The leak is far worse than the resignation, obama's people really screwed up, jail may await them...

[Fang]

Go get the traitors President Trump!

 

[2aguy]

which in itself is entirely based on the false lie that Trump's in bed with the Russians.

You don't know if it's a lie. All circumstantial evidence points to him being either in bed, or blackmailed by Russia.

He could eliminate a lot of the speculation by releasing his tax returns.

What is he hiding?

There is no such evidence...even the New York Times states explicitly that there is absolutely no evidence of this........and his tax returns have no bearing on this....

Investigating the clinton foundation and the 140 million dollars Putin gave to hilary through the foundation when she was Secretary of STate...that would be the big deal....

 

[Brynmr]

CLEARED! FBI Says Nothing Wrong With General Flynn's Communication With Russian Ambassador | The Sean Hannity Show

 

[Coyote]

How is any of this different then the wikileaks leaks on Hillary that you all were joyfully defending....?

It is completely different since the officials involved broke numerous laws and violated the agreements they made to serve. They can be charged with actual laws and we can find out who they were. How are you ok with the US Government spying on US citizens? Or better yet an outgoing US Government spying on an incoming Government?

Oh really?

Your argument, in defense of wikileaks was that it was justified in exposing potential "criminal conduct".

The leaks WERE an illegal act however.

Do you still justify it?

If so, how can you not justify the leaks on Flynn?

Ans: it's DIFFERENT when it's OUR side

Did wiki leaks obtain their information through a US covert operation against a United States citizen?

No?

So the difference is monumental.

There was no covert operation against a US citizen.

 

[Roudy]

Go get the traitors President Trump!

 

[Pop23]

How is any of this different then the wikileaks leaks on Hillary that you all were joyfully defending....?

It is completely different since the officials involved broke numerous laws and violated the agreements they made to serve. They can be charged with actual laws and we can find out who they were. How are you ok with the US Government spying on US citizens? Or better yet an outgoing US Government spying on an incoming Government?

Oh really?

Your argument, in defense of wikileaks was that it was justified in exposing potential "criminal conduct".

The leaks WERE an illegal act however.

Do you still justify it?

If so, how can you not justify the leaks on Flynn?

Ans: it's DIFFERENT when it's OUR side

Did wiki leaks obtain their information through a US covert operation against a United States citizen?

No?

So the difference is monumental.

There was no covert operation against a US citizen.

That's what this entire thread is about. Following the established law, the intelligent agent was bound to disengage the surveillance until a warrant was was issued. By not doing so he/she created a covert event.

Hope those that encouraged this will apologize to that person(s) when he/she is being led away to the federal penitentiary

 

[Synthaholic]

Flynn never negotiated anything with Russia nor did he promise anything.

What evidence do you base this on?

 

[Synthaholic]

Russia never should have had sanctions placed on them to begin with

So, all the intelligence agencies are lying?

You're a clown.

 

[Synthaholic]

Standard fascist behavior. "Waaa! The treasonous conduct of our party was revealed! Jail whatever patriot did that! All must put party before country!"

So, JimBowie, 2aguy, AnCap'n and Death Angel aren't even pretending to be loyal Americans any more. That's probably for the best, as they never could pull off the charade. The party gives orders, they obey, and they don't care how that harms the USA. Their boy sold us out to the Russians, and since anything their side does is good by definition, they now think selling the USA out to the Russians is a good thing.

No treason whatsoever by Flynn........Russia was put in "time out" by the globalists whose asses you kiss on a daily basis.

He violated the Logan Act.

He also called the Russian ambassador 5 times that day. That's a man with a mission. The real question:

Who Told Flynn to Call Russia?

You should read this and learn something, dope.

Okay I learned that guys opinion. Thanks. I disagree with it and I think he's making a shit ton of assumptions in an attempt to convince readers to reach a preset conclusion.

OK, you answer the question then: Who told Flynn to call Russia?

More leftie jerking off. Flynn has already been cleared of any wrongdoing.

FBI Reportedly Will Not Pursue Charges Against "Cooperative And Truthful" Mike Flynn | Zero Hedge

Why are you running from my question?

 

[Synthaholic]

FBI Reportedly Will Not Pursue Charges Against "Cooperative And Truthful" Mike Flynn | Zero Hedge

I see your Zero Hedge and raise you a Washington Post:

Flynn in FBI interview denied discussing sanctions with Russian ambassador

Lying to the FBI is a felony. #LockHimUp


And how desperate and pathetic do you have to be to rely on some site called Zero Hedge?

 

[Dale Smith]

Flynn never negotiated anything with Russia nor did he promise anything.

What evidence do you base this on?

What evidence do you have that he did? Flynn didn't have the authorization to lift anything. Why was Russia being sanctioned to begin with? Russia isn't playing ball with the globalists because they are nationalists. They don't believe that allowing third world muslims that can't speak the language enhances their country. Do you disagree with that?

BTW, the Hildebeast was lifting trade sanctions on radical muslim countries in exchange for donations to her slush fund (that was cleverly disguised as a foundation". Hitlery knew that Qatar and the Saudis were funneling weapons to ISIS because she approved of the selling of those weapons while allowing surface to air missiles in Libya (after that illegal coup d'e'tat) to be taken in to the hands of the ISIS mercenaries that were going to take them to Syria to fight a proxy war against Assad. This is the same Saudi government that financed at least 20 percent of her campaign....and leftards bitch about foreign inside influences?

Do you know how fucking stupid you come across as?

 

[Synthaholic]

If those in the DOJ used illegal wiretaps on a retired 3 star general, what makes you think they would stop there.

Are you really this fucking stupid? This has been answered numerous times in this thread: they didn't wiretap Flynn, they wiretapped the Russian Ambassador.

