Do you want me to begin with CUT Social Security...or end with that?This is the last lie......so far today.
Show us what is a lie
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
The New Democrat Platform
- Thread starter PoliticalChic
- Start date
- Thread starter
- #42
Talking about Russian collusion......the Russians couldn't ask for anything more than what Democrats are doing to this country right now. They called for blood in the streets, and if they don't stop there will be blood in the streets.True but this crap is starting to backfire big time on the Ds
One can only hope that you are correct.
For me, I believe that each of us has withing us the seeds of our own destruction, and this applies to Western Civilization as well. The Democrats are those seeds, and they're willing to take all of us down with them.
We're simply basking in the afterglow of a once great civilization. Atavism is on the rise.
The party that supported and allied with communists, Bolsheviks, and the USSR for 70 years suddenly pretends to disdain 'collusion.'
It is the same party that now stands for the same things Soviet Russia did.
And this is another lie.RepubliKlans get their political positions from Stormfront
I'll tell you what.....when you say anything honest I'll let you know.
Lying to them is just being clever.This is the last lie......so far today.
It is essential to recognize that the word has two different meaning to the Left and to the Right.
When applied to the Right, it is taken as an insult, to be responded to, to be proven incorrect.
To the Left it is to be shrugged at, an acceptable mode of debate.
They don't care if they are known to be liars. You'll see that above.
And anything we say is a total lie if one syllable is out of place....irregardless of it's authenticity.
rightwinger
Award Winning USMB Paid Messageboard Poster
- Aug 4, 2009
- 285,317
- 158,333
- 2,615
Still waiting Frau BraunThis is the last lie......so far today.
It is essential to recognize that the word has two different meaning to the Left and to the Right.
When applied to the Right, it is taken as an insult, to be responded to, to be proven incorrect.
To the Left it is to be shrugged at, an acceptable mode of debate.
They don't care if they are known to be liars. You'll see that above.
Where have I posted a lie?
rightwinger
Award Winning USMB Paid Messageboard Poster
- Aug 4, 2009
- 285,317
- 158,333
- 2,615
Lying to them is just being clever.This is the last lie......so far today.
It is essential to recognize that the word has two different meaning to the Left and to the Right.
When applied to the Right, it is taken as an insult, to be responded to, to be proven incorrect.
To the Left it is to be shrugged at, an acceptable mode of debate.
They don't care if they are known to be liars. You'll see that above.
And anything we say is a total lie if one syllable is out of place....irregardless of it's authenticity.
Still waiting..
You have nothing
- Thread starter
- #47
5. What could be more American than the first amendment????
“Trump And Universities In Fight Over Free Speech, Federal Research Funding
His executive orderconditions research funding on "compliance with the First Amendment" and directs federal agencies to ensure that institutions receiving federal research or education grants "promote free inquiry."”
Trump And Universities In Fight Over Free Speech, Federal Research Funding
What could be less American than Democrats endorsing censorship of individual’s freedom of speech?
"In her 1993 article "Regulation of Hate Speech and Pornography After R.A.V," for the University of Chicago Law Review, [Democrat Elena] Kagan writes:
"I take it as a given that we live in a society marred by racial and gender inequality, that certain forms of speech perpetuate and promote this inequality, and that the uncoerced disappearance of such speech would be cause for great elation."
In a 1996 paper, "Private Speech, Public Purpose: The Role of Governmental Motive in First Amendment Doctrine," Kagan argued it may be proper to suppress speech because it is offensive to society or to the government.
That paper asserted First Amendment doctrine is comprised of "motives and ... actions infested with them" and she goes so far as to claim that "First Amendment law is best understood and most readily explained as a kind of motive-hunting."
Kagan's name was also on a brief, United States V. Stevens, dug up by the Washington Examiner, stating: "Whether a given category of speech enjoys First Amendment protection depends upon a categorical balancing of the value of the speech against its societal costs."
If the government doesn't like what you say, Elena Kagan believes it is the duty of courts to tell you to shut up. If some pantywaist is offended by what you say, Elena Kagan believes your words can be "disappeared".
WyBlog -- Elena Kagan's America: some speech can be "disappeared"
Elena Kagan Radical anti-gun nut?
Brandenburg v. Ohio - Wikipedia
“Earlier this week, Obama-appointed Supreme Court Justice [Democrat] Elena Kagan wrote in her minority dissent to the Janus ruling that the Court had “weaponized the First Amendment.”
