

So, JimBowie, 2aguy, AnCap'n and Death Angel aren't even pretending to be loyal Americans any more. That's probably for the best, as they never could pull off the charade. The party gives orders, they obey, and they don't care how that harms the USA. Their boy sold us out to the Russians, and since anything their side does is good by definition, they now think selling the USA out to the Russians is a good thing.

No treason whatsoever by Flynn........Russia was put in "time out" by the globalists whose asses you kiss on a daily basis.

He violated the Logan Act.

He also called the Russian ambassador 5 times that day. That's a man with a mission. The real question:

Who Told Flynn to Call Russia?

You should read this and learn something, dope.

Why would I care if he called twenty times a day? NATO troops had been staging military equipment around the border of Russia. Would you like China or Russia to be staging troops and equipment around the border of North America? You wanted a nuclear war? There was never a reason to poke and prod Russia to begin with. Why are leftards fine with the globalist E.U and Soros backed overthrow of the Ukraine but were butt hurt when Crimea (which is overwhelmingly of Russian descent) wanted to take their chances with Russia instead of the E.U and the globalist bankers that own it? It was BY FAR the better move. How many countries are wanting to leave the "Hotel E.U"? The union that you can check out any time but you can never leave? The people that were apart of Brexit are finding that out. Why don't YOU learn something.....I know infinitely more than you.

 

[Syriusly]

The idiots in obama's intelligence agencies leaked the Flynn information....and since they have to protect the identity of Americans when they are surveilling foreign assets........there are very few people who would have had access to the Flynn recordings......and they all belong to obama.....and now, they can go and get them ......

Catherine Herridge has high level sources......

We are talking jail time for the leakers when they are caught.......

Top House Republican wants FBI 'assessment' on Trump-related leaks

But the release of information from the Flynn phone calls also appears especially problematic, because when the intelligence community captures phone calls of an American inside the U.S., even if the discussion involves a foreign national (in this case an ambassador), steps must be taken to shield the American caller's identity.

"If [the conversation] was picked up inadvertently, then that would have had to been approved by someone in the last administration to actually unmask his name so that the FBI or intelligence officials knew who it was on the other end of the phone talking to the Russian ambassador," Nunes explained.

"If in fact the press reports are right, someone made the decision to deliberately listen to General Flynn's phone calls and that is, I think, unprecedented, unwarranted, and flat-out wrong."

Former NSA analyst and whistleblower Bill Binney confirmed to Fox News that surveillance programs that touch on leadership are highly restricted.

"I think it is compartmentalized, meaning a small circle, less than 100 [people would have access to the intelligence]," Binney said. "They are supposed to minimize the American side. ... All presumed U.S. citizens have rights under the Fourth Amendment."

Nunes said the timing may be significant because the authorization to unmask Flynn was likely taken under the Obama administration, as the phone calls occurred in December.

The committee chairman said the issue goes beyond politics because it is also undermining the relationship between a president and world leaders.

"I think all foreign leaders now are going to be worried that this is going to somehow leak out. I think it has done tremendous damage to [America's] reputation around the world, and no one's talking about it -- and this is because someone in the national security apparatus decided to leak this out. It's very, very serious," he said.

Simply revealing the contents of the calls can have the effect of what the intelligence community calls "burning the source," because the parties involved know beyond a doubt the U.S. government has the ability to track the conversations.

The leaking of information about the investigation into Russian interference in the U.S. race points to the possible compromise of even more sensitive collection sources.

You sure are committed to trying to obscure Trump's teams Russian connections.

Trump's chief advisor had illegal communications with the Russian.

Trump blames it on President Obama.

 

[EverCurious]

Nothing in the communication was illegal.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

The idiots in obama's intelligence agencies leaked the Flynn information....and since they have to protect the identity of Americans when they are surveilling foreign assets........there are very few people who would have had access to the Flynn recordings......and they all belong to obama.....and now, they can go and get them ......

Catherine Herridge has high level sources......

We are talking jail time for the leakers when they are caught.......

