The Left has really, completely, lost its shit.

[jc456]

what about the Billy Bush story, what about the 12 women who supposedly were fondled by trump, what about all of the other fake new stories? to do what? What exactly do you think their purposes were? So you're ok with one way politics eh? fk you!

Billy Bush was actually Trump's own
words ,dope.

The 12 women came forward to the press.

The press reports stories, not create them.

who put it out there ahead of the election? What do you supposed the purpose was? DOH!!!

The 12 women came forward to the press.

sure they did. you got a bridge to nowhere?

So where are they now then?

See you haven't an honest bone in your body. you only want one way politics. As Aerosmith sang, 'Dream On'

BTW,
The press reports stories, not create them

What did wikileaks report but a story, wow you live in a fantasy land.

Why didn't the MSM report on the story? oh yeah, they were in clinton's pocket.

They reported the story because that's what they do. If I'm a reporter and I get an email with a video of Trump saying what he said or a woman who alleges Trump groped her. I'd check it out and run a story as that's what I do.

That is a far cry from a foreign govt hacking personal info and selectively releasing it.

If you can't see the difference, then you're dopey.

They reported the story because that's what they do. If I'm a reporter and I get an email with a video of Trump saying what he said or a woman who alleges Trump groped her. I'd check it out and run a story as that's what I do.

What's the purpose for to something that happen 12 years ago? Wasn't it to influence the election? come on man tell me that wasn't the reason. Again, you all are only ok with one way politics.Dream On

BTW, did they have Billy Bush and Trump's permission to air their conversation? how is that any different than getting emails ?

I explained it in very simple terms. If you want to ascribe a larger conspiracy to the actions of reporters, then that's on you.

As far as permission. I believe the show that Trump was on owns that footage.

what show was it? I think you are mistaken. but that is usual for you.

 

[Redfish]

so was the information within the emails released touched up or changed? Why are you ok with corruption in our government by our politicians? Shame on you for accepting the corruption? you're worse than the hack. All the hack did was enlighten the country on the corruption and you don't care. wow!!!!

Not only that you want more corruption by giving them back the keys!!!! wow, that is unamerican.

There was no corruption revealed.

Perjury, influence peddling, bribery, violation of national security laws. No corruption? Sure.

Of course none of that occurred.

So Comey was lying to congress? I thought he was your guy.

Comey was addressing her emails, not the emails that were hacked, dope. Not to mention he said none of that anyway.

Gowdy: Secretary Clinton said that she never sent any classified data on her private server, was that true?

Comey; There was classified data in some of those e-mails.

 

[imawhosure]

Of course their behaviors are similar. Both deploy spin, diversion, distortion, deflection, denial, personal attacks, straw man arguments, hypocrisy and outright lies to push their agendas, as naturally as they breathe. That's the point of my sig.

What I didn't expect was this madness I'm seeing from the Left right now. They're doing some of the same things they've been mocking the Right for, for years. For whatever reason, I thought they were better than this.
.

Well now you see who we've been talking about for years. It's funny when the camouflage falls off. Ask inner city folks!

I'm the first to admit I really don't understand partisan politics.

Still, this has been a surprise for me.
.

I will tell you from my 50 years of following politics, the left has always been unwilling to negotiate between the parties. Ever. Today it causes us to keep the government going all the time cause they won't negotiate what spending to cut. There is no such thing to a libturd as a spending cut.

How did that obumerrcare thingy work out? oh yeah after hours and it has to become law to know what is in it. Oh and keep your doctor, cheaper and all of those lies. That is all libturds. Social Security, Libturds. Welfare, Libturds. Name one entitlement that came from a republican.

Lastly, sorry, they hate people who have success.

The left has been unwilling, the right has been unwilling, unless of course the other sides decides to do what they want, and that doesn't happen.

You go on with the childish insults, and you point out half of one of the many problems, but you won't admit that the problem is partisan, it's not left wing, it's not right wing, it's partisan, and those who are partisan are the problem, and those who are partisan spend their whole time of their sad little lives insulting people because it's all they've got.

Yup. The point of my sig.
.

Well Mac, now we know why when you started this thread, the far leftists went off the deep end. I am sure all the usual suspect-astro turfers already knew what was in the pipeline, and your thread just put them in the correct light as their ridiculous narrative moved along. You really stepped into it this time, and for being an independent leaning left, you sure have the lefties wanting to dismiss everything you say at best, wanting to shut you up permanently at worst.

