The next Republican President hasn't been born yet

[nuhuh]

I see conservatard65 has derailed this thread into one about race. Surprised. I think I'll start referring to him as "Tank II"

BACK TO TOPIC:

Teapubs inability to field an electable Presidential candidate.

Discuss.....

okay.......................


Poll: Trump beats Hillary head-to-head | TheHill
thehill.com/.../252825-poll-trump-beats-hillary-head-to-head

• Cached

The Hill
Loading...
Sep 4, 2015 - Republican presidential front-runner Donald Trump leads Democrat Hillary Clinton ... In other head-to-head matchups, Trump beats out Sen


Carly Fiorina tops Hillary Clinton in head-to-head matchup ...
www.washingtontimes.com/.../carly-fiorina-tops-...

• Cached

The Washington Times
Loading...
Sep 24, 2015 - Carly Fiorina tops Hillary Clinton in head-to-head matchup: poll .... NO republican could have beaten Boxer in the liberal mecca district she ...


Hillary Trails 8 GOP Hopefuls, with Dr. Ben Carson Running ...
www.rushlimbaugh.com › Archives (Aug 20, 2015)

• Cached

Rush Limbaugh
Loading...
Aug 20, 2015 - In a head-to-head matchup in this poll, Hillary is beaten by eight of them. Trump leads the GOP field with moderates, 29%. He's got 25% ...

What a crock of shit you put out there and expect anyone to believe it. The Trump poll is from Sept 4, six weeks ago and everyone know Trump has lost in polling since then and the Quinnipiac poll from Sept 24, used a margin of error of for Republicans of -3.6% and -4.0% for Democrats and then used 20% more Republicans questioned to skew results.

Rush Limbaugh? if you want to be taken seriously you should find sources that don't make you look like a complete wanker.

So your head up your ass is considered a source?

Are you always an idiot or just when I'm around?

how else to communicate with you but to dumb oneself down???

Honestly, third grade jokes? Okay I'll play. When's the last time you could see your whole body in a mirror?

 

[nuhuh]

I see conservatard65 has derailed this thread into one about race. Surprised. I think I'll start referring to him as "Tank II"

BACK TO TOPIC:

Teapubs inability to field an electable Presidential candidate.

Discuss.....

okay.......................


Poll: Trump beats Hillary head-to-head | TheHill
thehill.com/.../252825-poll-trump-beats-hillary-head-to-head

• Cached

The Hill
Loading...
Sep 4, 2015 - Republican presidential front-runner Donald Trump leads Democrat Hillary Clinton ... In other head-to-head matchups, Trump beats out Sen


Carly Fiorina tops Hillary Clinton in head-to-head matchup ...
www.washingtontimes.com/.../carly-fiorina-tops-...

• Cached

The Washington Times
Loading...
Sep 24, 2015 - Carly Fiorina tops Hillary Clinton in head-to-head matchup: poll .... NO republican could have beaten Boxer in the liberal mecca district she ...


Hillary Trails 8 GOP Hopefuls, with Dr. Ben Carson Running ...
www.rushlimbaugh.com › Archives (Aug 20, 2015)

• Cached

Rush Limbaugh
Loading...
Aug 20, 2015 - In a head-to-head matchup in this poll, Hillary is beaten by eight of them. Trump leads the GOP field with moderates, 29%. He's got 25% ...

What a crock of shit you put out there and expect anyone to believe it. The Trump poll is from Sept 4, six weeks ago and everyone know Trump has lost in polling since then and the Quinnipiac poll from Sept 24, used a margin of error of for Republicans of -3.6% and -4.0% for Democrats and then used 20% more Republicans questioned to skew results.

Rush Limbaugh? if you want to be taken seriously you should find sources that don't make you look like a complete wanker.

i got an idea loser left-wing "wanker"; instead of crying about Rush Limbaugh you post some facts on that source or ANY of the others proving what they say isnt accurate in some way?//

you wouldnt want to give the impression YOU'RE THE WANKER now would you/??????

I'm not the idiot who tried to pass phony propaganda as truth here. You did. I'm willing to accept legitimate sources but not when they're skewed to make a predictable outcome.