Top House Republican wants FBI 'assessment' on Trump-related leaks

But the release of information from the Flynn phone calls also appears especially problematic, because when the intelligence community captures phone calls of an American inside the U.S., even if the discussion involves a foreign national (in this case an ambassador), steps must be taken to shield the American caller's identity.

"If [the conversation] was picked up inadvertently, then that would have had to been approved by someone in the last administration to actually unmask his name so that the FBI or intelligence officials knew who it was on the other end of the phone talking to the Russian ambassador," Nunes explained.

"If in fact the press reports are right, someone made the decision to deliberately listen to General Flynn's phone calls and that is, I think, unprecedented, unwarranted, and flat-out wrong."

Former NSA analyst and whistleblower Bill Binney confirmed to Fox News that surveillance programs that touch on leadership are highly restricted.

"I think it is compartmentalized, meaning a small circle, less than 100 [people would have access to the intelligence]," Binney said. "They are supposed to minimize the American side. ... All presumed U.S. citizens have rights under the Fourth Amendment."

Nunes said the timing may be significant because the authorization to unmask Flynn was likely taken under the Obama administration, as the phone calls occurred in December.

The committee chairman said the issue goes beyond politics because it is also undermining the relationship between a president and world leaders.

"I think all foreign leaders now are going to be worried that this is going to somehow leak out. I think it has done tremendous damage to [America's] reputation around the world, and no one's talking about it -- and this is because someone in the national security apparatus decided to leak this out. It's very, very serious," he said.

Simply revealing the contents of the calls can have the effect of what the intelligence community calls "burning the source," because the parties involved know beyond a doubt the U.S. government has the ability to track the conversations.

The leaking of information about the investigation into Russian interference in the U.S. race points to the possible compromise of even more sensitive collection sources.

Rube news, too funny two statue bowers jerking each other off

Why don't you go f**k yourself ?

 

[Sun Devil 92]

The idiots in obama's intelligence agencies leaked the Flynn information....and since they have to protect the identity of Americans when they are surveilling foreign assets........there are very few people who would have had access to the Flynn recordings......and they all belong to obama.....and now, they can go and get them ......

Catherine Herridge has high level sources......

We are talking jail time for the leakers when they are caught.......

Top House Republican wants FBI 'assessment' on Trump-related leaks

But the release of information from the Flynn phone calls also appears especially problematic, because when the intelligence community captures phone calls of an American inside the U.S., even if the discussion involves a foreign national (in this case an ambassador), steps must be taken to shield the American caller's identity.

"If [the conversation] was picked up inadvertently, then that would have had to been approved by someone in the last administration to actually unmask his name so that the FBI or intelligence officials knew who it was on the other end of the phone talking to the Russian ambassador," Nunes explained.

"If in fact the press reports are right, someone made the decision to deliberately listen to General Flynn's phone calls and that is, I think, unprecedented, unwarranted, and flat-out wrong."

Former NSA analyst and whistleblower Bill Binney confirmed to Fox News that surveillance programs that touch on leadership are highly restricted.

"I think it is compartmentalized, meaning a small circle, less than 100 [people would have access to the intelligence]," Binney said. "They are supposed to minimize the American side. ... All presumed U.S. citizens have rights under the Fourth Amendment."

Nunes said the timing may be significant because the authorization to unmask Flynn was likely taken under the Obama administration, as the phone calls occurred in December.

The committee chairman said the issue goes beyond politics because it is also undermining the relationship between a president and world leaders.

"I think all foreign leaders now are going to be worried that this is going to somehow leak out. I think it has done tremendous damage to [America's] reputation around the world, and no one's talking about it -- and this is because someone in the national security apparatus decided to leak this out. It's very, very serious," he said.

Simply revealing the contents of the calls can have the effect of what the intelligence community calls "burning the source," because the parties involved know beyond a doubt the U.S. government has the ability to track the conversations.

The leaking of information about the investigation into Russian interference in the U.S. race points to the possible compromise of even more sensitive collection sources.

You sure are committed to trying to obscure Trump's teams Russian connections.

