The painful truth about Ahmaud Arberry

Also, I have never seen anyone other than you claim that shop owner tried to "illegally imprison" Brown
you said it was a violent felony crime to illegally inprison someone when you did not witness a felony

Why are you too frightened to apply your cowardly interpretation of the law to the Michael Brown incident?

Are you unraveling?

How many years in prison do you want to give anyone who tries to stop an individual they have Reasonable Suspicion has committed a crime even though they had did not witnessed a felony?

Under your cowardly interpretation a serial killer could sneak into someone's house and kill them because they walked around the corner holding a gun

after all trespass is not a felony and he was scared of the gun so he gets to walk on a murder charge...nice
No one but you is claiming that shop owner "illegally imprisoned" Brown. So there's nothing there to argue as your idiotic, baseless claims mean nothing.
that's your position that's what you advocate for

Anyone who arrests anyone else without having witnessed a felony is a criminal according to you so that makes the little old man who Michael Brown robbed a criminal according to you

Your cowardly interpretation of the law with send the little old man who Michael Brown robbed to jail because he tried to imprison Michael Brown according to you

He even put his hands on him

you would want to charge him with felony assault for that kind of thing
That shop owner didn't "illegally imprison" Brown. The only one saying that is you and your only source of that is you. And you're a lying retard.
 
Sadly for you, you have no evidence of what he was thinking. The only evidence we have is that Travis was a deadly threat which means Arbery was within his right to fend off that deadly threat
Yes I do...
his behavior was extremely evident of casing

he was looking around the place searching for things

don't you know anything about the streets bro?
Nope, there's no evidence he was planning on taking anything. Your overactive imagination will not be admissible in court.
what was he looking for?

he kept looking around and for some reason we have never seen the totality of the footage they have on that

You don't have much experience with Street crime do you?
 
Also, I have never seen anyone other than you claim that shop owner tried to "illegally imprison" Brown
you said it was a violent felony crime to illegally inprison someone when you did not witness a felony

Why are you too frightened to apply your cowardly interpretation of the law to the Michael Brown incident?

Are you unraveling?

How many years in prison do you want to give anyone who tries to stop an individual they have Reasonable Suspicion has committed a crime even though they had did not witnessed a felony?

Under your cowardly interpretation a serial killer could sneak into someone's house and kill them because they walked around the corner holding a gun

after all trespass is not a felony and he was scared of the gun so he gets to walk on a murder charge...nice
No one but you is claiming that shop owner "illegally imprisoned" Brown. So there's nothing there to argue as your idiotic, baseless claims mean nothing.
that's your position that's what you advocate for

Anyone who arrests anyone else without having witnessed a felony is a criminal according to you so that makes the little old man who Michael Brown robbed a criminal according to you

Your cowardly interpretation of the law with send the little old man who Michael Brown robbed to jail because he tried to imprison Michael Brown according to you

He even put his hands on him

you would want to charge him with felony assault for that kind of thing
That shop owner didn't "illegally imprison" Brown. The only one saying that is you and your only source of that is you. And you're a lying retard.
If you think Travis McMichael is guilty of a violent assault for standing in front of someone out in a open road then you have to apply the same law to everyone else so the little old man who stood in front of Michael Brown goes to jail
 
Sadly for you, you have no evidence of what he was thinking. The only evidence we have is that Travis was a deadly threat which means Arbery was within his right to fend off that deadly threat
Yes I do...
his behavior was extremely evident of casing

he was looking around the place searching for things

don't you know anything about the streets bro?
Nope, there's no evidence he was planning on taking anything. Your overactive imagination will not be admissible in court.
what was he looking for?

he kept looking around and for some reason we have never seen the totality of the footage they have on that

You don't have much experience with Street crime do you?
Same thing these other folks were looking at -- checking out construction...

Starting at one minute into this video...

"There are dozens of surveillance videos showing people frequently coming in and out of the house, including children. A white couple entered on the day of the shooting."

Isn't it odd you haven't accused any of those other folks of stealing, or intending to steal?

 
Also, I have never seen anyone other than you claim that shop owner tried to "illegally imprison" Brown
you said it was a violent felony crime to illegally inprison someone when you did not witness a felony

Why are you too frightened to apply your cowardly interpretation of the law to the Michael Brown incident?

Are you unraveling?

How many years in prison do you want to give anyone who tries to stop an individual they have Reasonable Suspicion has committed a crime even though they had did not witnessed a felony?

