The Mystery Of Bernie Sanders Crowds.Did Most Of Them Fail Basic Math?

The 'investors' EARNED the money initially. They were taxed once on those earnings. The profit they make is then invested and Bonobo then taxes the profit on the investments.

Bogus argument. Using that logic there should be no sales tax, excise tax, etc., because we are taxed when we earn the money used to buy those taxed items.

If you use your taxed wages to buy, for instance, an airless paint sprayer you are taxed at the going rate on the money you make using that machine.

But if you buy stocks with your taxed wages you pay only 15% on the capital gains.

How does that help anything?

BTW, Obama didn't invent the tax system.
 
:poop:You have to wonder, right? They cheer on all of the "Free-Stuff Bullchit" as if Obama has a surplus of 20 trillion dollars. Maybe we need to get some reporters to attend the rallies and ask some of his uninformed fans where Bernie is going to get the money for free college and health-care when we already owe 18 trillion dollars.
Then we may get answers like "Huh? what?, uh,,,,whats a trillion dollars? is that like a few million?"
Or someone might say, "Uhhh, what? what's a national debt?":poke:

We can finance his suggestions the same way we finance the $37 billion subsidy to the big 6 oil companies. And the tax breaks for investors who produce no product or provide no service yet enjoy a tax rate lesser than those who labor. And that most expensive waste of money , these endless wars.

It's not a matter of money, it's a matter of priorities.
The 'investors' EARNED the money initially. They were taxed once on those earnings. The profit they make is then invested and Bonobo then taxes the profit on the investments.
Is there any point where you say "look the investor has paid taxes on the money HE earned initially twice so leave him the fuck alone".
The ONLY reason the LIBs/Socialists like Bonobo have to keep taxing the Makers is b/c they know without handing out 'free shit' to the Takers Bonobo and his party won't be able to basically buy votes.

until you go to school and learn the difference between being a liberal and a socialist, you should probably stop talking.

that said, it has not been taxed once already. money is taxed each time it changes hands.

I hope that helps you.
 
The 'investors' EARNED the money initially. They were taxed once on those earnings. The profit they make is then invested and Bonobo then taxes the profit on the investments.

Bogus argument. Using that logic there should be no sales tax, excise tax, etc., because we are taxed when we earn the money used to buy those taxed items.

If you use your taxed wages to buy, for instance, an airless paint sprayer you are taxed at the going rate on the money you make using that machine.

But if you buy stocks with your taxed wages you pay only 15% on the capital gains.

How does that help anything?

BTW, Obama didn't invent the tax system.

you know they don't get that whole fact-based reality thing
 
:poop:You have to wonder, right? They cheer on all of the "Free-Stuff Bullchit" as if Obama has a surplus of 20 trillion dollars. Maybe we need to get some reporters to attend the rallies and ask some of his uninformed fans where Bernie is going to get the money for free college and health-care when we already owe 18 trillion dollars.
Then we may get answers like "Huh? what?, uh,,,,whats a trillion dollars? is that like a few million?"
Or someone might say, "Uhhh, what? what's a national debt?":poke:

We can finance his suggestions the same way we finance the $37 billion subsidy to the big 6 oil companies. And the tax breaks for investors who produce no product or provide no service yet enjoy a tax rate lesser than those who labor. And that most expensive waste of money , these endless wars.

It's not a matter of money, it's a matter of priorities.
The 'investors' EARNED the money initially. They were taxed once on those earnings. The profit they make is then invested and Bonobo then taxes the profit on the investments.
Is there any point where you say "look the investor has paid taxes on the money HE earned initially twice so leave him the fuck alone".
The ONLY reason the LIBs/Socialists like Bonobo have to keep taxing the Makers is b/c they know without handing out 'free shit' to the Takers Bonobo and his party won't be able to basically buy votes.

until you go to school and learn the difference between being a liberal and a socialist, you should probably stop talking.

that said, it has not been taxed once already. money is taxed each time it changes hands.

I hope that helps you.
There is no difference unless you're willing to claim then support with evidence there is such thing as a conservative socialist.
 
:poop:You have to wonder, right? They cheer on all of the "Free-Stuff Bullchit" as if Obama has a surplus of 20 trillion dollars. Maybe we need to get some reporters to attend the rallies and ask some of his uninformed fans where Bernie is going to get the money for free college and health-care when we already owe 18 trillion dollars.
Then we may get answers like "Huh? what?, uh,,,,whats a trillion dollars? is that like a few million?"
Or someone might say, "Uhhh, what? what's a national debt?":poke:

We can finance his suggestions the same way we finance the $37 billion subsidy to the big 6 oil companies. And the tax breaks for investors who produce no product or provide no service yet enjoy a tax rate lesser than those who labor. And that most expensive waste of money , these endless wars.