Trump's chief advisor had illegal communications with the Russian.

Trump blames it on President Obama.

The one that is being tried when ?

 

[Dale Smith]

"Who Told Flynn to Call Russia? Written by Daniel Benjamin!!!!! Former water carrier for the Clintons and the Barrypuppet? ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!!!

 

[Sun Devil 92]

How is any of this different then the wikileaks leaks on Hillary that you all were joyfully defending....?

Hacking the DNC = Hacking the government ?

 

[Dale Smith]

The idiots in obama's intelligence agencies leaked the Flynn information....and since they have to protect the identity of Americans when they are surveilling foreign assets........there are very few people who would have had access to the Flynn recordings......and they all belong to obama.....and now, they can go and get them ......

Catherine Herridge has high level sources......

We are talking jail time for the leakers when they are caught.......

Top House Republican wants FBI 'assessment' on Trump-related leaks

But the release of information from the Flynn phone calls also appears especially problematic, because when the intelligence community captures phone calls of an American inside the U.S., even if the discussion involves a foreign national (in this case an ambassador), steps must be taken to shield the American caller's identity.

"If [the conversation] was picked up inadvertently, then that would have had to been approved by someone in the last administration to actually unmask his name so that the FBI or intelligence officials knew who it was on the other end of the phone talking to the Russian ambassador," Nunes explained.

"If in fact the press reports are right, someone made the decision to deliberately listen to General Flynn's phone calls and that is, I think, unprecedented, unwarranted, and flat-out wrong."

Former NSA analyst and whistleblower Bill Binney confirmed to Fox News that surveillance programs that touch on leadership are highly restricted.

"I think it is compartmentalized, meaning a small circle, less than 100 [people would have access to the intelligence]," Binney said. "They are supposed to minimize the American side. ... All presumed U.S. citizens have rights under the Fourth Amendment."

Nunes said the timing may be significant because the authorization to unmask Flynn was likely taken under the Obama administration, as the phone calls occurred in December.

The committee chairman said the issue goes beyond politics because it is also undermining the relationship between a president and world leaders.

"I think all foreign leaders now are going to be worried that this is going to somehow leak out. I think it has done tremendous damage to [America's] reputation around the world, and no one's talking about it -- and this is because someone in the national security apparatus decided to leak this out. It's very, very serious," he said.

Simply revealing the contents of the calls can have the effect of what the intelligence community calls "burning the source," because the parties involved know beyond a doubt the U.S. government has the ability to track the conversations.

The leaking of information about the investigation into Russian interference in the U.S. race points to the possible compromise of even more sensitive collection sources.

You sure are committed to trying to obscure Trump's teams Russian connections.

Trump's chief advisor had illegal communications with the Russian.

Trump blames it on President Obama.

Flynn should have been on the phone to Russia and telling them that Trump wasn't going to support the NATO build-up of troops,military equipment and cruise missiles. Russia was being prodded to act first to justify an attack. The west tried to blame them for the downing of flight MH 17. You believe every fucking thing the lamestream media feeds you......pathetic.

 

[Synthaholic]

which in itself is entirely based on the false lie that Trump's in bed with the Russians.

You don't know if it's a lie. All circumstantial evidence points to him being either in bed, or blackmailed by Russia.

He could eliminate a lot of the speculation by releasing his tax returns.

What is he hiding?

 

[Synthaholic]

Standard fascist behavior. "Waaa! The treasonous conduct of our party was revealed! Jail whatever patriot did that! All must put party before country!"

So, JimBowie, 2aguy, AnCap'n and Death Angel aren't even pretending to be loyal Americans any more. That's probably for the best, as they never could pull off the charade. The party gives orders, they obey, and they don't care how that harms the USA. Their boy sold us out to the Russians, and since anything their side does is good by definition, they now think selling the USA out to the Russians is a good thing.

No treason whatsoever by Flynn........Russia was put in "time out" by the globalists whose asses you kiss on a daily basis.

He violated the Logan Act.

He also called the Russian ambassador 5 times that day. That's a man with a mission. The real question:

Who Told Flynn to Call Russia?