Just a question---------->when you resided on the left, were you also a parrot like these people? They all post over, and over, and yet their talking points are exactly the same. Very seldom do we see something different, although I have to admit Candycorn has thought out of the box somewhat.

 

[Mac1958]

Three days later and the OP still hasn't named the conspiracy theories.

You lie so consistently and so naturally that I don't think you even know what reality is.

Below is a nice, civil, honest conversation I had with a lefty yesterday.

I know it won't be "good enough" for you, because (as I've said before) you can't "prove" anything to a hardcore partisan ideologue.

While I must admit it's a very good sign that I'm so far up in your heads, your behaviors do get tedious.

Wrong. Posts 6, 299, 337, 359 and 458 all include examples of my point.

But I already know that I could provide a thousand examples and they will all be denied.

Fine with me. Denial is a fundamental strategy of hardcore partisan ideologues, both ends. I'm used to it.
.

Post #6, is more of the same.
Post #299 - agree, could be or become a CT. The question is this: are there significant ties to Russia amongst the people being put into the cabinet or are they just passing/business/transienty sorts of things? Out of curiousity, - how does this compare other presidential cabinets? This reminds me the Muslim Brotherhood/Obama administration conspiracy theory so you have a point - this could become one with much being made out of very little.
Post #337 - pure hyperbole from Olberman. He sounds like a wingnut.
Post #359 - there's legitimate concern here because no one knows what Trump is going to do, he defies prediction. Totally. He is not like any politician we've known. He doesn't let normal protocals get in his way thus far. I wouldn't label this a CT yet until we see what happens, there is not enough info available to say.
#458 - agree, hyperbole, hysteria.

Agree with your point. Let's see if it persists. I for one am very disturbed at Russia's hacking, the timing of wikileaks releases, and Comey's last minute disruption which went completely against normal rules and protocal. I don't think it's CT or hysteria to BE disturbed. It is unprecedented. It violates something we, on both sides of the aisle consider inviolate - our electoral process. Each of those things taken seperately, can be overcome but when you take them all together - they become very worrisome. There is no way to know IF or to WHAT degree it effected the election, so that needs to be just let go by partisans. It's all conjecture. Trump was elected. But the fact that a foreign country was behind this, motive undetermined - should not be let go and I am glad there is a bipartisan call to look into it.

I want you to prove that I'm touting conspiracy theories.

Nice dodge, liar.

And again, nothing can be "proven" to someone like you.

I don't give a shit what you want.

And again, nice dodge, liar.
.

It's your accusation. Back it up.

Or, can we call your theory that liberals are losing it a conspiracy theory itself?

You still don't understand that I don't care.

Call it what you want, deny it all you want.
.

 

[candycorn]

So when a hacker makes the truth available about how the DNC tried to manipulate the election that's smearing one candidate? How about all the so-called Trump sexual victims who came out and lied? Were they and the media trying to smear one candidate?

politics is a dirty slimy business, to pretend otherwise is very naïve.

Hacking is a crime. Hacking done by state actors and attempting to influence an election is an act of espionage at best and an act of war at worst.

Here you go Mac. Here's one that is OK with this. Treasonous?

So hackers got into the DNC and revealed the corruption of that organization. They could have been hackers located in the USA or any other country. They put out the truth so all could see what the dems were trying to do.

If that's treason, then CNN, MSNBC, and the NY times are also guilty of treason.

I understand that the truth bothers you, as it should.

Except hacking is a crime and it originated within Russia.

Is CBS "within Russia"? How about CNN, FOX, ABC, NY Times? All within Russia?

Yes, hacking is a crime, but its lunacy to claim that Russia did it to influence our election and keep Hillary from winning.

The Russians have been 'rolling' Obama and Clinton for eight years. For them it was like stealing the lunch boxes of a Special Needs class.
Who would the Russians rather deal with for the next four years? Hillary and her merry band of Chamberlain pussies or one of the most hard nosed 'take no prisoners' businessmen in the world?
You LIBS REALLY need to fucking wise up!
Russian has dramatically accelerated it's war in Syria. Putin KNOWS after Trump becomes President when Trump tells Putin to fucking stop it will be an order not one of Obama's 'the 'Coward In Chiefs' mythical 'red lines'.

