The NSA records every phone call and email, so where are Hillary's missing

[Bassman007]

What I said asswipe, is that Trump has NSA members that voted for him inside the NSA, this just fumes your ass because at least one of them outed what Obama and Hillary did to Wikileaks as they published vault 7.

LOL you may resume licking Obamas ass now.

Vault7 - Home

The first full part of the series, "Year Zero", comprises 8,761 documents and files from an isolated, high-security network situated inside the CIA's Center for Cyber Intelligence in Langley, Virgina. It follows an introductory disclosure last month of CIA targeting French political parties and candidates in the lead up to the 2012 presidential election.

Recently, the CIA lost control of the majority of its hacking arsenal including malware, viruses, trojans, weaponized "zero day" exploits, malware remote control systems and associated documentation. This extraordinary collection, which amounts to more than several hundred million lines of code, gives its possessor the entire hacking capacity of the CIA. The archive appears to have been circulated among former U.S. government hackers and contractors in an unauthorized manner, one of whom has provided WikiLeaks with portions of the archive.

"Year Zero" introduces the scope and direction of the CIA's global covert hacking program, its malware arsenal and dozens of "zero day" weaponized exploits against a wide range of U.S. and European company products, include Apple's iPhone, Google's Android and Microsoft's Windows and even Samsung TVs, which are turned into covert microphones.

Since 2001 the CIA has gained political and budgetary preeminence over the U.S. National Security Agency (NSA). The CIA found itself building not just its now infamous drone fleet, but a very different type of covert, globe-spanning force — its own substantial fleet of hackers. The agency's hacking division freed it from having to disclose its often controversial operations to the NSA (its primary bureaucratic rival) in order to draw on the NSA's hacking capacities.

By the end of 2016, the CIA's hacking division, which formally falls under the agency's Center for Cyber Intelligence (CCI), had over 5000 registered users and had produced more than a thousand hacking systems, trojans, viruses, and other "weaponized" malware. Such is the scale of the CIA's undertaking that by 2016, its hackers had utilized more code than that used to run Facebook. The CIA had created, in effect, its "own NSA" with even less accountability and without publicly answering the question as to whether such a massive budgetary spend on duplicating the capacities of a rival agency could be justified

Wow, you must be a special kind of stupid.....I voted for obummer the first time, but then saw who he was putting in his cabinet and I turned against him. Lick that pricks ass? Far from it dude. The CIA AND the NSA are out of control. They have been for decades. Anyone with a brain knows this. This is merely the tip of a very large iceberg.

Again doofus Trump has decent Americans working for the NSA who voted for him, they have access to literally everything. Obama can not detur them now from outing what the Obama and Hillary clowns did. The only reason that this can piss you off, is because I am right.

LOL vault 8 and 9 are coming and you can not stop them

WikiLeaks - Vault 7: Projects

And they are outnumbered by the obamabots. It's simple numbers. They do what they can, but they are limited. That's why i said it would be at least a year till trumps is in real control of the Agency, as much as ANY outsider ever can be.

Did you read vault 7 doofus? One good man, a Trump voter in the NSA can do a whole lot of good.

Vault7 - Home

Get a grip, if the NSA wants to fuck Trump, they have to kill every Trump voter there and this isn't going to happen

Wrong, they just have to get HIM. Which is what I fear they will attempt. And no, I have not read the vault 7 releases yet. I have other things to do and all they will do is reinforce that which I have KNOWN for decades.

Actually you have not known about hacking objects for decades, that have not been around that long yet.

 

[leftwinger]

The NSA has a Y-tap on every ISP line. They capture it all. Supposedly they don't dig into it w/o warrant. Correct? How long do they keep it? If you encode your data, they will decode if need be.

 

[westwall]

Wow, you must be a special kind of stupid.....I voted for obummer the first time, but then saw who he was putting in his cabinet and I turned against him. Lick that pricks ass? Far from it dude. The CIA AND the NSA are out of control. They have been for decades. Anyone with a brain knows this. This is merely the tip of a very large iceberg.

Again doofus Trump has decent Americans working for the NSA who voted for him, they have access to literally everything. Obama can not detur them now from outing what the Obama and Hillary clowns did. The only reason that this can piss you off, is because I am right.