It's not a matter of money, it's a matter of priorities.
The 'investors' EARNED the money initially. They were taxed once on those earnings. The profit they make is then invested and Bonobo then taxes the profit on the investments.
Is there any point where you say "look the investor has paid taxes on the money HE earned initially twice so leave him the fuck alone".
The ONLY reason the LIBs/Socialists like Bonobo have to keep taxing the Makers is b/c they know without handing out 'free shit' to the Takers Bonobo and his party won't be able to basically buy votes.

until you go to school and learn the difference between being a liberal and a socialist, you should probably stop talking.

that said, it has not been taxed once already. money is taxed each time it changes hands.

I hope that helps you.
There is no difference unless you're willing to claim then support with evidence there is such thing as a conservative socialist.

your confusion is apparent. while it is likely that all socialists are liberal, not all liberals are socialist.

so I reiterate.... education is important. you should probably get one beyond the rantings of the rightwingnut blogosphere.
 
:poop:You have to wonder, right? They cheer on all of the "Free-Stuff Bullchit" as if Obama has a surplus of 20 trillion dollars. Maybe we need to get some reporters to attend the rallies and ask some of his uninformed fans where Bernie is going to get the money for free college and health-care when we already owe 18 trillion dollars.
Then we may get answers like "Huh? what?, uh,,,,whats a trillion dollars? is that like a few million?"
Or someone might say, "Uhhh, what? what's a national debt?":poke:

We can finance his suggestions the same way we finance the $37 billion subsidy to the big 6 oil companies. And the tax breaks for investors who produce no product or provide no service yet enjoy a tax rate lesser than those who labor. And that most expensive waste of money , these endless wars.

It's not a matter of money, it's a matter of priorities.
The 'investors' EARNED the money initially. They were taxed once on those earnings. The profit they make is then invested and Bonobo then taxes the profit on the investments.
Is there any point where you say "look the investor has paid taxes on the money HE earned initially twice so leave him the fuck alone".
The ONLY reason the LIBs/Socialists like Bonobo have to keep taxing the Makers is b/c they know without handing out 'free shit' to the Takers Bonobo and his party won't be able to basically buy votes.

until you go to school and learn the difference between being a liberal and a socialist, you should probably stop talking.

that said, it has not been taxed once already. money is taxed each time it changes hands.

I hope that helps you.
There is no difference unless you're willing to claim then support with evidence there is such thing as a conservative socialist.

your confusion is apparent. while it is likely that all socialists are liberal, not all liberals are socialist.

so I reiterate.... education is important. you should probably get one beyond the rantings of the rightwingnut blogosphere.

Yet you can't provide even one example of a conservative socialist.

Education is important. That's why I am educated. Don't confuse your indoctrination with being educated. They aren't the same thing.
 
We can finance his suggestions the same way we finance the $37 billion subsidy to the big 6 oil companies. And the tax breaks for investors who produce no product or provide no service yet enjoy a tax rate lesser than those who labor. And that most expensive waste of money , these endless wars.

It's not a matter of money, it's a matter of priorities.
The 'investors' EARNED the money initially. They were taxed once on those earnings. The profit they make is then invested and Bonobo then taxes the profit on the investments.
Is there any point where you say "look the investor has paid taxes on the money HE earned initially twice so leave him the fuck alone".
The ONLY reason the LIBs/Socialists like Bonobo have to keep taxing the Makers is b/c they know without handing out 'free shit' to the Takers Bonobo and his party won't be able to basically buy votes.

until you go to school and learn the difference between being a liberal and a socialist, you should probably stop talking.

that said, it has not been taxed once already. money is taxed each time it changes hands.

I hope that helps you.
There is no difference unless you're willing to claim then support with evidence there is such thing as a conservative socialist.

your confusion is apparent. while it is likely that all socialists are liberal, not all liberals are socialist.

so I reiterate.... education is important. you should probably get one beyond the rantings of the rightwingnut blogosphere.

Yet you can't provide even one example of a conservative socialist.

Education is important. That's why I am educated. Don't confuse your indoctrination with being educated. They aren't the same thing.


again, read my post. I don't need to.... all socialists are likely liberal.

not all liberals are socialist.

so please trying to read with comprehension little boy. you're sounding really absurd and ignorant.
 
The 'investors' EARNED the money initially. They were taxed once on those earnings. The profit they make is then invested and Bonobo then taxes the profit on the investments.
Is there any point where you say "look the investor has paid taxes on the money HE earned initially twice so leave him the fuck alone".
The ONLY reason the LIBs/Socialists like Bonobo have to keep taxing the Makers is b/c they know without handing out 'free shit' to the Takers Bonobo and his party won't be able to basically buy votes.

until you go to school and learn the difference between being a liberal and a socialist, you should probably stop talking.

that said, it has not been taxed once already. money is taxed each time it changes hands.

I hope that helps you.
There is no difference unless you're willing to claim then support with evidence there is such thing as a conservative socialist.

your confusion is apparent. while it is likely that all socialists are liberal, not all liberals are socialist.

so I reiterate.... education is important. you should probably get one beyond the rantings of the rightwingnut blogosphere.

Yet you can't provide even one example of a conservative socialist.