 

[rightwinger]

Easy....... Name any blue states you think will go Red in 2016
Name the swing states that Republicans will take in 2016 that they didn't take in 2012

Sorry my friend, I, unlike you don't operate under the illusion that I'm clairvoyant which would be especially silly since we're not even certain who's going to be running. Therefore making such predictions on such a micro scale is foolish in the extreme and is likely to come back and bite you right in the rear end.

Fortunately you seem to take being made fun of with a healthy sense humor so I suspect you'll be no worse for the wear if a Republican wins 2016 and all the right wingers bring back this thread and rub your nose in it.

For the record, I have no idea which party will take the White House in 2016, all that is certain is that modern Presidential history (since the end of WW II) has shown a strong propensity for the White House to change parties after no more than 2 terms (Reagan being the only exception) so history suggests that the Republicans have the odds in their favor. Personally I think it's natural that after 8 years of eating one flavor of partisan bullshit the America people want a change and choose to dine on the other flavor of partisan bullshit for a while. I also think if the Democrats are foolish enough to nominate her Highness the Marquees of Corruption and Scandal it will just improve the Republicans odds but that's just my opinion.

It doesn't take clairvoyance. All it takes is looking at how states have voted over the last six elections. It doesn't take a crystal ball to figure out that California and New York will go blue and that Texas and Alabama will go Red

You are welcome to bookmark this thread and rub my nose in it if a Republican wins. I may just keep bumping the thread till Election Day to remind Republicans that their task is futile

Reagan won 49 states.

That was thirty years ago. The dynamics have changed significantly and as much as Republican candidates embrace Reagan, they are no Reagan

If you watched the dem "debate" last night you know that no one in that clown car has a chance of winning. The only sane person on the stage was Webb and they wouldn't let him talk.

No current Republican is capable of beating Hillary

She has too big an advantage going in

Based on her performance last night, she is more than capable of responding to Republican conspiracy theories

 

[rightwinger]

Sounds like flippant Democratic bragging

But the current breakout of Red States/Blue States gives the Democrats a huge advantage. Bush struggled to reach 270 EVs and needed to nearly sweep swing states to make it
Both sides do not start the election with a clean slate. The Dems start with 242 EV while the Republicans only control 192. To win, Democrats only need to get 28 EVs out of the remaining swing state votes
Even the swing states are starting to lean blue.

I doubt if I will ever see another Republican President in my lifetime

Well I will say this... IF your premise is correct, there will never be another Republican president. If the current chasm in the GOP is not resolved in a way which leads to a decisive victory over the Socialists, we may not ever have another elected president. Our sovereignty is on the way to being lost due to illegal immigration.

The GOP is currently sharply divided between those who want to maintain status quo "moderatism" and avoid taking bold stands on principles and values, and those who have a clear conservative philosophy that is constantly under attack. It remains to be seen which "side" will ultimately prevail in the nomination process but if the GOP goes with another "moderate" like McCain or Romney, this will spell the demise of the GOP as a viable political party. They will simply go the way of the Whigs who suffered the same 'paralysis of thought' on the issues of the day.

Reagan said, we have to paint our message in bold colors and no pale pastels. The current top two front-runners in the GOP race are non-politician leaders who are not tied to the establishment GOP. That should be sounding alarm bells for the elite Republican establishment. The party is literally redefining itself.

Any preconceptions you have that the 2016 election will be a matter of Republicans winning over swing states from the last election, are simply goofy and ignorant of American politics and presidential election history.

The rebranding of Republicans will do even worse in the swing states which tend to go moderate. The "I'm more conservative than you" brinksmanship of the current GOP will turn off moderate voters. In the absence of a moderate Republican, a moderate Democrat will do

 

[bedowin62]

I see conservatard65 has derailed this thread into one about race. Surprised. I think I'll start referring to him as "Tank II"

BACK TO TOPIC:

Teapubs inability to field an electable Presidential candidate.

Discuss.....

okay.......................


Poll: Trump beats Hillary head-to-head | TheHill
thehill.com/.../252825-poll-trump-beats-hillary-head-to-head

• Cached

The Hill
Loading...
Sep 4, 2015 - Republican presidential front-runner Donald Trump leads Democrat Hillary Clinton ... In other head-to-head matchups, Trump beats out Sen


Carly Fiorina tops Hillary Clinton in head-to-head matchup ...
www.washingtontimes.com/.../carly-fiorina-tops-...

