Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And some Nutt bagger putting up a free WordPress site doesnt make it official.One cannot intimidate by wearing a hat you absolute foolHe did ask those things
Other outlets did cover the full; story showing why your narrative is false
Phillips was also in DC to push an agenda and there is nothing wrong with parents let their children learn about politics in this manner
Phillips lied that is a fact and your narrative is an outright lie.
Phillips willfully sought confrontation with those kids and has no right to claim intimidation when he went out of his way to confront them.
There was no mutual confrontation. It was sought by one man and that man is phillips
Those are all facts
The kids parents had nothing to do with this they were did not egg it on
Where did Phillps admit to a lie? And your account is false. Although, I think all impartial people agree that the intitial media reports should have sought out more video. But the Boys were trying to be bully punks with their hats.
Making Sense of the Phillips-Sandmann Viral Video
And the point is, there were never grounds for Sandmann to sue. His parents seem to have had imput into his "character." And it's going to dog him
Really? in groups.
https://statelymcdanielmanor.files.wordpress.com/2014/05/nbpp_intimidation.jpg?w=529
God damn you can reach.
The ONLY Point is Nick never had anything to sue over. Phillips said he felt intimidated. the WP reported that .. and it can't be sued for an opinion. And even subsequent video does not show Phillps would have been totally without reason for intimidation.
Nick's parents have a political agenda. So does Phillips. But Nick's parents are the ones trying to push theirs in court.
Sigh.Of course I'm not at the same intellectual....er....level as PolishPrince.So you cannot address the point.I missed your post wagging your finger at another poster, PolishPrince, for calling Nathan Phillips a "drunken injun"....which post # is it?He is not my pet. Are you capable of having a conversation without name calling?And...the court ruling? Explain why your pet thug didn't win his $250 million cash prize.No the court did not.
My god, have you actually looked at ANY facts surrounding this incident?
The court ruled that WAPO the was not liable for libel because reporting lies from their source was not libel as it was reported as his account.
Are you claiming that you are on the same intellectual level as PolishPrince? Do you really want to go there?
Honestly, I expected more from you up until this point. It seems as though I should have the two of you in similar esteem.So.....you are a-ok with him calling Nathan Phillips a "drunken injun", eh?
The kid's parents egged this on, and unfortunately for the kid it's gonna dog him.
Equating wearing a rather popular hat that ties to a political statement to the new black panther racist hate group trying to intimidate voters is not only pathetic - it is sickening.He did ask those thingsSandmann lawyers up faster than Trump. LOL He could simply have asked that his account of the facts be published too, and perhaps even have told the papers and television outlets of people who'd support his side. IF no one else, Fox the Wash Times and 'merican stinker would have been on it like Trump on a porn star
Sandmann may have been sandbagged by Phillips, I really don't know. But Sandmann was in DC to push a political agenda, and ANY parent of any ideology, who'd let a high school child be put in that position, needs a not-literal slap upside their stupid noggin.
The Post published that Phillips said he believed Sandmann was intimidating him. Phillips did say that. And their interaction in two "sides" confronted each other over a political issue involved two private individuals voluntarily entering the political arena. He can't sue the Wash Post or any other media outlet for publishing that.
He may be able to sue Phillips IF he can prove Phillips intentionally lied. I doubt he can do that, and even so, I'd be surprised if Phillips has any money to be sued for.
The kid's parents egged this on, and unfortunately for the kid it's gonna dog him.
Other outlets did cover the full; story showing why your narrative is false
Phillips was also in DC to push an agenda and there is nothing wrong with parents let their children learn about politics in this manner
Phillips lied that is a fact and your narrative is an outright lie.
Phillips willfully sought confrontation with those kids and has no right to claim intimidation when he went out of his way to confront them.
There was no mutual confrontation. It was sought by one man and that man is phillips
Those are all facts
The kids parents had nothing to do with this they were did not egg it on
Where did Phillps admit to a lie? And your account is false. Although, I think all impartial people agree that the intitial media reports should have sought out more video. But the Boys were trying to be bully punks with their hats.
