The left started fascisim and are still fascist

[Moonglow]

View attachment 119146

Obama signed over 250 executive orders, that's a lot of eo's.

List of United States federal executive orders - Wikipedia

Oh really? At the pace that Trumpet is setting himself with EO's and golfing, he'll surpass Oblama in one term..

 

[American_Jihad]

View attachment 119146

Obama signed over 250 executive orders, that's a lot of eo's.

List of United States federal executive orders - Wikipedia

Oh really? At the pace that Trumpet is setting himself with EO's and golfing, he'll surpass Oblama in one term..

Difference is Trump is good at multitasking, obongo not so much...

 

[Moonglow]

View attachment 119146

Obama signed over 250 executive orders, that's a lot of eo's.

List of United States federal executive orders - Wikipedia

Oh really? At the pace that Trumpet is setting himself with EO's and golfing, he'll surpass Oblama in one term..

Difference is Trump is good at multitasking, obongo not so much...

Yes with a comb over like he has, he has to make sure it stays in place and pull up his pants at the same time..

 

[American_Jihad]

View attachment 119146

Obama signed over 250 executive orders, that's a lot of eo's.

List of United States federal executive orders - Wikipedia

Oh really? At the pace that Trumpet is setting himself with EO's and golfing, he'll surpass Oblama in one term..

Difference is Trump is good at multitasking, obongo not so much...

Yes with a comb over like he has, he has to make sure it stays in place and pull up his pants at the same time..

I guess it's safe to say you don't frequent libraries...

 

[Republackan]

From Wikipedia:

Fascism /ˈfæʃɪzəm/ is a form of radical authoritarian nationalism[1][2] that came to prominence in early 20th-century Europe. The first fascist movements emerged in Italy during World War I, before it spread to other European countries. Opposed to liberalism, Marxism, and anarchism, fascism is usually placed on the far-right within the traditional left–right spectrum.[3][4]

Opposed to liberalism, a form of radical authoritarian nationalism..
Does this remind you of anyone in particular?

Don't use Wikipedia, it's a left wing site. They give no proof of what they say on this matter on Wikipedia.

The speaker gives actual names and events to back up his theory, Wikipedia gives only "THEIR" definition according to "THEIR" opinion.

 

[BULLDOG]

From Wikipedia:

Fascism /ˈfæʃɪzəm/ is a form of radical authoritarian nationalism[1][2] that came to prominence in early 20th-century Europe. The first fascist movements emerged in Italy during World War I, before it spread to other European countries. Opposed to liberalism, Marxism, and anarchism, fascism is usually placed on the far-right within the traditional left–right spectrum.[3][4]

Opposed to liberalism, a form of radical authoritarian nationalism..
Does this remind you of anyone in particular?

Don't use Wikipedia, it's a left wing site. They give no proof of what they say on this matter on Wikipedia.

The speaker gives actual names and events to back up his theory, Wikipedia gives only "THEIR" definition according to "THEIR" opinion.

Really? That particular article has 249 references, 7 primary sources, 37 secondary sources, and 4 links. It you don't accept that, you're an idiot.

 

[American_Jihad]

From Wikipedia:

Fascism /ˈfæʃɪzəm/ is a form of radical authoritarian nationalism[1][2] that came to prominence in early 20th-century Europe. The first fascist movements emerged in Italy during World War I, before it spread to other European countries. Opposed to liberalism, Marxism, and anarchism, fascism is usually placed on the far-right within the traditional left–right spectrum.[3][4]

Opposed to liberalism, a form of radical authoritarian nationalism..
Does this remind you of anyone in particular?

Don't use Wikipedia, it's a left wing site. They give no proof of what they say on this matter on Wikipedia.

The speaker gives actual names and events to back up his theory, Wikipedia gives only "THEIR" definition according to "THEIR" opinion.

Really? That particular article has 249 references, 7 primary sources, 37 secondary sources, and 4 links. It you don't accept that, you're an idiot.