The oath of office no longer applies to Republicans

[BWK]

so, if you really wish to go there, then name us the statute that allows a whistle blower to be anonymous? now you run along and find your barbie.

Not a counter argument to this. I knew you were a loser from the start. This failure pos wants to change the subject now. What a joke. That's it coward. Change the narrative.

Ahh Barbie baby, where’s that crime? Come on Tarzan yell it out you are so proud to know it tell us or dress your Barbie

Between Barbi, Ken, and Tarzan, this poster forgot he, she, it had a pussy and what the debate was about. Or just decided the distraction of being a pos quitter and loser was its best option.

A woman hater reveals through Barbie here. Wow Barbie you really stepped up. Now just post the crime you keep going on about

Barbie logic:

1. Trump is guilty of abuse of power
2. Abuse of power is when you break a law while in office
3. What law did Trump break?
4. Abuse of power.

Factbox: Abuse of power, obstruction - the charges against Trump explained

When you ignore proven violations of abuse of power, and obstruction of Congress, then go on Fox propaganda TV telling the world you are working hand and glove with the WH, you are violating your oath to the people of this country

There is no such law as "abuse of power" or "obstruction of Congress." Any "violations" are purely in your imagination. he hasn't violated any oath he took.

Abuse of power - Wikipedia Sure there is. Doesn't mean it is prosecuted in the same way. Abuse of power or abuse of authority, in the form of "malfeasance in office" or "official misconduct", is the commission of an unlawful act, done in an official capacity, which affects the performance of official duties. Malfeasance in office is often grounds for a for causeremoval of an elected official by statute or recall election.

What "unlawful act?"

I just posted it. The abuse of power was the factual based evidence of using a foreign power to collude and get political dirt on Trump's opponent in exchange for military aid Trump had no legal right to leverage with. It was already proven with zero defense from the Right.

Nope, you posted something that says breaking laws while in office is "an abuse of power." Name the laws that Trump broke. You can't say "abuse of power." You're in an infinite loop.

Factbox: Abuse of power, obstruction - the charges against Trump explained

Abuse of power is not specifically referred to as an impeachable offense in the U.S. Constitution, which states that a president can be removed from office for “Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.”

But the founders of the United States intended the phrase” other high Crimes and Misdemeanors” to broadly encompass abuses of power, legal scholars said.

You are not intellectually prepared to debate, because you aren't capable of manufacturing a coherent argument that makes sense.

 

[jc456]

so, if you really wish to go there, then name us the statute that allows a whistle blower to be anonymous? now you run along and find your barbie.

Not a counter argument to this. I knew you were a loser from the start. This failure pos wants to change the subject now. What a joke. That's it coward. Change the narrative.

Ahh Barbie baby, where’s that crime? Come on Tarzan yell it out you are so proud to know it tell us or dress your Barbie

Between Barbi, Ken, and Tarzan, this poster forgot he, she, it had a pussy and what the debate was about. Or just decided the distraction of being a pos quitter and loser was its best option.

A woman hater reveals through Barbie here. Wow Barbie you really stepped up. Now just post the crime you keep going on about

Barbie logic:

1. Trump is guilty of abuse of power
2. Abuse of power is when you break a law while in office
3. What law did Trump break?
4. Abuse of power.

 

[bripat9643]

Not a counter argument to this. I knew you were a loser from the start. This failure pos wants to change the subject now. What a joke. That's it coward. Change the narrative.

Ahh Barbie baby, where’s that crime? Come on Tarzan yell it out you are so proud to know it tell us or dress your Barbie

Between Barbi, Ken, and Tarzan, this poster forgot he, she, it had a pussy and what the debate was about. Or just decided the distraction of being a pos quitter and loser was its best option.

A woman hater reveals through Barbie here. Wow Barbie you really stepped up. Now just post the crime you keep going on about

Barbie logic:

1. Trump is guilty of abuse of power
2. Abuse of power is when you break a law while in office
3. What law did Trump break?
4. Abuse of power.

Factbox: Abuse of power, obstruction - the charges against Trump explained

There is no such law as "abuse of power" or "obstruction of Congress." Any "violations" are purely in your imagination. he hasn't violated any oath he took.

