The list of people Nick Sandmann's lawyer is suing

Never going to stop lying are you? You know you look like a complete and total fool. Philips got in Sandman's personal space you lying twit. Still waiting for your proof the Covington kids are homophobic bullies. Not ever happening. If that jackass (or you) had done that to my kid, I would be fine with you having to get that drum surgically removed from your backside. All your lies don't change the facts.
Nope...and apparently the courts agree with me, Grover.
No the court did not.

My god, have you actually looked at ANY facts surrounding this incident?
And...the court ruling? Explain why your pet thug didn't win his $250 million cash prize.
He is not my pet. Are you capable of having a conversation without name calling?

The court ruled that WAPO the was not liable for libel because reporting lies from their source was not libel as it was reported as his account.

The list of names in the lawsuit was ridiculous. The only ones with any responsibility might be the one who spread it and that person got his twitter account suspended.
Yes the list of names is asinine.

Did you have a point that was relevant to anything I have said thus far? Is there a point you wanted to make to me about the long list in the OP?
 
I'm totally devastated.
And you admire a racist thug and bully as proven by your avatar
:auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg: Priceless!
Simply applying your stupid logic.

A person who smiles is a thug a racist and a bully which you have said about this kid from covington many times

By definition that means YOU know Obama was a racist thug and bully
So...someone who is JUST smiling. How many times when you were growing up have you seen the school bullies block someone's way, get in their personal space and smirk? Or were you a Grover Dill supporting that kind of behavior?






Facts in evidence PROVE that it was your hero, the stolen valor POS activist who approached the kids.

How about you stop lying because you have been shown the facts. The facts prove you are lying. So stop it.

Facts are irrelevant when others control your mind. This is a classic example of how mind control works. When you are so far gone that you refuse to believe your very own eyes, you are totally incapable of getting help from anybody. You are too far gone at that point.
 
So...someone who is JUST smiling. How many times when you were growing up have you seen the school bullies block someone's way, get in their personal space and smirk? Or were you a Grover Dill supporting that kind of behavior?

Never going to stop lying are you? You know you look like a complete and total fool. Philips got in Sandman's personal space you lying twit. Still waiting for your proof the Covington kids are homophobic bullies. Not ever happening. If that jackass (or you) had done that to my kid, I would be fine with you having to get that drum surgically removed from your backside. All your lies don't change the facts.
Nope...and apparently the courts agree with me, Grover.
No the court did not.

My god, have you actually looked at ANY facts surrounding this incident?
And...the court ruling? Explain why your pet thug didn't win his $250 million cash prize.

Because the judge is a Carter appointee and is too old to make proper judgment on these cases.
Who appointed the judge is not relevant.
 
Simply applying your stupid logic.

A person who smiles is a thug a racist and a bully which you have said about this kid from covington many times

By definition that means YOU know Obama was a racist thug and bully
So...someone who is JUST smiling. How many times when you were growing up have you seen the school bullies block someone's way, get in their personal space and smirk? Or were you a Grover Dill supporting that kind of behavior?

Never going to stop lying are you? You know you look like a complete and total fool. Philips got in Sandman's personal space you lying twit. Still waiting for your proof the Covington kids are homophobic bullies. Not ever happening. If that jackass (or you) had done that to my kid, I would be fine with you having to get that drum surgically removed from your backside. All your lies don't change the facts.
Nope...and apparently the courts agree with me, Grover.
The courts do not agree with you.

The video proves who approached who and your Indian stolen valor liar approached and confronted the boy

Absolute fact
So...how'd the court ruling work out the way it did? Huh, Grover?
Because the judge ruled on the basis of first amendment protection

Which I believe was a good ruling.

He did not however rule that Sandman blocked the way of Phillips

Your claims are absolute proven lies
 
Simply applying your stupid logic.

A person who smiles is a thug a racist and a bully which you have said about this kid from covington many times

By definition that means YOU know Obama was a racist thug and bully
So...someone who is JUST smiling. How many times when you were growing up have you seen the school bullies block someone's way, get in their personal space and smirk? Or were you a Grover Dill supporting that kind of behavior?

Never going to stop lying are you? You know you look like a complete and total fool. Philips got in Sandman's personal space you lying twit. Still waiting for your proof the Covington kids are homophobic bullies. Not ever happening. If that jackass (or you) had done that to my kid, I would be fine with you having to get that drum surgically removed from your backside. All your lies don't change the facts.
Nope...and apparently the courts agree with me, Grover.
No the court did not.