• Cached

The Washington Times
Loading...
Sep 24, 2015 - Carly Fiorina tops Hillary Clinton in head-to-head matchup: poll .... NO republican could have beaten Boxer in the liberal mecca district she ...


Hillary Trails 8 GOP Hopefuls, with Dr. Ben Carson Running ...
www.rushlimbaugh.com › Archives (Aug 20, 2015)

• Cached

Rush Limbaugh
Loading...
Aug 20, 2015 - In a head-to-head matchup in this poll, Hillary is beaten by eight of them. Trump leads the GOP field with moderates, 29%. He's got 25% ...

What a crock of shit you put out there and expect anyone to believe it. The Trump poll is from Sept 4, six weeks ago and everyone know Trump has lost in polling since then and the Quinnipiac poll from Sept 24, used a margin of error of for Republicans of -3.6% and -4.0% for Democrats and then used 20% more Republicans questioned to skew results.

Rush Limbaugh? if you want to be taken seriously you should find sources that don't make you look like a complete wanker.

i got an idea loser left-wing "wanker"; instead of crying about Rush Limbaugh you post some facts on that source or ANY of the others proving what they say isnt accurate in some way?//

you wouldnt want to give the impression YOU'RE THE WANKER now would you/??????

I'm not the idiot who tried to pass phony propaganda as truth here. You did. I'm willing to accept legitimate sources but not when they're skewed to make a predictable outcome.

awww too bad, another wasted post where you could have rebutted any of the points made but failed to

 

[bedowin62]

Sounds like flippant Democratic bragging

But the current breakout of Red States/Blue States gives the Democrats a huge advantage. Bush struggled to reach 270 EVs and needed to nearly sweep swing states to make it
Both sides do not start the election with a clean slate. The Dems start with 242 EV while the Republicans only control 192. To win, Democrats only need to get 28 EVs out of the remaining swing state votes
Even the swing states are starting to lean blue.

I doubt if I will ever see another Republican President in my lifetime

Well I will say this... IF your premise is correct, there will never be another Republican president. If the current chasm in the GOP is not resolved in a way which leads to a decisive victory over the Socialists, we may not ever have another elected president. Our sovereignty is on the way to being lost due to illegal immigration.

The GOP is currently sharply divided between those who want to maintain status quo "moderatism" and avoid taking bold stands on principles and values, and those who have a clear conservative philosophy that is constantly under attack. It remains to be seen which "side" will ultimately prevail in the nomination process but if the GOP goes with another "moderate" like McCain or Romney, this will spell the demise of the GOP as a viable political party. They will simply go the way of the Whigs who suffered the same 'paralysis of thought' on the issues of the day.

Reagan said, we have to paint our message in bold colors and no pale pastels. The current top two front-runners in the GOP race are non-politician leaders who are not tied to the establishment GOP. That should be sounding alarm bells for the elite Republican establishment. The party is literally redefining itself.

Any preconceptions you have that the 2016 election will be a matter of Republicans winning over swing states from the last election, are simply goofy and ignorant of American politics and presidential election history.

The rebranding of Republicans will do even worse in the swing states which tend to go moderate. The "I'm more conservative than you" brinksmanship of the current GOP will turn off moderate voters. In the absence of a moderate Republican, a moderate Democrat will do

good one idiot; how is the running to the Left of Mao working out????

 

[bedowin62]

Sorry my friend, I, unlike you don't operate under the illusion that I'm clairvoyant which would be especially silly since we're not even certain who's going to be running. Therefore making such predictions on such a micro scale is foolish in the extreme and is likely to come back and bite you right in the rear end.

Fortunately you seem to take being made fun of with a healthy sense humor so I suspect you'll be no worse for the wear if a Republican wins 2016 and all the right wingers bring back this thread and rub your nose in it.

For the record, I have no idea which party will take the White House in 2016, all that is certain is that modern Presidential history (since the end of WW II) has shown a strong propensity for the White House to change parties after no more than 2 terms (Reagan being the only exception) so history suggests that the Republicans have the odds in their favor. Personally I think it's natural that after 8 years of eating one flavor of partisan bullshit the America people want a change and choose to dine on the other flavor of partisan bullshit for a while. I also think if the Democrats are foolish enough to nominate her Highness the Marquees of Corruption and Scandal it will just improve the Republicans odds but that's just my opinion.