Abuse of power - Wikipedia Sure there is. Doesn't mean it is prosecuted in the same way. Abuse of power or abuse of authority, in the form of "malfeasance in office" or "official misconduct", is the commission of an unlawful act, done in an official capacity, which affects the performance of official duties. Malfeasance in office is often grounds for a for causeremoval of an elected official by statute or recall election.

What "unlawful act?"

I just posted it. The abuse of power was the factual based evidence of using a foreign power to collude and get political dirt on Trump's opponent in exchange for military aid Trump had no legal right to leverage with. It was already proven with zero defense from the Right.

Nope, you posted something that says breaking laws while in office is "an abuse of power." Name the laws that Trump broke. You can't say "abuse of power." You're in an infinite loop.

Factbox: Abuse of power, obstruction - the charges against Trump explained

Abuse of power is not specifically referred to as an impeachable offense in the U.S. Constitution, which states that a president can be removed from office for “Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.”

But the founders of the United States intended the phrase” other high Crimes and Misdemeanors” to broadly encompass abuses of power, legal scholars said.

You are not intellectually prepared to debate, because you aren't capable of manufacturing a coherent argument that makes sense.

You still haven't listed a law the Trump broke. "Abuse of power" is not a law.

 

[BWK]

That's a good boy, BWK.

George Soros is smiling.

That's your counter argument? Now this folks is a grade "A" loser for sure.

I'm sorry your IQ is so low.

Luck of the draw, I guess.

Substituting retardism is not a replacement tool for debate. Try again.

 

[jc456]

That's a good boy, BWK.

George Soros is smiling.

That's your counter argument? Now this folks is a grade "A" loser for sure.

I'm sorry your IQ is so low.

Luck of the draw, I guess.

Substituting retardism is not a replacement tool for debate. Try again.

Stop using it then

 

[bripat9643]

That's a good boy, BWK.

George Soros is smiling.

That's your counter argument? Now this folks is a grade "A" loser for sure.

I'm sorry your IQ is so low.

Luck of the draw, I guess.

Substituting retardism is not a replacement tool for debate. Try again.

You still haven't figured out what's wrong with your syllogism, have you?

 

[miketx]

Both parties shit on their oath every day.
Dont be a dumbfuck and pretend otherwise

Negative! Link your proof they do it every day.

Regressive ROE


1. Demand a link or an explanation of the truth they are objecting to.

2. Promptly reject all explanations as right wing lies. Smoke spin deflect

3. Ignore any facts presented.

4. Ridicule spelling and typos, punctuation.

5. Attack the person as being juvenile, ie: "are you 12 years old", question their education, intelligence, Age

6. Employ misdirection,

6a. smear people

6b. attack religion

6c. attack your rationality.

7. Lie, make false assumptions

8. Play race/gender card/misogynist card

9. Play gay/lesbian card

10. Play the Nazi/Fascist/bigot card

11. Make up stuff/So you got nothing?

12. Deny constantly

13. Reword and repeat

14. Pretending not to understand, playing ignorant/what did I lie about

15. When losing, resort to personal attacks.

16. Russia

17. Fox News/Alex Jones/Brietbart/infowars/Stormfront/Gateway/hannity

18. You can’t read.

19. Trump Trump Trump TrumpTrump Trump

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

There is no such law as "abuse of power" or "obstruction of Congress." Any "violations" are purely in your imagination. he hasn't violated any oath he took.

Abuse of power - Wikipedia Sure there is. Doesn't mean it is prosecuted in the same way. Abuse of power or abuse of authority, in the form of "malfeasance in office" or "official misconduct", is the commission of an unlawful act, done in an official capacity, which affects the performance of official duties. Malfeasance in office is often grounds for a for causeremoval of an elected official by statute or recall election.

What "unlawful act?"

I just posted it. The abuse of power was the factual based evidence of using a foreign power to collude and get political dirt on Trump's opponent in exchange for military aid Trump had no legal right to leverage with. It was already proven with zero defense from the Right.

Nope, you posted something that says breaking laws while in office is "an abuse of power." Name the laws that Trump broke. You can't say "abuse of power." You're in an infinite loop.

You can't debate anything. Remember, you're a pos quitter with a pussy. Why would you pretend to want to know? Factbox: Abuse of power, obstruction - the charges against Trump explained

Don't even read your own links, do ya? From the article:

Abuse of power is not specifically referred to as an impeachable offense in the U.S. Constitution, which states that a president can be removed from office for “Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.”

