Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Funny, I don't see you bringing out the "broad brush" arguments when guno and other Regressive Leftists post vicious, hateful things about Christians.So no theories on the reason for the behaviors pointed out in the OP?
If you check with some brush manufacturers, perhaps they will give you a broader brush to paint others with.
Here is what happens. A guy murders innocent persons at place x. I won't use a theater because that is what a white guy did. I won't say a church because that is what a white guy did. I won't say Luby's restaurant because that is what a white guy did. I won't say Oklahoma City because that is what a white guy did. I won't say McDonalds because that is what a white guy did. I won't say school because that is what a whole raft of white guys have done.Here is what some do. But let us just say a guy murders a bunch of innocent people at place x. If it is a white guy, he's deranged and in no way represents all white folks. If he is a Muslim, the same peole who swear that the white guy is just deranged will claim that the Muslim represents all of the billions of muslims worldwide.
I know you're fishing for responses so you can make your canned snide comments about how liberals defend muslims or whatever your point was. I don't care. It's old, it's played and for whatever reason people who are honest enough to recognize that hate is a disease that afflicts all cultures and nationalities bothers you. That's your problem.
I do know what I think. If you murder somone or groups of someone who are unarmed, you are a psychoitic asshole. I choose not to believe you represent anyone other than other psychotic assholes regardless of your race, religion, income, nationality, etc... All nations on earth (that I'm aware of) have produced some pretty crummy people. I'm sure there are some exceptions.
Anyway, I have chunked the softball at you, now dip the broad brush in the paint and get busy.
Why is that, Candycorn? Don't worry, we both know why.
Oh, and tell me, what do you think of this nasty lie from NYcarbineer: "Hey, while you are vilifying the new Muslim mayor of London with your Islamophobic vitriole and bigotry...", when I have not come close to doing any such thing at any point? Okay, don't bother, we both know the answer to that one, too, Candycorn.
My point has been made over and over in this thread, and I'm not at all surprised with the way it went. I've exposed the Regressive Left for what they are, yet again. And that's why my posts are being so blatantly misrepresented and lied about. Good.
.
Good gawd.Uh, is this a trick question?Oh yeah, there's a very good chance I'll lose control of this one pretty quickly,Careful Mac, if this thread is considered a "political wind" turning ugly against Islam, you know for sure what side Obama will take, he told us. Not America. Not Christians. Not the world. Maybe that is what the left wing is really scared of, that and Christians trying to save the unborn.
"I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction." BHO
What I'm specifically focusing on is the behaviors of those who are so tolerant and defensive of one religion while simultaneously being so hateful of another.
No doubt it will get dragged in other directions, but that's my question here.
.
Quick question. I drove by at least one mosque on the way home the other evening. I know so because I saw the word “mosque” on the official public road sign (yellow sign, square, hung like a triangle as if it were warning about uneven lanes or a railroad crossing)….and likely 4 or 5 churches.
I didn’t give a second thought to what was being said inside any of the buildings.
Is that being tolerant and defensive?
Sounds like you did what a majority of people who do, is that a good answer?
This thread is about the Regressive Left's behavior.
.
No trick question...I do have some questions though;
First, lets clean up the mess you made.
"good" and "bad" are value judgments.
My behavior was to not really wonder what goes on in either place. Whether that is "good" or "bad" is someone else's question to consider...I'm not changing because some Christians gun down people in the name of their skewed view of their religion or because some Muslim gun down people in the name of their skewed view of their religion. I do recognize when people are murdered, the gunman is responsible for the murder, not some bullshit written thousands of years ago.
Next question.
If you do gun down someone who is of no threat to you or anyone else, can society assume that it is you that has a screw loose somewhere and whatever "message" you wrote on Facebook, MySpace, MyFace, Spacebook, Instagram, etc... are the writings of you, a mad man and they, in no definitive way, represent any group that person belongs to such as their religion, bowling group, union, employer, motorcycle club, shooting club, what bars they drink at, what clubs they go to etc....
Is there a point somewhere?