You mean the “hard nosed” guy who just got rolled for $25M to a bunch of people who were gullible enough to sign up for his “class”?

I understand you’re wearing out your kneepads for Trump but I think most of his harem would call you batshit crazy for that post.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Billy Bush was actually Trump's own
words ,dope.

The 12 women came forward to the press.

The press reports stories, not create them.

who put it out there ahead of the election? What do you supposed the purpose was? DOH!!!

The 12 women came forward to the press.

sure they did. you got a bridge to nowhere?

So where are they now then?

See you haven't an honest bone in your body. you only want one way politics. As Aerosmith sang, 'Dream On'

BTW,
The press reports stories, not create them

What did wikileaks report but a story, wow you live in a fantasy land.

Why didn't the MSM report on the story? oh yeah, they were in clinton's pocket.

They reported the story because that's what they do. If I'm a reporter and I get an email with a video of Trump saying what he said or a woman who alleges Trump groped her. I'd check it out and run a story as that's what I do.

That is a far cry from a foreign govt hacking personal info and selectively releasing it.

If you can't see the difference, then you're dopey.

They reported the story because that's what they do. If I'm a reporter and I get an email with a video of Trump saying what he said or a woman who alleges Trump groped her. I'd check it out and run a story as that's what I do.

What's the purpose for to something that happen 12 years ago? Wasn't it to influence the election? come on man tell me that wasn't the reason. Again, you all are only ok with one way politics.Dream On

BTW, did they have Billy Bush and Trump's permission to air their conversation? how is that any different than getting emails ?

I explained it in very simple terms. If you want to ascribe a larger conspiracy to the actions of reporters, then that's on you.

As far as permission. I believe the show that Trump was on owns that footage.

what show was it? I think you are mistaken. but that is usual for you.

What ever show Bush was interviewing Trump for. Unless his interview was contracted, the production company owns all of the footage recorded.

 

[candycorn]

Three days later and the OP still hasn't named the conspiracy theories.

You lie so consistently and so naturally that I don't think you even know what reality is.

Below is a nice, civil, honest conversation I had with a lefty yesterday.

I know it won't be "good enough" for you, because (as I've said before) you can't "prove" anything to a hardcore partisan ideologue.

While I must admit it's a very good sign that I'm so far up in your heads, your behaviors do get tedious.

Post #6, is more of the same.
Post #299 - agree, could be or become a CT. The question is this: are there significant ties to Russia amongst the people being put into the cabinet or are they just passing/business/transienty sorts of things? Out of curiousity, - how does this compare other presidential cabinets? This reminds me the Muslim Brotherhood/Obama administration conspiracy theory so you have a point - this could become one with much being made out of very little.
Post #337 - pure hyperbole from Olberman. He sounds like a wingnut.
Post #359 - there's legitimate concern here because no one knows what Trump is going to do, he defies prediction. Totally. He is not like any politician we've known. He doesn't let normal protocals get in his way thus far. I wouldn't label this a CT yet until we see what happens, there is not enough info available to say.
#458 - agree, hyperbole, hysteria.

Agree with your point. Let's see if it persists. I for one am very disturbed at Russia's hacking, the timing of wikileaks releases, and Comey's last minute disruption which went completely against normal rules and protocal. I don't think it's CT or hysteria to BE disturbed. It is unprecedented. It violates something we, on both sides of the aisle consider inviolate - our electoral process. Each of those things taken seperately, can be overcome but when you take them all together - they become very worrisome. There is no way to know IF or to WHAT degree it effected the election, so that needs to be just let go by partisans. It's all conjecture. Trump was elected. But the fact that a foreign country was behind this, motive undetermined - should not be let go and I am glad there is a bipartisan call to look into it.

I want you to prove that I'm touting conspiracy theories.

Nice dodge, liar.

And again, nothing can be "proven" to someone like you.

I don't give a shit what you want.

And again, nice dodge, liar.
.

It's your accusation. Back it up.

Or, can we call your theory that liberals are losing it a conspiracy theory itself?

You still don't understand that I don't care.

Call it what you want, deny it all you want.
.

And my point is proven yet again. If you’re going to set yourself up as the umpire, you need to be less partisan. And for someone who “doesn’t care” you spend a lot of time trying to legitimize yourself.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

There was no corruption revealed.

Perjury, influence peddling, bribery, violation of national security laws. No corruption? Sure.

Of course none of that occurred.

