Yurt
Gold Member
You were certainly referring to it. It does matter if GZ started it, damn right, it does. TM had the right to defend himself, and he had no obligation to retreat, and if GZ had a gun, TM had the right to beat him into the ground. GZ could only shoot TM if he thought his life was in danger. It was not.
And learn "English" and "countersuit" and "courts-martial" and "sergeants-major" for plural.
If Martin was reaching for Zimmerman's gun, then there's reason to believe it was.
Only if, and this has not been proven, that GZ did not provoke an incident or attack. If he did not and TM reached for the, gun, then, yes, GZ was justified in shooting.
absolutely wrong. zimmerman can provoke an incident and still claim self defense.
how many times do i have to say this?