I merely pointed out how Regressive Leftists behave in a specific situation and asked why they do it.
If you would actually like to respond to that question, great.
.
In your mind.Funny, I don't see you bringing out the "broad brush" arguments when guno and other Regressive Leftists post vicious, hateful things about Christians.So no theories on the reason for the behaviors pointed out in the OP?
If you check with some brush manufacturers, perhaps they will give you a broader brush to paint others with.
Here is what happens. A guy murders innocent persons at place x. I won't use a theater because that is what a white guy did. I won't say a church because that is what a white guy did. I won't say Luby's restaurant because that is what a white guy did. I won't say Oklahoma City because that is what a white guy did. I won't say McDonalds because that is what a white guy did. I won't say school because that is what a whole raft of white guys have done.Here is what some do. But let us just say a guy murders a bunch of innocent people at place x. If it is a white guy, he's deranged and in no way represents all white folks. If he is a Muslim, the same peole who swear that the white guy is just deranged will claim that the Muslim represents all of the billions of muslims worldwide.
I know you're fishing for responses so you can make your canned snide comments about how liberals defend muslims or whatever your point was. I don't care. It's old, it's played and for whatever reason people who are honest enough to recognize that hate is a disease that afflicts all cultures and nationalities bothers you. That's your problem.
I do know what I think. If you murder somone or groups of someone who are unarmed, you are a psychoitic asshole. I choose not to believe you represent anyone other than other psychotic assholes regardless of your race, religion, income, nationality, etc... All nations on earth (that I'm aware of) have produced some pretty crummy people. I'm sure there are some exceptions.
Anyway, I have chunked the softball at you, now dip the broad brush in the paint and get busy.
Why is that, Candycorn? Don't worry, we both know why.
Oh, and tell me, what do you think of this nasty lie from NYcarbineer: "Hey, while you are vilifying the new Muslim mayor of London with your Islamophobic vitriole and bigotry...", when I have not come close to doing any such thing at any point? Okay, don't bother, we both know the answer to that one, too, Candycorn.
My point has been made over and over in this thread, and I'm not at all surprised with the way it went. I've exposed the Regressive Left for what they are, yet again. And that's why my posts are being so blatantly misrepresented and lied about. Good.
.
I asked you several times why you brought up the mayor of London. You refused to respond.
Absent your explanation to the contrary, it's clear in the context of what followed that you were in fact attacking him for being a Muslim, and attacking those who elected him.
Being told to "shut up" on message board.This is so fascinating to watch, and election of London's new mayor is shedding even more light on it.
Members of one specific religion - a religion with a current record of extreme violence, intimidation and terror - are telling us precisely what they're going to do, and they're doing it. It's expansion is clear and rapid and undeniable. We're watching it happen in real time, particularly across Europe. This isn't a partisan or religious opinion, it is a clear fact, based on observation.
Meanwhile, a group of people - the Regressive Left (as honest liberal Bill Maher refers to them), a group all too happy to attack the misdeeds of another religion (Christianity, obviously) in absolutely every possible way, at absolutely every opportunity, are bending over backwards to be defensive and so very tolerant of the first religion. A religion, by the way, that treats women and gays as lesser objects, among other behaviors that the Regressive Leftists loathe.
Exactly what is happening here?
Is this just a petulant, knee-jerk reaction against Christianity and conservatives, is it that simple? Are they willing to be so very tolerant of one specific religion just to be contrarian against certain other people they hate?
Or could it be more? Is this behavior related to the payback tactics that we're seeing with race and wealth? Or perhaps do they harbor certain affinities for the religion to which they won't openly admit?
And directly to the Regressive Leftists here: I'm certainly not, nor do I ever, expect a straight, clear and honest answer from you on this. What I expect from you is the standard deflection, derision, personal insults and name-calling. I know that's what we'll get, it's an easy prediction. This thread is specifically about your behaviors, not about Islam. I'm just curious about this, and perhaps some other responses will shed some light or provide some clues.
.
Now that you've gotten your straight answers, and have been demolished in the process, how about you shut up and stop making a fool of yourself?