Making Sense of the Phillips-Sandmann Viral Video
And the point is, there were never grounds for Sandmann to sue. His parents seem to have had imput into his "character." And it's going to dog him
I don't think many people have bothered to investigate the FULL STORY of what happened on the Mall that day.
The real confrontation was not between MAGA Kid/Native American. The real confrontation was between the MAGA KidS/Black Hebrew Israelites. You can see the before during and after from the BHI point of view on this video -
I watched the whole thing awhile ago because I had the time. I do believe the Native American was attempting to diffuse the situation.
I also believe the MAGA kid was not being disrespectful to the Native American.
The kids were definitely verbally harassed by the Black Hebrew Israelites. But the BHI have clearly done this before and were not a physical threat to anyone that day.
I think the kids were curious and I don't blame them. But they started to get out of hand. Their group was getting larger and larger as more of the MAGA kids and adults showed up. The MAGA kids were feeling their oats and it was beginning to look dicey.
I would not have put my money on the MAGA kids despite their numbers. They really just wanted to holler and grab their dicks, literally and figuratively speaking. But the BHI may have had friends nearby. They are not new at this.
In comes Native American man with his drum and things de-escalated. At the very end, the BHI and some of the MAGA kids actually had a civil conversation. And the BHI are crazy MFers.
I blame the parents that were supposed to be supervising the kids. If they were doing their job, none of this would have happened. Lots of them just stood there like fools.
There are ALWAYS many sides to a story.
People believe what their tribe tells them to believe.
The Covington adults knew nothing about the drunken Indians or the Black Congressional Israelites. They don't put up with that shit in Kentucky.
As far as how the whole thing came down, the fact that there wasn't any violence, and the young men made it on the bus back to the Tremendous Commonwealth of Kentucky, it was fine. The problem is the outfits like CNN and the Washington Post thought it was a "story" that needed wide coverage to discourage young people in the future from getting involved in protests or civil events. Ruin these kids lives, keep them out of college or the work force, and next year, there won't be as many young people protesting for the Gift of Life itself.
Really it wasn't a story at all. Some local goofballs mouthed off to children waiting on the bus and the bus comes before there can be any violence. How is this a news story?
Where is your evidence that the Native Americans were drunk? Or are you just throwing up lies to see what will stick?
Mr. Phillips not only obviously appeared inebriated, he has a long record of booze related criminal activity.
Native American activist Nathan Phillips' past includes assault charge, escape from prison: report
The media is being sued because the media said Sandman was intimidating the drunken Indian and committing a variety of provocative acts. Their claims about Sandman all turned out to be utterly bogus. They lied and lied and lied.Yes they had reason to sueAnd some Nutt bagger putting up a free WordPress site doesnt make it official.One cannot intimidate by wearing a hat you absolute fool
Really? in groups.
https://statelymcdanielmanor.files.wordpress.com/2014/05/nbpp_intimidation.jpg?w=529
God damn you can reach.
The ONLY Point is Nick never had anything to sue over. Phillips said he felt intimidated. the WP reported that .. and it can't be sued for an opinion. And even subsequent video does not show Phillps would have been totally without reason for intimidation.
Nick's parents have a political agenda. So does Phillips. But Nick's parents are the ones trying to push theirs in court.
The judge may have been right to decide as he did but that does not mean they had no reason to sue
The indian fraud lie
You are an outright liar the subsequent video shows ABSOLUTELY that he had no reason for feeling intimidated and is a lying sack of shit
One more time read this slowly
When a person willfully seeks out a confrontation with someone else they cannot claimed to have been intimidated especially when the other person did nothing more than SMILE
Whether they had an agenda or not the kids did not seek attention and were smeared by fake news media
I don't think the video disproves the allegation that the maga hat kids weren't trying for intimidation or that Nick was merely an innocent peace maker.
But the kid's sneer may be naturally occurring and may not have been part of an attempt to intimidate Phillips.
But again, if a the media reported Phillips said he felt intimidated, there's no basis to sue the media … so long as Phillips in fact said that. That's where the kid's parents went off the rails. They should have stuck with Savanah Guthrie and their own media relations consultants and media campaign, and accepted the reality that they fucked up by ever letting Nick get loose in DC
The media is being sued because the media said Sandman was intimidating the drunken Indian and committing a variety of provocative acts. Their claims about Sandman all turned out to be utterly bogus. They lied and lied and lied.Yes they had reason to sueAnd some Nutt bagger putting up a free WordPress site doesnt make it official.
