Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Otay, sail foam kawl ova.
Wud I's be missin'?
Du no. I cantz unnastan deez creepy azz crackahs
It is a jury of his peers, not Trayvon's peers.The judge usually restrains both parties from seeing each other, but Zimmerman was the only one arrested and she was listed as the victim. Zimmerman was accused of hitting her for chewing gum and kicking her dog.
Was he convicted? Got some news for you. He won't be this time either.
You might be right, the jury is almost all white and the prosecution is doing a horrible job with the overwhelming evidence against Zimmerman.
Can you please give me links to the evidence?
Thank you!
Trayvon Martin / George Zimmerman Case Witnesses | AxiomAmnesia.com Presents They Always Get Away: Trayvon Martin/George Zimmerman Documents, Photos, Videos, Audio, and Articles
You need to stipulate "a reliable unbiased source...not a blog"...when dealing with Truthseeker.
Rule 41.
Was he convicted? Got some news for you. He won't be this time either.
You might be right, the jury is almost all white and the prosecution is doing a horrible job with the overwhelming evidence against Zimmerman.
Can you please give me links to the evidence?
Thank you!
That is what they keep arguing - that Zimmerman's injuries weren't severe enough to justify deadly force....
It's easy for someone to want it that way when they weren't the one having their head slammed into the concrete and weren't the one that had their nose broken.
IOU + rep when I can.
How was Trayvon supposed to know the guy in the black and red jacket with the dome cut was just observing? Would you want some guy following you to observe you walking to your house like that? Some guy that is ignoring your requests to stop following? How do we know Zimmerman did not make the first punch or grab Trayvon's phone?
You just keep making this stuff up as you go along.
I see so no one can speak up for the dead teen, cause you think he's a worthless "thug" right?
The judge usually restrains both parties from seeing each other, but Zimmerman was the only one arrested and she was listed as the victim. Zimmerman was accused of hitting her for chewing gum and kicking her dog.
Who testified to that? I didn't hear that testimony.
The police report is in evidence, there has been no witness testimony yet.
The judge usually restrains both parties from seeing each other, but Zimmerman was the only one arrested and she was listed as the victim. Zimmerman was accused of hitting her for chewing gum and kicking her dog.
Who testified to that? I didn't hear that testimony.
The police report is in evidence, there has been no witness testimony yet.
Good point.. the all female jury does sort of meet up with the requirement to find Zimmerman's peers.It is a jury of his peers, not Trayvon's peers.Was he convicted? Got some news for you. He won't be this time either.
You might be right, the jury is almost all white and the prosecution is doing a horrible job with the overwhelming evidence against Zimmerman.
It's easy for someone to want it that way when they weren't the one having their head slammed into the concrete and weren't the one that had their nose broken.
IOU + rep when I can.
See agree with her, she provides a reach around. Disagree with her and she brings down her "rep" authority down on your ass. ROFL I bet she'd love it if negs sent electric shocks through the interweb
One normally is expected to speculate based on facts, not preferred outcome.You assume it want over my head. My point is one that is typically not understood by authoritarians. Not to turn this to a political point. But you appear to believe a right to kill in self defense is the same as justification for taking a life in self defense. Authority to perform an act is not the same as justification for taking the act. If Trayvon had been packing and Zimmerman was not Trayvon could have led with his chin fallen to the concrete cried like a baby for 8sec when he knew someone was watching then shot and killed Zimmerman. Would he have been justified because it was self defense? Because he was able to intimidate Zimmerman into throwing punches? Or is self defense only for those in authority positions? What if Zimmerman was a bad cop and was beating on TM would you be defending the teen if he killed a cop in self defense?
Authority AND justification are what the law says they are. And the law says you are justified in killing a person who puts you in reasonable fear of death or serious bodily injury. You are not good at playing semantics. You shouldn't not even try. You look sillier with every one of your biased, racist, made up facts posts.
Where did I provide a made up fact? I thought you went to school. Can you really not discern the difference between speculation and fact? FYI if I provide a fact, given that I am not a witness, you'll see me make a citation. Citations are typically done with quotes, or colons followed by a paragraph and a reference. A speculative sentence with a question mark on the end is not a fact.. it's speculation for discussion.
You just keep making this stuff up as you go along.
I see so no one can speak up for the dead teen, cause you think he's a worthless "thug" right?
We do not speak up for the dead teen because he caused a person to have reasonable fear of death of serious bodily injury. The fact that he was also a thug changes nothing.
Good point.. the all female jury does sort of meet up with the requirement to find Zimmerman's peers.It is a jury of his peers, not Trayvon's peers.You might be right, the jury is almost all white and the prosecution is doing a horrible job with the overwhelming evidence against Zimmerman.
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.[note 1][1]
One normally is expected to speculate based on facts, not preferred outcome.Authority AND justification are what the law says they are. And the law says you are justified in killing a person who puts you in reasonable fear of death or serious bodily injury. You are not good at playing semantics. You shouldn't not even try. You look sillier with every one of your biased, racist, made up facts posts.
Where did I provide a made up fact? I thought you went to school. Can you really not discern the difference between speculation and fact? FYI if I provide a fact, given that I am not a witness, you'll see me make a citation. Citations are typically done with quotes, or colons followed by a paragraph and a reference. A speculative sentence with a question mark on the end is not a fact.. it's speculation for discussion.
It's easy for someone to want it that way when they weren't the one having their head slammed into the concrete and weren't the one that had their nose broken.
IOU + rep when I can.
See agree with her, she provides a reach around. Disagree with her and she brings down her "rep" authority down on your ass. ROFL I bet she'd love it if negs sent electric shocks through the interweb
Good point.. the all female jury does sort of meet up with the requirement to find Zimmerman's peers.It is a jury of his peers, not Trayvon's peers.You might be right, the jury is almost all white and the prosecution is doing a horrible job with the overwhelming evidence against Zimmerman.
Point taken.
You get in touch with Cory yet and set her straight on that stalking deal?