So Comey was lying to congress? I thought he was your guy.

Comey was addressing her emails, not the emails that were hacked, dope. Not to mention he said none of that anyway.

Gowdy: Secretary Clinton said that she never sent any classified data on her private server, was that true?

Comey; There was classified data in some of those e-mails.

Which one of the supposed "crimes" are you referencing?

Perjury, influence peddling, bribery, violation of national security laws. No corruption? Sure.

 

[Mac1958]

Well now you see who we've been talking about for years. It's funny when the camouflage falls off. Ask inner city folks!

I'm the first to admit I really don't understand partisan politics.

Still, this has been a surprise for me.
.

I will tell you from my 50 years of following politics, the left has always been unwilling to negotiate between the parties. Ever. Today it causes us to keep the government going all the time cause they won't negotiate what spending to cut. There is no such thing to a libturd as a spending cut.

How did that obumerrcare thingy work out? oh yeah after hours and it has to become law to know what is in it. Oh and keep your doctor, cheaper and all of those lies. That is all libturds. Social Security, Libturds. Welfare, Libturds. Name one entitlement that came from a republican.

Lastly, sorry, they hate people who have success.

The left has been unwilling, the right has been unwilling, unless of course the other sides decides to do what they want, and that doesn't happen.

You go on with the childish insults, and you point out half of one of the many problems, but you won't admit that the problem is partisan, it's not left wing, it's not right wing, it's partisan, and those who are partisan are the problem, and those who are partisan spend their whole time of their sad little lives insulting people because it's all they've got.

Yup. The point of my sig.
.

Well Mac, now we know why when you started this thread, the far leftists went off the deep end. I am sure all the usual suspect-astro turfers already knew what was in the pipeline, and your thread just put them in the correct light as their ridiculous narrative moved along. You really stepped into it this time, and for being an independent leaning left, you sure have the lefties wanting to dismiss everything you say at best, wanting to shut you up permanently at worst.

Just a question---------->when you resided on the left, were you also a parrot like these people? They all post over, and over, and yet their talking points are exactly the same. Very seldom do we see something different, although I have to admit Candycorn has thought out of the box somewhat.

I guess that's why I know them so well. Yeah, I was pretty bad. My first year in college I was your standard-issue long haired, pot smoking, mushroom-eating, Birkenstock-wearing, Grateful Dead-listening, rich person-hating kid. Then in my second year (I was a broadcast journalism major) I met the guy who'd be my professor, mentor and father figure.

He taught us in journalism classes how to question everything, avoid falling into ideological traps, recognize bullshit, carefully gather information, carefully analyze it, and present it carefully and comprehensively. I did that for about 18 years and later became a financial advisor, which (not so ironically) requires essentially the same skillset. And while in the media, believe me, I lived day in and day out with people like this.

So yeah, I think the reason they feel the way they do about me is because I know them so well. Not my problem.
.

 

[Mac1958]

You lie so consistently and so naturally that I don't think you even know what reality is.

Below is a nice, civil, honest conversation I had with a lefty yesterday.

I know it won't be "good enough" for you, because (as I've said before) you can't "prove" anything to a hardcore partisan ideologue.

While I must admit it's a very good sign that I'm so far up in your heads, your behaviors do get tedious.

I want you to prove that I'm touting conspiracy theories.

Nice dodge, liar.

And again, nothing can be "proven" to someone like you.

I don't give a shit what you want.

And again, nice dodge, liar.
.

It's your accusation. Back it up.

Or, can we call your theory that liberals are losing it a conspiracy theory itself?

You still don't understand that I don't care.

Call it what you want, deny it all you want.
.

And my point is proven yet again. If you’re going to set yourself up as the umpire, you need to be less partisan. And for someone who “doesn’t care” you spend a lot of time trying to legitimize yourself.

I'm not setting myself up as an umpire, nor do I care whether people here think I'm legitimate.

Anything else?
.

 

[candycorn]

I want you to prove that I'm touting conspiracy theories.

Nice dodge, liar.

And again, nothing can be "proven" to someone like you.

I don't give a shit what you want.

And again, nice dodge, liar.
.

It's your accusation. Back it up.

Or, can we call your theory that liberals are losing it a conspiracy theory itself?

You still don't understand that I don't care.

Call it what you want, deny it all you want.
.