God damn you can reach.
The ONLY Point is Nick never had anything to sue over. Phillips said he felt intimidated. the WP reported that .. and it can't be sued for an opinion. And even subsequent video does not show Phillps would have been totally without reason for intimidation.
Nick's parents have a political agenda. So does Phillips. But Nick's parents are the ones trying to push theirs in court.
The judge may have been right to decide as he did but that does not mean they had no reason to sue
The indian fraud lie
You are an outright liar the subsequent video shows ABSOLUTELY that he had no reason for feeling intimidated and is a lying sack of shit
One more time read this slowly
When a person willfully seeks out a confrontation with someone else they cannot claimed to have been intimidated especially when the other person did nothing more than SMILE
Whether they had an agenda or not the kids did not seek attention and were smeared by fake news media
I don't think the video disproves the allegation that the maga hat kids weren't trying for intimidation or that Nick was merely an innocent peace maker.
But the kid's sneer may be naturally occurring and may not have been part of an attempt to intimidate Phillips.
But again, if a the media reported Phillips said he felt intimidated, there's no basis to sue the media … so long as Phillips in fact said that. That's where the kid's parents went off the rails. They should have stuck with Savanah Guthrie and their own media relations consultants and media campaign, and accepted the reality that they fucked up by ever letting Nick get loose in DC
what bendog is actually saying is - if someone disagrees with him, he gets butthurt at their attack.s
Yes they had reason to sueAnd some Nutt bagger putting up a free WordPress site doesnt make it official.
God damn you can reach.
The ONLY Point is Nick never had anything to sue over. Phillips said he felt intimidated. the WP reported that .. and it can't be sued for an opinion. And even subsequent video does not show Phillps would have been totally without reason for intimidation.
Nick's parents have a political agenda. So does Phillips. But Nick's parents are the ones trying to push theirs in court.
The judge may have been right to decide as he did but that does not mean they had no reason to sue
The indian fraud lie
You are an outright liar the subsequent video shows ABSOLUTELY that he had no reason for feeling intimidated and is a lying sack of shit
One more time read this slowly
When a person willfully seeks out a confrontation with someone else they cannot claimed to have been intimidated especially when the other person did nothing more than SMILE
Whether they had an agenda or not the kids did not seek attention and were smeared by fake news media
I don't think the video disproves the allegation that the maga hat kids weren't trying for intimidation or that Nick was merely an innocent peace maker.
But the kid's sneer may be naturally occurring and may not have been part of an attempt to intimidate Phillips.
But again, if a the media reported Phillips said he felt intimidated, there's no basis to sue the media … so long as Phillips in fact said that. That's where the kid's parents went off the rails. They should have stuck with Savanah Guthrie and their own media relations consultants and media campaign, and accepted the reality that they fucked up by ever letting Nick get loose in DC
The video absolutely disproves that and you are simply a proven coward and liar to say otherwise'
A SMILE is not intimidation and neither is a sneer
The boy smiled
You keep ignoring the fact that the video proves the indian fuck sought out the confrontation in aggressive manner which means he could not have been fucking intimidated
The video proves this shit beyond any question and you know it does. But like many progressives you lack the maturity to admit when you are proven wrong
The media did not just report what was proven false they willfully edited the original video to support phillips proven lies and yes that is basis to sue
Actually he was in school...the claim that he wasn’t was based on a fragment of a clip. There were plenty of witnesses. A Student Started Filming During School Shooting. He Hasn't StoppedHogg survived a mass shooting and fought to prevent another
Sandmann and his yuppie friends blocked an elderly Native American veteran from playing his drum
Hogg wasn't even at the school you liar. Even he has admitted that. The "elderly" native American is a asshole, stolen valor, liar. Fine group of people you've hitched your wagon to their leftwing loser.
David Hogg at School During Parkland Shooting - FactCheck.org
Hogg was treated every bit as badly as Sandmann.
I disagree, no lies were made up about Hogg, nor were they continued AFTER it was known they were lies.