LOL vault 8 and 9 are coming and you can not stop them

WikiLeaks - Vault 7: Projects

And they are outnumbered by the obamabots. It's simple numbers. They do what they can, but they are limited. That's why i said it would be at least a year till trumps is in real control of the Agency, as much as ANY outsider ever can be.

Did you read vault 7 doofus? One good man, a Trump voter in the NSA can do a whole lot of good.

Vault7 - Home

Get a grip, if the NSA wants to fuck Trump, they have to kill every Trump voter there and this isn't going to happen

Wrong, they just have to get HIM. Which is what I fear they will attempt. And no, I have not read the vault 7 releases yet. I have other things to do and all they will do is reinforce that which I have KNOWN for decades.

Actually you have not known about hacking objects for decades, that have not been around that long yet.

The NSA has been hacking communications for decades dude. I suggest you get yourself a copy of The Puzzle Palace by Bamford.

 

[Bassman007]

Again doofus Trump has decent Americans working for the NSA who voted for him, they have access to literally everything. Obama can not detur them now from outing what the Obama and Hillary clowns did. The only reason that this can piss you off, is because I am right.

LOL vault 8 and 9 are coming and you can not stop them

WikiLeaks - Vault 7: Projects

And they are outnumbered by the obamabots. It's simple numbers. They do what they can, but they are limited. That's why i said it would be at least a year till trumps is in real control of the Agency, as much as ANY outsider ever can be.

Did you read vault 7 doofus? One good man, a Trump voter in the NSA can do a whole lot of good.

Vault7 - Home

Get a grip, if the NSA wants to fuck Trump, they have to kill every Trump voter there and this isn't going to happen

Wrong, they just have to get HIM. Which is what I fear they will attempt. And no, I have not read the vault 7 releases yet. I have other things to do and all they will do is reinforce that which I have KNOWN for decades.

Actually you have not known about hacking objects for decades, that have not been around that long yet.

The NSA has been hacking communications for decades dude. I suggest you get yourself a copy of The Puzzle Palace by Bamford.

No one has been hacking smart TV's for decades that have not been around for that long.

Seriously how old are you 15? or are you 65 and senile?

 

[westwall]

And they are outnumbered by the obamabots. It's simple numbers. They do what they can, but they are limited. That's why i said it would be at least a year till trumps is in real control of the Agency, as much as ANY outsider ever can be.

Did you read vault 7 doofus? One good man, a Trump voter in the NSA can do a whole lot of good.

Vault7 - Home

Get a grip, if the NSA wants to fuck Trump, they have to kill every Trump voter there and this isn't going to happen

Wrong, they just have to get HIM. Which is what I fear they will attempt. And no, I have not read the vault 7 releases yet. I have other things to do and all they will do is reinforce that which I have KNOWN for decades.

Actually you have not known about hacking objects for decades, that have not been around that long yet.

The NSA has been hacking communications for decades dude. I suggest you get yourself a copy of The Puzzle Palace by Bamford.

No one has been hacking smart TV's for decades that have not been around for that long.

Seriously how old are you 15? or are you 65 and senile?

I'm old enough to know that when you resort to simple insults, and making statements that are not pertinent to the conversation that I am dealing with a 'tard. The NSA EVOLVES, unlike seemingly you. The NSA has been able to view the screens of computers (inside buildings mind you) from airborne platforms since at least the 1980's, when the first reports of them being able to do that filtered out.

The point I am trying to make to you is that so long as communications have been transmitted by wire, or radio frequency there has been somebody intercepting them. As communications have improved and advanced, so have the listeners. I was first using the internet waaaay the hell back in 1979, no doubt long before you were born, we were all amazed at the technology. Little did we know just how far, and how fast that technology would develop.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

They probably can't get much when she uses a private server. They're more into the mainstream American data collection.

It's not exactly rocket science to set up a decently secure Linux server with a dedicated hardware firewall.

It does require a bit of geekery, though.

Something tells me Hillary's wasn't that good.

Look moron, her private server was no more private than your computer is now. The term private server only means that it was not an official government computer authorized for secret data. My guess is that you are NSA trying to cover the fact that the NSA already has every one of these emails. Or you are just really dumb, which is what every NSA agent is trained to act like.

