The new Trump indictment here:

[Dante Reawakened]

The context is contained in the indictment.

Now the issue is whether, with the incredible nature of the seriousness of the charges, should Trump be detained in federal custody?

repeat...

 

[The5thHorseman]

https://s.wsj.net/public/resources/documents/U.S.-Trump-Nauta-Indictment-6-8-2023.pdf?mod=series_trumpfbi

At first glance, it is the crap I’ve been anticipating. Lots of people have.

The strongest part of the government’s case seems to be this alleged audio recording of Trump discussing some allegedly not declassified document. But that comes with the baggage of context which we haven’t seen.

The rest of it is the usual twat waffle shit from prosecutors who are hostile to being fair.

This will line up as a thorny trial. But if they get a fair jury and the legal instructions about the charges are proper and clear enough, the government is going to have a tough time.

How have you done to date with these prognostications?

 

[The5thHorseman]

Completely ignorant of the facts so far.

read the indictment

I'm quite surprised to hear that....

 

[BackAgain]

How have you done to date with these prognostications?

You mean predicting that the special counsel would secure an indictment? Or that the charges would be crap? The the answer is “quite good.”

But tell you what, Squidward, you have my permission to worry about it.

 

[Rambunctious]

 

[Rambunctious]

 

[Esdraelon]

The context is contained in the indictment.

Now the issue is whether, with the incredible nature of the seriousness of the charges, should Trump be detained in federal custody?

Yeah, you do that. It should make for an interesting outcome. Feckin' NAZIS.

 

[The5thHorseman]

You mean predicting that the special counsel would secure an indictment? Or that the charges would be crap? The the answer is “quite good.”

But tell you what, Squidward, you have my permission to worry about it.

Predicting the direction and outcome of recent high profile cases...

If you're the same back again as the one who completely whiffed on Flynn and Aileen, I think you should qualify these comments with a disclaimer...

Like "Past results are no guarantee of future failure - regardless of persistence."

That should cover you.

 

[BackAgain]

Predicting the direction and outcome of recent high profile cases...

If you're the same back again as the one who completely whiffed on Flynn and Aileen, I think you should qualify these comments with a disclaimer...

More false claims by you. Lying is your only “support” for your grandiose claims.

Like "Past results are no guarantee of future failure - regardless of persistence."

That should cover you.

<~~ covers everyone one of your posts, and you.

 

[The5thHorseman]

More false claims by you. Lying is your only “support” for your grandiose claims.


<~~ covers everyone one of your posts, and you.

Easy enough...

What did you predict would happen when the DoJ filed its motion to dismiss the case against Michael Flynn?

 

[BackAgain]

Easy enough...

What did you predict would happen when the DoJ filed its motion to dismiss the case against Michael Flynn?

Link?

 

[The5thHorseman]

Link?

I'm asking...

Can you not read?

 

[BackAgain]

I'm asking...

Can you not read?

I’m asking for you to share the link.

Can you not read?

 

[The5thHorseman]

I’m asking for you to share the link.

Can you not read?

What link?

 

[BackAgain]

What link?

Jeez. You’re a painful dolt. A link to the alleged discussion you were mentioning, you abject asshole.

 

[The5thHorseman]

Jeez. You’re a painful dolt. A link to the alleged discussion you were mentioning, you abject asshole.

I asked you a question, to which you responded with a request for a link.

Focus, cornhole.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

BackAgain has been smacked on to his back foot again.

Tuesday is going to be delicious.

 

[BackAgain]

I asked you a question, to which you responded with a request for a link.

Focus, cornhole.

Dipshit motherfucker. I replied to your dopey comment by asking did for a link. Then I had to make that clear request even more clear for your weak ass brain to handle. And yet, now, you’re still whimpering.

Grow some balls.

Provide the link, you scumbucket.

 

[Leo123]

Now we know how Hitler took over Germany. Or how Putin keeps control of Russia. Or Bibi is still in power in Israel.

The indictment spells out Trump’s alleged scheme to move dozens of boxes containing sensitive government material after he was asked to turn them over.
“The classified documents Trump stored in his boxes included information regarding defense and weapons capabilities of both the United States and foreign countries; United States nuclear programs; potential vulnerabilities of the United States and its allies to military attack; and plans for possible retaliation in response to a foreign attack,” the indictment reads.

The charges against Trump include conspiracy to obstruct justice, willful retention of national defense information and making false statements

You must think he's above the law

The indictment spells out Trump’s alleged scheme to move dozens of boxes containing sensitive government material after he was asked to turn them over.

Stop falsely accusing Biden when Trump has been caught red handed.

Trump’s aide was also charged Friday in the alleged scheme. Walt Nauta, a former military valet who worked at Mar-a-Lago following Trump’s presidency, was seen on Mar-a-Lago surveillance video moving boxes from a storage room before and after a subpoena was issued.

This indictment is separate from another case in which state prosecutors in New York charged Trump with 30 felony counts related to a hush money payment made to a porn star before the 2016 election.

Listen to what Trump said.

“I never thought it possible that such a thing could happen to a former President of the United States, who received far more votes than any sitting President in the History of our Country, and is currently leading, by far, all Candidates, both Democrat and Republican, in Polls of the 2024 Presidential Election,” he wrote on his Truth Social site.

That's right. He thought he was above the law too. And what does it matter how popular he was? Does that give him the right to break the law? What the fuck was he doing with these documents? Selling them to spies? Sure seems like it.

Trump will sell anything. Even national secrets.

The former president said he had a standing order to automatically declassify anything removed from the Oval Office and that “everybody knew” he had taken boxes of documents with him to his Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida.
But prosecutors spent months obtaining evidence from employees at the club and Trump’s aides, as well as a reported tape of him discussing a sensitive military document he indicated he knew was secret.
There are still several other investigations into Trump’s behavior that could pose even more legal peril, including federal and state investigations into his efforts to remain in power after his 2020 electoral loss to Joe Biden.

The ‘box moving scheme!’ Yeah they got him now! Yeah that’s the ticket!

 

[The5thHorseman]

Dipshit motherfucker. I replied to your dopey comment by asking did for a link. Then I had to make that clear request even more clear for your weak ass brain to handle. And yet, now, you’re still whimpering.

Grow some balls.

Provide the link, you scumbucket.

I replied to your dopey comment by asking did for a link

Then I had to make that clear request even more clear for your weak ass brain to handle

Got ya...

Thanks for clearing that up.