Sixties Fan
Diamond Member
- Mar 6, 2017
- 59,394
- 11,273
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Global Empire - The Balfour Declaration: A Blood-Drenched Centenary
He keeps talking about the "creation" of a Jewish homeland. Right away he is misleading. The Jewish homeland ALREADY EXISTED. While the Jewish people did not self-determination, self-government or sovereignty over that homeland -- that fact that is IS the homeland of the Jewish people is indisputable.
"There were some plans to create a Jewish homeland out of the rift valley of Kenya or even Madagascar, but it was rejected because the Jewish people had these ideas of past (vague hand wave)... "Seriously? I mean, really, seriously? How about if we make a homeland for the Palestinians in Mongolia? After all...these "ideas of the past" aren't even worth finishing the freaking sentence over, right?
..."but just going to live with the Palestinian people...that was encompassed in the Palestinian congresses ...they state quite clearly that anyone, those who have lived in Palestine, Mizrahi, Arab Jews, and those people who lived there, that those people should have full rights...it contrasts with the Balfour Declaration ... and the non-Jewish community having civic and religious rights but they don't talk about having political rights and rights to self-determination and national identity...is no where expressed in there...in contrast to that the Palestinian Congress quite explicitly stated that those people who lived there should have rights to citizenship so there was very much a contrast." Wait, what? So he is saying that the Arabs offered MORE rights to the Jewish people than the Jewish people offered to them? That the Arab people offered the Jewish people political rights, rights to self-determination and rights to national identity? Someone PAH-LEESE give me a link to that.
Oh, there we go, he corrects it in the next sentence -- he says that there was a conflict between the Eastern European Jews (who wanted political rights, rights to self-determination and rights to national identity) with the Jews who were a small religious sect, completely integrated into the (Arabic) community. In other words, to clarify the double speak -- we would like to offer Jews political rights, rights to self-determination and rights to national identity, well, as long as you don't actually WANT any of those things. Sheesh.
Oh and let's throw in a smear -- Eastern European Jews are, you know, distasteful.
Oh, and then he goes into a lovely comment about how Jewish people can't really be both ethnically Jewish and also be loyal to whatever country they find themselves in, therefore, they renounce their "Jewishness" in favor of their nationality. Can we just level THAT playing field, please? From now on, people of Palestinian heritage who have another nationality (nearly all of them in the diaspora) are not "really" Palestinian any more.
Okay, I give up on that one.
The Palestinians have always wanted equal rights for everyone without distinction. Even their current constitution states that all Palestinians shall be equal under the law without regard to race, religion, sex, etc......they state quite clearly that anyone, those who have lived in Palestine, Mizrahi, Arab Jews, and those people who lived there, that those people should have full rights...
Global Empire - The Balfour Declaration: A Blood-Drenched Centenary
He keeps talking about the "creation" of a Jewish homeland. Right away he is misleading. The Jewish homeland ALREADY EXISTED. While the Jewish people did not self-determination, self-government or sovereignty over that homeland -- that fact that is IS the homeland of the Jewish people is indisputable.
"There were some plans to create a Jewish homeland out of the rift valley of Kenya or even Madagascar, but it was rejected because the Jewish people had these ideas of past (vague hand wave)... "Seriously? I mean, really, seriously? How about if we make a homeland for the Palestinians in Mongolia? After all...these "ideas of the past" aren't even worth finishing the freaking sentence over, right?
..."but just going to live with the Palestinian people...that was encompassed in the Palestinian congresses ...they state quite clearly that anyone, those who have lived in Palestine, Mizrahi, Arab Jews, and those people who lived there, that those people should have full rights...it contrasts with the Balfour Declaration ... and the non-Jewish community having civic and religious rights but they don't talk about having political rights and rights to self-determination and national identity...is no where expressed in there...in contrast to that the Palestinian Congress quite explicitly stated that those people who lived there should have rights to citizenship so there was very much a contrast." Wait, what? So he is saying that the Arabs offered MORE rights to the Jewish people than the Jewish people offered to them? That the Arab people offered the Jewish people political rights, rights to self-determination and rights to national identity? Someone PAH-LEESE give me a link to that.
Oh, there we go, he corrects it in the next sentence -- he says that there was a conflict between the Eastern European Jews (who wanted political rights, rights to self-determination and rights to national identity) with the Jews who were a small religious sect, completely integrated into the (Arabic) community. In other words, to clarify the double speak -- we would like to offer Jews political rights, rights to self-determination and rights to national identity, well, as long as you don't actually WANT any of those things. Sheesh.
