The Left has really, completely, lost its shit.

Link?

Go ahead, I'll wait here.

You are an unhinged, congenital liar, and I'm pretty sure you don't even realize it.

What in the world is wrong with you?
.

You refuse to state for the record whether or not you consider the Russian hacking story a liberal conspiracy theory.
Of course it isn't.

So you admit that I didn't say what you clearly claim I said.

Do you realize that is a lie? Do you have any idea what a lie is, or how often you do it?

Do you even care?
.


So I FINALLY drag it out of you.

So if the Russian hacking is off the conspiracy table (even though every RWnut in the thread thought that is what you were talking about in the OP)

then what ARE the conspiracy theories you're talking about?

Let me remind you what you said in the OP:

Conspiracy theory after conspiracy theory, charge after charge with no solid evidence.

That's a claim of MANY. So what are the 'many'?

So you admit that I didn't say what you clearly claim I said.

Do you realize that is a lie? Do you have any idea what a lie is, or how often you do it?

Do you even care?
.

What would you expect from a liberal? Honesty? :lol:

Hey, gargoyle, do you believe the Russians were hacking or not?
 
You refuse to state for the record whether or not you consider the Russian hacking story a liberal conspiracy theory.
Of course it isn't.

So you admit that I didn't say what you clearly claim I said.

Do you realize that is a lie? Do you have any idea what a lie is, or how often you do it?

Do you even care?
.


So I FINALLY drag it out of you.

So if the Russian hacking is off the conspiracy table (even though every RWnut in the thread thought that is what you were talking about in the OP)

then what ARE the conspiracy theories you're talking about?

Let me remind you what you said in the OP:

Conspiracy theory after conspiracy theory, charge after charge with no solid evidence.

That's a claim of MANY. So what are the 'many'?

So you admit that I didn't say what you clearly claim I said.

Do you realize that is a lie? Do you have any idea what a lie is, or how often you do it?

Do you even care?
.

What would you expect from a liberal? Honesty? :lol:

I agree and who would expect anything else from such a sore loser.

The whole bunch of them are sore losers. They would much rather have stupid, careless and incompetent Hillary in the WH. What a bunch of idiots.

I proved the OP to be baseless. Deal with it.
 
You refuse to state for the record whether or not you consider the Russian hacking story a liberal conspiracy theory.
Of course it isn't.

So you admit that I didn't say what you clearly claim I said.

Do you realize that is a lie? Do you have any idea what a lie is, or how often you do it?

Do you even care?
.


So I FINALLY drag it out of you.

So if the Russian hacking is off the conspiracy table (even though every RWnut in the thread thought that is what you were talking about in the OP)

then what ARE the conspiracy theories you're talking about?

Let me remind you what you said in the OP:

Conspiracy theory after conspiracy theory, charge after charge with no solid evidence.

That's a claim of MANY. So what are the 'many'?

So you admit that I didn't say what you clearly claim I said.

Do you realize that is a lie? Do you have any idea what a lie is, or how often you do it?

Do you even care?
.

What would you expect from a liberal? Honesty? :lol:

I agree and who would expect anything else from such a sore loser.

The whole bunch of them are sore losers. They would much rather have stupid, careless and incompetent Hillary in the WH. What a bunch of idiots.

Would you like to help Mac out? Can you name the conspiracy theories that Mac is accusing the left of pushing?

Go ahead.
 
Oh Mac is completely capable of defending himself from an idiot like you.

Sore loser you.
 
then why'd she get in with the recount in three states? Why is her side promoting fake news about russians?

Why all the popular vote news?

Excuse me, but.....:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

"She" isn't in the recount in three states. She has representatives involved with the process just as Trump does.


There is nothing fake about the Russian story.



^^^^^useful idiot^^^^^^^^^^^^ just what the leftists ordered. amazing.

Tell us some more about Comey's testimony.


find the questioning done by Trey Gowdy. You found Chaffetz, see if you can find Gowdy's. Then post it, you might just have a learning moment.

What I posted refutes exactly everything you said.


Post Gowdy's questions and Comey's answers. Unless you do that, this conversation is over.
 
You refuse to state for the record whether or not you consider the Russian hacking story a liberal conspiracy theory.
Of course it isn't.

So you admit that I didn't say what you clearly claim I said.

Do you realize that is a lie? Do you have any idea what a lie is, or how often you do it?

Do you even care?
.


So I FINALLY drag it out of you.

So if the Russian hacking is off the conspiracy table (even though every RWnut in the thread thought that is what you were talking about in the OP)

then what ARE the conspiracy theories you're talking about?

Let me remind you what you said in the OP:

Conspiracy theory after conspiracy theory, charge after charge with no solid evidence.