The majority opinion dwelt on issues of compelled speech, noting that “because such compulsion so plainly violates the Constitution, most of our free speech cases have involved restrictions on what can be said, rather than laws compelling speech. But measures compelling speech are at least as threatening.”
Kagan, however, has other ideas and claimed in her dissent that
“The First Amendment was meant for better things,” she concluded.
Kagan’s fantastical notion of “black-robed rulers overriding citizens’ choices” by “weaponizing the First Amendment” is puzzling. Citizens in non-right-to-work states are completely free to join a union if they so wish, and in doing so, commit to paying union dues. The only change here is that unions can no longer extort dues from non-members in any state.
Citizens’ choices have not been overridden; indeed, citizen choice is expanded under this ruling. They can join a union or not join a union, those who do not join cannot be compelled to pay union dues, but they are also not barred from doing so if they wish.
Her point about “weaponizing the First Amendment” is equally confounding. The Founders intendedthe First Amendment to be a weapon . . . against government tyranny and oppression. They were insistent that freedom of speech was required to check government and to maintain a free and independent citizenry.” Who's afraid of the 1st Amendment?
BTW, this Democrat star Kagan has been guilty of lying, and fraud as well as opposing free speech.
…the Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, and anti-Semitism.
“Trump And Universities In Fight Over Free Speech, Federal Research Funding
His executive orderconditions research funding on "compliance with the First Amendment" and directs federal agencies to ensure that institutions receiving federal research or education grants "promote free inquiry."”
Trump And Universities In Fight Over Free Speech, Federal Research Funding
What could be less American than Democrats endorsing censorship of individual’s freedom of speech?
"In her 1993 article "Regulation of Hate Speech and Pornography After R.A.V," for the University of Chicago Law Review, [Democrat Elena] Kagan writes:
"I take it as a given that we live in a society marred by racial and gender inequality, that certain forms of speech perpetuate and promote this inequality, and that the uncoerced disappearance of such speech would be cause for great elation."
In a 1996 paper, "Private Speech, Public Purpose: The Role of Governmental Motive in First Amendment Doctrine," Kagan argued it may be proper to suppress speech because it is offensive to society or to the government.
That paper asserted First Amendment doctrine is comprised of "motives and ... actions infested with them" and she goes so far as to claim that "First Amendment law is best understood and most readily explained as a kind of motive-hunting."
Kagan's name was also on a brief, United States V. Stevens, dug up by the Washington Examiner, stating: "Whether a given category of speech enjoys First Amendment protection depends upon a categorical balancing of the value of the speech against its societal costs."
If the government doesn't like what you say, Elena Kagan believes it is the duty of courts to tell you to shut up. If some pantywaist is offended by what you say, Elena Kagan believes your words can be "disappeared".
WyBlog -- Elena Kagan's America: some speech can be "disappeared"
Elena Kagan Radical anti-gun nut?
Brandenburg v. Ohio - Wikipedia
“Earlier this week, Obama-appointed Supreme Court Justice [Democrat] Elena Kagan wrote in her minority dissent to the Janus ruling that the Court had “weaponized the First Amendment.”
The majority opinion dwelt on issues of compelled speech, noting that “because such compulsion so plainly violates the Constitution, most of our free speech cases have involved restrictions on what can be said, rather than laws compelling speech. But measures compelling speech are at least as threatening.”
Kagan, however, has other ideas and claimed in her dissent that
“The First Amendment was meant for better things,” she concluded.
Kagan’s fantastical notion of “black-robed rulers overriding citizens’ choices” by “weaponizing the First Amendment” is puzzling. Citizens in non-right-to-work states are completely free to join a union if they so wish, and in doing so, commit to paying union dues. The only change here is that unions can no longer extort dues from non-members in any state.
Citizens’ choices have not been overridden; indeed, citizen choice is expanded under this ruling. They can join a union or not join a union, those who do not join cannot be compelled to pay union dues, but they are also not barred from doing so if they wish.
Her point about “weaponizing the First Amendment” is equally confounding. The Founders intendedthe First Amendment to be a weapon . . . against government tyranny and oppression. They were insistent that freedom of speech was required to check government and to maintain a free and independent citizenry.” Who's afraid of the 1st Amendment?
BTW, this Democrat star Kagan has been guilty of lying, and fraud as well as opposing free speech.
…the Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, and anti-Semitism.
william the wie
Gold Member
- Nov 18, 2009
- 16,667
- 2,402
- 280
The Ds doubling down on Dumb is normal for them but this go round they seem to be going for the record.
- Thread starter
- #49
The Ds doubling down on Dumb is normal for them but this go round they seem to be going for the record.