Oh and let's throw in a smear -- Eastern European Jews are, you know, distasteful.
Oh, and then he goes into a lovely comment about how Jewish people can't really be both ethnically Jewish and also be loyal to whatever country they find themselves in, therefore, they renounce their "Jewishness" in favor of their nationality. Can we just level THAT playing field, please? From now on, people of Palestinian heritage who have another nationality (nearly all of them in the diaspora) are not "really" Palestinian any more.
Okay, I give up on that one.
The Palestinians have always wanted equal rights for everyone without distinction. Even their current constitution states that all Palestinians shall be equal under the law without regard to race, religion, sex, etc......they state quite clearly that anyone, those who have lived in Palestine, Mizrahi, Arab Jews, and those people who lived there, that those people should have full rights...
The Palestinians have always wanted equal rights for everyone without distinction.
Global Empire - The Balfour Declaration: A Blood-Drenched Centenary
He keeps talking about the "creation" of a Jewish homeland. Right away he is misleading. The Jewish homeland ALREADY EXISTED. While the Jewish people did not self-determination, self-government or sovereignty over that homeland -- that fact that is IS the homeland of the Jewish people is indisputable.
"There were some plans to create a Jewish homeland out of the rift valley of Kenya or even Madagascar, but it was rejected because the Jewish people had these ideas of past (vague hand wave)... "Seriously? I mean, really, seriously? How about if we make a homeland for the Palestinians in Mongolia? After all...these "ideas of the past" aren't even worth finishing the freaking sentence over, right?
..."but just going to live with the Palestinian people...that was encompassed in the Palestinian congresses ...they state quite clearly that anyone, those who have lived in Palestine, Mizrahi, Arab Jews, and those people who lived there, that those people should have full rights...it contrasts with the Balfour Declaration ... and the non-Jewish community having civic and religious rights but they don't talk about having political rights and rights to self-determination and national identity...is no where expressed in there...in contrast to that the Palestinian Congress quite explicitly stated that those people who lived there should have rights to citizenship so there was very much a contrast." Wait, what? So he is saying that the Arabs offered MORE rights to the Jewish people than the Jewish people offered to them? That the Arab people offered the Jewish people political rights, rights to self-determination and rights to national identity? Someone PAH-LEESE give me a link to that.
Oh, there we go, he corrects it in the next sentence -- he says that there was a conflict between the Eastern European Jews (who wanted political rights, rights to self-determination and rights to national identity) with the Jews who were a small religious sect, completely integrated into the (Arabic) community. In other words, to clarify the double speak -- we would like to offer Jews political rights, rights to self-determination and rights to national identity, well, as long as you don't actually WANT any of those things. Sheesh.
Oh and let's throw in a smear -- Eastern European Jews are, you know, distasteful.
Oh, and then he goes into a lovely comment about how Jewish people can't really be both ethnically Jewish and also be loyal to whatever country they find themselves in, therefore, they renounce their "Jewishness" in favor of their nationality. Can we just level THAT playing field, please? From now on, people of Palestinian heritage who have another nationality (nearly all of them in the diaspora) are not "really" Palestinian any more.
Okay, I give up on that one.
The Palestinians have always wanted equal rights for everyone without distinction. Even their current constitution states that all Palestinians shall be equal under the law without regard to race, religion, sex, etc......they state quite clearly that anyone, those who have lived in Palestine, Mizrahi, Arab Jews, and those people who lived there, that those people should have full rights...
Global Empire - The Balfour Declaration: A Blood-Drenched Centenary
He keeps talking about the "creation" of a Jewish homeland. Right away he is misleading. The Jewish homeland ALREADY EXISTED. While the Jewish people did not self-determination, self-government or sovereignty over that homeland -- that fact that is IS the homeland of the Jewish people is indisputable.
"There were some plans to create a Jewish homeland out of the rift valley of Kenya or even Madagascar, but it was rejected because the Jewish people had these ideas of past (vague hand wave)... "Seriously? I mean, really, seriously? How about if we make a homeland for the Palestinians in Mongolia? After all...these "ideas of the past" aren't even worth finishing the freaking sentence over, right?