That's a claim of MANY. So what are the 'many'?

So you admit that I didn't say what you clearly claim I said.

Do you realize that is a lie? Do you have any idea what a lie is, or how often you do it?

Do you even care?
.

What would you expect from a liberal? Honesty? :lol:

Hey, gargoyle, do you believe the Russians were hacking or not?

Looks like I hit a nerve! The truth hurts you bad, eh? :lol: Face it, you had a crappy candidate and a crappy campaign. You LOST, and you will continue to lose because you are part of a dishonest and bad people.
 
Here's what Mac is trying to say:

He's throwing a fit in the OP at the Left for acting like the Right. He's singling out the Left because he thinks the Left should know better,

because he knows we on the Left are smarter and more informed and more sensible. He finds it disturbing when he thinks (I emphasize 'thinks') liberals are suddenly acting as idiotically as the rightwingers do constantly.

He doesn't throw fits when the Right goes off on their conspiracy nonsense because, like the rest of us, he knows that rightwingers don't know any better and are ineducable,

so why bother?
Tissue?
.

One big assed box is needed for all these lefty loons who just can't believe Hillary, that piss poor candidate, lost. LOL

The piss poor candidate beat Trump by just under 3 million votes.
really? How come this discussion then?
 
`
This is absolutely fascinating, and one of the primary reasons I visit this site - to observe the behaviors of hardcore partisan ideologues.

I've dropped several examples of my point in this thread, including in direct response to your posts.

So tell me:
  • Have you not bothered to read them?
  • Have you somehow not seen them?
  • Have you forgotten about them?
  • Or do they not qualify as examples in your mind?
Looking forward to yet another fascinating response, thanks.
.

Instead of taking post after post hundreds of words to try to get me to go back and glean through all your posts,

just name, in a few words, THREE conspiracy theories that you're talking about:

1.
2.
3.
You're the one who is so fixated on this.

You're on the thread. I'll bet your mouse works.
.

So you can't list any. That's my point, from the start of this thread. Now confirmed again by you.
I've listed many.

And you are a liar.

"I won't read it, so it's not there".
.

Is the Russian hacking story a conspiracy theory?
hell yes, unless of course you can post up some evidence. The DOJ already said there wasn't. Assange stated the emails came from a leak within the party. So unless you got something, then it's a left conspiracy.
 
Of course it isn't.

So you admit that I didn't say what you clearly claim I said.

Do you realize that is a lie? Do you have any idea what a lie is, or how often you do it?

Do you even care?
.


So I FINALLY drag it out of you.

So if the Russian hacking is off the conspiracy table (even though every RWnut in the thread thought that is what you were talking about in the OP)

then what ARE the conspiracy theories you're talking about?

Let me remind you what you said in the OP:

Conspiracy theory after conspiracy theory, charge after charge with no solid evidence.

That's a claim of MANY. So what are the 'many'?

So you admit that I didn't say what you clearly claim I said.

Do you realize that is a lie? Do you have any idea what a lie is, or how often you do it?

Do you even care?
.

What would you expect from a liberal? Honesty? :lol:

Hey, gargoyle, do you believe the Russians were hacking or not?

Looks like I hit a nerve! The truth hurts you bad, eh? :lol: Face it, you had a crappy candidate and a crappy campaign. You LOST, and you will continue to lose because you are part of a dishonest and bad people.

The topic is liberal conspiracy theories. Name them.
 
I've listed many.

And you are a liar.

"I won't read it, so it's not there".
.

Is the Russian hacking story a conspiracy theory?
Why are you having such an epic meltdown over my observation?

Is my opinion really that important to you?

Holy crap, do you think you're changing someone's mind with all this?
.

Okay, I'll take that as a 'no'. See what I mean? He has NOTHING to back up his original OPINION, aka accusation,
that the left is engaging in a multitude of conspiracy theories. He can't even name one.
To whom are you writing, specifically, when you say "he"?
.

You. Name 3 conspiracy theories that the left (and by the left I mean enough of the left to justify using that broad brush) is currently pushing.

We've eliminated the Russian hacking. So what else?
you did?
 
Here's what Mac is trying to say:

He's throwing a fit in the OP at the Left for acting like the Right. He's singling out the Left because he thinks the Left should know better,

because he knows we on the Left are smarter and more informed and more sensible. He finds it disturbing when he thinks (I emphasize 'thinks') liberals are suddenly acting as idiotically as the rightwingers do constantly.

He doesn't throw fits when the Right goes off on their conspiracy nonsense because, like the rest of us, he knows that rightwingers don't know any better and are ineducable,

so why bother?
Tissue?
.

One big assed box is needed for all these lefty loons who just can't believe Hillary, that piss poor candidate, lost. LOL

The piss poor candidate beat Trump by just under 3 million votes.