There were definitely some stupid and in a couple of cases terrible things said about Hogg after he started his anti gun crusade, but they were brief.
The Sandmann crap lasted for over two weeks.
That doesn’t make sense...lies were made up. That he wasn’t in school and that he was a crisis actor, and it went on for weeks. Very much like Sandmann.
How the fake "crisis actors" conspiracy took off on social media after Florida school shooting
The only place you saw anti hogg reports were in fringe websites that no one reasonable looks at. Sandmann was attacked by the MSM.
It's a HUGE difference Coyote.
what bendog is actually saying is - if someone disagrees with him, he gets butthurt at their attack.s
Yes they had reason to sueAnd some Nutt bagger putting up a free WordPress site doesnt make it official.
God damn you can reach.
The ONLY Point is Nick never had anything to sue over. Phillips said he felt intimidated. the WP reported that .. and it can't be sued for an opinion. And even subsequent video does not show Phillps would have been totally without reason for intimidation.
Nick's parents have a political agenda. So does Phillips. But Nick's parents are the ones trying to push theirs in court.
The judge may have been right to decide as he did but that does not mean they had no reason to sue
The indian fraud lie
You are an outright liar the subsequent video shows ABSOLUTELY that he had no reason for feeling intimidated and is a lying sack of shit
One more time read this slowly
When a person willfully seeks out a confrontation with someone else they cannot claimed to have been intimidated especially when the other person did nothing more than SMILE
Whether they had an agenda or not the kids did not seek attention and were smeared by fake news media
I don't think the video disproves the allegation that the maga hat kids weren't trying for intimidation or that Nick was merely an innocent peace maker.
But the kid's sneer may be naturally occurring and may not have been part of an attempt to intimidate Phillips.
But again, if a the media reported Phillips said he felt intimidated, there's no basis to sue the media … so long as Phillips in fact said that. That's where the kid's parents went off the rails. They should have stuck with Savanah Guthrie and their own media relations consultants and media campaign, and accepted the reality that they fucked up by ever letting Nick get loose in DC
The video absolutely disproves that and you are simply a proven coward and liar to say otherwise'
A SMILE is not intimidation and neither is a sneer
The boy smiled
You keep ignoring the fact that the video proves the indian fuck sought out the confrontation in aggressive manner which means he could not have been fucking intimidated
The video proves this shit beyond any question and you know it does. But like many progressives you lack the maturity to admit when you are proven wrong
The media did not just report what was proven false they willfully edited the original video to support phillips proven lies and yes that is basis to sue
he's pretty much being the posterboy of asshole liberals who can't take an alternative thought.
Actually he was in school...the claim that he wasn’t was based on a fragment of a clip. There were plenty of witnesses. A Student Started Filming During School Shooting. He Hasn't StoppedHogg wasn't even at the school you liar. Even he has admitted that. The "elderly" native American is a asshole, stolen valor, liar. Fine group of people you've hitched your wagon to their leftwing loser.
David Hogg at School During Parkland Shooting - FactCheck.org
Hogg was treated every bit as badly as Sandmann.
I disagree, no lies were made up about Hogg, nor were they continued AFTER it was known they were lies.
There were definitely some stupid and in a couple of cases terrible things said about Hogg after he started his anti gun crusade, but they were brief.
The Sandmann crap lasted for over two weeks.
That doesn’t make sense...lies were made up. That he wasn’t in school and that he was a crisis actor, and it went on for weeks. Very much like Sandmann.
How the fake "crisis actors" conspiracy took off on social media after Florida school shooting
The only place you saw anti hogg reports were in fringe websites that no one reasonable looks at. Sandmann was attacked by the MSM.
It's a HUGE difference Coyote.
Laura Ingraham isn’t fringe, neither is Brietbart. They are well followed by the right. Fox is MSM. Many outlets have as wide a reach as MSM so in terms of defamatory attacks there is no essential difference any more. There is no excuse for either Kidd to be treated this way and we ought to be outraged at both!
what bendog is actually saying is - if someone disagrees with him, he gets butthurt at their attack.s
Yes they had reason to sueThe ONLY Point is Nick never had anything to sue over. Phillips said he felt intimidated. the WP reported that .. and it can't be sued for an opinion. And even subsequent video does not show Phillps would have been totally without reason for intimidation.