And we're bound by law to end the wiretap when an American citizen was identified as the other party.

Did they? No. they are above the law. So my question stands.

Link to that law.

 

[Synthaholic]

CLEARED! FBI Says Nothing Wrong With General Flynn's Communication With Russian Ambassador | The Sean Hannity Show

Sean Hannity!

 

[Synthaholic]

What evidence do you have that he did?

You said: "Flynn never negotiated anything with Russia nor did he promise anything."

Back up your bullshit, imbecile.

 

[Synthaholic]

Flynn didn't have the authorization to lift anything.

Who said he did? He was speaking on behalf of the person who did have that authority.

 

[Synthaholic]

Why was Russia being sanctioned to begin with?

For interfering with our election.

Don't you fucking know anything, dope?

 

[Synthaholic]

BTW, the Hildebeast was lifting trade sanctions on radical muslim countries in exchange for donations to her slush fund (that was cleverly disguised as a foundation".

I can't tell whose ass you're farther up, Breitbart's or Alex Jones.

I do know that you love it in there.

 

[mamooth]

Fascinating.

Not even a single Trump-thug is willing to put country over party. Just like the old Soviet communists that they seek to emulate in every way, they're all obeying TheParty with fear and trembling, knowing that TheParty will turn on them if they don't obey.

It's so good to be a liberal, as we don't have to spend life on our knees. We free men can only pity the Trump-slaves as they endlessly bow and scrape.

 

[flacaltenn]

How is any of this different then the wikileaks leaks on Hillary that you all were joyfully defending....?

It is completely different since the officials involved broke numerous laws and violated the agreements they made to serve. They can be charged with actual laws and we can find out who they were. How are you ok with the US Government spying on US citizens? Or better yet an outgoing US Government spying on an incoming Government?

Oh really?

Your argument, in defense of wikileaks was that it was justified in exposing potential "criminal conduct".

The leaks WERE an illegal act however.

Do you still justify it?

If so, how can you not justify the leaks on Flynn?

Ans: it's DIFFERENT when it's OUR side

Did wiki leaks obtain their information through a US covert operation against a United States citizen?

No?

So the difference is monumental.

There was no covert operation against a US citizen.

Of course there was "a covert operation" against an American citizen -- Gen Flynn, T-Rump, and who the hell else knows how many others in the transition team. Even worse it appears completely unauthorized and certain HIGHLY illegal to leak any of that information to the public.

It's not unusual to intercept and record conversations like that. What makes it unusual is that you need to be TASKED to FLAG it, Transcript it, Analyze it and Distribute it. And distribution of stuff like that is restricted to a couple hundred very trusted people. And if you take OUTSIDE that circle -- you're a traitor and criminal with no future.

The problem is -- when PARTISANS infiltrate that trusted circle and start using that awesome power to form an insurrection -- the war that could start would end this Republic as we know it. Because of the massive amount of incriminating and embarrassing shit that's been bottled up in that power to spy for decades. Which is why -- until 9/11 all these agencies were EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED from conducting ANY Domestic operations.

Which brings up the point that pisses me off the most. Which is -- that all these party animals, both left and right don't give a crap about Civil Liberties unless and until THEIR SIDE is the victim. The Patriot Act powers and all this unimaginable power to probe and spy is just FINE WITH THEM -- when THEIR SIDE is in power. Which leaves the REAL Civil Libertarians to worry about how all this end should the genie get out of the bottle.

End the hypocrisy here. Be CONSISTENT on Civil Liberties implications of having these powerful agencies hijacked and misused. Or face a literal Armageddon some day... Not being dramatic. Just stating a fact.

 

[Pop23]

How is any of this different then the wikileaks leaks on Hillary that you all were joyfully defending....?

It is completely different since the officials involved broke numerous laws and violated the agreements they made to serve. They can be charged with actual laws and we can find out who they were. How are you ok with the US Government spying on US citizens? Or better yet an outgoing US Government spying on an incoming Government?

Oh really?

Your argument, in defense of wikileaks was that it was justified in exposing potential "criminal conduct".

The leaks WERE an illegal act however.

Do you still justify it?

If so, how can you not justify the leaks on Flynn?

Ans: it's DIFFERENT when it's OUR side

Did wiki leaks obtain their information through a US covert operation against a United States citizen?

No?

So the difference is monumental.

There was no covert operation against a US citizen.

Of course there was "a covert operation" against an American citizen -- Gen Flynn, T-Rump, and who the hell else knows how many others in the transition team. Even worse it appears completely unauthorized and certain HIGHLY illegal to leak any of that information to the public.

It's not unusual to intercept and record conversations like that. What makes it unusual is that you need to be TASKED to FLAG it, Transcript it, Analyze it and Distribute it. And distribution of stuff like that is restricted to a couple hundred very trusted people. And if you take OUTSIDE that circle -- you're a traitor and criminal with no future.

The problem is -- when PARTISANS infiltrate that trusted circle and start using that awesome power to form an insurrection -- the war that could start would end this Republic as we know it. Because of the massive amount of incriminating and embarrassing shit that's been bottled up in that power to spy for decades. Which is why -- until 9/11 all these agencies were EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED from conducting ANY Domestic operations.

Which brings up the point that pisses me off the most. Which is -- that all these party animals, both left and right don't give a crap about Civil Liberties unless and until THEIR SIDE is the victim. The Patriot Act powers and all this unimaginable power to probe and spy is just FINE WITH THEM -- when THEIR SIDE is in power. Which leaves the REAL Civil Libertarians to worry about how all this end should the genie get out of the bottle.

End the hypocrisy here. Be CONSISTENT on Civil Liberties implications of having these powerful agencies hijacked and misused. Or face a literal Armageddon some day... Not being dramatic. Just stating a fact.

This thread is over.