My god, have you actually looked at ANY facts surrounding this incident?
And...the court ruling? Explain why your pet thug didn't win his $250 million cash prize.

I explained the court ruling you deceitful coward you never fucking read the ruling. The ruling did not say anything about phillips being blocked

The only thug is that racist piece of trash obama who you made into a bully and thug
 
Never going to stop lying are you? You know you look like a complete and total fool. Philips got in Sandman's personal space you lying twit. Still waiting for your proof the Covington kids are homophobic bullies. Not ever happening. If that jackass (or you) had done that to my kid, I would be fine with you having to get that drum surgically removed from your backside. All your lies don't change the facts.
Nope...and apparently the courts agree with me, Grover.
No the court did not.

My god, have you actually looked at ANY facts surrounding this incident?
And...the court ruling? Explain why your pet thug didn't win his $250 million cash prize.

Because the judge is a Carter appointee and is too old to make proper judgment on these cases.
Who appointed the judge is not relevant.

I think it is. After all, usually judges picked by leftists will lean left. It's why leftist Presidents pick those judges, just like Republicans pick different judges who will likely lean right on issues.
 
His SAT score was WELL below the average that Harvard accepts and he wasn't noted to be a straight-A student, which is typical for Harvard. Hogg was admitted because he's a far-left activist.
Oh? What is his SAT score since you seem to know?

1270

He has a 4.2 GPA so there is that. But Harvard is looking for future leaders and Hogg has demonstrated that ability in spades.

Leadership ability is much more difficult to find than the ability to memorize things and score well on a test.
"Leadership" is a lot more than rushing to stand in front of a camera.

Leadership is getting thousands of followers on social media and starting a nation wide movement.

These children who are having live shooter drills at school WILL deal with gun control so their children aren’t terrorized in this way.
What kind of "shooting drills" are they having, hiding in the closet like Hogg the hero did?
 
So...someone who is JUST smiling. How many times when you were growing up have you seen the school bullies block someone's way, get in their personal space and smirk? Or were you a Grover Dill supporting that kind of behavior?

Never going to stop lying are you? You know you look like a complete and total fool. Philips got in Sandman's personal space you lying twit. Still waiting for your proof the Covington kids are homophobic bullies. Not ever happening. If that jackass (or you) had done that to my kid, I would be fine with you having to get that drum surgically removed from your backside. All your lies don't change the facts.
Nope...and apparently the courts agree with me, Grover.
The courts do not agree with you.

The video proves who approached who and your Indian stolen valor liar approached and confronted the boy

Absolute fact
So...how'd the court ruling work out the way it did? Huh, Grover?
Because the judge ruled on the basis of first amendment protection

Which I believe was a good ruling.

He did not however rule that Sandman blocked the way of Phillips

Your claims are absolute proven lies
The judge ruled on the basis that he's a Democrat.
 
What goes around comes around
Now you have a perfect example why we are in decline as a nation. Hogg gets a scholarship and Sandmann does not. Another talker to listen to providing nothing. Compared to a walker who has the ability to build and create and who has been denied. For America, what goes around has come around. Come on...do more....do more.....let the violence and killings increase. You can do it!

Hogg survived a mass shooting and fought to prevent another
Sandmann and his yuppie friends blocked an elderly Native American veteran from playing his drum





Hogg wasn't even at the school you liar. Even he has admitted that. The "elderly" native American is a asshole, stolen valor, liar. Fine group of people you've hitched your wagon to their leftwing loser.
Actually he was in school...the claim that he wasn’t was based on a fragment of a clip. There were plenty of witnesses. A Student Started Filming During School Shooting. He Hasn't Stopped
David Hogg at School During Parkland Shooting - FactCheck.org

Hogg was treated every bit as badly as Sandmann.





I disagree, no lies were made up about Hogg, nor were they continued AFTER it was known they were lies.

There were definitely some stupid and in a couple of cases terrible things said about Hogg after he started his anti gun crusade, but they were brief.

The Sandmann crap lasted for over two weeks.

That doesn’t make sense...lies were made up. That he wasn’t in school and that he was a crisis actor, and it went on for weeks. Very much like Sandmann.