Education is important. That's why I am educated. Don't confuse your indoctrination with being educated. They aren't the same thing.


again, read my post. I don't need to.... all socialists are likely liberal.

not all liberals are socialist.

so please trying to read with comprehension little boy. you're sounding really absurd and ignorant.

All socialists ARE liberal not just likely.

Under what Liberal means today from an economic sense, I disagree with your statement that not all Liberals are socialists.
 
All socialists ARE liberal not just likely.

Under what Liberal means today from an economic sense, I disagree with your statement that not all Liberals are socialists.

Do you believe Hillary, Patron Saint of Wall Street and Big Bank PACs, is a socialist?
 
All socialists ARE liberal not just likely.

Under what Liberal means today from an economic sense, I disagree with your statement that not all Liberals are socialists.

Do you believe Hillary, Patron Saint of Wall Street and Big Bank PACs, is a socialist?

"I know we can afford it because we're going to make the wealthy pay for it. That is the way to get it done" - H. Clinton.

That's how socialists think.
 
All socialists ARE liberal not just likely.

Under what Liberal means today from an economic sense, I disagree with your statement that not all Liberals are socialists.

Do you believe Hillary, Patron Saint of Wall Street and Big Bank PACs, is a socialist?

"I know we can afford it because we're going to make the wealthy pay for it. That is the way to get it done" - H. Clinton.

That's how socialists think.

In her case, that's how hypocrites think. It's called biting the hand that feeds you (then probably chatting them up in private and saying "Never mind...I just had to say that so they'll vote for me...and a vote for me is a vote for Goldman Sachs").
 
The 'investors' EARNED the money initially. They were taxed once on those earnings. The profit they make is then invested and Bonobo then taxes the profit on the investments.

Bogus argument. Using that logic there should be no sales tax, excise tax, etc., because we are taxed when we earn the money used to buy those taxed items.

If you use your taxed wages to buy, for instance, an airless paint sprayer you are taxed at the going rate on the money you make using that machine.

But if you buy stocks with your taxed wages you pay only 15% on the capital gains.

How does that help anything?

BTW, Obama didn't invent the tax system.

we have a problem with guns because of people who think they still live in the wild west
 
All socialists ARE liberal not just likely.

Under what Liberal means today from an economic sense, I disagree with your statement that not all Liberals are socialists.

Do you believe Hillary, Patron Saint of Wall Street and Big Bank PACs, is a socialist?

"I know we can afford it because we're going to make the wealthy pay for it. That is the way to get it done" - H. Clinton.

That's how socialists think.

In her case, that's how hypocrites think. It's called biting the hand that feeds you (then probably chatting them up in private and saying "Never mind...I just had to say that so they'll vote for me...and a vote for me is a vote for Goldman Sachs").

How quickly lefties turn on their own.
 
The 'investors' EARNED the money initially. They were taxed once on those earnings. The profit they make is then invested and Bonobo then taxes the profit on the investments.

Bogus argument. Using that logic there should be no sales tax, excise tax, etc., because we are taxed when we earn the money used to buy those taxed items.

If you use your taxed wages to buy, for instance, an airless paint sprayer you are taxed at the going rate on the money you make using that machine.

But if you buy stocks with your taxed wages you pay only 15% on the capital gains.

How does that help anything?

BTW, Obama didn't invent the tax system.

we have a problem with guns because of people who think they still live in the wild west
No we have a problem with liberals who insist there be gun free zones that endanger us and our children

Sent from my SM-G386T1 using Tapatalk
 
:poop:You have to wonder, right? They cheer on all of the "Free-Stuff Bullchit" as if Obama has a surplus of 20 trillion dollars. Maybe we need to get some reporters to attend the rallies and ask some of his uninformed fans where Bernie is going to get the money for free college and health-care when we already owe 18 trillion dollars.
Then we may get answers like "Huh? what?, uh,,,,whats a trillion dollars? is that like a few million?"
Or someone might say, "Uhhh, what? what's a national debt?":poke:
Most of them failed basic common sense and work ethic.
 
All socialists ARE liberal not just likely.

Under what Liberal means today from an economic sense, I disagree with your statement that not all Liberals are socialists.

Do you believe Hillary, Patron Saint of Wall Street and Big Bank PACs, is a socialist?

"I know we can afford it because we're going to make the wealthy pay for it. That is the way to get it done" - H. Clinton.

That's how socialists think.

In her case, that's how hypocrites think. It's called biting the hand that feeds you (then probably chatting them up in private and saying "Never mind...I just had to say that so they'll vote for me...and a vote for me is a vote for Goldman Sachs").

How quickly lefties turn on their own.

Anyone who's in the pocket of Wall Street and the banks is not anything of mine.

I know the only way you feel safe is to put people in little boxes labeled "For" and "Against." I'd expect that kind of binary-think in some high school kid. Apparently you can take the kid out of high school but, 30+ years later, his worldview still hasn't matured.
 

Forum List

Back
Top