Priceless.
.
No more than the 2000 and 2004 elections.
Sorry? Are you confused?
Just saying the Obama was no more suspicious than the 2000 and 2004.
I know what you said. The question is why would you say it? It isn't related to the discussion at all.
Neither was the interjection of Obama. You don't like it, put me on ignore. You whine and cry a lot.
Idiot. I didn't bring up Obama. You don't pay attention. You appear a bit schizo.
I don't put people on ignore. Only pussies do that.
In your mind.Funny, I don't see you bringing out the "broad brush" arguments when guno and other Regressive Leftists post vicious, hateful things about Christians.So no theories on the reason for the behaviors pointed out in the OP?
If you check with some brush manufacturers, perhaps they will give you a broader brush to paint others with.
Here is what happens. A guy murders innocent persons at place x. I won't use a theater because that is what a white guy did. I won't say a church because that is what a white guy did. I won't say Luby's restaurant because that is what a white guy did. I won't say Oklahoma City because that is what a white guy did. I won't say McDonalds because that is what a white guy did. I won't say school because that is what a whole raft of white guys have done.Here is what some do. But let us just say a guy murders a bunch of innocent people at place x. If it is a white guy, he's deranged and in no way represents all white folks. If he is a Muslim, the same peole who swear that the white guy is just deranged will claim that the Muslim represents all of the billions of muslims worldwide.
I know you're fishing for responses so you can make your canned snide comments about how liberals defend muslims or whatever your point was. I don't care. It's old, it's played and for whatever reason people who are honest enough to recognize that hate is a disease that afflicts all cultures and nationalities bothers you. That's your problem.
I do know what I think. If you murder somone or groups of someone who are unarmed, you are a psychoitic asshole. I choose not to believe you represent anyone other than other psychotic assholes regardless of your race, religion, income, nationality, etc... All nations on earth (that I'm aware of) have produced some pretty crummy people. I'm sure there are some exceptions.
Anyway, I have chunked the softball at you, now dip the broad brush in the paint and get busy.
Why is that, Candycorn? Don't worry, we both know why.
Oh, and tell me, what do you think of this nasty lie from NYcarbineer: "Hey, while you are vilifying the new Muslim mayor of London with your Islamophobic vitriole and bigotry...", when I have not come close to doing any such thing at any point? Okay, don't bother, we both know the answer to that one, too, Candycorn.
My point has been made over and over in this thread, and I'm not at all surprised with the way it went. I've exposed the Regressive Left for what they are, yet again. And that's why my posts are being so blatantly misrepresented and lied about. Good.
.
I asked you several times why you brought up the mayor of London. You refused to respond.
Absent your explanation to the contrary, it's clear in the context of what followed that you were in fact attacking him for being a Muslim, and attacking those who elected him.
.
We need as many Regressive Lefties as possible to deny that they do what is described in the OP.
For proof, we can just have them read this very thread. Deflection after deflection after deflection. Anything to change the subject of the thread.
And then we'll see a ton more of it after the next horrific jihadist slaughter.
.
Its on his list of things to do.Good gawd.Uh, is this a trick question?Oh yeah, there's a very good chance I'll lose control of this one pretty quickly,
What I'm specifically focusing on is the behaviors of those who are so tolerant and defensive of one religion while simultaneously being so hateful of another.
No doubt it will get dragged in other directions, but that's my question here.
.
Quick question. I drove by at least one mosque on the way home the other evening. I know so because I saw the word “mosque” on the official public road sign (yellow sign, square, hung like a triangle as if it were warning about uneven lanes or a railroad crossing)….and likely 4 or 5 churches.
I didn’t give a second thought to what was being said inside any of the buildings.
Is that being tolerant and defensive?
Sounds like you did what a majority of people who do, is that a good answer?
This thread is about the Regressive Left's behavior.
.
No trick question...I do have some questions though;
First, lets clean up the mess you made.
"good" and "bad" are value judgments.