You must mean this....
- Thread starter
- #50
…the Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, ...and anti-Semitism.
6. Democrats aren’t anti-Israel….they are anti-Jews.
Omar spoke about Jews, not Israeli policy.
“Rep. Ilhan Omar of Minnesota has, on several occasions, made classically anti-Semitic claims about American Jews,…
The gist of Omar's complaints is that the perfidious, string-pulling Hebraic hordes control Congress with their shady shekels, Israel has hypnotized the world, and American Jews are guilty of dual loyalty.”
House Democrats Finding It Hard to Confront Anti-Semitism
Know how we know that Ocasio-Cortez, anti-Semite, speaks for the Democrat Party?
Here’s how:
“Multiple 2020 Democrats say they won’t attend AIPAC summit” Multiple 2020 Democrats say they won't attend AIPAC summit
Trump....clearly the very antithesis of the anti-Semite Democrats:
“Trump, No Stranger to Jewish Stereotypes, Rejects Ilhan Omar’s Apology “Anti-Semitism has no place in the United States Congress,” Mr. Trump told reporters during a cabinet meeting. “Congressman Omar is terrible, what she said. And I think she should either resign from Congress or she should certainly resign from the House Foreign Affairs Committee.” Trump, No Stranger to Jewish Stereotypes, Rejects Ilhan Omar’s Apology
Early Democrats would have decried this sort of offense......not this bunch.
6. Democrats aren’t anti-Israel….they are anti-Jews.
Omar spoke about Jews, not Israeli policy.
“Rep. Ilhan Omar of Minnesota has, on several occasions, made classically anti-Semitic claims about American Jews,…
The gist of Omar's complaints is that the perfidious, string-pulling Hebraic hordes control Congress with their shady shekels, Israel has hypnotized the world, and American Jews are guilty of dual loyalty.”
House Democrats Finding It Hard to Confront Anti-Semitism
Know how we know that Ocasio-Cortez, anti-Semite, speaks for the Democrat Party?
Here’s how:
“Multiple 2020 Democrats say they won’t attend AIPAC summit” Multiple 2020 Democrats say they won't attend AIPAC summit
Trump....clearly the very antithesis of the anti-Semite Democrats:
“Trump, No Stranger to Jewish Stereotypes, Rejects Ilhan Omar’s Apology “Anti-Semitism has no place in the United States Congress,” Mr. Trump told reporters during a cabinet meeting. “Congressman Omar is terrible, what she said. And I think she should either resign from Congress or she should certainly resign from the House Foreign Affairs Committee.” Trump, No Stranger to Jewish Stereotypes, Rejects Ilhan Omar’s Apology
Early Democrats would have decried this sort of offense......not this bunch.
When have you not posted a lie?Still waiting Frau BraunThis is the last lie......so far today.
It is essential to recognize that the word has two different meaning to the Left and to the Right.
When applied to the Right, it is taken as an insult, to be responded to, to be proven incorrect.
To the Left it is to be shrugged at, an acceptable mode of debate.
They don't care if they are known to be liars. You'll see that above.
Where have I posted a lie?
You say we have nothing only because you refuse to admit to your lies.....Lying to them is just being clever.This is the last lie......so far today.
It is essential to recognize that the word has two different meaning to the Left and to the Right.
When applied to the Right, it is taken as an insult, to be responded to, to be proven incorrect.
To the Left it is to be shrugged at, an acceptable mode of debate.
They don't care if they are known to be liars. You'll see that above.
And anything we say is a total lie if one syllable is out of place....irregardless of it's authenticity.
Still waiting..
You have nothing
I've pointed out several already.
- Thread starter
- #53
You say we have nothing only because you refuse to admit to your lies.....Lying to them is just being clever.This is the last lie......so far today.
It is essential to recognize that the word has two different meaning to the Left and to the Right.
When applied to the Right, it is taken as an insult, to be responded to, to be proven incorrect.
To the Left it is to be shrugged at, an acceptable mode of debate.
They don't care if they are known to be liars. You'll see that above.
And anything we say is a total lie if one syllable is out of place....irregardless of it's authenticity.
Still waiting..
You have nothing
I've pointed out several already.
Yup....it's useless.
- Thread starter
- #54
7. In Katherine Anne Porter's "Ship of Fools," she puts this prophetic question in the mouth of a Jewish traveler on the ship, speaking about the future for Jews in pre-war Germany:
"Listen, my friend, there are a million Jews in Germany alone. What are they going to do, kill us all?"
Is the handwriting on the wall for our Jewish Americans????