..."but just going to live with the Palestinian people...that was encompassed in the Palestinian congresses ...they state quite clearly that anyone, those who have lived in Palestine, Mizrahi, Arab Jews, and those people who lived there, that those people should have full rights...it contrasts with the Balfour Declaration ... and the non-Jewish community having civic and religious rights but they don't talk about having political rights and rights to self-determination and national identity...is no where expressed in there...in contrast to that the Palestinian Congress quite explicitly stated that those people who lived there should have rights to citizenship so there was very much a contrast." Wait, what? So he is saying that the Arabs offered MORE rights to the Jewish people than the Jewish people offered to them? That the Arab people offered the Jewish people political rights, rights to self-determination and rights to national identity? Someone PAH-LEESE give me a link to that.
Oh, there we go, he corrects it in the next sentence -- he says that there was a conflict between the Eastern European Jews (who wanted political rights, rights to self-determination and rights to national identity) with the Jews who were a small religious sect, completely integrated into the (Arabic) community. In other words, to clarify the double speak -- we would like to offer Jews political rights, rights to self-determination and rights to national identity, well, as long as you don't actually WANT any of those things. Sheesh.
Oh and let's throw in a smear -- Eastern European Jews are, you know, distasteful.
Oh, and then he goes into a lovely comment about how Jewish people can't really be both ethnically Jewish and also be loyal to whatever country they find themselves in, therefore, they renounce their "Jewishness" in favor of their nationality. Can we just level THAT playing field, please? From now on, people of Palestinian heritage who have another nationality (nearly all of them in the diaspora) are not "really" Palestinian any more.
Okay, I give up on that one.
The Palestinians have always wanted equal rights for everyone without distinction. Even their current constitution states that all Palestinians shall be equal under the law without regard to race, religion, sex, etc......they state quite clearly that anyone, those who have lived in Palestine, Mizrahi, Arab Jews, and those people who lived there, that those people should have full rights...
That must be correct. We just have to ignore 1,400 years of Islamist history to accept your nonsense claim.
I’m hoping you can explain dhimmitude in the context of Islamic equal rights.
Global Empire - The Balfour Declaration: A Blood-Drenched Centenary
He keeps talking about the "creation" of a Jewish homeland. Right away he is misleading. The Jewish homeland ALREADY EXISTED. While the Jewish people did not self-determination, self-government or sovereignty over that homeland -- that fact that is IS the homeland of the Jewish people is indisputable.
"There were some plans to create a Jewish homeland out of the rift valley of Kenya or even Madagascar, but it was rejected because the Jewish people had these ideas of past (vague hand wave)... "Seriously? I mean, really, seriously? How about if we make a homeland for the Palestinians in Mongolia? After all...these "ideas of the past" aren't even worth finishing the freaking sentence over, right?
..."but just going to live with the Palestinian people...that was encompassed in the Palestinian congresses ...they state quite clearly that anyone, those who have lived in Palestine, Mizrahi, Arab Jews, and those people who lived there, that those people should have full rights...it contrasts with the Balfour Declaration ... and the non-Jewish community having civic and religious rights but they don't talk about having political rights and rights to self-determination and national identity...is no where expressed in there...in contrast to that the Palestinian Congress quite explicitly stated that those people who lived there should have rights to citizenship so there was very much a contrast." Wait, what? So he is saying that the Arabs offered MORE rights to the Jewish people than the Jewish people offered to them? That the Arab people offered the Jewish people political rights, rights to self-determination and rights to national identity? Someone PAH-LEESE give me a link to that.
Oh, there we go, he corrects it in the next sentence -- he says that there was a conflict between the Eastern European Jews (who wanted political rights, rights to self-determination and rights to national identity) with the Jews who were a small religious sect, completely integrated into the (Arabic) community. In other words, to clarify the double speak -- we would like to offer Jews political rights, rights to self-determination and rights to national identity, well, as long as you don't actually WANT any of those things. Sheesh.
Oh and let's throw in a smear -- Eastern European Jews are, you know, distasteful.
Oh, and then he goes into a lovely comment about how Jewish people can't really be both ethnically Jewish and also be loyal to whatever country they find themselves in, therefore, they renounce their "Jewishness" in favor of their nationality. Can we just level THAT playing field, please? From now on, people of Palestinian heritage who have another nationality (nearly all of them in the diaspora) are not "really" Palestinian any more.
Okay, I give up on that one.
The Palestinians have always wanted equal rights for everyone without distinction. Even their current constitution states that all Palestinians shall be equal under the law without regard to race, religion, sex, etc......they state quite clearly that anyone, those who have lived in Palestine, Mizrahi, Arab Jews, and those people who lived there, that those people should have full rights...
That must be correct. We just have to ignore 1,400 years of Islamist history to accept your nonsense claim.
