The ONE question to ask those pushing the covid jab

danielpalos said:
Because we already know right-wingers are just plain immoral, unethical, false-witness bearing practitioners of the Abomination of Hypocrisy (unto God with a McCarthy era phrase in our pledge)? Why are they pushing Ivermectin.

I hope your eyes are opened bud before it is too late.
 
Here's what the left does. Attack the source, attack the person bringing it up. Then post more misinformation and lies about what is really going on about the situation. Having this shot does not protect you. it does not keep you out of the hospital. it does not keep you out of the morgue. Run this by Governor Newsolini with his reported adverse reaction which will take him 3 to 6 months to recover from. It's a nerve problem brought on by the clot shot. Are you ignoring that today? LOL

Goebbels would be proud of you. You learn well. Accuse other of that which you are guilty!https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Goebbels

  1. Joseph Goebbels - Wikipedia

    Paul Joseph Goebbels (pronounced [ˈpaʊ̯l ˈjoːzɛf ˈɡœbl̩s] (); 29 October 1897 – 1 May 1945) was a German Nazi politician who was the Gauleiter (district leader) of Berlin, chief propagandist for the Nazi Party, and then Reich Minister of Propaganda from 1933 to 1945. He was one of Adolf Hitler's closest and most devoted acolytes, known for his skills in public speaking and his ...
 
They report what is coming out of CDC and what's on the VAERS reports. Leftist media wants to keep you in the dark...and you seem perfectly happy with that. Keeps you from worrying doesn't it? I remember a time when the liberals protested anything coming out of gov't. Libs called the gov't liars and babykillers. Now you are the gov't. Looks different now don't it.
Do you people ever get tired of blathering and whining, .......and lying?

 


That does not mean that it does not happen. There is every reason to believe that it does. Common sense shouldtell you that if a person can be reinfected, they can spread it


The COVID-19 pandemic has strained the public health data supply chain. In many states, this has challenged hospitals, healthcare providers, and laboratories in reporting complete demographic information, such as race and ethnicity. The volume of cases has also made it challenging for state, local, and territorial health departments to conduct thorough investigations. As a result, some COVID-19 case notifications do not have complete information, even as health departments continue to make improvements through methods such as automated data flows.

Missing data can affect interpretation of factors that might put people at higher risk for severe disease. Analyses of incomplete data elements are likely an underestimate of the true occurrence.
 
That does not mean that it does not happen. There is every reason to believe that it does. Common sense shouldtell you that if a person can be reinfected, they can spread it
Just like a vaccinated person can. This OSHA mandate is unscientific, unconstitutional and nothing more than political bullshit.
 
Just like a vaccinated person can. This OSHA mandate is unscientific, unconstitutional and nothing more than political bullshit.
Oh please!! How the fuck is it unconstitutional and why now. Vaccine mandates have been around for a very long time. Yes a vaxxed person can catch and spread Covid. No one is dying that but you fuckers do not want to talk about the fact that they are far less likely to. THAY+T is indeed scientific
 
Oh please!! How the fuck is it unconstitutional and why now.
Uh, because the Constitution does not give the Federal government the power. If you think otherwise let us know which clause. And it's never had the power.

Vaccine mandates have been around for a very long time.
By states. Never by the Federal government. Not once. Not ever.


Yes a vaxxed person can catch and spread Covid. No one is dying that but you fuckers do not want to talk about the fact that they are far less likely to. THAY+T is indeed scientific
Well, this "fucker" will talk about it. You have no science to say I'm far less likely to catch COVID from a vaccinated than an unvaccinated person in the workplace. That is unless you choose ignore natural immunity. Which is somewhere between 40M and 120M people in this country.
 
Uh, because the Constitution does not give the Federal government the power. If you think otherwise let us know which clause. And it's never had the power.
Actually it does:
Providing for the welfare of the general public is a basic goal of government. The preamble to the U.S. Constitution cites promotion of the general welfare as a primary reason for the creation of the Constitution. Promotion of the general welfare is also a stated purpose in state constitutions and statutes.

General Welfare - Federal, Court, Congress, and Spending - JRank …

law.jrank.org/pages/7116/General-Welfare.html

What is purpose of promoting general welfare?
Ultimately, general welfare is about caring for other people’s well-being. It’s about consideration, about sympathy (sometimes), empathy, understanding; it’s about caring for other people. When we promote the aforementioned, we set out to motivate other people to make a positive difference in the World.
What does promoting the general welfare mean? - Quora
www.quora.com/What-does-promoting-the-general-welfar…
OSHA's statuatory authoity flows from that concept:

In terms of statutory authority, OSHA has a broad mandate to protect employee health and safety. There’s no question that protection from workplace exposure to disease is part of that mandate. The only real question is about timing. Normally, it would take OSHA several years to make a rule governing a workplace hazard. There’s a special provision of the statute short-circuiting that procedure when there’s a need for action. Specifically, the fast-track process is allowed when employees are exposed to “grave danger from exposure to substances or agents determined to be toxic or physically harmful or from new hazard” and an emergency standard is “necessary to protect employees from such danger.”

That has not ben challenged on constutional grounds, a least not sucessfully. Therefor. IT IS CONSTUTUTIONAL and it matters little whether the mandates are state or federal. You people are just having a hissy fit because it is about Covid which your criminal Lord and Master, Trump has politicised for his ownbenefit, specifically to rile up his base of moronic minions
 
Uh, because the Constitution does not give the Federal government the power. If you think otherwise let us know which clause. And it's never had the power.

By states. Never by the Federal government. Not once. Not ever.



Well, this "fucker" will talk about it. You have no science to say I'm far less likely to catch COVID from a vaccinated than an unvaccinated person in the workplace. That is unless you choose ignore natural immunity. Which is somewhere between 40M and 120M people in this country.
There is plenty of science that says that you are far less likely to catch and spread Carona if vaxxed, and that natural immunity is not lasting. It has been posted right here .You are eather to stupid to comprehend the written word or just lying. Which is it?
 

Forum List

Back
Top