How the fake "crisis actors" conspiracy took off on social media after Florida school shooting
 
Now you have a perfect example why we are in decline as a nation. Hogg gets a scholarship and Sandmann does not. Another talker to listen to providing nothing. Compared to a walker who has the ability to build and create and who has been denied. For America, what goes around has come around. Come on...do more....do more.....let the violence and killings increase. You can do it!

Hogg survived a mass shooting and fought to prevent another
Sandmann and his yuppie friends blocked an elderly Native American veteran from playing his drum





Hogg wasn't even at the school you liar. Even he has admitted that. The "elderly" native American is a asshole, stolen valor, liar. Fine group of people you've hitched your wagon to their leftwing loser.
Actually he was in school...the claim that he wasn’t was based on a fragment of a clip. There were plenty of witnesses. A Student Started Filming During School Shooting. He Hasn't Stopped
David Hogg at School During Parkland Shooting - FactCheck.org

Hogg was treated every bit as badly as Sandmann.





I disagree, no lies were made up about Hogg, nor were they continued AFTER it was known they were lies.

There were definitely some stupid and in a couple of cases terrible things said about Hogg after he started his anti gun crusade, but they were brief.

The Sandmann crap lasted for over two weeks.

That doesn’t make sense...lies were made up. That he wasn’t in school and that he was a crisis actor, and it went on for weeks. Very much like Sandmann.

How the fake "crisis actors" conspiracy took off on social media after Florida school shooting
Lol
Hogg is a spineless piece of shit... He wants firearm registry which is dog whistle for confiscation.
 
Sandmann lawyers up faster than Trump. LOL He could simply have asked that his account of the facts be published too, and perhaps even have told the papers and television outlets of people who'd support his side. IF no one else, Fox the Wash Times and 'merican stinker would have been on it like Trump on a porn star

Sandmann may have been sandbagged by Phillips, I really don't know. But Sandmann was in DC to push a political agenda, and ANY parent of any ideology, who'd let a high school child be put in that position, needs a not-literal slap upside their stupid noggin.

The Post published that Phillips said he believed Sandmann was intimidating him. Phillips did say that. And their interaction in two "sides" confronted each other over a political issue involved two private individuals voluntarily entering the political arena. He can't sue the Wash Post or any other media outlet for publishing that.

He may be able to sue Phillips IF he can prove Phillips intentionally lied. I doubt he can do that, and even so, I'd be surprised if Phillips has any money to be sued for.

The kid's parents egged this on, and unfortunately for the kid it's gonna dog him.
 
So...someone who is JUST smiling. How many times when you were growing up have you seen the school bullies block someone's way, get in their personal space and smirk? Or were you a Grover Dill supporting that kind of behavior?

Never going to stop lying are you? You know you look like a complete and total fool. Philips got in Sandman's personal space you lying twit. Still waiting for your proof the Covington kids are homophobic bullies. Not ever happening. If that jackass (or you) had done that to my kid, I would be fine with you having to get that drum surgically removed from your backside. All your lies don't change the facts.
Nope...and apparently the courts agree with me, Grover.
No the court did not.

My god, have you actually looked at ANY facts surrounding this incident?
And...the court ruling? Explain why your pet thug didn't win his $250 million cash prize.

Because the judge is a Carter appointee and is too old to make proper judgment on these cases.
There's always a whiny excuse for CRCs, isn't there?
 
Nope...and apparently the courts agree with me, Grover.
No the court did not.

My god, have you actually looked at ANY facts surrounding this incident?
And...the court ruling? Explain why your pet thug didn't win his $250 million cash prize.
He is not my pet. Are you capable of having a conversation without name calling?

The court ruled that WAPO the was not liable for libel because reporting lies from their source was not libel as it was reported as his account.
I missed your post wagging your finger at another poster, PolishPrince, for calling Nathan Phillips a "drunken injun"....which post # is it?
So you cannot address the point.

Are you claiming that you are on the same intellectual level as PolishPrince? Do you really want to go there?
Honestly, I expected more from you up until this point. It seems as though I should have the two of you in similar esteem.
Of course I'm not at the same intellectual....er....level as PolishPrince. :71: So.....you are a-ok with him calling Nathan Phillips a "drunken injun", eh?
 