 

[BWK]

Ahh Barbie baby, where’s that crime? Come on Tarzan yell it out you are so proud to know it tell us or dress your Barbie

Between Barbi, Ken, and Tarzan, this poster forgot he, she, it had a pussy and what the debate was about. Or just decided the distraction of being a pos quitter and loser was its best option.

A woman hater reveals through Barbie here. Wow Barbie you really stepped up. Now just post the crime you keep going on about

Barbie logic:

1. Trump is guilty of abuse of power
2. Abuse of power is when you break a law while in office
3. What law did Trump break?
4. Abuse of power.

Factbox: Abuse of power, obstruction - the charges against Trump explained

Abuse of power - Wikipedia Sure there is. Doesn't mean it is prosecuted in the same way. Abuse of power or abuse of authority, in the form of "malfeasance in office" or "official misconduct", is the commission of an unlawful act, done in an official capacity, which affects the performance of official duties. Malfeasance in office is often grounds for a for causeremoval of an elected official by statute or recall election.

What "unlawful act?"

I just posted it. The abuse of power was the factual based evidence of using a foreign power to collude and get political dirt on Trump's opponent in exchange for military aid Trump had no legal right to leverage with. It was already proven with zero defense from the Right.

Nope, you posted something that says breaking laws while in office is "an abuse of power." Name the laws that Trump broke. You can't say "abuse of power." You're in an infinite loop.

Factbox: Abuse of power, obstruction - the charges against Trump explained

Abuse of power is not specifically referred to as an impeachable offense in the U.S. Constitution, which states that a president can be removed from office for “Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.”

But the founders of the United States intended the phrase” other high Crimes and Misdemeanors” to broadly encompass abuses of power, legal scholars said.

You are not intellectually prepared to debate, because you aren't capable of manufacturing a coherent argument that makes sense.

You still haven't listed a law the Trump broke. "Abuse of power" is not a law.

Sure it is. I already presented it to you through Wikipedia. I can't force you to be intelligent enough to interpret basic words when you can't understand them.

Abuse of power or abuse of authority, in the form of "malfeasance in office" or "official misconduct", is the commission of an unlawful act, done in an official capacity, which affects the performance of official duties. Malfeasance in office is often grounds for a for causeremoval of an elected official by statute or recall election.

Abuse of power is an unlawful act. Trump has been officially charged with that unlawful act. It's all that is needed to impeach. Which is exactly what the Dems did. Even most middle school kids understand that. Any other excuse by you just isn't worth shit for a counter argument.

 

[The Original Tree]

How is anyone going to know what a trial is by looking at The Clown show Adolph Schiffler and Nazi
Nadler ran?

And speaking of trials, aren’t you supposed to have an actual crime to hold one of those?

McConnell swear to impartiality

When did we elect politicians to be impartial? The entire point in electing politicians is that we don't want them to be impartial. We want them to take our side every time.

You do know what a trial is, don't you?

[/QUOTE]
English Stumpy, we speak English here.[/QUOTE]

How oils anyone know what a trial is by looking at The Clown show Adolph Schiffler and Mazi
Nadler ran?

And speaking of trials, aren’t you supposed to have an actual crime to hold one of those.

McConnell swear to impartiality

When did we elect politicians to be impartial? The entire point in electing politicians is that we don't want them to be impartial. We want them to take our side every time.

You do know what a trial is, don't you?

English Stumpy, we speak English here.

 

[BWK]

Abuse of power - Wikipedia Sure there is. Doesn't mean it is prosecuted in the same way. Abuse of power or abuse of authority, in the form of "malfeasance in office" or "official misconduct", is the commission of an unlawful act, done in an official capacity, which affects the performance of official duties. Malfeasance in office is often grounds for a for causeremoval of an elected official by statute or recall election.

What "unlawful act?"

I just posted it. The abuse of power was the factual based evidence of using a foreign power to collude and get political dirt on Trump's opponent in exchange for military aid Trump had no legal right to leverage with. It was already proven with zero defense from the Right.

Nope, you posted something that says breaking laws while in office is "an abuse of power." Name the laws that Trump broke. You can't say "abuse of power." You're in an infinite loop.

