gallantwarrior
Gold Member
I suppose you are now including Jonathan Gruber among those of my "ilk"?Sorry to say, but so much of the electorate deserves insult. They are willfully ignorant and will cast a vote for a candidate who promises them the most goodies, or who most resembles them in appearance, or who may be perceived as "cute" or attractive in some way. It's difficult to persuade those who are incapable of looking beyond their own individual self interest and recognizing how their stupid, ignorant choices affect the nation as an entirety, including themselves. They accept liars, cheats, criminals, and pretenders for no other reason than they like to believe the swill fed to them by the lackey media.You know what's really scary? The same bunch of low-information, racist morons are insisting that Hillary is presidential material, too!OK, so you admit that you are blowing smoke.
Thanks.
No, I said what I said. It wasn't even close. Obama won by millions and millions of votes and wide margin on the electoral college.
He won easily.
And you don't even disagree with me.
Yeah, insult the electorate when you can't convince them to vote for your candidate. That'll work. Don't take any responsibility for your own losses. Always, always blame it on someone else.
Why is it that in the party of 'personal responsibility', its always someone else's fault?
And I'm sure that telling the electorate how stupid they are and how worthy of insult they are is a winning strategy.
I mean, your ilk have managed to convince the majority of the electorate to vote for your candidate.....ONCE in the last quarter century? How's that 'the electorate can go fuck itself' strategy working out for you?