Under your cowardly interpretation a serial killer could sneak into someone's house and kill them because they walked around the corner holding a gun

after all trespass is not a felony and he was scared of the gun so he gets to walk on a murder charge...nice
No one but you is claiming that shop owner "illegally imprisoned" Brown. So there's nothing there to argue as your idiotic, baseless claims mean nothing.
that's your position that's what you advocate for

Anyone who arrests anyone else without having witnessed a felony is a criminal according to you so that makes the little old man who Michael Brown robbed a criminal according to you

Your cowardly interpretation of the law with send the little old man who Michael Brown robbed to jail because he tried to imprison Michael Brown according to you

He even put his hands on him

you would want to charge him with felony assault for that kind of thing
That shop owner didn't "illegally imprison" Brown. The only one saying that is you and your only source of that is you. And you're a lying retard.
If you think Travis McMichael is guilty of a violent assault for standing in front of someone out in a open road then you have to apply the same law to everyone else so the little old man who stood in front of Michael Brown goes to jail
LOLOLOL

Not only do I think that -- even you said that...

Any trained military operator is going to ask himself what a man is doing to running directly at a vehicle where he knows a deadly threat exists
 
Sadly for you, you have no evidence of what he was thinking. The only evidence we have is that Travis was a deadly threat which means Arbery was within his right to fend off that deadly threat
Yes I do...
his behavior was extremely evident of casing

he was looking around the place searching for things

don't you know anything about the streets bro?
Nope, there's no evidence he was planning on taking anything. Your overactive imagination will not be admissible in court.
what was he looking for?

he kept looking around and for some reason we have never seen the totality of the footage they have on that

You don't have much experience with Street crime do you?
Same thing these other folks were looking at -- checking out construction...

Starting at one minute into this video...

"There are dozens of surveillance videos showing people frequently coming in and out of the house, including children. A white couple entered on the day of the shooting."

Isn't it odd you haven't accused any of those other folks of stealing, or intending to steal?


did they try to throat punch anyone?
 
Sadly for you, you have no evidence of what he was thinking. The only evidence we have is that Travis was a deadly threat which means Arbery was within his right to fend off that deadly threat
Yes I do...
his behavior was extremely evident of casing

he was looking around the place searching for things

don't you know anything about the streets bro?
Nope, there's no evidence he was planning on taking anything. Your overactive imagination will not be admissible in court.
what was he looking for?

he kept looking around and for some reason we have never seen the totality of the footage they have on that

You don't have much experience with Street crime do you?
Same thing these other folks were looking at -- checking out construction...

Starting at one minute into this video...

"There are dozens of surveillance videos showing people frequently coming in and out of the house, including children. A white couple entered on the day of the shooting."

Isn't it odd you haven't accused any of those other folks of stealing, or intending to steal?


did they try to throat punch anyone?

Don't know but then neither did Arbery until after he was shot.
 
Also, I have never seen anyone other than you claim that shop owner tried to "illegally imprison" Brown
you said it was a violent felony crime to illegally inprison someone when you did not witness a felony

Why are you too frightened to apply your cowardly interpretation of the law to the Michael Brown incident?

Are you unraveling?

How many years in prison do you want to give anyone who tries to stop an individual they have Reasonable Suspicion has committed a crime even though they had did not witnessed a felony?

Under your cowardly interpretation a serial killer could sneak into someone's house and kill them because they walked around the corner holding a gun

after all trespass is not a felony and he was scared of the gun so he gets to walk on a murder charge...nice
No one but you is claiming that shop owner "illegally imprisoned" Brown. So there's nothing there to argue as your idiotic, baseless claims mean nothing.
that's your position that's what you advocate for

Anyone who arrests anyone else without having witnessed a felony is a criminal according to you so that makes the little old man who Michael Brown robbed a criminal according to you

Your cowardly interpretation of the law with send the little old man who Michael Brown robbed to jail because he tried to imprison Michael Brown according to you

He even put his hands on him

you would want to charge him with felony assault for that kind of thing
That shop owner didn't "illegally imprison" Brown. The only one saying that is you and your only source of that is you. And you're a lying retard.
If you think Travis McMichael is guilty of a violent assault for standing in front of someone out in a open road then you have to apply the same law to everyone else so the little old man who stood in front of Michael Brown goes to jail
LOLOLOL

Not only do I think that -- even you said that...

Any trained military operator is going to ask himself what a man is doing to running directly at a vehicle where he knows a deadly threat exists
the mcmichels were a DEADLY THREAT to ahmaud arberry

why would a street Criminal attack a deadly threat when they have clear open road in front of them?
 
Sadly for you, you have no evidence of what he was thinking. The only evidence we have is that Travis was a deadly threat which means Arbery was within his right to fend off that deadly threat
Yes I do...
his behavior was extremely evident of casing

he was looking around the place searching for things

don't you know anything about the streets bro?
Nope, there's no evidence he was planning on taking anything. Your overactive imagination will not be admissible in court.
what was he looking for?

he kept looking around and for some reason we have never seen the totality of the footage they have on that

You don't have much experience with Street crime do you?
Same thing these other folks were looking at -- checking out construction...