You can't debate anything. Remember, you're a pos quitter with a pussy. Why would you pretend to want to know? Factbox: Abuse of power, obstruction - the charges against Trump explained

Don't even read your own links, do ya? From the article:

Abuse of power is not specifically referred to as an impeachable offense in the U.S. Constitution, which states that a president can be removed from office for “Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.”

Ha flaming idiot, did you read the next sentence? You folks are so fucking dumb.
Abuse of power is not specifically referred to as an impeachable offense in the U.S. Constitution, which states that a president can be removed from office for “Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.”

But the founders of the United States intended the phrase” other high Crimes and Misdemeanors” to broadly encompass abuses of power, legal scholars said.

 

[bripat9643]

Between Barbi, Ken, and Tarzan, this poster forgot he, she, it had a pussy and what the debate was about. Or just decided the distraction of being a pos quitter and loser was its best option.

A woman hater reveals through Barbie here. Wow Barbie you really stepped up. Now just post the crime you keep going on about

Barbie logic:

1. Trump is guilty of abuse of power
2. Abuse of power is when you break a law while in office
3. What law did Trump break?
4. Abuse of power.

Factbox: Abuse of power, obstruction - the charges against Trump explained

What "unlawful act?"

I just posted it. The abuse of power was the factual based evidence of using a foreign power to collude and get political dirt on Trump's opponent in exchange for military aid Trump had no legal right to leverage with. It was already proven with zero defense from the Right.

Nope, you posted something that says breaking laws while in office is "an abuse of power." Name the laws that Trump broke. You can't say "abuse of power." You're in an infinite loop.

Factbox: Abuse of power, obstruction - the charges against Trump explained

Abuse of power is not specifically referred to as an impeachable offense in the U.S. Constitution, which states that a president can be removed from office for “Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.”

But the founders of the United States intended the phrase” other high Crimes and Misdemeanors” to broadly encompass abuses of power, legal scholars said.

You are not intellectually prepared to debate, because you aren't capable of manufacturing a coherent argument that makes sense.

You still haven't listed a law the Trump broke. "Abuse of power" is not a law.

Sure it is. I already presented it to you through Wikipedia. I can't force you to be intelligent enough to interpret basic words when you can't understand them.

Abuse of power or abuse of authority, in the form of "malfeasance in office" or "official misconduct", is the commission of an unlawful act, done in an official capacity, which affects the performance of official duties. Malfeasance in office is often grounds for a for causeremoval of an elected official by statute or recall election.

Abuse of power is an unlawful act. Trump has been officially charged with that unlawful act. It's all that is needed to impeach. Which is exactly what the Dems did. Even most middle school kids understand that. Any other excuse by you just isn't worth shit for a counter argument.

I've already explained to you that "abuse of power" is not a law.

Barbie logic:

1. Trump is guilty of abuse of power
2. Abuse of power is when you break a law while in office
3. What law did Trump break?
4. Go back to 1.
   
   

 

[BWK]

How is anyone going to know what a trial is by looking at The Clown show Adolph Schiffler and Nazi
Nadler ran?

And speaking of trials, aren’t you supposed to have an actual crime to hold one of those?

McConnell swear to impartiality

When did we elect politicians to be impartial? The entire point in electing politicians is that we don't want them to be impartial. We want them to take our side every time.

You do know what a trial is, don't you?

English Stumpy, we speak English here.[/QUOTE]

How oils anyone know what a trial is by looking at The Clown show Adolph Schiffler and Mazi
Nadler ran?

And speaking of trials, aren’t you supposed to have an actual crime to hold one of those.

McConnell swear to impartiality

When did we elect politicians to be impartial? The entire point in electing politicians is that we don't want them to be impartial. We want them to take our side every time.

You do know what a trial is, don't you?

English Stumpy, we speak English here.

[/QUOTE]
You showed up to present useless arguments. Get lost.

 

[BWK]

A woman hater reveals through Barbie here. Wow Barbie you really stepped up. Now just post the crime you keep going on about

Barbie logic:

1. Trump is guilty of abuse of power
2. Abuse of power is when you break a law while in office
3. What law did Trump break?
4. Abuse of power.

Factbox: Abuse of power, obstruction - the charges against Trump explained

I just posted it. The abuse of power was the factual based evidence of using a foreign power to collude and get political dirt on Trump's opponent in exchange for military aid Trump had no legal right to leverage with. It was already proven with zero defense from the Right.

