R
rdean
Guest
Will he?
Why? Why not?
He won't. He's been caught in more lies than a Republican congressman.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Will he?
Why? Why not?
Scharazade Ali. That is her name. Before i changed the channel, the question was asked if riots would erupt due to the verdict..if the verdict is not quilty. Mz Footstool On Her Head rolled her eyes, did the snake head dance and then said the rodney king riots were tempter tantrums but whitey calls them riots. (She didn't exactly say whitey, but it was damn close).
Everyone else on the panel..including blacks....were aghast at her attitude. SHE is what is wrong with the race problem.She and alll that think just as she does. She WANTS blacks to have a "temper tantrum". She showed that plain and simple.
The media is riot jonesing.
OK.Here's what's interesting about today's Defense Witness, Chris Zerino...
He implied that a witness that sticks too much to their story may be lying.
He said that he didn't think that Zimmerman's injuries were as serious as he indicated them to be.
WoW!!!
Few things. There doesn't have to be any injuries for there to be a legal claim of self defense. Walking or running or even following are not felonies in Florida, so unless you have evidence that GZ threw the first punch, TM can not be legally justified in defending himself. To the point that the aggressor can still claim self defense 2a or 2b:
Florida Statutes (Fla. Stat.)
Title XLVI. Crimes.
Chapter 776: JUSTIFIABLE USE OF FORCE
776.041 Use of force by aggressor.
The justification described in the preceding sections of this chapter is not available to a person who:
(1) Is attempting to commit, committing, or escaping after the commission of, a forcible felony; or
(2) Initially provokes the use of force against himself or herself, unless:
(a) Such force is so great that the person reasonably believes that he or she is in imminent danger of death or great bodily harm and that he or she has exhausted every reasonable means to escape such danger other than the use of force which is likely to cause death or great bodily harm to the assailant; or
(b) In good faith, the person withdraws from physical contact with the assailant and indicates clearly to the assailant that he or she desires to withdraw and terminate the use of force, but the assailant continues or resumes the use of force.
Got to take the good with the bad bro.
Marc please respond.
I can't hear you, as you're not addressing the facts of the case.MarcAtl,
Why are you racist against whites? Please let your bigotry rest for a moment to consider the evidence.
Let's stop right there...OK, but how else could it be if not that in the case of, gunman Zimmerman vs. unarmed Trayvon?never said what you claim
when you want an honest discussion, get back to me
there are a few scenarios and you are hearing about them from the prosecution's witnesses. zimmerman started it, martin got the best of him and in the heat of the fight he went too far and zimmerman reasonably feared for his life.....zimmerman didn't start it....etc
OK.Few things. There doesn't have to be any injuries for there to be a legal claim of self defense. Walking or running or even following are not felonies in Florida, so unless you have evidence that GZ threw the first punch, TM can not be legally justified in defending himself. To the point that the aggressor can still claim self defense 2a or 2b:
Florida Statutes (Fla. Stat.)
Title XLVI. Crimes.
Chapter 776: JUSTIFIABLE USE OF FORCE
776.041 Use of force by aggressor.
The justification described in the preceding sections of this chapter is not available to a person who:
(1) Is attempting to commit, committing, or escaping after the commission of, a forcible felony; or
(2) Initially provokes the use of force against himself or herself, unless:
(a) Such force is so great that the person reasonably believes that he or she is in imminent danger of death or great bodily harm and that he or she has exhausted every reasonable means to escape such danger other than the use of force which is likely to cause death or great bodily harm to the assailant; or
(b) In good faith, the person withdraws from physical contact with the assailant and indicates clearly to the assailant that he or she desires to withdraw and terminate the use of force, but the assailant continues or resumes the use of force.
Got to take the good with the bad bro.
Marc please respond.
1. Most of the applicable witnesses don't believe that Zimmerman's injuries were as bad as he CLAIMED they were...so, no imminent danger.
2. Where's the evidence that Trayvon threw the first punch?
Whoops!
CNN broadcasts George Zimmermans Social Security number
?Future lawsuit?: CNN broadcasts George Zimmerman?s Social Security number | Twitchy
There are light skinned hispanics and dark skinned hispanics. It's a legitimate term.
Hispanics are considered "white" in the US census and has nothing to do with whether they are light skinned or dark skinned. They are considered caucasians and caucasians are "white".
The term Hispanic deals with ethnicity, not race. GZ is Hispanic, ergo, white, but he is not "Anglo". Perhaps if those who are on GZ's side would have known that just because his name was Zimmerman that he was not "anglo", but was "Hispanic" - they may have remained neutral on the case.
A debatable methodology of terms
Are Latinos White? Census Confusion Sparks Debate Over Racial Identity
"The census is not logical," said David Tavárez, professor of anthropology at Vassar College in New York. "It responds to the political pressures of certain groups in this country."
-Geaux
Let's stop right there...OK, but how else could it be if not that in the case of, gunman Zimmerman vs. unarmed Trayvon?
there are a few scenarios and you are hearing about them from the prosecution's witnesses. zimmerman started it, martin got the best of him and in the heat of the fight he went too far and zimmerman reasonably feared for his life.....zimmerman didn't start it....etc
That being the case, wasn't Trayvon defending himself in fear of HIS life? Which ultimately got taken as we all know. So it turns out he had the right fear and was justified in fighting to the death.
Do you agree?
Tell that to Mz Footstool head, SantaFe. She is determined to urge blacks to "have a tantrum". Which usually means they will destroy their own neighborhoods and each other. What a bunch of doofuses.
Is anyone else experiencing deja vu?
My quotey thing is broken on my phone [MENTION=42649]Gracie[/MENTION] the local news has been playing riots from last year because there's been like 1 picketer (is that a word?) at the court. Paaaathetic.