It doesn't take clairvoyance. All it takes is looking at how states have voted over the last six elections. It doesn't take a crystal ball to figure out that California and New York will go blue and that Texas and Alabama will go Red

You are welcome to bookmark this thread and rub my nose in it if a Republican wins. I may just keep bumping the thread till Election Day to remind Republicans that their task is futile

Reagan won 49 states.

That was thirty years ago. The dynamics have changed significantly and as much as Republican candidates embrace Reagan, they are no Reagan

If you watched the dem "debate" last night you know that no one in that clown car has a chance of winning. The only sane person on the stage was Webb and they wouldn't let him talk.

No current Republican is capable of beating Hillary

She has too big an advantage going in

Based on her performance last night, she is more than capable of responding to Republican conspiracy theories

not really self-deluder; Republicans arent going to cow in front of her the way your old White male pussies did

 

[nuhuh]

I see conservatard65 has derailed this thread into one about race. Surprised. I think I'll start referring to him as "Tank II"

BACK TO TOPIC:

Teapubs inability to field an electable Presidential candidate.

Discuss.....

okay.......................


Poll: Trump beats Hillary head-to-head | TheHill
thehill.com/.../252825-poll-trump-beats-hillary-head-to-head

• Cached

The Hill
Loading...
Sep 4, 2015 - Republican presidential front-runner Donald Trump leads Democrat Hillary Clinton ... In other head-to-head matchups, Trump beats out Sen


Carly Fiorina tops Hillary Clinton in head-to-head matchup ...
www.washingtontimes.com/.../carly-fiorina-tops-...

• Cached

The Washington Times
Loading...
Sep 24, 2015 - Carly Fiorina tops Hillary Clinton in head-to-head matchup: poll .... NO republican could have beaten Boxer in the liberal mecca district she ...


Hillary Trails 8 GOP Hopefuls, with Dr. Ben Carson Running ...
www.rushlimbaugh.com › Archives (Aug 20, 2015)

• Cached

Rush Limbaugh
Loading...
Aug 20, 2015 - In a head-to-head matchup in this poll, Hillary is beaten by eight of them. Trump leads the GOP field with moderates, 29%. He's got 25% ...

What a crock of shit you put out there and expect anyone to believe it. The Trump poll is from Sept 4, six weeks ago and everyone know Trump has lost in polling since then and the Quinnipiac poll from Sept 24, used a margin of error of for Republicans of -3.6% and -4.0% for Democrats and then used 20% more Republicans questioned to skew results.

Rush Limbaugh? if you want to be taken seriously you should find sources that don't make you look like a complete wanker.

i got an idea loser left-wing "wanker"; instead of crying about Rush Limbaugh you post some facts on that source or ANY of the others proving what they say isnt accurate in some way?//

you wouldnt want to give the impression YOU'RE THE WANKER now would you/??????

I'm not the idiot who tried to pass phony propaganda as truth here. You did. I'm willing to accept legitimate sources but not when they're skewed to make a predictable outcome.

awww too bad, another wasted post where you could have rebutted any of the points made but failed to

Why would anyone rebut propaganda? Put something honest out there and we can talk otherwise you're wasting everyone's time.

 

[bedowin62]

go tell the FBI and obama only conspiricy theories are behind the email server investigation.

obama is the one trying to torpedo hillary in favor of biden.

you idiots pining for the 1st female president better hope biden doesnt enter the race

 

[bedowin62]

okay.......................


Poll: Trump beats Hillary head-to-head | TheHill
thehill.com/.../252825-poll-trump-beats-hillary-head-to-head

• Cached

The Hill
Loading...
Sep 4, 2015 - Republican presidential front-runner Donald Trump leads Democrat Hillary Clinton ... In other head-to-head matchups, Trump beats out Sen


Carly Fiorina tops Hillary Clinton in head-to-head matchup ...
www.washingtontimes.com/.../carly-fiorina-tops-...

• Cached

The Washington Times
Loading...
Sep 24, 2015 - Carly Fiorina tops Hillary Clinton in head-to-head matchup: poll .... NO republican could have beaten Boxer in the liberal mecca district she ...