And my point is proven yet again. If you’re going to set yourself up as the umpire, you need to be less partisan. And for someone who “doesn’t care” you spend a lot of time trying to legitimize yourself.

I'm not setting myself up as an umpire, nor do I care whether people here think I'm legitimate.

Anything else?
.

A. Yes you are.
B. You prove my point yet again.

Please continue.

 

[Mac1958]

Nice dodge, liar.

And again, nothing can be "proven" to someone like you.

I don't give a shit what you want.

And again, nice dodge, liar.
.

It's your accusation. Back it up.

Or, can we call your theory that liberals are losing it a conspiracy theory itself?

You still don't understand that I don't care.

Call it what you want, deny it all you want.
.

And my point is proven yet again. If you’re going to set yourself up as the umpire, you need to be less partisan. And for someone who “doesn’t care” you spend a lot of time trying to legitimize yourself.

I'm not setting myself up as an umpire, nor do I care whether people here think I'm legitimate.

Anything else?
.

A. Yes you are.
B. You prove my point yet again.

Please continue.

Okie dokie!
.

 

[candycorn]

I'm the first to admit I really don't understand partisan politics.

Still, this has been a surprise for me.
.

I will tell you from my 50 years of following politics, the left has always been unwilling to negotiate between the parties. Ever. Today it causes us to keep the government going all the time cause they won't negotiate what spending to cut. There is no such thing to a libturd as a spending cut.

How did that obumerrcare thingy work out? oh yeah after hours and it has to become law to know what is in it. Oh and keep your doctor, cheaper and all of those lies. That is all libturds. Social Security, Libturds. Welfare, Libturds. Name one entitlement that came from a republican.

Lastly, sorry, they hate people who have success.

The left has been unwilling, the right has been unwilling, unless of course the other sides decides to do what they want, and that doesn't happen.

You go on with the childish insults, and you point out half of one of the many problems, but you won't admit that the problem is partisan, it's not left wing, it's not right wing, it's partisan, and those who are partisan are the problem, and those who are partisan spend their whole time of their sad little lives insulting people because it's all they've got.

Yup. The point of my sig.
.

Well Mac, now we know why when you started this thread, the far leftists went off the deep end. I am sure all the usual suspect-astro turfers already knew what was in the pipeline, and your thread just put them in the correct light as their ridiculous narrative moved along. You really stepped into it this time, and for being an independent leaning left, you sure have the lefties wanting to dismiss everything you say at best, wanting to shut you up permanently at worst.

Just a question---------->when you resided on the left, were you also a parrot like these people? They all post over, and over, and yet their talking points are exactly the same. Very seldom do we see something different, although I have to admit Candycorn has thought out of the box somewhat.

I guess that's why I know them so well. Yeah, I was pretty bad. My first year in college I was your standard-issue long haired, pot smoking, mushroom-eating, Birkenstock-wearing, Grateful Dead-listening, rich person-hating kid. Then in my second year (I was a broadcast journalism major) I met the guy who'd be my professor, mentor and father figure.

He taught us in journalism classes how to question everything, avoid falling into ideological traps, recognize bullshit, carefully gather information, carefully analyze it, and present it carefully and comprehensively. I did that for about 18 years and later became a financial advisor, which (not so ironically) requires essentially the same skillset. And while in the media, believe me, I lived day in and day out with people like this.

So yeah, I think the reason they feel the way they do about me is because I know them so well. Not my problem.
.

Uh no.

The reason some feel that you’re a feckless piece of shit is because you behave like…a feckless piece of shit.

Amazingly…when Ms. Clinton was being accused of running a child trafficking ring..where was your “recognition of bullshit”
When she was accused of being Yoko Ono’s lover?
When she was accused of murder?
When she was accused of having Parkinson’s Disease?
When she was accused of having to wear a catheter?

Somehow, I don’t recall a thread detailing the right wing “losing it’s shit”…

Hence the charge of being feckless. We must have had the same professor because your bullshit is recognizable from a mile away. And to think…you yourself voted for Ms. Clinton.

 

[NYcarbineer]

I want you to prove that I'm touting conspiracy theories.

Nice dodge, liar.

And again, nothing can be "proven" to someone like you.

I don't give a shit what you want.

And again, nice dodge, liar.
.

It's your accusation. Back it up.

Or, can we call your theory that liberals are losing it a conspiracy theory itself?

You still don't understand that I don't care.

Call it what you want, deny it all you want.
.