Sandmann lawyers up faster than Trump. LOL He could simply have asked that his account of the facts be published too, and perhaps even have told the papers and television outlets of people who'd support his side. IF no one else, Fox the Wash Times and 'merican stinker would have been on it like Trump on a porn star

Sandmann may have been sandbagged by Phillips, I really don't know. But Sandmann was in DC to push a political agenda, and ANY parent of any ideology, who'd let a high school child be put in that position, needs a not-literal slap upside their stupid noggin.

The Post published that Phillips said he believed Sandmann was intimidating him. Phillips did say that. And their interaction in two "sides" confronted each other over a political issue involved two private individuals voluntarily entering the political arena. He can't sue the Wash Post or any other media outlet for publishing that.

He may be able to sue Phillips IF he can prove Phillips intentionally lied. I doubt he can do that, and even so, I'd be surprised if Phillips has any money to be sued for.

The kid's parents egged this on, and unfortunately for the kid it's gonna dog him.
You know, I bet that dog speaks better English than you, and worse yet; probably the Injun too.
 
Sandmann lawyers up faster than Trump. LOL He could simply have asked that his account of the facts be published too, and perhaps even have told the papers and television outlets of people who'd support his side. IF no one else, Fox the Wash Times and 'merican stinker would have been on it like Trump on a porn star

Sandmann may have been sandbagged by Phillips, I really don't know. But Sandmann was in DC to push a political agenda, and ANY parent of any ideology, who'd let a high school child be put in that position, needs a not-literal slap upside their stupid noggin.

The Post published that Phillips said he believed Sandmann was intimidating him. Phillips did say that. And their interaction in two "sides" confronted each other over a political issue involved two private individuals voluntarily entering the political arena. He can't sue the Wash Post or any other media outlet for publishing that.

He may be able to sue Phillips IF he can prove Phillips intentionally lied. I doubt he can do that, and even so, I'd be surprised if Phillips has any money to be sued for.

The kid's parents egged this on, and unfortunately for the kid it's gonna dog him.
You know, I bet that dog speaks better English than you, and worse yet; probably the Injun too.
Of course, Chubs, it's all about dogs and derogatory names for minorities that make for "better English".
 
Sandmann lawyers up faster than Trump. LOL He could simply have asked that his account of the facts be published too, and perhaps even have told the papers and television outlets of people who'd support his side. IF no one else, Fox the Wash Times and 'merican stinker would have been on it like Trump on a porn star

Sandmann may have been sandbagged by Phillips, I really don't know. But Sandmann was in DC to push a political agenda, and ANY parent of any ideology, who'd let a high school child be put in that position, needs a not-literal slap upside their stupid noggin.

The Post published that Phillips said he believed Sandmann was intimidating him. Phillips did say that. And their interaction in two "sides" confronted each other over a political issue involved two private individuals voluntarily entering the political arena. He can't sue the Wash Post or any other media outlet for publishing that.

He may be able to sue Phillips IF he can prove Phillips intentionally lied. I doubt he can do that, and even so, I'd be surprised if Phillips has any money to be sued for.

The kid's parents egged this on, and unfortunately for the kid it's gonna dog him.
You know, I bet that dog speaks better English than you, and worse yet; probably the Injun too.
Of course, Chubs, it's all about dogs and derogatory names for minorities that make for "better English".
I've called you fat but never a dog, though you likely are that too.
 
Sandmann lawyers up faster than Trump. LOL He could simply have asked that his account of the facts be published too, and perhaps even have told the papers and television outlets of people who'd support his side. IF no one else, Fox the Wash Times and 'merican stinker would have been on it like Trump on a porn star

Sandmann may have been sandbagged by Phillips, I really don't know. But Sandmann was in DC to push a political agenda, and ANY parent of any ideology, who'd let a high school child be put in that position, needs a not-literal slap upside their stupid noggin.

The Post published that Phillips said he believed Sandmann was intimidating him. Phillips did say that. And their interaction in two "sides" confronted each other over a political issue involved two private individuals voluntarily entering the political arena. He can't sue the Wash Post or any other media outlet for publishing that.

He may be able to sue Phillips IF he can prove Phillips intentionally lied. I doubt he can do that, and even so, I'd be surprised if Phillips has any money to be sued for.