Hillary Trails 8 GOP Hopefuls, with Dr. Ben Carson Running ...
www.rushlimbaugh.com › Archives (Aug 20, 2015)

• Cached

Rush Limbaugh
Loading...
Aug 20, 2015 - In a head-to-head matchup in this poll, Hillary is beaten by eight of them. Trump leads the GOP field with moderates, 29%. He's got 25% ...

What a crock of shit you put out there and expect anyone to believe it. The Trump poll is from Sept 4, six weeks ago and everyone know Trump has lost in polling since then and the Quinnipiac poll from Sept 24, used a margin of error of for Republicans of -3.6% and -4.0% for Democrats and then used 20% more Republicans questioned to skew results.

Rush Limbaugh? if you want to be taken seriously you should find sources that don't make you look like a complete wanker.

i got an idea loser left-wing "wanker"; instead of crying about Rush Limbaugh you post some facts on that source or ANY of the others proving what they say isnt accurate in some way?//

you wouldnt want to give the impression YOU'RE THE WANKER now would you/??????

I'm not the idiot who tried to pass phony propaganda as truth here. You did. I'm willing to accept legitimate sources but not when they're skewed to make a predictable outcome.

awww too bad, another wasted post where you could have rebutted any of the points made but failed to

Why would anyone rebut propaganda? Put something honest out there and we can talk otherwise you're wasting everyone's time.

you rebut to set the record straight
you wont rebut any of that because you cant, it's the truth

 

[bedowin62]

what's propaganda leftard? is hillary not trailing several republicans in head to head matchup polls????

 

[nuhuh]

What a crock of shit you put out there and expect anyone to believe it. The Trump poll is from Sept 4, six weeks ago and everyone know Trump has lost in polling since then and the Quinnipiac poll from Sept 24, used a margin of error of for Republicans of -3.6% and -4.0% for Democrats and then used 20% more Republicans questioned to skew results.

Rush Limbaugh? if you want to be taken seriously you should find sources that don't make you look like a complete wanker.

i got an idea loser left-wing "wanker"; instead of crying about Rush Limbaugh you post some facts on that source or ANY of the others proving what they say isnt accurate in some way?//

you wouldnt want to give the impression YOU'RE THE WANKER now would you/??????

I'm not the idiot who tried to pass phony propaganda as truth here. You did. I'm willing to accept legitimate sources but not when they're skewed to make a predictable outcome.

awww too bad, another wasted post where you could have rebutted any of the points made but failed to

Why would anyone rebut propaganda? Put something honest out there and we can talk otherwise you're wasting everyone's time.

you rebut to set the record straight
you wont rebut any of that because you cant, it's the truth

I already demonstrated how the numbers were skewed, A reasonable person would have looked for another post not sit at his computer and throw insults.

 

[Conservative65]

I see conservatard65 has derailed this thread into one about race. Surprised. I think I'll start referring to him as "Tank II"

BACK TO TOPIC:

Teapubs inability to field an electable Presidential candidate.

Discuss.....

Interesting that what you call a derailed thread began when JakeStarkey played the race card. I had mentioned nothing about race until he brought it up.

I doubt you'll address that but I do suspect you pucker up to his ass and kiss it.

I'll refer to you as Vaseline since your chapped lips need some. Pucker up.

That is a typical racialist response since he mentioned AA and race, then blames everyone else. The fact is that a successful GOP run is going to have to address minorities, including, women, to be successful.

Of course it will, and the current leading GOP candidates are doing very well with minorities and women (women are not a minority by the way).

Now, if you dems can find a way to allow illegals to vote, you may have a shot. You do know what the word 'illegal' means don't you?

I think they know what illegal means when it comes to those crossing the border. They try to justify how because the illegals come to find a better life how it's OK in that situation.

 

[Conservative65]

i got an idea loser left-wing "wanker"; instead of crying about Rush Limbaugh you post some facts on that source or ANY of the others proving what they say isnt accurate in some way?//

you wouldnt want to give the impression YOU'RE THE WANKER now would you/??????