And my point is proven yet again. If you’re going to set yourself up as the umpire, you need to be less partisan. And for someone who “doesn’t care” you spend a lot of time trying to legitimize yourself.

I'm not setting myself up as an umpire, nor do I care whether people here think I'm legitimate.

Anything else?
.

Do you still believe the Russian hacking story is pure conspiracy theory, devoid of any legitimate concern?

 

[Mac1958]

Nice dodge, liar.

And again, nothing can be "proven" to someone like you.

I don't give a shit what you want.

And again, nice dodge, liar.
.

It's your accusation. Back it up.

Or, can we call your theory that liberals are losing it a conspiracy theory itself?

You still don't understand that I don't care.

Call it what you want, deny it all you want.
.

And my point is proven yet again. If you’re going to set yourself up as the umpire, you need to be less partisan. And for someone who “doesn’t care” you spend a lot of time trying to legitimize yourself.

I'm not setting myself up as an umpire, nor do I care whether people here think I'm legitimate.

Anything else?
.

Do you still believe the Russian hacking story is pure conspiracy theory, devoid of any legitimate concern?

Still?

Link?
.

 

[candycorn]

Nice dodge, liar.

And again, nothing can be "proven" to someone like you.

I don't give a shit what you want.

And again, nice dodge, liar.
.

It's your accusation. Back it up.

Or, can we call your theory that liberals are losing it a conspiracy theory itself?

You still don't understand that I don't care.

Call it what you want, deny it all you want.
.

And my point is proven yet again. If you’re going to set yourself up as the umpire, you need to be less partisan. And for someone who “doesn’t care” you spend a lot of time trying to legitimize yourself.

I'm not setting myself up as an umpire, nor do I care whether people here think I'm legitimate.

Anything else?
.

Do you still believe the Russian hacking story is pure conspiracy theory, devoid of any legitimate concern?

This should be good.

 

[NYcarbineer]

I will tell you from my 50 years of following politics, the left has always been unwilling to negotiate between the parties. Ever. Today it causes us to keep the government going all the time cause they won't negotiate what spending to cut. There is no such thing to a libturd as a spending cut.

How did that obumerrcare thingy work out? oh yeah after hours and it has to become law to know what is in it. Oh and keep your doctor, cheaper and all of those lies. That is all libturds. Social Security, Libturds. Welfare, Libturds. Name one entitlement that came from a republican.

Lastly, sorry, they hate people who have success.

The left has been unwilling, the right has been unwilling, unless of course the other sides decides to do what they want, and that doesn't happen.

You go on with the childish insults, and you point out half of one of the many problems, but you won't admit that the problem is partisan, it's not left wing, it's not right wing, it's partisan, and those who are partisan are the problem, and those who are partisan spend their whole time of their sad little lives insulting people because it's all they've got.

Yup. The point of my sig.
.

Well Mac, now we know why when you started this thread, the far leftists went off the deep end. I am sure all the usual suspect-astro turfers already knew what was in the pipeline, and your thread just put them in the correct light as their ridiculous narrative moved along. You really stepped into it this time, and for being an independent leaning left, you sure have the lefties wanting to dismiss everything you say at best, wanting to shut you up permanently at worst.

Just a question---------->when you resided on the left, were you also a parrot like these people? They all post over, and over, and yet their talking points are exactly the same. Very seldom do we see something different, although I have to admit Candycorn has thought out of the box somewhat.

I guess that's why I know them so well. Yeah, I was pretty bad. My first year in college I was your standard-issue long haired, pot smoking, mushroom-eating, Birkenstock-wearing, Grateful Dead-listening, rich person-hating kid. Then in my second year (I was a broadcast journalism major) I met the guy who'd be my professor, mentor and father figure.

He taught us in journalism classes how to question everything, avoid falling into ideological traps, recognize bullshit, carefully gather information, carefully analyze it, and present it carefully and comprehensively. I did that for about 18 years and later became a financial advisor, which (not so ironically) requires essentially the same skillset. And while in the media, believe me, I lived day in and day out with people like this.

So yeah, I think the reason they feel the way they do about me is because I know them so well. Not my problem.
.

Uh no.

The reason some feel that you’re a feckless piece of shit is because you behave like…a feckless piece of shit.