The kid's parents egged this on, and unfortunately for the kid it's gonna dog him.
You know, I bet that dog speaks better English than you, and worse yet; probably the Injun too.
Of course, Chubs, it's all about dogs and derogatory names for minorities that make for "better English".
I've called you fat but never a dog, though you likely are that too.
loser
 
Sandmann lawyers up faster than Trump. LOL He could simply have asked that his account of the facts be published too, and perhaps even have told the papers and television outlets of people who'd support his side. IF no one else, Fox the Wash Times and 'merican stinker would have been on it like Trump on a porn star

Sandmann may have been sandbagged by Phillips, I really don't know. But Sandmann was in DC to push a political agenda, and ANY parent of any ideology, who'd let a high school child be put in that position, needs a not-literal slap upside their stupid noggin.

The Post published that Phillips said he believed Sandmann was intimidating him. Phillips did say that. And their interaction in two "sides" confronted each other over a political issue involved two private individuals voluntarily entering the political arena. He can't sue the Wash Post or any other media outlet for publishing that.

He may be able to sue Phillips IF he can prove Phillips intentionally lied. I doubt he can do that, and even so, I'd be surprised if Phillips has any money to be sued for.

The kid's parents egged this on, and unfortunately for the kid it's gonna dog him.
He did ask those things

Other outlets did cover the full; story showing why your narrative is false

Phillips was also in DC to push an agenda and there is nothing wrong with parents let their children learn about politics in this manner


Phillips lied that is a fact and your narrative is an outright lie.

Phillips willfully sought confrontation with those kids and has no right to claim intimidation when he went out of his way to confront them.

There was no mutual confrontation. It was sought by one man and that man is phillips

Those are all facts

The kids parents had nothing to do with this they were did not egg it on
 
No the court did not.

My god, have you actually looked at ANY facts surrounding this incident?
And...the court ruling? Explain why your pet thug didn't win his $250 million cash prize.
He is not my pet. Are you capable of having a conversation without name calling?

The court ruled that WAPO the was not liable for libel because reporting lies from their source was not libel as it was reported as his account.
I missed your post wagging your finger at another poster, PolishPrince, for calling Nathan Phillips a "drunken injun"....which post # is it?
So you cannot address the point.

Are you claiming that you are on the same intellectual level as PolishPrince? Do you really want to go there?
Honestly, I expected more from you up until this point. It seems as though I should have the two of you in similar esteem.
Of course I'm not at the same intellectual....er....level as PolishPrince. :71: So.....you are a-ok with him calling Nathan Phillips a "drunken injun", eh?

It should not bother you as you are fine with making obama out to be a racist bully and thug

So stop complaining when you are just a fucking liar and hypocrite
 
Sandmann lawyers up faster than Trump. LOL He could simply have asked that his account of the facts be published too, and perhaps even have told the papers and television outlets of people who'd support his side. IF no one else, Fox the Wash Times and 'merican stinker would have been on it like Trump on a porn star

Sandmann may have been sandbagged by Phillips, I really don't know. But Sandmann was in DC to push a political agenda, and ANY parent of any ideology, who'd let a high school child be put in that position, needs a not-literal slap upside their stupid noggin.

The Post published that Phillips said he believed Sandmann was intimidating him. Phillips did say that. And their interaction in two "sides" confronted each other over a political issue involved two private individuals voluntarily entering the political arena. He can't sue the Wash Post or any other media outlet for publishing that.

He may be able to sue Phillips IF he can prove Phillips intentionally lied. I doubt he can do that, and even so, I'd be surprised if Phillips has any money to be sued for.

The kid's parents egged this on, and unfortunately for the kid it's gonna dog him.
He did ask those things

Other outlets did cover the full; story showing why your narrative is false

Phillips was also in DC to push an agenda and there is nothing wrong with parents let their children learn about politics in this manner


Phillips lied that is a fact and your narrative is an outright lie.

Phillips willfully sought confrontation with those kids and has no right to claim intimidation when he went out of his way to confront them.

There was no mutual confrontation. It was sought by one man and that man is phillips

Those are all facts

The kids parents had nothing to do with this they were did not egg it on

Where did Phillps admit to a lie? And your account is false. Although, I think all impartial people agree that the intitial media reports should have sought out more video. But the Boys were trying to be bully punks with their hats.

Making Sense of the Phillips-Sandmann Viral Video

And the point is, there were never grounds for Sandmann to sue. His parents seem to have had imput into his "character." And it's going to dog him
 

Forum List

Back
Top