Next

Oh I forgot, spent yellowcake Uranium for dirty bomb

Hey dumdum, the cheeto still has at least TWO (that we know of) unsecured private servers, a bassackward Android his kudos could listen in on, and he can't keep his fat pie hole shut.

Sadly, Secy Clinton is not president. We don't actually have a president.

What we have is a huge leaking White House. The fatso that sits in the Oval Office very part time has no control over his own big mouth or those of his corrupt, crooked, pro-Pooting dynastic empire.


Sent from my iPad using USMessageBoard.com

 

[Manonthestreet]

Did you know there are at least 100,000 unreleased yet and they claim it will take until 2020 to do that.....Why isnt she in prison for lying her ass off?

 

[Bassman007]

They probably can't get much when she uses a private server. They're more into the mainstream American data collection.

It's not exactly rocket science to set up a decently secure Linux server with a dedicated hardware firewall.

It does require a bit of geekery, though.

Something tells me Hillary's wasn't that good.

Look moron, her private server was no more private than your computer is now. The term private server only means that it was not an official government computer authorized for secret data. My guess is that you are NSA trying to cover the fact that the NSA already has every one of these emails. Or you are just really dumb, which is what every NSA agent is trained to act like.

Next

Oh I forgot, spent yellowcake Uranium for dirty bomb

Hey dumdum, the cheeto still has at least TWO (that we know of) unsecured private servers, a bassackward Android his kudos could listen in on, and he can't keep his fat pie hole shut.

Sadly, Secy Clinton is not president. We don't actually have a president.

What we have is a huge leaking White House. The fatso that sits in the Oval Office very part time has no control over his own big mouth or those of his corrupt, crooked, pro-Pooting dynastic empire.


Sent from my iPad using USMessageBoard.com

Hey dumdum, Trump can have as many unsecured private servers as he wants, as long as he is not doing secured government business on them. Hillary didn't even use a government email, her private server was everything.

Now go bang someone with your strap on dildo

MM MM GOOD

 

[Bassman007]

Did you read vault 7 doofus? One good man, a Trump voter in the NSA can do a whole lot of good.

Vault7 - Home

Get a grip, if the NSA wants to fuck Trump, they have to kill every Trump voter there and this isn't going to happen

Wrong, they just have to get HIM. Which is what I fear they will attempt. And no, I have not read the vault 7 releases yet. I have other things to do and all they will do is reinforce that which I have KNOWN for decades.

Actually you have not known about hacking objects for decades, that have not been around that long yet.

The NSA has been hacking communications for decades dude. I suggest you get yourself a copy of The Puzzle Palace by Bamford.

No one has been hacking smart TV's for decades that have not been around for that long.

Seriously how old are you 15? or are you 65 and senile?

I'm old enough to know that when you resort to simple insults, and making statements that are not pertinent to the conversation that I am dealing with a 'tard. The NSA EVOLVES, unlike seemingly you. The NSA has been able to view the screens of computers (inside buildings mind you) from airborne platforms since at least the 1980's, when the first reports of them being able to do that filtered out.

The point I am trying to make to you is that so long as communications have been transmitted by wire, or radio frequency there has been somebody intercepting them. As communications have improved and advanced, so have the listeners. I was first using the internet waaaay the hell back in 1979, no doubt long before you were born, we were all amazed at the technology. Little did we know just how far, and how fast that technology would develop.

An internet without computers to connect to would be quite boring in 1979, much like you. Now can you guess my age, without my following the 1979 leader....................


Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

 

[westwall]

Wrong, they just have to get HIM. Which is what I fear they will attempt. And no, I have not read the vault 7 releases yet. I have other things to do and all they will do is reinforce that which I have KNOWN for decades.

Actually you have not known about hacking objects for decades, that have not been around that long yet.

The NSA has been hacking communications for decades dude. I suggest you get yourself a copy of The Puzzle Palace by Bamford.

No one has been hacking smart TV's for decades that have not been around for that long.

Seriously how old are you 15? or are you 65 and senile?