Amazingly…when Ms. Clinton was being accused of running a child trafficking ring..where was your “recognition of bullshit”
When she was accused of being Yoko Ono’s lover?
When she was accused of murder?
When she was accused of having Parkinson’s Disease?
When she was accused of having to wear a catheter?

Somehow, I don’t recall a thread detailing the right wing “losing it’s shit”…

Hence the charge of being feckless. We must have had the same professor because your bullshit is recognizable from a mile away. And to think…you yourself voted for Ms. Clinton.

He kisses rightwing ass around here because their cult is very adept at the reward and punishment routine of training posters,

at least those susceptible.

 

[Mac1958]

I will tell you from my 50 years of following politics, the left has always been unwilling to negotiate between the parties. Ever. Today it causes us to keep the government going all the time cause they won't negotiate what spending to cut. There is no such thing to a libturd as a spending cut.

How did that obumerrcare thingy work out? oh yeah after hours and it has to become law to know what is in it. Oh and keep your doctor, cheaper and all of those lies. That is all libturds. Social Security, Libturds. Welfare, Libturds. Name one entitlement that came from a republican.

Lastly, sorry, they hate people who have success.

The left has been unwilling, the right has been unwilling, unless of course the other sides decides to do what they want, and that doesn't happen.

You go on with the childish insults, and you point out half of one of the many problems, but you won't admit that the problem is partisan, it's not left wing, it's not right wing, it's partisan, and those who are partisan are the problem, and those who are partisan spend their whole time of their sad little lives insulting people because it's all they've got.

Yup. The point of my sig.
.

Well Mac, now we know why when you started this thread, the far leftists went off the deep end. I am sure all the usual suspect-astro turfers already knew what was in the pipeline, and your thread just put them in the correct light as their ridiculous narrative moved along. You really stepped into it this time, and for being an independent leaning left, you sure have the lefties wanting to dismiss everything you say at best, wanting to shut you up permanently at worst.

Just a question---------->when you resided on the left, were you also a parrot like these people? They all post over, and over, and yet their talking points are exactly the same. Very seldom do we see something different, although I have to admit Candycorn has thought out of the box somewhat.

I guess that's why I know them so well. Yeah, I was pretty bad. My first year in college I was your standard-issue long haired, pot smoking, mushroom-eating, Birkenstock-wearing, Grateful Dead-listening, rich person-hating kid. Then in my second year (I was a broadcast journalism major) I met the guy who'd be my professor, mentor and father figure.

He taught us in journalism classes how to question everything, avoid falling into ideological traps, recognize bullshit, carefully gather information, carefully analyze it, and present it carefully and comprehensively. I did that for about 18 years and later became a financial advisor, which (not so ironically) requires essentially the same skillset. And while in the media, believe me, I lived day in and day out with people like this.

So yeah, I think the reason they feel the way they do about me is because I know them so well. Not my problem.
.

Uh no.

The reason some feel that you’re a feckless piece of shit is because you behave like…a feckless piece of shit.

Amazingly…when Ms. Clinton was being accused of running a child trafficking ring..where was your “recognition of bullshit”
When she was accused of being Yoko Ono’s lover?
When she was accused of murder?
When she was accused of having Parkinson’s Disease?
When she was accused of having to wear a catheter?

Somehow, I don’t recall a thread detailing the right wing “losing it’s shit”…

Hence the charge of being feckless. We must have had the same professor because your bullshit is recognizable from a mile away. And to think…you yourself voted for Ms. Clinton.

Always good to see the personal attacks, thanks.
.

 

[g5000]

Look at the threads in Politics right now.

Conspiracy theory after conspiracy theory, charge after charge with no solid evidence.
.

Stop. You're killing me with irony.

Seriously.

 

[NYcarbineer]

It's your accusation. Back it up.

Or, can we call your theory that liberals are losing it a conspiracy theory itself?

You still don't understand that I don't care.

Call it what you want, deny it all you want.
.

And my point is proven yet again. If you’re going to set yourself up as the umpire, you need to be less partisan. And for someone who “doesn’t care” you spend a lot of time trying to legitimize yourself.

I'm not setting myself up as an umpire, nor do I care whether people here think I'm legitimate.

Anything else?
.

Do you still believe the Russian hacking story is pure conspiracy theory, devoid of any legitimate concern?

Still?

Link?
.

So you acknowledge that concern over Russian hacking was NOT one of the crazy conspiracy theories you were referring to in the OP.

So name the ones that were.