Nick's parents have a political agenda. So does Phillips. But Nick's parents are the ones trying to push theirs in court.
The judge may have been right to decide as he did but that does not mean they had no reason to sue
The indian fraud lie
You are an outright liar the subsequent video shows ABSOLUTELY that he had no reason for feeling intimidated and is a lying sack of shit
One more time read this slowly
When a person willfully seeks out a confrontation with someone else they cannot claimed to have been intimidated especially when the other person did nothing more than SMILE
Whether they had an agenda or not the kids did not seek attention and were smeared by fake news media
I don't think the video disproves the allegation that the maga hat kids weren't trying for intimidation or that Nick was merely an innocent peace maker.
But the kid's sneer may be naturally occurring and may not have been part of an attempt to intimidate Phillips.
But again, if a the media reported Phillips said he felt intimidated, there's no basis to sue the media … so long as Phillips in fact said that. That's where the kid's parents went off the rails. They should have stuck with Savanah Guthrie and their own media relations consultants and media campaign, and accepted the reality that they fucked up by ever letting Nick get loose in DC
The video absolutely disproves that and you are simply a proven coward and liar to say otherwise'
A SMILE is not intimidation and neither is a sneer
The boy smiled
You keep ignoring the fact that the video proves the indian fuck sought out the confrontation in aggressive manner which means he could not have been fucking intimidated
The video proves this shit beyond any question and you know it does. But like many progressives you lack the maturity to admit when you are proven wrong
The media did not just report what was proven false they willfully edited the original video to support phillips proven lies and yes that is basis to sue
he's pretty much being the posterboy of asshole liberals who can't take an alternative thought.
No what I'm saying is that even if every fact Nick alleged is assumed true, there's still no basis for him to sue, and if you're too fuckign thick to understand that, it's not my fault, Now fuck off
Thats what you say now after your allegations have been proven to be baldfaced lieswhat bendog is actually saying is - if someone disagrees with him, he gets butthurt at their attack.s
Yes they had reason to sueThe ONLY Point is Nick never had anything to sue over. Phillips said he felt intimidated. the WP reported that .. and it can't be sued for an opinion. And even subsequent video does not show Phillps would have been totally without reason for intimidation.
Nick's parents have a political agenda. So does Phillips. But Nick's parents are the ones trying to push theirs in court.
The judge may have been right to decide as he did but that does not mean they had no reason to sue
The indian fraud lie
You are an outright liar the subsequent video shows ABSOLUTELY that he had no reason for feeling intimidated and is a lying sack of shit
One more time read this slowly
When a person willfully seeks out a confrontation with someone else they cannot claimed to have been intimidated especially when the other person did nothing more than SMILE
Whether they had an agenda or not the kids did not seek attention and were smeared by fake news media
I don't think the video disproves the allegation that the maga hat kids weren't trying for intimidation or that Nick was merely an innocent peace maker.
But the kid's sneer may be naturally occurring and may not have been part of an attempt to intimidate Phillips.
But again, if a the media reported Phillips said he felt intimidated, there's no basis to sue the media … so long as Phillips in fact said that. That's where the kid's parents went off the rails. They should have stuck with Savanah Guthrie and their own media relations consultants and media campaign, and accepted the reality that they fucked up by ever letting Nick get loose in DC
The video absolutely disproves that and you are simply a proven coward and liar to say otherwise'
A SMILE is not intimidation and neither is a sneer
The boy smiled
You keep ignoring the fact that the video proves the indian fuck sought out the confrontation in aggressive manner which means he could not have been fucking intimidated
The video proves this shit beyond any question and you know it does. But like many progressives you lack the maturity to admit when you are proven wrong
The media did not just report what was proven false they willfully edited the original video to support phillips proven lies and yes that is basis to sue
he's pretty much being the posterboy of asshole liberals who can't take an alternative thought.