My behavior was to not really wonder what goes on in either place. Whether that is "good" or "bad" is someone else's question to consider...I'm not changing because some Christians gun down people in the name of their skewed view of their religion or because some Muslim gun down people in the name of their skewed view of their religion. I do recognize when people are murdered, the gunman is responsible for the murder, not some bullshit written thousands of years ago.
Next question.
If you do gun down someone who is of no threat to you or anyone else, can society assume that it is you that has a screw loose somewhere and whatever "message" you wrote on Facebook, MySpace, MyFace, Spacebook, Instagram, etc... are the writings of you, a mad man and they, in no definitive way, represent any group that person belongs to such as their religion, bowling group, union, employer, motorcycle club, shooting club, what bars they drink at, what clubs they go to etc....
Is there a point somewhere?
I merely pointed out how Regressive Leftists behave in a specific situation and asked why they do it.
If you would actually like to respond to that question, great.
.
We would like, for starters, ONE real life example of someone here acting the way you accuse them of acting.
I'll be saving this thread for later use. They'll do it many, many more times.You can give them a million good examples, it won't matter.Holy crap, now the Regressive Lefties are denying that they even do it.
Just like some of them deny the very existence of PC.
No, they don't deflect, as they have this whole freaking thread, just as I predicted.
Denial!! I have to admit, I didn't predict THAT one! You've gone beyond the call of duty!
.
Examples of USMB members doing "it", please. And....I wish a horrible death upon any violent extremist Muslim who still breathes. May their false god be erased from the collective human memory.
Earmuffs.....bitch.
White, ‘Chrisitian’ Terrorists masquerading as patriots
Comparing Republican “Christian Values” To Islamic Fundamentalism
Muslim Vs. Christian Terrorist Kill Scores
They will simply deny, right in the face of all of them. They are liars.
.
there is no better way to scatter cockroaches or liberals than to expose them to light.
One of them did it on this very thread, deflecting while denying it's not done!
Check out posts 213 & 214. They can't help themselves.
.
In your mind.Funny, I don't see you bringing out the "broad brush" arguments when guno and other Regressive Leftists post vicious, hateful things about Christians.So no theories on the reason for the behaviors pointed out in the OP?
If you check with some brush manufacturers, perhaps they will give you a broader brush to paint others with.
Here is what happens. A guy murders innocent persons at place x. I won't use a theater because that is what a white guy did. I won't say a church because that is what a white guy did. I won't say Luby's restaurant because that is what a white guy did. I won't say Oklahoma City because that is what a white guy did. I won't say McDonalds because that is what a white guy did. I won't say school because that is what a whole raft of white guys have done.Here is what some do. But let us just say a guy murders a bunch of innocent people at place x. If it is a white guy, he's deranged and in no way represents all white folks. If he is a Muslim, the same peole who swear that the white guy is just deranged will claim that the Muslim represents all of the billions of muslims worldwide.
I know you're fishing for responses so you can make your canned snide comments about how liberals defend muslims or whatever your point was. I don't care. It's old, it's played and for whatever reason people who are honest enough to recognize that hate is a disease that afflicts all cultures and nationalities bothers you. That's your problem.
I do know what I think. If you murder somone or groups of someone who are unarmed, you are a psychoitic asshole. I choose not to believe you represent anyone other than other psychotic assholes regardless of your race, religion, income, nationality, etc... All nations on earth (that I'm aware of) have produced some pretty crummy people. I'm sure there are some exceptions.
Anyway, I have chunked the softball at you, now dip the broad brush in the paint and get busy.
Why is that, Candycorn? Don't worry, we both know why.
Oh, and tell me, what do you think of this nasty lie from NYcarbineer: "Hey, while you are vilifying the new Muslim mayor of London with your Islamophobic vitriole and bigotry...", when I have not come close to doing any such thing at any point? Okay, don't bother, we both know the answer to that one, too, Candycorn.
My point has been made over and over in this thread, and I'm not at all surprised with the way it went. I've exposed the Regressive Left for what they are, yet again. And that's why my posts are being so blatantly misrepresented and lied about. Good.
.
I asked you several times why you brought up the mayor of London. You refused to respond.