Starting at one minute into this video...

"There are dozens of surveillance videos showing people frequently coming in and out of the house, including children. A white couple entered on the day of the shooting."

Isn't it odd you haven't accused any of those other folks of stealing, or intending to steal?


did they try to throat punch anyone?

Don't know but then neither did Arbery until after he was shot.

you think travis shot him before he was attacked???
 
Also, I have never seen anyone other than you claim that shop owner tried to "illegally imprison" Brown
you said it was a violent felony crime to illegally inprison someone when you did not witness a felony

Why are you too frightened to apply your cowardly interpretation of the law to the Michael Brown incident?

Are you unraveling?

How many years in prison do you want to give anyone who tries to stop an individual they have Reasonable Suspicion has committed a crime even though they had did not witnessed a felony?

Under your cowardly interpretation a serial killer could sneak into someone's house and kill them because they walked around the corner holding a gun

after all trespass is not a felony and he was scared of the gun so he gets to walk on a murder charge...nice
No one but you is claiming that shop owner "illegally imprisoned" Brown. So there's nothing there to argue as your idiotic, baseless claims mean nothing.
that's your position that's what you advocate for

Anyone who arrests anyone else without having witnessed a felony is a criminal according to you so that makes the little old man who Michael Brown robbed a criminal according to you

Your cowardly interpretation of the law with send the little old man who Michael Brown robbed to jail because he tried to imprison Michael Brown according to you

He even put his hands on him

you would want to charge him with felony assault for that kind of thing
That shop owner didn't "illegally imprison" Brown. The only one saying that is you and your only source of that is you. And you're a lying retard.
If you think Travis McMichael is guilty of a violent assault for standing in front of someone out in a open road then you have to apply the same law to everyone else so the little old man who stood in front of Michael Brown goes to jail
LOLOLOL

Not only do I think that -- even you said that...

Any trained military operator is going to ask himself what a man is doing to running directly at a vehicle where he knows a deadly threat exists
the mcmichels were a DEADLY THREAT to ahmaud arberry

why would a street Criminal attack a deadly threat when they have clear open road in front of them?
He tried fleeing. For over 4 minutes he tried to get away from them. But they relentlessly prevented his escape to the point he had no choice but to fight for his life with self-defense against a deadly threat.
 
Sadly for you, you have no evidence of what he was thinking. The only evidence we have is that Travis was a deadly threat which means Arbery was within his right to fend off that deadly threat
Yes I do...
his behavior was extremely evident of casing

he was looking around the place searching for things

don't you know anything about the streets bro?
Nope, there's no evidence he was planning on taking anything. Your overactive imagination will not be admissible in court.
what was he looking for?

he kept looking around and for some reason we have never seen the totality of the footage they have on that

You don't have much experience with Street crime do you?
Same thing these other folks were looking at -- checking out construction...

Starting at one minute into this video...

"There are dozens of surveillance videos showing people frequently coming in and out of the house, including children. A white couple entered on the day of the shooting."

Isn't it odd you haven't accused any of those other folks of stealing, or intending to steal?


did they try to throat punch anyone?

Don't know but then neither did Arbery until after he was shot.

you think travis shot him before he was attacked???

I know Travis shot him before Arbery punched him. You would know that too had you been capable of paying attention.
 
He tried fleeing. For over 4 minutes he tried to get away from them. But they relentlessly prevented his escape to the point he had no choice but to fight for his life with self-defense against a deadly threat.
what was it that made him panic?

why did he attack?
 
Sadly for you, you have no evidence of what he was thinking. The only evidence we have is that Travis was a deadly threat which means Arbery was within his right to fend off that deadly threat
Yes I do...
his behavior was extremely evident of casing

he was looking around the place searching for things

don't you know anything about the streets bro?
Nope, there's no evidence he was planning on taking anything. Your overactive imagination will not be admissible in court.
what was he looking for?

he kept looking around and for some reason we have never seen the totality of the footage they have on that

You don't have much experience with Street crime do you?
Same thing these other folks were looking at -- checking out construction...

Starting at one minute into this video...

"There are dozens of surveillance videos showing people frequently coming in and out of the house, including children. A white couple entered on the day of the shooting."

Isn't it odd you haven't accused any of those other folks of stealing, or intending to steal?


did they try to throat punch anyone?

Don't know but then neither did Arbery until after he was shot.

you think travis shot him before he was attacked???