Ahh who's the President elect again???

The president elect is the guy who lost the election by 3 million votes, because we have a weird, obsolete system of selecting presidents.
in what game was that played in?

Hey BTW, you should really read the rules if you want to participate in a presidential election. It is obvious you have no idea how the US chooses presidents. Go read up!!!

Again, you should understand the rules before you play.
 
Last edited:
`
Instead of taking post after post hundreds of words to try to get me to go back and glean through all your posts,

just name, in a few words, THREE conspiracy theories that you're talking about:

1.
2.
3.
You're the one who is so fixated on this.

You're on the thread. I'll bet your mouse works.
.

So you can't list any. That's my point, from the start of this thread. Now confirmed again by you.
I've listed many.

And you are a liar.

"I won't read it, so it's not there".
.

Is the Russian hacking story a conspiracy theory?
hell yes, unless of course you can post up some evidence. The DOJ already said there wasn't. Assange stated the emails came from a leak within the party. So unless you got something, then it's a left conspiracy.

Then argue with the OP. He says the Russian hacking is not a conspiracy theory and now claims he wasn't talking about that when he posted the thread.
 
So I FINALLY drag it out of you.

So if the Russian hacking is off the conspiracy table (even though every RWnut in the thread thought that is what you were talking about in the OP)

then what ARE the conspiracy theories you're talking about?

Let me remind you what you said in the OP:

Conspiracy theory after conspiracy theory, charge after charge with no solid evidence.

That's a claim of MANY. So what are the 'many'?

So you admit that I didn't say what you clearly claim I said.

Do you realize that is a lie? Do you have any idea what a lie is, or how often you do it?

Do you even care?
.

What would you expect from a liberal? Honesty? :lol:

Hey, gargoyle, do you believe the Russians were hacking or not?

Looks like I hit a nerve! The truth hurts you bad, eh? :lol: Face it, you had a crappy candidate and a crappy campaign. You LOST, and you will continue to lose because you are part of a dishonest and bad people.

The topic is liberal conspiracy theories. Name them.
if you can't read, we can't help you.
 
Is the Russian hacking story a conspiracy theory?
Why are you having such an epic meltdown over my observation?

Is my opinion really that important to you?

Holy crap, do you think you're changing someone's mind with all this?
.

Okay, I'll take that as a 'no'. See what I mean? He has NOTHING to back up his original OPINION, aka accusation,
that the left is engaging in a multitude of conspiracy theories. He can't even name one.
To whom are you writing, specifically, when you say "he"?
.

You. Name 3 conspiracy theories that the left (and by the left I mean enough of the left to justify using that broad brush) is currently pushing.

We've eliminated the Russian hacking. So what else?
you did?

The OP did.
 
`
You're the one who is so fixated on this.

You're on the thread. I'll bet your mouse works.
.

So you can't list any. That's my point, from the start of this thread. Now confirmed again by you.
I've listed many.

And you are a liar.

"I won't read it, so it's not there".
.

Is the Russian hacking story a conspiracy theory?
hell yes, unless of course you can post up some evidence. The DOJ already said there wasn't. Assange stated the emails came from a leak within the party. So unless you got something, then it's a left conspiracy.

Then argue with the OP. He says the Russian hacking is not a conspiracy theory and now claims he wasn't talking about that when he posted the thread.
I said it was. Why are you including the OP in my statement?
 
Why are you having such an epic meltdown over my observation?

Is my opinion really that important to you?

Holy crap, do you think you're changing someone's mind with all this?
.

Okay, I'll take that as a 'no'. See what I mean? He has NOTHING to back up his original OPINION, aka accusation,
that the left is engaging in a multitude of conspiracy theories. He can't even name one.
To whom are you writing, specifically, when you say "he"?
.

You. Name 3 conspiracy theories that the left (and by the left I mean enough of the left to justify using that broad brush) is currently pushing.

We've eliminated the Russian hacking. So what else?
you did?

The OP did.
I haven't seen that.
 
So you admit that I didn't say what you clearly claim I said.

Do you realize that is a lie? Do you have any idea what a lie is, or how often you do it?

Do you even care?
.

What would you expect from a liberal? Honesty? :lol:

Hey, gargoyle, do you believe the Russians were hacking or not?

Looks like I hit a nerve! The truth hurts you bad, eh? :lol: Face it, you had a crappy candidate and a crappy campaign. You LOST, and you will continue to lose because you are part of a dishonest and bad people.

The topic is liberal conspiracy theories. Name them.
if you can't read, we can't help you.

Okay, so I can add you to the long list of RWnuts plus Mac who cannot name a single liberal conspiracy theory that is being pushed today.
 

Forum List

Back
Top