Absent your explanation to the contrary, it's clear in the context of what followed that you were in fact attacking him for being a Muslim, and attacking those who elected him.
.
Sorry? Are you confused?
Just saying the Obama was no more suspicious than the 2000 and 2004.
I know what you said. The question is why would you say it? It isn't related to the discussion at all.
Neither was the interjection of Obama. You don't like it, put me on ignore. You whine and cry a lot.
Idiot. I didn't bring up Obama. You don't pay attention. You appear a bit schizo.
I don't put people on ignore. Only pussies do that.
Hey nut job, I never said you brought up Obama. Seems you don't comprehend reading well. Surprised you don't put people on ignore, you seem to be a whiney pussy.
Obama was brought up, not by you but he was brought up, you responded and so did I, sorry you can't follow along.
Its on his list of things to do.Good gawd.Uh, is this a trick question?Quick question. I drove by at least one mosque on the way home the other evening. I know so because I saw the word “mosque” on the official public road sign (yellow sign, square, hung like a triangle as if it were warning about uneven lanes or a railroad crossing)….and likely 4 or 5 churches.
I didn’t give a second thought to what was being said inside any of the buildings.
Is that being tolerant and defensive?
Sounds like you did what a majority of people who do, is that a good answer?
This thread is about the Regressive Left's behavior.
.
No trick question...I do have some questions though;
First, lets clean up the mess you made.
"good" and "bad" are value judgments.
My behavior was to not really wonder what goes on in either place. Whether that is "good" or "bad" is someone else's question to consider...I'm not changing because some Christians gun down people in the name of their skewed view of their religion or because some Muslim gun down people in the name of their skewed view of their religion. I do recognize when people are murdered, the gunman is responsible for the murder, not some bullshit written thousands of years ago.
Next question.
If you do gun down someone who is of no threat to you or anyone else, can society assume that it is you that has a screw loose somewhere and whatever "message" you wrote on Facebook, MySpace, MyFace, Spacebook, Instagram, etc... are the writings of you, a mad man and they, in no definitive way, represent any group that person belongs to such as their religion, bowling group, union, employer, motorcycle club, shooting club, what bars they drink at, what clubs they go to etc....
Is there a point somewhere?
I merely pointed out how Regressive Leftists behave in a specific situation and asked why they do it.
If you would actually like to respond to that question, great.
.
We would like, for starters, ONE real life example of someone here acting the way you accuse them of acting.
They are still looking for an example of a Tranny exposing themselves to "a six year old".
Londoners March Willingly Into the Burning Cage |
There's your mayor of London terrorist ties
Good gawd.Uh, is this a trick question?Oh yeah, there's a very good chance I'll lose control of this one pretty quickly,
What I'm specifically focusing on is the behaviors of those who are so tolerant and defensive of one religion while simultaneously being so hateful of another.
No doubt it will get dragged in other directions, but that's my question here.
.
Quick question. I drove by at least one mosque on the way home the other evening. I know so because I saw the word “mosque” on the official public road sign (yellow sign, square, hung like a triangle as if it were warning about uneven lanes or a railroad crossing)….and likely 4 or 5 churches.
I didn’t give a second thought to what was being said inside any of the buildings.
Is that being tolerant and defensive?
Sounds like you did what a majority of people who do, is that a good answer?
This thread is about the Regressive Left's behavior.
.
No trick question...I do have some questions though;
First, lets clean up the mess you made.
"good" and "bad" are value judgments.
My behavior was to not really wonder what goes on in either place. Whether that is "good" or "bad" is someone else's question to consider...I'm not changing because some Christians gun down people in the name of their skewed view of their religion or because some Muslim gun down people in the name of their skewed view of their religion. I do recognize when people are murdered, the gunman is responsible for the murder, not some bullshit written thousands of years ago.
Next question.
If you do gun down someone who is of no threat to you or anyone else, can society assume that it is you that has a screw loose somewhere and whatever "message" you wrote on Facebook, MySpace, MyFace, Spacebook, Instagram, etc... are the writings of you, a mad man and they, in no definitive way, represent any group that person belongs to such as their religion, bowling group, union, employer, motorcycle club, shooting club, what bars they drink at, what clubs they go to etc....