Nope, you posted something that says breaking laws while in office is "an abuse of power." Name the laws that Trump broke. You can't say "abuse of power." You're in an infinite loop.

Factbox: Abuse of power, obstruction - the charges against Trump explained

Abuse of power is not specifically referred to as an impeachable offense in the U.S. Constitution, which states that a president can be removed from office for “Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.”

But the founders of the United States intended the phrase” other high Crimes and Misdemeanors” to broadly encompass abuses of power, legal scholars said.

You are not intellectually prepared to debate, because you aren't capable of manufacturing a coherent argument that makes sense.

You still haven't listed a law the Trump broke. "Abuse of power" is not a law.

Sure it is. I already presented it to you through Wikipedia. I can't force you to be intelligent enough to interpret basic words when you can't understand them.

Abuse of power or abuse of authority, in the form of "malfeasance in office" or "official misconduct", is the commission of an unlawful act, done in an official capacity, which affects the performance of official duties. Malfeasance in office is often grounds for a for causeremoval of an elected official by statute or recall election.

Abuse of power is an unlawful act. Trump has been officially charged with that unlawful act. It's all that is needed to impeach. Which is exactly what the Dems did. Even most middle school kids understand that. Any other excuse by you just isn't worth shit for a counter argument.

I've already explained to you that "abuse of power" is not a law.

Barbie logic:

1. Trump is guilty of abuse of power
2. Abuse of power is when you break a law while in office
3. What law did Trump break?
4. Go back to 1.
   

I DON'T CARE WHAT YOU EXPLAINED. Wikipedia tells me everything I need to know. And who are you? Nobody! Get it now?

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

What "unlawful act?"

I just posted it. The abuse of power was the factual based evidence of using a foreign power to collude and get political dirt on Trump's opponent in exchange for military aid Trump had no legal right to leverage with. It was already proven with zero defense from the Right.

Nope, you posted something that says breaking laws while in office is "an abuse of power." Name the laws that Trump broke. You can't say "abuse of power." You're in an infinite loop.

You can't debate anything. Remember, you're a pos quitter with a pussy. Why would you pretend to want to know? Factbox: Abuse of power, obstruction - the charges against Trump explained

Don't even read your own links, do ya? From the article:

Abuse of power is not specifically referred to as an impeachable offense in the U.S. Constitution, which states that a president can be removed from office for “Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.”

Ha flaming idiot, did you read the next sentence? You folks are so fucking dumb.
Abuse of power is not specifically referred to as an impeachable offense in the U.S. Constitution, which states that a president can be removed from office for “Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.”

But the founders of the United States intended the phrase” other high Crimes and Misdemeanors” to broadly encompass abuses of power, legal scholars said.

Yeah, I read that, leftist commie legal scholars. And it said "to broadly" meaning it can apply to anybody at any time. So when the next commie President is in the White House under Republican House leadership, we are going to do the exact same; use that weak generalization of high crimes.

 

[bripat9643]

Barbie logic:

1. Trump is guilty of abuse of power
2. Abuse of power is when you break a law while in office
3. What law did Trump break?
4. Abuse of power.

Factbox: Abuse of power, obstruction - the charges against Trump explained

Nope, you posted something that says breaking laws while in office is "an abuse of power." Name the laws that Trump broke. You can't say "abuse of power." You're in an infinite loop.

Factbox: Abuse of power, obstruction - the charges against Trump explained

Abuse of power is not specifically referred to as an impeachable offense in the U.S. Constitution, which states that a president can be removed from office for “Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.”

But the founders of the United States intended the phrase” other high Crimes and Misdemeanors” to broadly encompass abuses of power, legal scholars said.

You are not intellectually prepared to debate, because you aren't capable of manufacturing a coherent argument that makes sense.

You still haven't listed a law the Trump broke. "Abuse of power" is not a law.

Sure it is. I already presented it to you through Wikipedia. I can't force you to be intelligent enough to interpret basic words when you can't understand them.

Abuse of power or abuse of authority, in the form of "malfeasance in office" or "official misconduct", is the commission of an unlawful act, done in an official capacity, which affects the performance of official duties. Malfeasance in office is often grounds for a for causeremoval of an elected official by statute or recall election.

Abuse of power is an unlawful act. Trump has been officially charged with that unlawful act. It's all that is needed to impeach. Which is exactly what the Dems did. Even most middle school kids understand that. Any other excuse by you just isn't worth shit for a counter argument.