The Democrat Party accepts without comment myriad anti-Jewish statements by its officials.
What is the only country that Obama sent paid apparatchiks to target and destabilize?
“Obama admin. sent taxpayer money to campaign to oust Netanyahu”
Obama admin. sent taxpayer money to campaign to oust Netanyahu
One would expect nothing less from the Muslim President.
The current Democrat Party carries on his work.
The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, and anti-Semitism…
"Listen, my friend, there are a million Jews in Germany alone. What are they going to do, kill us all?"
Is the handwriting on the wall for our Jewish Americans????
The Democrat Party accepts without comment myriad anti-Jewish statements by its officials.
What is the only country that Obama sent paid apparatchiks to target and destabilize?
“Obama admin. sent taxpayer money to campaign to oust Netanyahu”
Obama admin. sent taxpayer money to campaign to oust Netanyahu
One would expect nothing less from the Muslim President.
The current Democrat Party carries on his work.
The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, and anti-Semitism…
imawhosure
Platinum Member
- Apr 25, 2015
- 9,356
- 2,973
- 360
The Democratic Party stands for Truth, Justice and the American Way
Republicans are destroying our society to create a subservient workforce for the wealthy
Winger, you have said a lot of phony baloney things in the time I have been here, but that post not only takes the cake, it confiscates the whole bakery, lol. Somewhere up above...….or maybe down below, JFK is laughing so hard at your post, he has reminded himself he used to have to pee!
rightwinger
Award Winning USMB Paid Messageboard Poster
- Aug 4, 2009
- 285,317
- 158,333
- 2,615
As I suspected......you have nothing to support your claimWhen have you not posted a lie?Still waiting Frau BraunThis is the last lie......so far today.
It is essential to recognize that the word has two different meaning to the Left and to the Right.
When applied to the Right, it is taken as an insult, to be responded to, to be proven incorrect.
To the Left it is to be shrugged at, an acceptable mode of debate.
They don't care if they are known to be liars. You'll see that above.
Where have I posted a lie?
rightwinger
Award Winning USMB Paid Messageboard Poster
- Aug 4, 2009
- 285,317
- 158,333
- 2,615
Again with the broad, unsubstantiated claimsThe Democratic Party stands for Truth, Justice and the American Way
Republicans are destroying our society to create a subservient workforce for the wealthy
Winger, you have said a lot of phony baloney things in the time I have been here, but that post not only takes the cake, it confiscates the whole bakery, lol. Somewhere up above...….or maybe down below, JFK is laughing so hard at your post, he has reminded himself he used to have to pee!
Show an example or STFU
imawhosure
Platinum Member
- Apr 25, 2015
- 9,356
- 2,973
- 360
Again with the broad, unsubstantiated claimsThe Democratic Party stands for Truth, Justice and the American Way
Republicans are destroying our society to create a subservient workforce for the wealthy
Winger, you have said a lot of phony baloney things in the time I have been here, but that post not only takes the cake, it confiscates the whole bakery, lol. Somewhere up above...….or maybe down below, JFK is laughing so hard at your post, he has reminded himself he used to have to pee!
Show an example or STFU
What, that JFK is probably pissing on himself, lol. Wasn't he the President that FORCED the SOCIALIST/COMMUNIST missiles out of Cuba, only to discover after death, that HIS party turned into exactly what the people were who put them there-)
Now go eat a doughnut from your confiscated bakery little one. You are laughed at in polite company, which is exactly why, from wherever he may be, JFK is laughing with us, AT YOU too! You phony baloney.
The Original Tree
Diamond Member
This is The Democrat Platform Ver Batim
If anyone has any doubts why they tried to overturn our election, simply realize that President Trump set their plans back 12 years.
The UN had to repackage Agenda 21 As Agenda 2030 due to Trump’s election.
http://www.usmessageboard.com/threads/agenda-21-the-dossier-fundamentally-transforming-america.746828/
If anyone has any doubts why they tried to overturn our election, simply realize that President Trump set their plans back 12 years.
The UN had to repackage Agenda 21 As Agenda 2030 due to Trump’s election.
http://www.usmessageboard.com/threads/agenda-21-the-dossier-fundamentally-transforming-america.746828/
Last edited:
- Thread starter
- #60
The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, and anti-Semitism…
But wait…..there’s more:
But wait…..there’s more:
Similar threads
- Replies
- 29
- Views
- 273
- Replies
- 22
- Views
- 203
- Replies
- 11
- Views
- 138
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 19
- Views
- 126
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8513
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 483
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-