Is there a point somewhere?
I merely pointed out how Regressive Leftists behave in a specific situation and asked why they do it.
If you would actually like to respond to that question, great.
.
We would like, for starters, ONE real life example of someone here acting the way you accuse them of acting.
Wow, I'm REALLY in your head.littleMac is doing exactly what his good friend PC does. Start a thread with some nonsense, then, after dozens of posts from other posters knock it for a loop,
he and she come back in their threads maniacally crowing how no one can prove the OP false.
It's weird, and mildly amusing.
.
Londoners March Willingly Into the Burning Cage |
There's your mayor of London terrorist ties
At least you're trying. The editorial isn't well referenced though.[/QUO
Plenty of links
This is so fascinating to watch, and election of London's new mayor is shedding even more light on it.
Members of one specific religion - a religion with a current record of extreme violence, intimidation and terror - are telling us precisely what they're going to do, and they're doing it. It's expansion is clear and rapid and undeniable. We're watching it happen in real time, particularly across Europe. This isn't a partisan or religious opinion, it is a clear fact, based on observation.
Meanwhile, a group of people - the Regressive Left (as honest liberal Bill Maher refers to them), a group all too happy to attack the misdeeds of another religion (Christianity, obviously) in absolutely every possible way, at absolutely every opportunity, are bending over backwards to be defensive and so very tolerant of the first religion. A religion, by the way, that treats women and gays as lesser objects, among other behaviors that the Regressive Leftists loathe.
Exactly what is happening here?
Is this just a petulant, knee-jerk reaction against Christianity and conservatives, is it that simple? Are they willing to be so very tolerant of one specific religion just to be contrarian against certain other people they hate?
Or could it be more? Is this behavior related to the payback tactics that we're seeing with race and wealth? Or perhaps do they harbor certain affinities for the religion to which they won't openly admit?
And directly to the Regressive Leftists here: I'm certainly not, nor do I ever, expect a straight, clear and honest answer from you on this. What I expect from you is the standard deflection, derision, personal insults and name-calling. I know that's what we'll get, it's an easy prediction. This thread is specifically about your behaviors, not about Islam. I'm just curious about this, and perhaps some other responses will shed some light or provide some clues.
.
[
Here are three, more can be provided but I don't see much use in doing so.
White, ‘Chrisitian’ Terrorists masquerading as patriots
This is so fascinating to watch, and election of London's new mayor is shedding even more light on it.
Members of one specific religion - a religion with a current record of extreme violence, intimidation and terror - are telling us precisely what they're going to do, and they're doing it. It's expansion is clear and rapid and undeniable. We're watching it happen in real time, particularly across Europe. This isn't a partisan or religious opinion, it is a clear fact, based on observation.
Meanwhile, a group of people - the Regressive Left (as honest liberal Bill Maher refers to them), a group all too happy to attack the misdeeds of another religion (Christianity, obviously) in absolutely every possible way, at absolutely every opportunity, are bending over backwards to be defensive and so very tolerant of the first religion. A religion, by the way, that treats women and gays as lesser objects, among other behaviors that the Regressive Leftists loathe.
Exactly what is happening here?
Is this just a petulant, knee-jerk reaction against Christianity and conservatives, is it that simple? Are they willing to be so very tolerant of one specific religion just to be contrarian against certain other people they hate?
Or could it be more? Is this behavior related to the payback tactics that we're seeing with race and wealth? Or perhaps do they harbor certain affinities for the religion to which they won't openly admit?
And directly to the Regressive Leftists here: I'm certainly not, nor do I ever, expect a straight, clear and honest answer from you on this. What I expect from you is the standard deflection, derision, personal insults and name-calling. I know that's what we'll get, it's an easy prediction. This thread is specifically about your behaviors, not about Islam. I'm just curious about this, and perhaps some other responses will shed some light or provide some clues.
.
Please re-read this OP.