You should read this and learn something, dope.

Why would I care if he called twenty times a day?

It's a violation of the Logan Act. Which you are obviously ignorant about.

I know infinitely more than you.

Not even close. You're a partisan hack moron.

 

[EverCurious]

which in itself is entirely based on the false lie that Trump's in bed with the Russians.

You don't know if it's a lie. All circumstantial evidence points to him being either in bed, or blackmailed by Russia.

He could eliminate a lot of the speculation by releasing his tax returns.

What is he hiding?

No it doesn't, again the entire thing is based on false assumptions and opinions, none of which are based in any facts.

There is /nothing/ connecting Trump to the Russians, even before he was elected it was investigated and there was nothing, no evidence what-so-ever. Yet folks are still running around saying he's in bed with Putin.

 

[Synthaholic]

Wingnuts were fine with leaks six months ago.

 

[Dale Smith]

Standard fascist behavior. "Waaa! The treasonous conduct of our party was revealed! Jail whatever patriot did that! All must put party before country!"

So, JimBowie, 2aguy, AnCap'n and Death Angel aren't even pretending to be loyal Americans any more. That's probably for the best, as they never could pull off the charade. The party gives orders, they obey, and they don't care how that harms the USA. Their boy sold us out to the Russians, and since anything their side does is good by definition, they now think selling the USA out to the Russians is a good thing.

No treason whatsoever by Flynn........Russia was put in "time out" by the globalists whose asses you kiss on a daily basis.

He violated the Logan Act.

He also called the Russian ambassador 5 times that day. That's a man with a mission. The real question:

Who Told Flynn to Call Russia?

You should read this and learn something, dope.

Why would I care if he called twenty times a day?

It's a violation of the Logan Act. Which you are obviously ignorant about.

I know infinitely more than you.

Not even close. You're a partisan hack moron.

Flynn never negotiated anything with Russia nor did he promise anything. I am only partisan about the truth...while you are only interested in anything that promotes leftardism. Yeah, I know more than you. Russia never should have had sanctions placed on them to begin with and Trump should left them ASAP and THANK them for kicking the ever living shit out of the "Deep State" CIA rogue elements that backed the cleverly repackaged mercenary group your lamestream media refers to as "ISIS". Google "Scott Bennett, military whistleblower" and get back to me.

 

[Roudy]

Standard fascist behavior. "Waaa! The treasonous conduct of our party was revealed! Jail whatever patriot did that! All must put party before country!"

So, JimBowie, 2aguy, AnCap'n and Death Angel aren't even pretending to be loyal Americans any more. That's probably for the best, as they never could pull off the charade. The party gives orders, they obey, and they don't care how that harms the USA. Their boy sold us out to the Russians, and since anything their side does is good by definition, they now think selling the USA out to the Russians is a good thing.

No treason whatsoever by Flynn........Russia was put in "time out" by the globalists whose asses you kiss on a daily basis.

He violated the Logan Act.

He also called the Russian ambassador 5 times that day. That's a man with a mission. The real question:

Who Told Flynn to Call Russia?

You should read this and learn something, dope.

Okay I learned that guys opinion. Thanks. I disagree with it and I think he's making a shit ton of assumptions in an attempt to convince readers to reach a preset conclusion.

OK, you answer the question then: Who told Flynn to call Russia?

More leftie jerking off. Flynn has already been cleared of any wrongdoing.

FBI Reportedly Will Not Pursue Charges Against "Cooperative And Truthful" Mike Flynn | Zero Hedge

 

[Pop23]

If those in the DOJ used illegal wiretaps on a retired 3 star general, what makes you think they would stop there.

Are you really this fucking stupid? This has been answered numerous times in this thread: they didn't wiretap Flynn, they wiretapped the Russian Ambassador.

And we're bound by law to end the wiretap when an American citizen was identified as the other party.

Did they? No. they are above the law. So my question stands.

 

[there4eyeM]

False indignation and hypocritical pursuit of the guilty.

War crimes trials for the Iraq criminality, then on to minor affairs.