No what I'm saying is that even if every fact Nick alleged is assumed true, there's still no basis for him to sue, and if you're too fuckign thick to understand that, it's not my fault, Now fuck off
no you're saying he was asking for it cause he was daring to wear a maga-hat.what bendog is actually saying is - if someone disagrees with him, he gets butthurt at their attack.s
Yes they had reason to sueThe ONLY Point is Nick never had anything to sue over. Phillips said he felt intimidated. the WP reported that .. and it can't be sued for an opinion. And even subsequent video does not show Phillps would have been totally without reason for intimidation.
Nick's parents have a political agenda. So does Phillips. But Nick's parents are the ones trying to push theirs in court.
The judge may have been right to decide as he did but that does not mean they had no reason to sue
The indian fraud lie
You are an outright liar the subsequent video shows ABSOLUTELY that he had no reason for feeling intimidated and is a lying sack of shit
One more time read this slowly
When a person willfully seeks out a confrontation with someone else they cannot claimed to have been intimidated especially when the other person did nothing more than SMILE
Whether they had an agenda or not the kids did not seek attention and were smeared by fake news media
I don't think the video disproves the allegation that the maga hat kids weren't trying for intimidation or that Nick was merely an innocent peace maker.
But the kid's sneer may be naturally occurring and may not have been part of an attempt to intimidate Phillips.
But again, if a the media reported Phillips said he felt intimidated, there's no basis to sue the media … so long as Phillips in fact said that. That's where the kid's parents went off the rails. They should have stuck with Savanah Guthrie and their own media relations consultants and media campaign, and accepted the reality that they fucked up by ever letting Nick get loose in DC
The video absolutely disproves that and you are simply a proven coward and liar to say otherwise'
A SMILE is not intimidation and neither is a sneer
The boy smiled
You keep ignoring the fact that the video proves the indian fuck sought out the confrontation in aggressive manner which means he could not have been fucking intimidated
The video proves this shit beyond any question and you know it does. But like many progressives you lack the maturity to admit when you are proven wrong
The media did not just report what was proven false they willfully edited the original video to support phillips proven lies and yes that is basis to sue
he's pretty much being the posterboy of asshole liberals who can't take an alternative thought.
No what I'm saying is that even if every fact Nick alleged is assumed true, there's still no basis for him to sue, and if you're too fuckign thick to understand that, it's not my fault, Now fuck off
I don't think many people have bothered to investigate the FULL STORY of what happened on the Mall that day.
The real confrontation was not between MAGA Kid/Native American. The real confrontation was between the MAGA KidS/Black Hebrew Israelites. You can see the before during and after from the BHI point of view on this video -
I watched the whole thing awhile ago because I had the time. I do believe the Native American was attempting to diffuse the situation.
I also believe the MAGA kid was not being disrespectful to the Native American.
The kids were definitely verbally harassed by the Black Hebrew Israelites. But the BHI have clearly done this before and were not a physical threat to anyone that day.
I think the kids were curious and I don't blame them. But they started to get out of hand. Their group was getting larger and larger as more of the MAGA kids and adults showed up. The MAGA kids were feeling their oats and it was beginning to look dicey.
I would not have put my money on the MAGA kids despite their numbers. They really just wanted to holler and grab their dicks, literally and figuratively speaking. But the BHI may have had friends nearby. They are not new at this.
In comes Native American man with his drum and things de-escalated. At the very end, the BHI and some of the MAGA kids actually had a civil conversation. And the BHI are crazy MFers.
I blame the parents that were supposed to be supervising the kids. If they were doing their job, none of this would have happened. Lots of them just stood there like fools.
There are ALWAYS many sides to a story.
People believe what their tribe tells them to believe.
The Covington adults knew nothing about the drunken Indians or the Black Congressional Israelites. They don't put up with that shit in Kentucky.
As far as how the whole thing came down, the fact that there wasn't any violence, and the young men made it on the bus back to the Tremendous Commonwealth of Kentucky, it was fine. The problem is the outfits like CNN and the Washington Post thought it was a "story" that needed wide coverage to discourage young people in the future from getting involved in protests or civil events. Ruin these kids lives, keep them out of college or the work force, and next year, there won't be as many young people protesting for the Gift of Life itself.
Really it wasn't a story at all. Some local goofballs mouthed off to children waiting on the bus and the bus comes before there can be any violence. How is this a news story?