I know Travis shot him before Arbery punched him. You would know that too had you been capable of paying attention.

show me the frame where travis shot him?

why NOT shoot him here??
Screenshot_20210101-144215.png
 
Sadly for you, you have no evidence of what he was thinking. The only evidence we have is that Travis was a deadly threat which means Arbery was within his right to fend off that deadly threat
Yes I do...
his behavior was extremely evident of casing

he was looking around the place searching for things

don't you know anything about the streets bro?
Nope, there's no evidence he was planning on taking anything. Your overactive imagination will not be admissible in court.
what was he looking for?

he kept looking around and for some reason we have never seen the totality of the footage they have on that

You don't have much experience with Street crime do you?
Same thing these other folks were looking at -- checking out construction...

Starting at one minute into this video...

"There are dozens of surveillance videos showing people frequently coming in and out of the house, including children. A white couple entered on the day of the shooting."

Isn't it odd you haven't accused any of those other folks of stealing, or intending to steal?


did they try to throat punch anyone?

Don't know but then neither did Arbery until after he was shot.

you think travis shot him before he was attacked???

I know Travis shot him before Arbery punched him. You would know that too had you been capable of paying attention.

show me the frame where travis shot him?

why NOT shoot him here??View attachment 451662

Can't shoot him there without risking hitting Bryan.

This is the frame where the first shot is first heard...

arbery5-jpg.338224
 
They were denied bail for doing silly things like trying to delete naughty social media posts... it had absolutely nothing to do with the fact that they shot a guy who ran up and tried to beat a shotgun out of one of them

You are so racist you smell through the internet.

“The judge Walmsley said the footage shows the McMichaels pose a threat to the community. They had no way of knowing if Arbery was responsible for the burglaries they suspected him of, the judge concluded.
“And that somehow resulted in individuals thinking it was appropriate to block that individual’s path of travel, shoulder a firearm in order to get him to stop,”

The judge says exactly why bail is denied. The three suspects had no way of knowing if Arbery was responsible for the burglaries when they blocked AA path of travel, shouldered a firearm in order to get him to stop which resulted in his death.

They are accused of being murderers and thus a danger to society.
The judge is full of chit--------another one that needs to be disbarred.
 
If you think Travis McMichael is guilty of a violent assault for standing in front of someone out in a open road

TM did not just stand in front of someone out on a open road you racist liar. He aimed a shotgun at AA while his fellow felon in the black truck was chasing AA from behind.

You have to know you are lying every time you post your bullshit racist nonsense that TM stood still “was just standing there” during the two seconds before he shot AA in the chest the first time.

There was no way TM got from point A to point B by standing still:

FE7CF5B8-843F-4F3A-B160-B121C0F29931.jpeg
 
Look man nobody in their right mind is going to Simply Veer to the right in an attempt to avoid two men with guns who were supposedly threatening them...

You are the idiot spewing AA had mental issues and yet you bring this argument to this forum. Seriously?

No one with a loaded shotgun makes this move against an unarmed jogger if his intent is to let the jogger pass by his truck unscathed.

View attachment 446894
And TM started that attack from the position where he “aimed” the shotgun at AA right here:

View attachment 446895

LOL@
"No one with a loaded shotgun makes this move against an unarmed jogger if his intent is to let the jogger pass by his truck unscathed"

-He wasn't a jogger he was a criminal fleeing from the scene of the crime

- if Travis intended to hurt him he had lots of chances prior to being punched

- there's absolutely no way they could determine whether or not he was armed they do know he was intent on Escape however
"He wasn't a jogger he was a criminal fleeing from the scene of the crime"

He committed a misdemeanor. Georgia law doesn't allow for the McMichaels to detain anyone for anything less than a felony.
he committed a crime that precipitated Reasonable Suspicion of a felony

And then incited pursuit by fleeing and refusing to identify himself

He then escalated a confrontation by utilizing violence

sure is tough to defend a criminal isn't it?
There was no "reasonable suspicion of a felony" as none of those 3 hillbillies knew Arbery was just on that site. You lose again.
That's a stupid claim---------
They knew who they were looking for based on description and they were alerted by neighbor who snagged aa casing the new home.
Then you have AA responded.
You would have to be stupid not to realize that AA was the suspect.
 
If you think Travis McMichael is guilty of a violent assault for standing in front of someone out in a open road

TM did not just stand in front of someone out on a open road you racist liar. He aimed a shotgun at AA while his fellow felon in the black truck was chasing AA from behind.

You have to know you are lying every time you post your bullshit racist nonsense that TM stood still “was just standing there” during the two seconds before he shot AA in the chest the first time.

There was no way TM got from point A to point B by standing still:

View attachment 451715
You are truly delusional.......You don't run toward guys with guns trying to escape..geebus
 

Forum List

Back
Top