I've already explained to you that "abuse of power" is not a law.

Barbie logic:

1. Trump is guilty of abuse of power
2. Abuse of power is when you break a law while in office
3. What law did Trump break?
4. Go back to 1.

I DON'T CARE WHAT YOU EXPLAINED. Wikipedia tells me everything I need to know. And who are you? Nobody! Get it now?

"Wikipedia tells me everything I need to know."

That explains more than you know.

 

[The Original Tree]

Malfeasance of Office was specifically addressed by the Forefathers as something Impeachment was never meant to address.

Disagreements over policy is not a reason to impeach.

 

[bripat9643]

I just posted it. The abuse of power was the factual based evidence of using a foreign power to collude and get political dirt on Trump's opponent in exchange for military aid Trump had no legal right to leverage with. It was already proven with zero defense from the Right.

Nope, you posted something that says breaking laws while in office is "an abuse of power." Name the laws that Trump broke. You can't say "abuse of power." You're in an infinite loop.

You can't debate anything. Remember, you're a pos quitter with a pussy. Why would you pretend to want to know? Factbox: Abuse of power, obstruction - the charges against Trump explained

Don't even read your own links, do ya? From the article:

Abuse of power is not specifically referred to as an impeachable offense in the U.S. Constitution, which states that a president can be removed from office for “Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.”

Ha flaming idiot, did you read the next sentence? You folks are so fucking dumb.
Abuse of power is not specifically referred to as an impeachable offense in the U.S. Constitution, which states that a president can be removed from office for “Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.”

But the founders of the United States intended the phrase” other high Crimes and Misdemeanors” to broadly encompass abuses of power, legal scholars said.

Yeah, I read that, leftist commie legal scholars. And it said "to broadly" meaning it can apply to anybody at any time. So when the next commie President is in the White House under Republican House leadership, we are going to do the exact same; use that weak generalization of high crimes.

tax increase?

Abuse of power.

 

[Norman]

A woman hater reveals through Barbie here. Wow Barbie you really stepped up. Now just post the crime you keep going on about

Barbie logic:

1. Trump is guilty of abuse of power
2. Abuse of power is when you break a law while in office
3. What law did Trump break?
4. Abuse of power.

Factbox: Abuse of power, obstruction - the charges against Trump explained

I just posted it. The abuse of power was the factual based evidence of using a foreign power to collude and get political dirt on Trump's opponent in exchange for military aid Trump had no legal right to leverage with. It was already proven with zero defense from the Right.

Nope, you posted something that says breaking laws while in office is "an abuse of power." Name the laws that Trump broke. You can't say "abuse of power." You're in an infinite loop.

Factbox: Abuse of power, obstruction - the charges against Trump explained

Abuse of power is not specifically referred to as an impeachable offense in the U.S. Constitution, which states that a president can be removed from office for “Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.”

But the founders of the United States intended the phrase” other high Crimes and Misdemeanors” to broadly encompass abuses of power, legal scholars said.

You are not intellectually prepared to debate, because you aren't capable of manufacturing a coherent argument that makes sense.

You still haven't listed a law the Trump broke. "Abuse of power" is not a law.

Sure it is. I already presented it to you through Wikipedia. I can't force you to be intelligent enough to interpret basic words when you can't understand them.

Abuse of power or abuse of authority, in the form of "malfeasance in office" or "official misconduct", is the commission of an unlawful act, done in an official capacity, which affects the performance of official duties. Malfeasance in office is often grounds for a for causeremoval of an elected official by statute or recall election.

Abuse of power is an unlawful act. Trump has been officially charged with that unlawful act. It's all that is needed to impeach. Which is exactly what the Dems did. Even most middle school kids understand that. Any other excuse by you just isn't worth shit for a counter argument.

I've already explained to you that "abuse of power" is not a law.

Barbie logic:

1. Trump is guilty of abuse of power
2. Abuse of power is when you break a law while in office
3. What law did Trump break?
4. Go back to 1.
   

They are experts of circular logic.

But in the end it all boils down to Orange Man Bad.

 

[The Original Tree]

How is anyone to know what a trial is by looking at The Clown show Adolph Schiffler and Nazi Nadler ran?

And speaking of trials, aren’t you supposed to have an actual crime to hold one of those?