Where is your evidence that the Native Americans were drunk? Or are you just throwing up lies to see what will stick?
Mr. Phillips not only obviously appeared inebriated, he has a long record of booze related criminal activity.
Native American activist Nathan Phillips' past includes assault charge, escape from prison: report
Oh he appeared drunk and he has been seen drinking in the past. Well there ya go. He must have been drunk. That's all you need in MAGA land!
He did not appear drunk when I watched the video.
I don't think many people have bothered to investigate the FULL STORY of what happened on the Mall that day.
The real confrontation was not between MAGA Kid/Native American. The real confrontation was between the MAGA KidS/Black Hebrew Israelites. You can see the before during and after from the BHI point of view on this video -
I watched the whole thing awhile ago because I had the time. I do believe the Native American was attempting to diffuse the situation.
I also believe the MAGA kid was not being disrespectful to the Native American.
The kids were definitely verbally harassed by the Black Hebrew Israelites. But the BHI have clearly done this before and were not a physical threat to anyone that day.
I think the kids were curious and I don't blame them. But they started to get out of hand. Their group was getting larger and larger as more of the MAGA kids and adults showed up. The MAGA kids were feeling their oats and it was beginning to look dicey.
I would not have put my money on the MAGA kids despite their numbers. They really just wanted to holler and grab their dicks, literally and figuratively speaking. But the BHI may have had friends nearby. They are not new at this.
In comes Native American man with his drum and things de-escalated. At the very end, the BHI and some of the MAGA kids actually had a civil conversation. And the BHI are crazy MFers.
I blame the parents that were supposed to be supervising the kids. If they were doing their job, none of this would have happened. Lots of them just stood there like fools.
There are ALWAYS many sides to a story.
People believe what their tribe tells them to believe.
The Covington adults knew nothing about the drunken Indians or the Black Congressional Israelites. They don't put up with that shit in Kentucky.
As far as how the whole thing came down, the fact that there wasn't any violence, and the young men made it on the bus back to the Tremendous Commonwealth of Kentucky, it was fine. The problem is the outfits like CNN and the Washington Post thought it was a "story" that needed wide coverage to discourage young people in the future from getting involved in protests or civil events. Ruin these kids lives, keep them out of college or the work force, and next year, there won't be as many young people protesting for the Gift of Life itself.
Really it wasn't a story at all. Some local goofballs mouthed off to children waiting on the bus and the bus comes before there can be any violence. How is this a news story?
Where is your evidence that the Native Americans were drunk? Or are you just throwing up lies to see what will stick?
Mr. Phillips not only obviously appeared inebriated, he has a long record of booze related criminal activity.
Native American activist Nathan Phillips' past includes assault charge, escape from prison: report
Oh he appeared drunk and he has been seen drinking in the past. Well there ya go. He must have been drunk. That's all you need in MAGA land!
He did not appear drunk when I watched the video.
He's a minority and the thug is a CRC white...we know that's all they care about.
I don't think many people have bothered to investigate the FULL STORY of what happened on the Mall that day.
The real confrontation was not between MAGA Kid/Native American. The real confrontation was between the MAGA KidS/Black Hebrew Israelites. You can see the before during and after from the BHI point of view on this video -
I watched the whole thing awhile ago because I had the time. I do believe the Native American was attempting to diffuse the situation.
I also believe the MAGA kid was not being disrespectful to the Native American.
The kids were definitely verbally harassed by the Black Hebrew Israelites. But the BHI have clearly done this before and were not a physical threat to anyone that day.
I think the kids were curious and I don't blame them. But they started to get out of hand. Their group was getting larger and larger as more of the MAGA kids and adults showed up. The MAGA kids were feeling their oats and it was beginning to look dicey.
I would not have put my money on the MAGA kids despite their numbers. They really just wanted to holler and grab their dicks, literally and figuratively speaking. But the BHI may have had friends nearby. They are not new at this.
In comes Native American man with his drum and things de-escalated. At the very end, the BHI and some of the MAGA kids actually had a civil conversation. And the BHI are crazy MFers.
I blame the parents that were supposed to be supervising the kids. If they were doing their job, none of this would have happened. Lots of them just stood there like fools.
There are ALWAYS many sides to a story.
