Nope; it says so in our Second Amendment; only well regulated militias of the People are necessary to the security of a free State, not the People who are the unorganized militia.so what; only well regulated militia may not be Infringed when keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Union; defense of self and property is not covered by our Second Amendment.reasonable gun control is only laws that change things for criminals. your idea of reasonable gun control are laws that ONLY RESTRICT what honest gun owners can do. that is not reasonable at all.
Well regulated militia are necessary to the security of a free State, the unorganized militia and gun lovers, not so much.
And yet, fuck you, we have the right to own guns as well.
so what; only well regulated militia may not be Infringed
You are incorrect. Again.
when keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Union;
My right does not require state or union.
defense of self and property is not covered by our Second Amendment
You are incorrect. Again.
That's not what the Supreme Court says, and their opinion overrules yours.