I'm not the idiot who tried to pass phony propaganda as truth here. You did. I'm willing to accept legitimate sources but not when they're skewed to make a predictable outcome.

awww too bad, another wasted post where you could have rebutted any of the points made but failed to

Why would anyone rebut propaganda? Put something honest out there and we can talk otherwise you're wasting everyone's time.

you rebut to set the record straight
you wont rebut any of that because you cant, it's the truth

I already demonstrated how the numbers were skewed, A reasonable person would have looked for another post not sit at his computer and throw insults.

More like said it expecting people to accept it.

 

[nuhuh]

what's propaganda leftard? is hillary not trailing several republicans in head to head matchup polls????

You want to debate polling a year out from a presidential election? Do you even for a moment realize just how ridiculously silly that whole idea is? Why don't you sit down and think about this for a moment, I'm sure you'll get it if you try really hard.

 

[Conservative65]

I see conservatard65 has derailed this thread into one about race. Surprised. I think I'll start referring to him as "Tank II"

BACK TO TOPIC:

Teapubs inability to field an electable Presidential candidate.

Discuss.....

Interesting that what you call a derailed thread began when JakeStarkey played the race card. I had mentioned nothing about race until he brought it up.

I doubt you'll address that but I do suspect you pucker up to his ass and kiss it.

I'll refer to you as Vaseline since your chapped lips need some. Pucker up.

That is a typical racialist response since he mentioned AA and race, then blames everyone else. The fact is that a successful GOP run is going to have to address minorities, including, women, to be successful.

I've already addressed how you were the first to mention race. In fact, it included that very term.

For a Democrat to be successful they have to pander to minorities, fags, freaks, and the like. Key word being pander.

 

[bedowin62]

i got an idea loser left-wing "wanker"; instead of crying about Rush Limbaugh you post some facts on that source or ANY of the others proving what they say isnt accurate in some way?//

you wouldnt want to give the impression YOU'RE THE WANKER now would you/??????

I'm not the idiot who tried to pass phony propaganda as truth here. You did. I'm willing to accept legitimate sources but not when they're skewed to make a predictable outcome.

awww too bad, another wasted post where you could have rebutted any of the points made but failed to

Why would anyone rebut propaganda? Put something honest out there and we can talk otherwise you're wasting everyone's time.

you rebut to set the record straight
you wont rebut any of that because you cant, it's the truth

I already demonstrated how the numbers were skewed, A reasonable person would have looked for another post not sit at his computer and throw insults.

no you havent loser. stop lying to yourself and be a man for once

 

[Conservative65]

I see conservatard65 has derailed this thread into one about race. Surprised. I think I'll start referring to him as "Tank II"

BACK TO TOPIC:

Teapubs inability to field an electable Presidential candidate.

Discuss.....

Interesting that what you call a derailed thread began when JakeStarkey played the race card. I had mentioned nothing about race until he brought it up.

I doubt you'll address that but I do suspect you pucker up to his ass and kiss it.

I'll refer to you as Vaseline since your chapped lips need some. Pucker up.

Is that another way of saying that you'll post on-topic now?

Read the thread title son.

It's saying that you're the type that gives a pass to those you agree with. It's not my problem is you suck up to those you agree with. Admit it boy.

 

[bedowin62]

what's propaganda leftard? is hillary not trailing several republicans in head to head matchup polls????

You want to debate polling a year out from a presidential election? Do you even for a moment realize just how ridiculously silly that whole idea is? Why don't you sit down and think about this for a moment, I'm sure you'll get it if you try really hard.

good one idiot. remember what you said about polling a year out when talking about ANY presidential poll ok??

ur a joke

 

[nuhuh]

I'm not the idiot who tried to pass phony propaganda as truth here. You did. I'm willing to accept legitimate sources but not when they're skewed to make a predictable outcome.

awww too bad, another wasted post where you could have rebutted any of the points made but failed to

Why would anyone rebut propaganda? Put something honest out there and we can talk otherwise you're wasting everyone's time.

you rebut to set the record straight
you wont rebut any of that because you cant, it's the truth

I already demonstrated how the numbers were skewed, A reasonable person would have looked for another post not sit at his computer and throw insults.

no you havent loser. stop lying to yourself and be a man for once

Yes I did. Your silly poll was skewed to produce a predictable outcome. What makes it even sillier is that it is a poll that is supposed to show a positive result a year from an election. In any serious thinkers brain that's funny.