People believe what their tribe tells them to believe.
The Covington adults knew nothing about the drunken Indians or the Black Congressional Israelites. They don't put up with that shit in Kentucky.
As far as how the whole thing came down, the fact that there wasn't any violence, and the young men made it on the bus back to the Tremendous Commonwealth of Kentucky, it was fine. The problem is the outfits like CNN and the Washington Post thought it was a "story" that needed wide coverage to discourage young people in the future from getting involved in protests or civil events. Ruin these kids lives, keep them out of college or the work force, and next year, there won't be as many young people protesting for the Gift of Life itself.
Really it wasn't a story at all. Some local goofballs mouthed off to children waiting on the bus and the bus comes before there can be any violence. How is this a news story?
Where is your evidence that the Native Americans were drunk? Or are you just throwing up lies to see what will stick?
Mr. Phillips not only obviously appeared inebriated, he has a long record of booze related criminal activity.
Native American activist Nathan Phillips' past includes assault charge, escape from prison: report
Oh he appeared drunk and he has been seen drinking in the past. Well there ya go. He must have been drunk. That's all you need in MAGA land!
He did not appear drunk when I watched the video.
He's a minority and the thug is a CRC white...we know that's all they care about.
In your twisted mind, Sandman is automatically the perpetrator because he's white and he was wearing a MAGA hat. That's all there is to it.He's a minority and the thug is a CRC white...we know that's all they care about.Where is your evidence that the Native Americans were drunk? Or are you just throwing up lies to see what will stick?The Covington adults knew nothing about the drunken Indians or the Black Congressional Israelites. They don't put up with that shit in Kentucky.
As far as how the whole thing came down, the fact that there wasn't any violence, and the young men made it on the bus back to the Tremendous Commonwealth of Kentucky, it was fine. The problem is the outfits like CNN and the Washington Post thought it was a "story" that needed wide coverage to discourage young people in the future from getting involved in protests or civil events. Ruin these kids lives, keep them out of college or the work force, and next year, there won't be as many young people protesting for the Gift of Life itself.
Really it wasn't a story at all. Some local goofballs mouthed off to children waiting on the bus and the bus comes before there can be any violence. How is this a news story?
Mr. Phillips not only obviously appeared inebriated, he has a long record of booze related criminal activity.
Native American activist Nathan Phillips' past includes assault charge, escape from prison: report
Oh he appeared drunk and he has been seen drinking in the past. Well there ya go. He must have been drunk. That's all you need in MAGA land!
He did not appear drunk when I watched the video.
He fit their narrative perfectly: a privileged Christian white kid who bullies minorities. They were falling all over themselves to attack him. They didn't care what the facts were or if they were ruining his life.In your twisted mind, Sandman is automatically the perpetrator because he's white and he was wearing a MAGA hat. That's all there is to it.He's a minority and the thug is a CRC white...we know that's all they care about.Where is your evidence that the Native Americans were drunk? Or are you just throwing up lies to see what will stick?
Mr. Phillips not only obviously appeared inebriated, he has a long record of booze related criminal activity.
Native American activist Nathan Phillips' past includes assault charge, escape from prison: report
Oh he appeared drunk and he has been seen drinking in the past. Well there ya go. He must have been drunk. That's all you need in MAGA land!
He did not appear drunk when I watched the video.
That and the fact that Sandmann was in Washington to support the concept of Human Life itself is really offensive to liberals
He fit their narrative perfectly: a privileged Christian white kid who bullies minorities. They were falling all over themselves to attack him. They didn't care what the facts were or if they were ruining his life.In your twisted mind, Sandman is automatically the perpetrator because he's white and he was wearing a MAGA hat. That's all there is to it.He's a minority and the thug is a CRC white...we know that's all they care about.Mr. Phillips not only obviously appeared inebriated, he has a long record of booze related criminal activity.
Native American activist Nathan Phillips' past includes assault charge, escape from prison: report
Oh he appeared drunk and he has been seen drinking in the past. Well there ya go. He must have been drunk. That's all you need in MAGA land!
He did not appear drunk when I watched the video.
That and the fact that Sandmann was in Washington to support the concept of Human Life itself is really offensive to liberals
