Faun
Diamond Member
- Nov 14, 2011
- 124,353
- 81,200
- 2,635
He did no such thing.
LOLOL
You think Trump didn't try to stay in office despite having no proof of election fraud??
You crazy.
![cuckoo :cuckoo: :cuckoo:](/styles/smilies/cuckoo.gif)
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He did no such thing.
trump gave us record low UE, a booming economy, there was no war in europe, afghan people were still free…he had some temper issues, but those were the good old days compared to these train wreak of a global crisis maker
recession….on top of inflation…
LOLOL
You think Trump didn't try to Stat in office despite having no proof of election fraud??
You crazy.![]()
Proof that could be discovered in the time allotted?
He thought he had been cheated.
It doesn't matter what he thought. What mattered is had had no proof.
Considering the timeframe, he couldn't get "proof".
And anything he found would have been dismissed and buried anyway.
He spent two months chasing his own tail and spouting debunked claims of fraud while losing court case after court case. That's on him. If only he cared more about the USA than his ego, he would have conceded, allow for a smooth transition of power, and allowed the country to heal.
None of those early cases went into the merits.
LOL
That's because no one filed a case with actual evidence of fraud. Half the cases were dismissed due to lack of evidence or lack of merit. The other half due to lack of standing
As I said, nothing was decided on the merits.
People committing fraud tend to take steps to hide said fraud.
Because no cases were meritorious.
That wasn't decided, because they were rejected for other reasons.
Again... many cases were rejected because they lacked merit. Many other cases were rejected because they lacked evidence. And many cases were rejected because they lacked standing.
Cite a specific case where you think the judge was wrong for dismissing a case...
nah they ruled the dems violated the equal protection rights of the people of flJust stop lying already. The SCOTUS ruled the clock ran out by the Safe Harbor date...
the Court also ruled that no new recount could take place, because none could be finished by the “safe harbor” deadline—the date, set by federal law (3 U.S.C. §5), by which states were required to resolve any disputes regarding the selection of presidential electors in order to guarantee that their final determination “shall be conclusive, and shall govern in the counting of the electoral votes as provided in the Constitution.”
Like I always say, if conservatives didn't lie, they'd have absolutely nothing to say.
i guess at some point in history it has been lowerYou're lying again.
The unemployment rate has been lower than Trump's low. So no, Trump did not give us "record low UE."
Like I always say, if conservatives didn't lie, they'd have absolutely nothing to say.
41 year record…reagan inherited and got inflation down. xiden and the dems created itWe don't have record high inflation. Inflation was higher under Reagan than it is now.
Like I always say, if conservatives didn't lie, they'd have absolutely nothing to say.
And as such were never RULED on the merits.
Again... cite a specific case you think a judge dismissed improperly...
nah they ruled the dems violated the equal protection rights of the people of fl