I'm old enough to know that when you resort to simple insults, and making statements that are not pertinent to the conversation that I am dealing with a 'tard. The NSA EVOLVES, unlike seemingly you. The NSA has been able to view the screens of computers (inside buildings mind you) from airborne platforms since at least the 1980's, when the first reports of them being able to do that filtered out.

The point I am trying to make to you is that so long as communications have been transmitted by wire, or radio frequency there has been somebody intercepting them. As communications have improved and advanced, so have the listeners. I was first using the internet waaaay the hell back in 1979, no doubt long before you were born, we were all amazed at the technology. Little did we know just how far, and how fast that technology would develop.

An internet without computers to connect to would be quite boring in 1979, much like you. Now can you guess my age, without my following the 1979 leader....................


Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

Well, I certainly know more than you do. Back then it was called ARPNET, and the computers we were using were massive things. Not like the ones today. That's for sure. But you have to have actually been doing things to actually know that sort of history. You must think that there were no personal computers until the first Apple was built. You would be wrong. They existed, they were just expensive.

 

[Bassman007]

Actually you have not known about hacking objects for decades, that have not been around that long yet.

The NSA has been hacking communications for decades dude. I suggest you get yourself a copy of The Puzzle Palace by Bamford.

No one has been hacking smart TV's for decades that have not been around for that long.

Seriously how old are you 15? or are you 65 and senile?

I'm old enough to know that when you resort to simple insults, and making statements that are not pertinent to the conversation that I am dealing with a 'tard. The NSA EVOLVES, unlike seemingly you. The NSA has been able to view the screens of computers (inside buildings mind you) from airborne platforms since at least the 1980's, when the first reports of them being able to do that filtered out.

The point I am trying to make to you is that so long as communications have been transmitted by wire, or radio frequency there has been somebody intercepting them. As communications have improved and advanced, so have the listeners. I was first using the internet waaaay the hell back in 1979, no doubt long before you were born, we were all amazed at the technology. Little did we know just how far, and how fast that technology would develop.

An internet without computers to connect to would be quite boring in 1979, much like you. Now can you guess my age, without my following the 1979 leader....................


Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

Well, I certainly know more than you do. Back then it was called ARPNET, and the computers we were using were massive things. Not like the ones today. That's for sure. But you have to have actually been doing things to actually know that sort of history. You must think that there were no personal computers until the first Apple was built. You would be wrong. They existed, they were just expensive.

Dude a fucking vacume tube contraption which is what you are babbling about had exactly ZERO practical applications, and software could not even be written for so called computers that did what two or three calculations per second. You are the lost one, saying that the ARPANET was the internet is like saying that a vacume tube that can turn on and off once a second is equal to a modern super computer that can do 33,860 TRILLION calculations per second.

Get out of the past and understand that the newest harddrive uses not a base two system, but a base 4 system, and DNA, as in biology.

 

[Bassman007]

Actually you have not known about hacking objects for decades, that have not been around that long yet.

The NSA has been hacking communications for decades dude. I suggest you get yourself a copy of The Puzzle Palace by Bamford.

No one has been hacking smart TV's for decades that have not been around for that long.

Seriously how old are you 15? or are you 65 and senile?

I'm old enough to know that when you resort to simple insults, and making statements that are not pertinent to the conversation that I am dealing with a 'tard. The NSA EVOLVES, unlike seemingly you. The NSA has been able to view the screens of computers (inside buildings mind you) from airborne platforms since at least the 1980's, when the first reports of them being able to do that filtered out.

The point I am trying to make to you is that so long as communications have been transmitted by wire, or radio frequency there has been somebody intercepting them. As communications have improved and advanced, so have the listeners. I was first using the internet waaaay the hell back in 1979, no doubt long before you were born, we were all amazed at the technology. Little did we know just how far, and how fast that technology would develop.

An internet without computers to connect to would be quite boring in 1979, much like you. Now can you guess my age, without my following the 1979 leader....................


Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

Well, I certainly know more than you do. Back then it was called ARPNET, and the computers we were using were massive things. Not like the ones today. That's for sure. But you have to have actually been doing things to actually know that sort of history. You must think that there were no personal computers until the first Apple was built. You would be wrong. They existed, they were just expensive.

You give up or did they destroy your computer to stop you from babbling?