I’m hoping you can explain dhimmitude in the context of Islamic equal rights.
Sure, they haven't had it for 150 years.
The Great Book Robbery
Global Empire - The Balfour Declaration: A Blood-Drenched Centenary
He keeps talking about the "creation" of a Jewish homeland. Right away he is misleading. The Jewish homeland ALREADY EXISTED. While the Jewish people did not self-determination, self-government or sovereignty over that homeland -- that fact that is IS the homeland of the Jewish people is indisputable.
"There were some plans to create a Jewish homeland out of the rift valley of Kenya or even Madagascar, but it was rejected because the Jewish people had these ideas of past (vague hand wave)... "Seriously? I mean, really, seriously? How about if we make a homeland for the Palestinians in Mongolia? After all...these "ideas of the past" aren't even worth finishing the freaking sentence over, right?
..."but just going to live with the Palestinian people...that was encompassed in the Palestinian congresses ...they state quite clearly that anyone, those who have lived in Palestine, Mizrahi, Arab Jews, and those people who lived there, that those people should have full rights...it contrasts with the Balfour Declaration ... and the non-Jewish community having civic and religious rights but they don't talk about having political rights and rights to self-determination and national identity...is no where expressed in there...in contrast to that the Palestinian Congress quite explicitly stated that those people who lived there should have rights to citizenship so there was very much a contrast." Wait, what? So he is saying that the Arabs offered MORE rights to the Jewish people than the Jewish people offered to them? That the Arab people offered the Jewish people political rights, rights to self-determination and rights to national identity? Someone PAH-LEESE give me a link to that.
Oh, there we go, he corrects it in the next sentence -- he says that there was a conflict between the Eastern European Jews (who wanted political rights, rights to self-determination and rights to national identity) with the Jews who were a small religious sect, completely integrated into the (Arabic) community. In other words, to clarify the double speak -- we would like to offer Jews political rights, rights to self-determination and rights to national identity, well, as long as you don't actually WANT any of those things. Sheesh.
Oh and let's throw in a smear -- Eastern European Jews are, you know, distasteful.
Oh, and then he goes into a lovely comment about how Jewish people can't really be both ethnically Jewish and also be loyal to whatever country they find themselves in, therefore, they renounce their "Jewishness" in favor of their nationality. Can we just level THAT playing field, please? From now on, people of Palestinian heritage who have another nationality (nearly all of them in the diaspora) are not "really" Palestinian any more.
Okay, I give up on that one.
The Palestinians have always wanted equal rights for everyone without distinction. Even their current constitution states that all Palestinians shall be equal under the law without regard to race, religion, sex, etc......they state quite clearly that anyone, those who have lived in Palestine, Mizrahi, Arab Jews, and those people who lived there, that those people should have full rights...
That must be correct. We just have to ignore 1,400 years of Islamist history to accept your nonsense claim.
I’m hoping you can explain dhimmitude in the context of Islamic equal rights.
Sure, they haven't had it for 150 years.
“Evian was a death sentence," said Dr. Shimon Samuels, Wiesenthal Centre Director for International Relations, who spoke this week at an international gathering of experts in Evian on the 80th anniversary of the conference.
"It succeeded in its aims:
- proving Hitler's point that no-one and nowhere wanted the Jews;
- setting the appeasement scene of Munich a few weeks later;
- justifying the British White Paper that closed the doors of the Palestine Mandate;
- giving validity to the 1942 Wannsee Protocol, which listed by country the number of Jews to be murdered, totaling over 11 million.”
“Of 32 countries represented, 31 Ambassadors rose to explain why they would not take Jews. Only one, the Dominican Republic, offered 100,000 visas for German Jewish bachelor farmers. The bachelors were expected to marry Dominican women. Agriculturists were very few. Nevertheless, some 500 arrived after the outbreak of war - the last to leave Europe.”
“However, Evian carries another message" he continued, "... the indisputable justification for a Jewish State... the wandering Jew has a home... there are no more Jewish refugees... for Jews, there can never be another Evian.”
(full article online)
The July 1938 Conference that sealed the fate of European Jewry
Thirty-two countries at the July 1938 Evian Conference and only one country (with an ulterior motive) agrees to accept the desperate Jews of Europe! It should be known that the head of the Evian Conference was one, Earl Winterton, a British anti-Semite who sided with the Arabs on the Palestine issue.
A History of Money in Palestine : The Case of the Frozen Bank Accounts of 1948